Spalding's Baseball Guide and Official League Book for 1889
by unknown · English · Gutenberg #9477 · 446,616 chars · public domain (US)
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Spalding's Baseball Guide and Official League Book for 1889
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.
Title: Spalding's Baseball Guide and Official League Book for 1889
Editor: Henry Chadwick
Release date: December 1, 2005 [eBook #9477]
Most recently updated: January 2, 2021
Language: English
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/9477
Credits: Produced by Joshua Hutchinson, Lorna Hanrahan and PG Distributed Proofreaders
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SPALDING'S BASEBALL GUIDE AND OFFICIAL LEAGUE BOOK FOR 1889 ***
Produced by Joshua Hutchinson, Lorna Hanrahan
and PG Distributed Proofreaders
[Illustration: *Text included in illustration.
Spalding's Official Base Ball Guide*]
THE SPALDING TRADE MARK.
[Illustration : *Spalding trade mark*]
Experience has shown that in Base Ball and Athletic Goods, as in all other
lines of business, unprincipled persons are always eager to prey on the
reputation gained by honest dealing and good business management. We regret
to state that we have not escaped the attention of such parties, who have
appropriated our original designs, styles and names, and by using similar
illustrations and descriptions, deceive the public into believing that the
articles were manufactured by us, and that we are responsible for their
inferior quality. A wide acquaintance with sportsmen and an extended
experience with the various sports, has enabled us to anticipate the wants
of our patrons in securing outfits, and to offer only such articles as were
perfectly satisfactory for our own use, knowing by practical tests that
they would serve the purpose properly, and be unfailing to the purchaser.
In order to protect our customers, and to preserve our reputation, we have
found it necessary to place our "Trade Mark" on the higher grades of goods
that we manufacture and introduce. The care and discrimination exercised in
selecting only articles of the highest quality as being worthy of bearing
our Trade Mark, has resulted in giving to them a reputation as being
practically the best of their kind that could be produced.
In our opinion a satisfied customer is the best advertisement that we can
have, and dealers and individuals will please bear in mind that on whatever
article our TRADE MARK appears, we guarantee it to be exactly as
represented, and wherever just cause for complaint exists, we will thank
the purchaser for returning the article to us and receiving a perfect one
in return, or the refunding of the purchase money. Our line of Base Balls
is now so well known to the trade, and they are so thoroughly appreciated
by the base ball players of the country, that it seems almost unnecessary
to call special attention to their superior merits. Spalding's League Ball,
having stood the severe test of the National League for the last ten years,
and having again been adopted as the official ball of that leading
organization for 1888 as well as the other prominent professional College
and Amateur Associations, gives it a reputation and sale unequalled by any
other ball on the market. BEWARE OF CHEAP IMITATIONS; NO League Ball is
genuine without our Trade Mark on each box and ball, and the autograph of
[Illustration: *Autogram of A. G. Spalding*]
on each label.
We hope that ball players will not be misled by the remarks of interested
dealers handling inferior goods, that the articles they offer "are just as
good as Spalding's" and at a cheaper price. We accept their frequent
references to our goods as the highest compliment that can be paid us,
and only ask that purchasers will do their own comparisons, and be
convinced that our goods are really the cheapest as they certainly are the
best. Special trade prices are quoted to dealers on application.
CHICAGO. A. G. SPALDING & BROS. NEW YORK.
Publisher's Notice
* * * * *
"Spalding's Base Ball Guide" again greets the base ball public with the
official records of America's national game. First issued in 1877, it has
grown in popularity, has been enlarged and improved from year to year, and
is now the recognized authority upon base ball matters. The statistics
contained in the "Guide" can be relied upon, nearly all of them having been
compiled from official records.
The "Guide" has attained such a size--180 pages--as to preclude the
possibility of publishing in the same issue the League Constitution in
full, and other interesting League matter. We are therefore compelled, in
addition, to publish the "Official League Book," which contains only
official League matter as furnished by Secretary Young, including the
League Constitution in full.
Copies of the "Guide" or "League Book," will be mailed to any address upon
receipt of twelve cents each. Trade orders supplied through the News
Companies, or direct from the publishers.
CHICAGO. A. G. SPALDING & BROS. NEW YORK
* * * * *
WASHINGTON, D. C., March 5, 1889.
By the authority vested in me, I do hereby certify that Messrs. A. G.
Spalding & Bros., of Chicago and New York, have been granted the
_exclusive_ right to publish the Official League Book for 1889.
N. E. YOUNG,
_Secretary National League of Professional Base Ball Clubs._
DEPOTS OF SUPPLIES
FOR THE SALE OF
A. G. SPALDING AND BROS.
ATHLETIC GOODS
For the convenience of our patrons, and for the purpose of bringing our
complete line of Athletic Goods more prominently before Base Ball Players,
we have arranged with the following houses to carry at all times a complete
line of all our Athletic Goods. Their prices will be the same as ours.
Orders for goods may be sent to
WESTERN DEPOTS.
A. G. SPALDING & BROS 108 Madison St., Chicago, Ill.
E. C. MEACHAM ARMS CO. 515 Washington Ave., St. Louis, Mo.
J. R. HAWLEY 164 Vine St., Cincinnati, Ohio
BURROWS BROS. CO. 23 to 27 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio
J. B. FIELD & CO. 77 Woodward Ave., Detroit, Mich.
V. KINDLER 418 Genessee Ave. East Saginaw, Mich.
E. G. STUDLEY & CO. 4 Monroe St., Grand Rapids, Mich.
CHAS. MAYER & CO. 29 Washington St., Indianapolis, Ind.
A. G. PRATT & CO. 502 Wood St., Pittsburgh, Pa.
WEST BOOK & STATIONERY CO. 379 & 381 Broadway, Milwaukee, Wis.
G. B. GROSVENOR 744 Main St., Dubuque, Iowa
J W. RECCIUS & BRO 304 Market St., Louisville, Ky.
S. G. MORTON & CO. 426 Nicollet Ave. Minneapolis, Minn.
JOURNAL PUBLISHING CO. Helena, Montana
COLLINS GUN CO. 1312 Douglas St., Omaha, Neb.
M. F. KENNEDY & BROS 66 East 3d St., St, Paul, Minn
GEO. F HIGGINS & CO. 354 16th St., Denver, Col.
F. M. MENGES Sporting Goods CO. 924 Main St Kansas City, Mo.
WM. BECK & SON 165 2d St. Portland, Oregon
REDHEAD, NORTON, LATHROP & CO. Des Moines, Iowa
TUFTS. LYON ARMS CO. Los Angeles, Cal.
EASTERN DEPOTS.
A. G. SPALDING & BROS 241 Broadway, N. Y.
E. W. VINE 1 Green St., Albany, N. Y.
S G. LEVALLEY 189 Main St., Buffalo, N. Y.
RHODE ISLAND NEWS CO. 113 Westminster St., Providence, R.I.
SCRANTOM, WETMORE & Co 10 State St., Rochester, N. Y.
R. WOOD'S SONS 72 S. Salina St., Syracuse, N. Y.
M. W. BULL & Co 445 Main St., Springfield, Mass.
M. C. EBBECKE & Co Allentown, Pa.
M. A. TAPPAN 1013 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, D. C.
VON LENGERKE & DETMOLD Newark, N. J.
SOUTHERN DEPOTS.
F. F. HANSELL & BRO 28 and 30 Camp St., New Orleans, La.
A. J. ANDERSON 2d and Houston Sts. Fort Worth, Texas
R. M. MANSFORD 293 Main St., Memphis, Tenn.
BIRMINGHAM ARMS Co Birmingham, Ala.
H. DREW & BRO Jacksonville, Fla.
J. W. SAWYER Key West, Fla.
FOREIGN DEPOTS.
McLEAN BROS & RIGG, Limited Sydney, Australia
McLEAN BROS & RIGG, Limited Adelaide, Australia
BOYLE & SCOTT Melbourne, Australia
W. MCARTHUR & Co Auckland, N. Z.
THOS. LACK Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands
THE HINGSTON-SMITH ARMS Co Winnipeg, Manitoba
C. FLOOD & SONS St. Johns, N. B.
LOCAL AGENCIES.
WESTERN.
A. G. CASE Aurora, Ill.
C. E. DALTON Bloomington, Ill.
A. P. CUNNINGHAM Champaign, Ill.
C. H. CARYL Kalamazoo, Mich.
SPENCER BROS Marquette, Mich.
JOHN T. BUKER Rockford, Ill.
BAKER & WATSON Terre Haute, Ind.
GREGORY & Co Winona, Minn.
J. A. ELLIOTT Danville, Ill.
EASTERN.
N. A. FROST Hanover, N. H.
G. W. BLODGETT & Co Amherst, Mass.
TALBOT BROS Pittsfield, Mass
J. W. BRINE New Haven, Ct.
C. S. WEST Flushing, L. I.
J. W. BRINE Cambridge, Mass.
A. H. POMEROY Hartford, Ct
HIRST & LEACH Princeton, N. J.
A. W. SCOTT Stamford, Ct.
BRENNAN & DAVIS Bradford, Pa.
F. A. CLAPP & Co Worcester, Mass.
GEO. DART Tuxedo, N. Y.
WILLIAM A. HULBERT.
The late Mr. William A Hulbert may be justly considered as the Father of
the National League, for he it was who in 1875 was mainly instrumental in
bringing about the secession from the old National Professional Association
in 1875 which resulted in the establishment of the National League in 1876.
To Mr. Hulbert is due the credit of rescuing professional ball playing from
the abuses which prevailed in the ranks at the time he first became
connected with the Chicago Club. Especially to his persistent course in
refusing to consent to the reinstatement of any player expelled from a
professional club for crooked play, is the present honesty of the game due.
Mr. Hulbert was the second President of the National league, Mr. M G
Bulkely, the present Governor of Connecticut, being the League s first
President. Mr. Hulbert died in April, 1882 from heart disease. He was
essentially a reformer and in his business and social relations sincerity
and candor were marked characteristics. The National League adopted this
resolution at his death: _Resolved_ That to him alone is due the credit of
having founded the National League, and to his able leadership, sound
judgment and impartial management is the success of the League chiefly due.
SPALDING'S BASE BALL GUIDE AND
Official League Book for 1889.
A complete hand book of the national game of base ball,
CONTAINING
Statistical reviews of the various professional association championship
seasons, as also the records and averages of the inter-collegiate
associations, east & west.
ADDED TO WHICH IS THE
COMPLETE OFFICIAL LEAGUE RECORD FOR 1888.
ALSO
_Brief Record of the Base Ball Tours to England in 1874 and to Australia
in 1888._
TOGETHER WITH
The new code of playing rules, as revised by the committee of conference.
Attached to which is an official explanatory appendix, giving a correct
interpretation of the new rules, also the official record of all league
games and players, and the official schedule of league games for 1889,
pitchers' records in victories for 1888.
Base running and throwing records of 1888, with the leading noteworthy
events. Records of the veteran batsmen of the league from 1876 to 1888.
_Handsomely Illustrated with Portraits and Pictures_
[Illustration: Boston Grounds.]
[Illustration: CORRECT DIAGRAM OF A BALL GROUND.]
[Illustration: PHILADELPHIA GROUNDS]
The publishers of "Spalding's Base Ball Guide" present to the fraternity in
the GUIDE for 1889, the model baseball annual of the period; the thirteenth
annual edition of the work being in every respect the most complete
baseball GUIDE ever issued. Exceeding as it does every other book of the
kind in size--over two hundred pages of reading matter --as also in its new
feature of pictorial illustrations, it presents an epitome of the
professional history of the game for 1888, unequaled by any other work of
the kind previously published. In fact, the GUIDE for 1889 has been made to
conform to the very exceptional year of important events its chapters
record--a year which will be remembered for a long time to come as fruitful
of the most noteworthy occurrences known in the annals of our national
game.
The prominent features of the GUIDE for 1889 are the complete record of
the pitching in the League and American championship contests; the
instructive chapters on "the lessons of the campaign," then on "team
work;" the analyses of the play in the world's championship series of
contests; the new tables showing the figures of the campaigns of the past
eighteen years, and especially the explanatory appendix or chapter of
official instructions to umpires and captains.
The great size of the GUIDE precludes the possibility of including the
games record of the League campaign, as also other records of League
legislation, etc., and these will be found in the "Official League Book,"
which contains only official League matter as furnished by Secretary
Young, including the League Constitution in full.
[Illustration: CHICAGO GROUNDS.]
The American national game of base ball has reached a period in its
history, when it no longer needs to be referred to as a field exercise,
calling for particular mention of its peculiar merits. It is now the
established favorite game of ball of the American people, and occupies a
position in public estimation which no other field sport in vogue
approaches. The game has attained its present position of popularity, not
only from its adaptability to our peculiar national characteristics, as
regards its possession of special points of attraction; but also from its
value as a field sport which presents sufficient excitement in itself to
draw thousands of spectators, without the extrinsic aid of betting as its
chief point of interest, the latter attraction being something which
pertains to nearly every other popular sport. Then, too, it should be
borne in mind that base ball first taught us Americans the value of
physical exercise as an important aid to perfect work in cultivating the
mind up to its highest point. It is to the introduction of base ball as a
national pastime, in fact, that the growth of athletic sports in general
in popularity is largely due; and the game pointed out to the mercantile
community of our large cities that "all work and no play" is the most
costly policy they can pursue, both in regard to the advantages to their
own health, and in the improvement in the work of their employees, the
combination of work and play judiciously, yielding results in better work
and more satisfactory service than was possible under the old rule. Thus,
the game has acted like a lever in lifting into public favor all athletic
sports.
A great deal is said about the special attraction of this and that
leading sport of the day. The turfman thinks there is nothing approaching
the excitement of a horse race, which from the start to the finish
occupies but a few minutes of time. The rower regards a three mile "shell"
race as the very acme of sporting pleasures; while the yachtsman looks
upon all other contests as of trifling importance compared with that
ending in the winning of his club regatta cup; and so on through the whole
category of sports of the field, the forest and the river. But if any one
can present to us a sport or pastime, a race or a contest, which can in
all its essentials of stirring excitement, displays of manly courage,
nerve and endurance, and its unwearying scenes of skillful play and
alternations of success equal our national game of ball, we should like to
see it.
What can present a more attractive picture to the lover of out door
sports than the scene presented at a base ball match between two trained
professional teams competing for championship honors, in which every point
of play is so well looked after in the field, that it is only by some
extra display of skill at the bat, that a single run is obtained in a full
nine innings game? If it is considered, too, that base ball is a healthy,
recreative exercise, suitable for all classes of our people, there can be
no surprise that such a game should reach the unprecedented popularity it
has.
THE PROFESSIONAL SEASON OF 1888.
The season of 1888, in the professional arena, was marked by several
events which placed it on record as the most noteworthy, known in the
thirteen years' history of the National League. In the first place it was
the inaugural year of the grand movement made by the President of the
Chicago Club, to extend the popularity of our national game beyond the
American continent; an event which exhibited the characteristic energy,
pluck, liberality and business enterprise of Mr. Spalding, in a very
marked manner; the grand success which the venture met with being a well
merited reward for the large financial outlay which he incurred in the
experiment. Secondly, the struggle for the championship of the League,
resulting as it did in the success of the New York club, gave to the East
a lead in the pennant races which they had not held since 1884, when the
Providence club won the championship, Chicago having held the honors in
1885 and 1886, and Detroit in 1887. The past season, too, excelled all
previous years in the vast assemblages of spectators who were gathered at
the grounds of the prominent clubs on holiday occasions; as also in the
immense aggregate of people who patronized the professional contests of
the year. It was also an exceptional year in regard to the close and
exciting contest for the League pennant, between the four leading clubs of
that organization; and at the end of the championship season the sequel of
the contest for the base ball championship of the world finished off the
campaign of 1888, in a manner that greatly added to the honors won by the
victorious League club from New York. The contest for the American
Association championship was also one of the interesting events of the
season, and one, too, which taught aspiring clubs a lesson which they can
well profit by; and that is, that success in championship contests is due
far more to able management, competent captaining, and thorough team work,
than to the gathering together of the strongest of star players in a club
team. In the League, in this respect, while the Boston club had invested,
at great financial cost, in securing the services of noted star players,
the Chicago club, though weakened by the release of players from their
team who had done yeoman service in their ranks for years, were yet able
to excel the picked team of star players of the Boston club, simply by
superiority in handling those they had left to them. In the Association
arena, too, a similar condition of things prevailed in the case of the St.
Louis and Brooklyn clubs, the costly investment of the Brooklyn club for
new players, only enabling them to reach second place in the pennant race,
while the "weakened"(?) St Louis team, by better conceited work together
were enabled to break the record by capturing the Association pennant for
the fourth successive season, something only equaled by the Boston club
under the reign of the old National Association in 1872, '73, '74, and '75.
An event of the season of 1888, also, was the widening the sphere of
professional club operations in the United States, by the inauguration of
the Texas League, which, though not as successful as desired in its first
year, nevertheless opened up a new and large territory for the occupation
of the professional clubs. Closing too, as the year did with a
commendable movement on the part of the League legislators to regulate the
salary system so as to get rid of several costly abuses; it may be justly
said that in no year since professional ball playing was officially
recognized, was there so much done to promote the welfare of the national
game as during the season of 1888.
The summary record of the season's work of the several professional
Leagues and Association prominent during the season of 1888, is as follows:
|Champion |Games |Per Cent. of
Leagues |Club. |Played |Victories
-------------------+------------+---------+----------
National League |New York | 532 | .641
American | | |
Association |St. Louis | 540 | .681
International | | |
Association | Syracuse | 433 | .718
Western | | |
Association | Des Moines | 458 | .648
Central League | Newark | 4*6[A] | .783
Southern League | Birmingham | 101 | .620
New England League | Lowell | 209 | .566
California League | Stockton | 268 | .615
Texas League | Dallas | 146 | .660
Tri-State League | Lima | 538 | .701
[**Proofreaders note A: * indecipherable number**]
| Number of Clubs.
| Began the | Ended the
Leagues | Season. | Season.
---------------------------+-------------+---------
National League | 8 | 8
American Association | 8 | 8
International Association | 8 | 8
Western Association | 8 | 7
Central League | 8 | 7
Southern League | 4 | 4
New England League | 7 | 4
California League | 4 | 4
Texas League | 6 | 4
Tri-State League | 10 | 10
THE LEAGUE'S PENNANT RACE OF 1888.
The championship campaign of the League for 1888 began on April 20, with
the customary home games between the eight clubs, each in its respective
section, the New York team opening the season at Washington, and the
Bostons at Philadelphia; while in the West Detroit opened at Pittsburg,
and the Chicagos at Indianapolis, the winning clubs being New York,
Boston, Pittsburg and Chicago. By the end of the first week of the
campaign, Boston was in the van without a defeat being charged to them,
while every other club had suffered at least one defeat, Boston leading in
the race, followed by Chicago, New York, Pittsburg, Detroit, Indianapolis,
Washington and Philadelphia, the latter suffering from the great drawback
of the death of their best player Ferguson, a loss which handicapped them
all through the season. By the end of the first week in May the contest
had assumed quite an interesting phase in one respect, and that was the
remarkable success of the Boston team, which, up to May 2 had won every
championship game they had played, the record on May 4 leaving them in the
van. By May 5, however, Chicago pulled up even with them, the two teams
standing with a record of 11 victories and 2 defeats each, and a
percentage of .862 at the close of the third week of the spring campaign.
In the meantime Philadelphia had rallied and had pulled up to seventh
place, and Detroit had overhauled Pittsburg, Indianapolis falling into the
last ditch. By the end of May quite a change had been made in the relative
position of the eight clubs, Chicago having gone to the front and Boston
to second position, while Detroit had moved up to third place, and New
York had fallen back to fourth; while Philadelphia had worked up well and
had got into fifth position, Pittsburg having made a bad tumble to sixth
place, leaving Indianapolis and Washington to bring up the rear.
The month of June saw more changes in the positions of all of the eight
clubs except Chicago and Philadelphia, the former having tenaciously held
on to first place since the last week in April; while Philadelphia
steadily remained a good fifth. Boston, however, fell off badly in the
running, the second week in June seeing, them down to fourth place; while
by June 9 Detroit had got into second place, and was running Chicago a
close race. During the last of May New York had got down to fourth
position; but in the first week of June they had rallied and resumed third
place; but the next week saw them fall back again, while Boston rallied
back to third position. By the end of June the eight clubs occupied the
following relative positions in the race Chicago held the lead, with
Detroit second, Boston third, New York fourth, Philadelphia fifth,
Pittsburg sixth, with Indianapolis and Washington as the two tail enders.
July proved to be the most important month of the season's race, as it
was in this month that the New York team as effectually rallied under the
personal influence of Mr. John B. Day, who from that time out took
personal cognizance of the doings of the "Giants." The first week in July
saw the New York team drive Boston out of third place, while Pittsburg,
for the time being, was forced to occupy seventh position, Indianapolis
leading them for a week in July. During the last week in July, Chicago --
which club had held the lead consecutively from May 5 to July 23--took a
bad tumble, and fell back to third position, while New York and Detroit
stood tied for a few days for first place, until Chicago rallied, and then
the Detroits were driven back; the end of July leaving New York in the
van, with Detroit second, Chicago third, Boston and Philadelphia close
together in fourth and fifth positions, while Pittsburg, Indianapolis, and
Washington occupied the rear positions. It was now that the race began to
be intensely interesting. The steady play of the New York team gave a new
feature to the contest, and it now began to be a nip and tuck fight
between the "Giants" and the Chicagos for first place, with Detroit close
to them as a good third. August saw the steadiest running of the season in
the race, but few changes being made in the relative positions of the
contestants, the last week of the month seeing New York in the van,
Chicago second, Detroit third, Boston fourth, Philadelphia fifth, and
Pittsburg, Washington and Indianapolis in the rear.
The promise for an exciting close of the campaign loomed up very bright
in September, and during that month, while New York and Chicago still
retained their leading positions, Boston temporarily rallied, and got into
third place for a week; but Detroit pushed them back, while Philadelphia
began to rally for a closing dash for one of the three leading positions.
At the close of September the record left New York in the van, with the
assurance of a successful termination of the campaign for the "Giants,"
while the struggle for second place between Chicago, Boston, Detroit and
Philadelphia greatly added to the excitement of the closing month of the
campaign. Chicago held on to second place, and Philadelphia, which club on
September 29 stood in fifth place rallied brilliantly in October, and
drove Boston to fourth place and Detroit to fifth, Boston having occupied
fifth place on the 6th of October, Pittsburg, Indianapolis and Washington
finally bringing up the rear.
A feature of the campaign was the fact that at no time after May was it
doubtful in regard to the position of Pittsburgh, Indianapolis and
Washington as the three tail-enders of the race. But for this the campaign
would have been the most brilliant on record. As it was, however, the
contest for the three leading positions by the other five clubs made it
exceedingly interesting throughout, New York's final success giving a new
impetus to the succeeding campaign of 1889.
THE STATISTICS OF THE CAMPAIGN.
During the League championship season of 1888 an aggregate of 552 games
were played, of which 530 were victories and defeats; and 22 were drawn
games, and two were won by forfeit. Of the 552 games played and won, no
less than 432 were won by single figure scores, and but 98 by double
figures. A noteworthy feature of the campaign was, that while the New York
Club won the championship by 84 victories to Chicago's 77, with but 47
defeats to Chicago's 58, they failed to score as many runs in the
aggregate as the Chicago Club did by 659 to 725, the Chicago's majority of
runs being 66. The New York Club's score of runs, in fact, was exceeded by
Detroit, Boston, and even Indianapolis, the latter's aggregate of runs
being 666.
Below will be found a complete summary of the statistics of the League
campaign of 1888:
| | | P | | | | I |
| | | h | | | | n |
| | | i | | | | d | W
| | | l | | | P | i | a
| N | | a | | | i | a | s
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | .
------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--
Victories | 84| 77| 69| 70| 68| 66| 50| 48
Defeats | 47| 58| 61| 64| 63| 68| 85| 86
Drawn Games | 7| 1| 1| 3| 3| 4| 1| 2
Total Games Played | 138| 135| 131| 137| 134| 138| 136| 136
Won by Forfeit | 1| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0
Lost by Forfeit | 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0
Per Cent. of Victories |.641|.570|.532|.522|.519|.493|.370|.358
Series Won | 5| 4| 2| 2| 3| 2| 1| 0
Series Lost | 1| 1| 2| 2| 1| 1| 6| 5
Series Tied | 0| 1| 0| 0| 2| 1| 0| 0
Series Unfinished | 6| 4| 6| 4| 5| 3| 3| 5
Chicago Victories | 19| 13| 16| 7| 10| 13| 6| 6
Chicago Defeats | 3| 9| 7| 13| 5| 19| 11| 23
Home Victories | 44| 43| 37| 34| 41| 38| 31| 26
Home Defeats | 23| 26| 31| 29| 26| 30| 35| 38
Victories Abroad | 40| 34| 32| 36| 27| 28| 19| 22
Defeats Abroad | 24| 32| 30| 31| 37| 70| 50| 48
Extra Innings Victories | 2| 1| 8| 6| 3| 6| 3| 0
Extra Innings Defeats | 2| 1| 3| 8| 6| 0| 5| 4
Single Figure Victories | 70| 55| 62| 58| 50| 57| 37| 44
Single Figure Defeats | 44| 45| 55| 49| 51| 58| 67| 65
Double Figure Victories | 12| 22| 6| 12| 18| 9| 13| 4
Double Figure Defeats | 4| 12| 6| 15| 12| 10| 18| 21
Batting Average |.240|.247|.229|.240|.243|.223|.233|.207
Fielding Average |.918|.906|.919|.904|.916|.914|.904|.899
Highest Score in Games | 19| 21| 17| 20| 18| 14| 15| 22
Worst Defeat |4-11|0-14|1-14|0-13|2-12|1-16|0-13|0-14
Won by One Run | 21| 18| 28| 16| 10| 10| 13| 12
Lost by One Run | 12| 7| 16| 21| 19| 16| 28| 17
Total Runs Scored | 659| 725| 536| 669| 716| 531| 666| 482
The following is the record of the single figure victories scored in the
League championship arena in 1888:
SINGLE FIGURE| | | P | | | | I | ||
VICTORIES. | | | h | | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | P | i | a || V
| N | | a | | | i | a | s || i
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h || c
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i || t
| | I | l | o | t | s | p | n || o
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g || r
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t || i
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o || e
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
-------------+---+---+---+----+---+---+---+---++---
New York | --| 12| 10|8[1]| 5| 11| 13| 11|| 70
Philadelphia | 4| --| 9| 5 | 8| 7| 9| 10|| 60
Boston | 8| 9| --| 9 | 5| 6| 12| 9|| 58
Pittsburg | 7| 6| 7| -- | 8| 8| 8| 13|| 57
[**Proofreaders note: The data for the last two teams was not included**]
[Footnote 1: One victory scored by New York was from a forfeited game
charged against the Pittsburg team as 9 to 0.]
The following is the record of the double figure victories scored by the
eight League clubs in the championship arena in 1888:
DOUBLE FIGURE| | | | I | | | P | ||
VICTORIES. | | | | n | | | h | ||
| | | | d | | | i | W ||
| | | | i | | P | l | a || V
| | | N | a | | i | a | s || i
| C | D | e | n | | t | d | h || c
| h | e | w | a | B | t | e | i || t
| i | t | | p | o | s | l | n || o
| c | r | Y | o | s | b | p | g || r
| a | o | o | l | t | u | h | t || i
| g | i | r | i | o | r | i | o || e
| o | t | k | s | n | g | a | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
-------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++----
Chicago | --| 3| 0| 4| 4| 3| 1| 7|| 22
Detroit | 1| --| 2| 5| 2| 4| 2| 2|| 18
New York | 3| 0| --| 3| 2| 1| 2| 2|| 13
Indianapolis | 1| 2| 0| --| 5| 1| 0| 4|| 13
Boston | 2| 4| 0| 2| --| 1| 0| 3|| 12
Pittsburg | 3| 2| 0| 1| 1| --| 0| 2|| 9
Philadelphia | 1| 0| 1| 3| 1| 0| --| 1|| 7
Washington | 1| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| --|| 4
-------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++----
Defeats | 12| 12| 4| 18| 15| 10| 6| 21|| 89
The following table presents the figures of the _series_ of games won and
lost in the League championship arena in 1888. The letters "W" and "L"
indicate games won and lost:
| | | P | | | | I | || |
| | | h | | | | n | ||S|S
| | | i | | | | d | W ||S|e|e
| | | l | | | P | i | a ||e|r|r
| N | | a | | | i | a | s ||r|i|i
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h ||i|e|e
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i ||e|s|s
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n ||s| |
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g || |L|T
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t ||W|o|i
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o ||o|s|e
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n ||n|t|d
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . ||.|.|.
------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----++-+-+-
| W| L| W| L| W| L| W| L| W| L| W| L| W| L| W| L|| | |
New York |--|--| 8|11|11| 7|10| 7|14| 5|12| 8|14| 5|15| 4||5|1|0
Chicago |11| 8|--|--|10|10| 9|11| 8|10|12| 7|14| 6|13| 6||4|1|1
Detroit | 7|11|10|10|--|--|10|10|11| 7| 8|10|11| 8|11| 7||3|1|2
Pittsburg | 7|10| 1| 9|10|10|--|--| 6|11| 8|10|14| 6|10| 9||2|1|1
Philadelphia| 5|14|10| 8| 7|11|14| 6|--|--|10| 9|13| 4|10| 9||2|2|0
Boston | 8|12| 7|13|10| 8|10| 8| 9|10|--|--|11| 9|15| 5||2|2|0
Indianapolis| 5|14| 6|14| 8|11| 6|14| 4|13| 9|11|--|--|12| 9||1|6|0
Washington | 4|15| 6|13| 7|11| 9|10| 9|10| 5|15| 8|12|--|--||0|5|0
THE "CHICAGO" GAMES OF 1888.
The record of the "Chicago" games--or games in which the defeated team
did not score a single run--in the League championship series of 1888 is
appended:
| | P | | | | | I | ||
| | h | | | | | n | ||
| | i | | | | | d | W ||
| | l | | P | | | i | a || V
| N | a | | i | | | a | s || i
| e | d | C | t | D | | n | h || c
| w | e | h | t | e | B | a | i || t
| | l | i | s | t | o | p | n || o
| Y | p | c | b | r | s | o | g || r
| o | h | a | u | o | t | l | t || i
| r | i | g | r | i | o | i | o || e
| k | a | o | g | t | n | s | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
New York | --| 1| 2| 4| 2| 1| 3| 6|| 19
Philadelphia| 0| --| 3| 6| 1| 4| 0| 2|| 16
Chicago | 1| 1| --| 3| 1| 2| 1| 4|| 13
Pittsburg | 1| 2| 1| --| 0| 2| 4| 3|| 13
Detroit | 0| 1| 2| 1| --| 2| 1| 3|| 10
Boston | 1| 0| 0| 3| 0| --| 1| 2|| 7
Indianapolis| 0| 0| 1| 0| 1| 1| --| 3|| 6
Washington | 0| 2| 0| 2| 0| 1| 1| --|| 6
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Defeats | 3| 7| 9| 19| 5| 13| 11| 23|| 90
EXTRA INNINGS GAMES.
The record of the victories and defeats scored by the eight League Clubs
in extra innings games in the championship series of 1888 was as follows:
Date. |Contesting |Cities. |Pitchers. |In's.|Scr.
|Clubs. | | | |
--------+----------------+------------+----------+-----+
Sept. 1|Philadelphia |Philadelphia|Sanders | |
| v. Wash'n | |Widner | 12 | 2-0
July 30 |Philadelphia |Boston |Buffinton | |
| v. Boston | |Sanders | 11 | 4-3
July 31|Philadelphia |Boston |Sanders | |
| v. " | |Clarkson | 11 | 6-5
Sept. 22|Philadelphia |Indianapolis|Sanders | |
| v. In'polis | |Healy | 11 | 6-5
May 26|Philadelphia |Boston |Buffinton | |
| v. Boston | |Madden | 10 | 1-0
Aug. 11|Philadelphia |Philadelphia|Casey | |
| v. Detroit | |Getzein | 10 | 1-0
Aug. 13|Philadelphia |Philadelphia|Buffinton | |
| v. In'polis | |Burdick | 10 | 2-1
Aug. 9|Philadelphia |Philadelphia|Casey | |
| v. Detroit | |Getzein | 10 | 6-5
April 20|Pittsburg |Pittsburg |Morris | |
| v. Detroit | |Getzein | 12 | 5-2
Aug. 1|Pittsburg |Chicago |Galvin | |
| v. Chicago | |Baldwin | 12 | 6-4
Sept. 21|Pittsburg |Pittsburg |Morris | |
| v. Boston | |Radbourne | 10 | 2-1
Sept. 3|Pittsburg |Indianapolis|Morris | |
| v. Indianap's | |Healy | 10 | 5-4
Sept. 4|Pittsburg |Indianapolis|Galvin | |
| v. Indianap's | |Boyle | 10 | 5-4
May 10|Pittsburg |Pittsburg |Morris | |
| v. Boston | |Clarkson | 10 | 11-10
June 28 |Boston |Boston |Sowders | |
| v. Washington | |O'Day | 14 | 9-7
Aug. 15|Boston |Boston |Radbourne | |
| v. Detroit | |Beatin | 12 | 4-3
April 21|Boston |Washington |Clarkson | |
| v. Washington | |O'Day | 11 | 1-0
June 19|Boston |Washington |Sowders | |
| v. New York | |Keefe | 11 | 8-7
April 30|Boston |New York |Clarkson | |
|v. New York | |Welch | 10 | 4-3
April 28|Boston |Washington |Sowders | |
| v. Washington | |Daily | 10 | 4-3
July 30|Indianapolis |Detroit |Burdick | |
| v. Detroit | |Getzein | 11 | 6-5
July 31|Indianapolis |Detroit |Healy | |
| v. Detroit | |Conway | 11 | 7-5
July 6|Indianapolis |Indianapolis|Boyle | |
|v. Ph'd'phia | |Casey | 11 | 9-8
June 8|Detroit |Boston |Getzein | |
| v. Boston | |Clarkson | 16 | 11-5
May 12|Detroit |Detroit |Conway | |
|v. Philadelphia | |Gleason | 12 | 3-1
July 2|Detroit |Indianapolis|Conway | |
|v. Indianapolis | |Healy | 12 | 4-3
July 24|New York |New York |Welch | |
| v. Boston | |Madden | 13 | 6-3
July 28|New York |New York |Keefe | |
| v. Philadelphia| |Sanders | 10 | 4-2
June 6|Chicago |Boston |Van Halt'n| |
| v. Boston | |Radb'rn e| 10 | 3-2
DRAWN GAMES.
Date. |Contesting Clubs. |Cities. | Pitchers. |In's.|Scr.
------+---------------------+----------+---------------+-----+----
Apr 23|New York v. Was'ngt'n|Washingt'n|Welch O'Day| 13 | 1-1
Aug 13|Chicago v. New York |New York |Baldwin Welch| 12 | 5-5
Sept 3|Philadelphia v N York|New York |Sanders Keefe| 11 | 0-0
May 15|New York v. Pittsburg|Pittsburg |Keefe Galvin| 11 | 3-3
Aug 8|Pittsburg v. Boston |Boston |Morris Sowders| 11 | 3-3
Sep 28|Detroit v. New York |New York |Gruber Titcomb| 10 | 2-2
The following is the record of the victories scored by the eight
League Clubs on home grounds in the championship arena during
1888:
| | | P | | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | P | i | a || G
| N | | a | | | i | a | s || a
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h || m
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i || e
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n || s
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g ||
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t || W
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o || o
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n || n
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . ||..
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
New York | --| 4| 8| 5| 6| 6| 7| 8|| 44
Chicago | 6| --| 4| 7| 5| 4| 9| 8|| 43
Philadelphia| 4| 4| --| 3| 5| 7| 9| 5|| 37
Boston | 3| 4| 1| --| 6| 6| 6| 8|| 34
Detroit | 4| 5| 8| 5| --| 7| 6| 6|| 41
Pittsburg | 3| 6| 2| 6| 7| --| 8| 6|| 38
Indianapolis| 3| 5| 3| 5| 4| 4| --| 7|| 31
Washington | 1| 4| 4| 3| 4| 5| 5| --|| 26
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Games Lost | 24| 32| 30| 34| 37| 39| 50| 48||294
The record of victories on opponent's grounds is as follows:
| | | P | | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | P | i | a || G
| N | | a | | | i | a | s || a
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h || m
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i || e
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n || s
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g ||
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t || W
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o || o
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n || n
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . ||..
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
New York | --| 4| 6| 7| 5| 4| 7| 7|| 40
Chicago | 5| --| 4| 5| 5| 5| 5| 5|| 34
Philadelphia| 1| 6| --| 6| 2| 8| 4| 5|| 32
Boston | 5| 3| 8| --| 4| 4| 5| 7|| 36
Detroit | 3| 5| 3| 3| --| 3| 5| 5|| 27
Pittsburg | 4| 5| 4| 2| 3| --| 6| 4|| 28
Indianapolis| 2| 1| 1| 4| 4| 2| --| 5|| 19
Washington | 3| 2| 5| 2| 3| 4| 3| --|| 22
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Games Lost | 23| 26| 31| 29| 26| 30| 35| 38||238
[Illustration: JOHN B. DAY, NEW YORK]
[Illustration: F. K. STEARNS DETROIT]
[Illustration: A. G SPALDING, CHICAGO.]
[Illustration: F. DE H ROBINSON, CLEVELAND]
LEAGUE CLUB PRESIDENTS.
[Illustration: W. A. NIMICK, PITTSBURG.]
[Illustration: J. T. BRUSH, INDIANAPOLIS.]
[Illustration: WALTER F. HEWETT, WASHINGTON.]
[Illustration: A. J. REACH, PHILADELPHIA.]
LEAGUE CLUB PRESIDENTS.
THE LESSONS OF THE LEAGUE CAMPAIGN OF 1888.
Among the noteworthy results of the League championship campaign of 1888
meriting special comment as affording lessons to be profited by in the
future, may be named, first, the success of the Eastern Club of New York,
in winning the pennant from the West; secondly, that of the Chicago Club
in attaining second place in the race in the face of drawbacks which,
under any other management, would have sufficed to have left the Club
among the tail-enders; and thirdly, the remarkable failure of the Boston
Club to attain even one of the three leading positions in the race, after
that club had incurred such a heavy expense in strengthening its team with
"star" players. The success of the New York Club in winning the
championship, introducing, as it did, a new possessor of the League
pennant and its accompanying honors, may justly be regarded as an
advantage to the general interests of the National League, inasmuch as it
is anything but desirable that one club should, season after season, carry
off the honors, as the old Boston Club did in the early history of the
professional championship contest; or as the Chicago Club has done in
monopolizing the championship of the National League during the past
thirteen years of its history. Such monopoly of the honors of each
season's campaign, by one or two of the leading clubs of each year,
materially lessens the public interest taken in the annual competition.
Besides which, it interferes, to a costly extent, with the financial
prosperity of a majority of the competing clubs. Now that a club, new to
championship honors, has replaced one of the monopolists, the other
previously unsuccessful clubs will begin to entertain hopes of being able
to "get in at the death," as the fox hunters say, in future pennant races,
if not this ensuing year, and thereby a new interest will be imparted to
coming campaigns.
A feature of the past campaign of 1888 worthy of remark, too, is the fact
of the surprisingly good work on the field accomplished by the so-called
"weakened Chicago team." While this work was unquestionably due in a great
measure to able management, the assisting element of "temperance in the
ranks" had much to do with it. It is equally unquestionable that the very
reverse had a great deal to do with the lamentable failure of the Boston
team to follow up the success with which that club's team opened the
campaign. The contrast, these two clubs presented in this special respect
calls for the most earnest consideration of the vital question of
insisting upon temperate habits in all the club teams during the period of
the championship season each year. The evil of drunkenness among the
professional teams is one which has grown upon the fraternity until it has
become too costly an abuse to be longer tolerated. Drunken professionals
should be driven from service just as the crooks of a dozen years ago
were, never to be allowed to return. Drunken players are not only a costly
drawback to success individually, but they permeate the whole baseball
fraternity with a demoralizing influence. The fact is, professional
baseball playing has arrived at that point of excellence, and reached so
advanced a position in regard to its financial possibilities, that it will
no longer pay, in any solitary respect, to allow players of drinking
habits in first-class teams. The demands of the game, as it is now played,
are such as to require a player to have all his wits about him to play
ball up to the standard it has now reached. He needs the steadiest of
nerves, the clearest eyesight, the most unclouded judgment, and the
healthiest physique to play the game as it is required to be done by the
exacting public patrons of the present day. Another thing, the capitalists
who have ventured thousands of dollars in baseball stock companies, can no
longer allow their money to be risked in teams which are weakened by the
presence of men of drinking habits. Mr. Spalding's plucky and most
successful experiment has conclusively shown that a baseball team run on
temperance principles can successfully compete with teams stronger in
other respects, but which are weakened by the toleration of drinking
habits in their ranks. Here is a lesson taught by the campaign of 1888
which points a moral, if it does not adorn a tale.
Another special lesson of the past campaign which was practically
illustrated by the Boston Club was, that star players do not make a
winning team. The fact is, the pennant cannot be won by any costly outlay
in securing the services of this, that, or the other "greatest player in
the country." It is well managed and harmonious teams, not picked nines
led by special stars, which win in the long run. Now and then--as there
are exceptions in all cases--a picked nine will attain a certain degree of
success. But for steady struggles for permanent success in the
professional championship arena, team work of the very best, and admirably
managed teams will alone achieve steady victory. The old Boston teams
under Harry Wright, and the Chicago teams under Anson, are a standing
proof of this fact. Let the National League magnates ponder these truths
earnestly.
THE LEAGUE PITCHING OF 1888.
While there is no more reliable a record, by which to estimate a
pitcher's skill in the box, than the figures showing the runs clean earned
off the pitching; in the absence of such figures the best criterion is
that of the record of victories and defeats pitched in, the percentage of
victories to games played being the deciding point in awarding the palm of
superior work in the box. In 1888 the pitchers were handicapped by the
absurd rule which charged runs scored on bases on balls as _earned_ runs,
successive bases on balls giving an earned run to the batting side, even
in the absence of a single base hit. To estimate a pitcher's skill on such
a basis is nonsense. As the scoring rules do not admit of the record of
data showing runs clean earned off the pitching, and not off the fielding
and pitching combined, we are obliged to make up a record of the
percentage of victories as the only reliable figures at command on which
to judge the pitching of the season. By and by the Committee of Conference
will get out of the old rut in this respect, and then correct data will be
available; until then we must do the best we can under the circumstances,
and consequently the names of the pitchers of the League Clubs who took
part in not less than ten games are appended, and these are placed in the
order of the best percentage of victories.
| | | | | | P
| | | | | | e
| | | | | | r
| | | | | | c
| | | | | P | e
| | | | | l | n
| | | | L | a | t
| | | W | o | y | a
| | | o | s | e | g
| | | n | t | d | e
|PITCHERS. |CLUB. | . | . | . | .
--+-----------+------------+---+---+---+-----
1|Keefe |New York | 35| 12| 47| .745
2|Conway |Detroit | 31| 14| 15| .689
3|Buffinton |Philadelphia| 29| 15| 44| .659
4|Sanders |Philadelphia| 19| 10| 29| .655
5|Krock |Chicago | 25| 14| 39| .641
6|Titcomb |New York | 14| 8| 22| .636
7|Clarkson |Boston | 33| 20| 53| .623
8|Tener |Chicago | 7| 5| 12| .583
9|Welch |New York | 26| 19| 45| .577
10|Sowders |Boston | 19| 15| 34| .559
11|Morris |Pittsburg | 29| 24| 53| .547
12|Van Haltren|Chicago | 13| 11| 24| .542
13|Staley |Pittsburg | 12| 12| 24| .500
14|Burdick |Indianapolis| 10| 10| 20| .500
15|Galvin |Pittsburg | 23| 25| 48| .479
16|Whitney |Washington | 19| 21| 40| .475
17|Baldwin |Chicago | 13| 15| 28| .464
18|Gruber |Detroit | 11| 13| 24| .458
19|Crane |New York | 5| 6| 11| .455
20|Casey |Philadelphia| 14| 19| 33| .424
21|Beatin |Detroit | 5| 7| 12| .417
22|Getzein |Detroit | 18| 26| 44| .409
23|Boyle |Indianapolis| 15| 22| 37| .405
24|Madden |Boston | 7| 12| 19| .368
25|Widner |Washington | 4| 7| 11| .364
26|O'Day |Washington | 16| 31| 47| .340
27|Shreve |Indianapolis| 11| 24| 35| .314
28|Radbourne |Boston | 7| 16| 23| .304
29|Gleason |Philadelphia| 7| 17| 24| .292
Some remarkable pitching was done during the season of 1888, alike in the
American arena, as in the League. The strategic work was up to a very high
mark in the League, and in this, Keefe, Conway, Buffinton, Clarkson,
Welch, Galvin, and Morris bore off the palm, while in speed alone, Crane
of New York excelled.
The detailed record of victories and defeats pitched in during the
championship campaign of 1888 by those who pitched in at least five
victories, is as follows. The names are given in the order of most
victories and fewest defeats:
VICTORIES.
| | | P | | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | P | i | a || V
| N | | a | | | I | a | s || i
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h || c
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i || t
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n || o
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g || r
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t || i
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o || e
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
-----------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Keefe | --| 3| 5| 5| 5| 3| 8| 6|| 35
Clarkson | 5| --| 5| --| 6| 1| 5| 6|| 33
Conway | 5| 5| 5| 2| --| 5| 6| 3|| 31
Buffinton | 3| 4| --| 5| 2| 7| 5| 3|| 29
Morris | 6| 3| 4| 6| 3| --| 4| 3|| 29
Welch | --| 3| 5| 6| 1| 4| 3| 4|| 26
Krock | 5| --| 2| 3| 4| 3| 4| 4|| 25
Sanders | 0| 3| --| 3| 1| 3| 5| 4|| 19
Sowders | 3| 1| 2| --| 2| 4| 2| 5|| 19
Whitney | 3| 3| 4| 3| 1| 3| 2| --|| 19
Getzein | 0| 4| 4| 2| --| 2| 3| 3|| 18
O'Day | 1| 2| 3| 2| 3| 3| 2| --|| 16
Boyle | 2| 1| 2| 4| 2| 1| --| 3|| 15
Titcomb | --| 1| 2| 1| 3| 2| 1| 4|| 14
Casey | 1| 2| --| 2| 4| 2| 2| 1|| 14
Van Haltren| 0| --| 2| 1| 2| 2| 2| 4|| 13
Baldwin | 3| --| 1| 3| 2| 2| 2| 0|| 13
Staley | 0| 2| 0| 1| 1| --| 6| 3|| 12
Gruber | 2| 1| 1| 3| --| 1| 2| 1|| 11
Shreve | 2| 1| 0| 3| 3| 1| --| 1|| 11
Burdick | 1| 3| 0| 1| 1| 3| --| 1|| 10
Tener | 2| --| 0| 2| 1| 0| 1| 1|| 7
Madden | 0| 0| 2| --| 0| 3| 1| 1|| 7
Radbourne | 0| 1| 0| --| 2| 1| 0| 3|| 7
Gleason | 1| 0| --| 0| 0| 3| 1| 2|| 7
Crane | --| 1| 2| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1|| 5
Beatin | 0| 0| 0| 1| --| 1| 0| 3|| 5
DEFEATS
| | | P | | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | P | i | a ||
| N | | a | | | I | a | s ||
| e | C | d | | D | t | n | h ||
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a | i || D
| | i | l | o | t | s | p | n || e
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o | g || f
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l | t || e
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i | o || a
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
-----------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Tener | 1| --| 2| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1|| 5
Crane | --| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 2| 2|| 6
Beatin | 1| 2| 1| 2| --| 0| 1| 0|| 7
Titcomb | --| 1| 0| 1| 3| 2| 0| 1|| 8
Sanders | 3| 2| --| 2| 1| 1| 0| 1|| 10
Burdick | 1| 1| 3| 1| 1| 0| --| 3|| 10
Van Haltren| 2| --| 1| 2| 3| 2| 1| 0|| 11
Keefe | --| 4| 1| 4| 0| 1| 2| 0|| 12
Staley | 2| 1| 2| 2| 3| --| 1| 1|| 12
Madden | 3| 2| 2| --| 2| 2| 1| 0|| 12
Gruber | 3| 1| 2| 2| --| 0| 2| 3|| 13
Conway | 2| 2| 1| 2| --| 3| 1| 3|| 14
Krock | 2| --| 2| 3| 2| 3| 1| 1|| 14
Buffinton | 4| 2| --| 3| 2| 2| 1| 1|| 15
Sowders | 3| 2| 4| --| 2| 2| 2| 0|| 15
Baldwin | 1| --| 1| 1| 4| 4| 2| 2|| 15
Radbourne | 2| 5| 0| --| 2| 2| 2| 3|| 16
Gleason | 2| 3| --| 3| 3| 1| 0| 5|| 17
Welch | --| 6| 4| 3| 2| 2| 1| 1|| 19
Casey | 5| 1| --| 1| 5| 2| 3| 2|| 19
Clarkson | 4| 3| 4| --| 2| 2| 3| 2|| 20
Whitney | 4| 1| 2| 5| 2| 4| 3| --|| 21
Boyle | 5| 5| 3| 3| 1| 5| --| 0|| 22
Morris | 3| 4| 4| 2| 3| --| 2| 6|| 24
Shreve | 4| 4| 4| 2| 5| 3| --| 2|| 24
Galvin | 4| 3| 7| 5| 3| --| 1| 2|| 25
Getzein | 5| 3| 3| 4| --| 7| 3| 1|| 26
O'Day | 4| 5| 4| 5| 3| 3| 7| --|| 31
These pitching records not only present a tolerably fair criterion of a
pitcher's skill in the box--though of course not as reliable as the data
of clean earned runs off his pitching or of clean hits made from it--but
they afford an interesting and instructive record from which to judge of
the success of a pitcher in defeating one particular team more frequently
than he does another, and vice versa. In fact, experience has shown that
no matter how effective a pitcher may be in a season's work, it will be
found that there is always one team which bothers him more than any other
he has to face, just as shown in the above quoted instances.
In regard to judging of a pitcher's ability as a fielder in his position
by the fielding averages of pitchers the basis was made equally as
unreliable as the estimate of earned runs was, owing to the fact that the
data of the fielding averages of a pitcher were made up from the figures
of "assistance on strikes" as well as from legitimate fielding
assistances. For this reason the pitcher, who was really a poor fielder in
his position in fielding balls from the bat, but who happened to be
fortunate in striking batsmen out by his pitching--thereby getting a big
record of pitching assistances--became the leader in the pitcher's
fielding averages; while the pitcher who really excelled as a fielder when
in the box, but who was not as fortunate in striking out his batting
opponents, and therefore could not furnish as good a record of assistances
on strikes, was set down in the fielding averages as a tail-ender.
The individual club record of the pitching of 1888 presents some
interesting figures. For instance, we find that while Chicago used no less
than eleven pitchers during the championship season Philadelphia was
content with but four. No less than twenty new pitchers entered the League
season in 1888, and of these, Sanders of Philadelphia; Tener and Krock of
Chicago; Sowders of Boston; Staley of Pittsburgh; Burdick of Indianapolis,
and Widner of Washington, proved to be acquisitions.
Below will be found the individual club pitching records for 1888,
showing the victories and defeats each club pitcher participated in as an
occupant of the box. The names given in italics are those of pitchers new
to the League arena:
EASTERN CLUBS.
NEW YORK.
| | P | | | | I | ||
| | h | | | | n | ||
| | i | | | | d | W ||
| | l | | | P | i | a ||
| | a | | | i | a | s ||
| C | d | | D | t | n | h ||
| h | e | B | e | t | a | i ||
| I | l | o | t | s | p | n ||
| c | p | s | r | b | o | g ||
| a | h | t | o | u | l | t ||
| g | i | o | i | r | i | o ||
| o | a | n | t | g | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
--------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
--------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Keefe | 3| 4| 5| 2| 5| 4| 5| 0| 3| 1| 8| 2| 6| 0||35|12| 47
Welch | 3| 6| 5| 4| 6| 3| 1| 2| 4| 2| 3| 1| 4| 1||25|19| 45
Titcomb | 1| 1| 2| 0| 1| 1| 3| 3| 2| 2| 1| 0| 4| 1||14| 8| 22
_Crane_ | 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 1| 0| 2| 1| 2|| 5| 6| 11
George | 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 2| 1| 3
Weidman | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 1| 1| 2
--------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 8|11|14| 5|12| 8|11| 7| 9| 7|14| 5|15| 4||83|47|130
| | | | | | | | |[1]
[Footnote 1: One game with Pittsburg was won by forfeit.]
CHICAGO.
| | P | | | | I | ||
| | h | | | | n | ||
| | i | | | | d | W ||
| | l | | | P | i | a ||
| N | a | | | i | a | s ||
| e | d | | D | t | n | h ||
| w | e | B | e | t | a | i ||
| | l | o | t | s | p | n ||
| Y | p | s | r | b | o | g ||
| o | h | t | o | u | l | t ||
| r | i | o | i | r | i | o ||
| k | a | n | t | g | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
_Krock_ | 5| 2| 2| 2| 3| 3| 4| 2| 3| 3| 4| 1| 4| 1||25|14|39
Van Haltren| 0| 2| 2| 1| 1| 2| 2| 3| 2| 2| 2| 1| 4| 0||13|11|24
Baldwin | 3| 1| 1| 1| 3| 1| 2| 4| 2| 4| 2| 2| 0| 2||13|15|28
_Tener_ | 2| 1| 0| 2| 2| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 1| 1|| 7| 5|12
_Dwyer_ | 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0|| 4| 1| 5
_Borchers_ | 0| 0| 1| 1| 1| 0| 0| 1| 1| 2| 1| 0| 0| 1|| 4| 5| 9
Ryan | 1| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 3| 1| 4
_Gumpert_ | 0| 1| 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 2| 0|| 3| 3| 6
_Clark_ | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0|| 2|| 0| 2
_Bryman_ | 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1|| 2| 1| 3
_Mains_ | 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 1| 1| 2
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals |11| 8| 8| 9|12| 7|10|10| 9|11|14| 6|13| 6||77|57|134
| | | |[1]
[Footnote 1: One defeat with the Philadelphia Club was by forfeit.]
DETROIT.
| | | P | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | P | i | a ||
| N | | a | | i | a | s ||
| e | C | d | | t | n | h ||
| w | h | e | B | t | a | i ||
| | i | l | o | s | p | n ||
| Y | c | p | s | b | o | g ||
| o | a | h | t | u | l | t ||
| r | g | i | o | r | i | o ||
| k | o | a | n | g | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Conway | 5| 2| 5| 2| 5| 1| 2| 2| 5| 3| 6| 1| 3| 3||31|14| 45
Getzein| 0| 5| 4| 3| 4| 3| 2| 4| 2| 7| 3| 3| 3| 1||18|26| 44
Gruber | 2| 3| 1| 1| 1| 2| 3| 2| 1| 0| 2| 3| 1| 3|| 1|13| 24
Beatin | 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 1| 1| 2| 1| 0| 0| 1| 3| 0|| 5| 7| 12
Baldwin| 0| 0| 0| 2| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0|| 3| 3| 6
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 7|11|10|10|11| 7| 8|10|10|10|11| 8|11| 7||68|63|131
PHILADELPHIA.
| | | | | | I | ||
| | | | | | n | ||
| | | | | | d | W ||
| | | | | P | i | a ||
| N | | | | i | a | s ||
| e | C | | D | t | n | h ||
| w | h | B | e | t | a | i ||
| | i | o | t | s | p | n ||
| Y | c | s | r | b | o | g ||
| o | a | t | o | u | l | t ||
| r | g | o | i | r | i | o ||
| k | o | n | t | g | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|P.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Buffinton| 3| 4| 4| 2| 5| 3| 2| 2| 7| 2| 5| 1| 3| 1||29|15| 44
_Sanders_| 0| 3| 3| 2| 3| 2| 1| 1| 3| 1| 5| 0| 4| 1||19|10| 29
Casey | 1| 5| 2| 1| 2| 1| 4| 5| 2| 2| 2| 3| 1| 2||14|19| 33
_Gleason_| 1| 2| 0| 3| 0| 3| 0| 3| 3| 1| 1| 0| 2| 5|| 7|17| 24
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 4|14| 9| 8|10| 9| 7|11|15| 6|13| 4|10| 9||69|71|130
| | |[1] | | | | |[2]
[Footnote 1: One game with Chicago was won by forfeit.]
[Footnote 2: One game with Pittsburg thrown out.]
BOSTON.
| | | P | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | P | i | a ||
| N | | a | | i | a | s ||
| e | C | d | D | t | n | h ||
| w | h | e | e | t | a | i ||
| | i | l | t | s | p | n ||
| Y | c | p | r | b | o | g ||
| o | a | h | o | u | l | t ||
| r | g | i | i | r | i | o ||
| k | o | a | t | g | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Clarkson | 5| 4| 5| 3| 5| 4| 6| 2| 1| 2| 5| 3| 6| 2||33|20| 53
_Sowders_| 3| 3| 1| 2| 2| 4| 2| 2| 4| 2| 2| 2| 5| 0||19|15| 34
Madden | 0| 3| 0| 2| 2| 2| 0| 2| 3| 2| 1| 1| 1| 0|| 7|12| 19
Radbourne| 0| 2| 1| 5| 0| 0| 2| 2| 1| 2| 0| 2| 3| 3|| 7|16| 23
Conway | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 3| 1| 0| 0|| 4| 1| 5
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 8|12| 7|10| 9|10|10| 8|10| 8|11| 9|15| 5||70|64|134
INDIANAPOLIS.
| | | P | | | | ||
| | | h | | | | ||
| | | i | | | | W ||
| | | l | | | P | a ||
| N | | a | | | i | s ||
| e | C | d | | D | t | h ||
| w | h | e | B | e | t | i ||
| | i | l | o | t | s | n ||
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | g ||
| o | a | h | t | o | u | t ||
| r | g | i | o | i | r | o ||
| k | o | a | n | t | g | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Boyle | 2| 5| 1| 5| 2| 3| 4| 3| 2| 1| 1| 5| 3| 0||15|22| 37
Healy | 0| 3| 1| 4| 2| 2| 1| 3| 2| 3| 1| 6| 5| 3||12|24| 36
Shreve | 2| 4| 1| 4| 0| 4| 3| 2| 3| 5| 1| 3| 1| 2||11|24| 35
_Burdick_| 1| 1| 3| 1| 0| 3| 1| 1| 1| 1| 3| 0| 1| 3||10|10| 20
Moffat | 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 1| 0| 0| 2| 0|| 2| 5| 7
---------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 5|14| 6|14| 4|13| 9|11| 8|11| 6|14|12| 8||50|85|135
WASHINGTON.
| | | P | | | | I ||
| | | h | | | | n ||
| | | i | | | | d ||
| | | l | | | P | i ||
| N | | a | | | i | a ||
| e | C | d | | D | t | n ||
| w | h | e | B | e | t | a ||
| | i | l | o | t | s | p ||
| Y | c | p | s | r | b | o ||
| o | a | h | t | o | u | l ||
| r | g | i | o | i | r | i ||
| k | o | a | n | t | g | s ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Whitney | 3| 4| 3| 1| 4| 2| 3| 5| 1| 2| 3| 4| 2| 3||18|21| 40
O'Day | 1| 4| 2| 5| 3| 4| 2| 5| 3| 3| 3| 3| 2| 7||16|31| 47
Keefe | 0| 2| 0| 2| 0| 1| 0| 1| 2| 1| 2| 0| 2| 0|| 6| 7| 13
_Widner_ | 0| 1| 0| 2| 1| 2| 0| 2| 1| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0|| 4| 7| 11
Daily | 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 0| 1| 0|| 2| 4| 6
Gilmore | 0| 3| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 2| 0| 1|| 1|10| 11
_Greening_| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 0| 1| 1
_Haddock_ | 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0|| 0| 2| 2
Shaw | 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 1|| 0| 3| 3
----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+---
Totals | 4|15| 6|13| 9|10| 5|15| 7|11| 9|10| 8|12||48|86|134
PITTSBURG.
| | | P | | | I | ||
| | | h | | | n | ||
| | | i | | | d | W ||
| | | l | | | i | a ||
| N | | a | | | a | s ||
| e | C | d | | D | n | h ||
| w | h | e | B | e | a | i ||
| | i | l | o | t | p | n ||
| Y | c | p | s | r | o | g ||
| o | a | h | t | o | l | t ||
| r | g | i | o | i | i | o ||
| k | o | a | n | t | s | n ||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || Totals.
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----++-+--+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----++-+--+---
Morris | 6| 3| 3| 4| 4| 4| 6| 2| 3| 3| 4| 2| 3| 6||29|24| 53
Galvin | 1| 4| 5| 3| 2| 7| 1| 5| 6| 3| 5| 1| 3| 2||23|25| 48
_Staley_ | 0| 2| 2| 1| 0| 2| 1| 2| 1| 3| 5| 1| 3| 1||12|12| 24
_Knell_ | 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0|| 1| 2| 3
_Henderson_| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 0|| 1| 4| 5
Maul | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 0| 1| 1
-----------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----++-+--+---
Totals | 7| 9|11| 9| 6|15| 8|10|10|10|14| 6|10| 9||66|68|134
|[1] | | | |[1]
[Footnote 1: One game with New York was forfeited, and one defeat with
Philadelphia was thrown out.]
The retiring pitchers of the year were McCormick of Pittsburgh, Ferguson
of Philadelphia, who died early in the season; Weidman and Twitchell of
Detroit; Shaw of Washington; Mattimore of New York; Pyle and Sprague of
Chicago; Leitner, Morrison and Kirby of Indianapolis, and Stemmyer of
Boston
THE MONTHLY RECORDS.
The month of _April_ saw Boston taking the lead in the record of
victories for that month, that club not sustaining a single defeat in
April. Chicago stood second, with New York and Pittsburgh tied in the
number of victories and defeats credited and charged to each club, Detroit
standing fifth, while Indianapolis, Philadelphia and Washington brought up
the rear.
_In May_ Chicago led all the other teams in their victories that month;
Detroit being second, Philadelphia third, New York fourth, and Boston
fifth, Indianapolis being sixth, with Pittsburgh and Washington tied for
last place in the May record, Boston and Pittsburgh falling off badly this
month.
_In June_ Detroit won the most victories, it being their best month's
work of the season, Chicago being second, Philadelphia third, New York
fourth, Boston fifth, Washington sixth, with Indianapolis seventh and
Pittsburgh last, it being the latter club's poorest month's work of the
campaign.
_In July_ the new rule of management, inaugurated by Mr. Day, placed New
York in the front, and the result was that the "Giants" in July made the
best month's record of the season, over 18 victories to but five defeats;
Detroit stood second on the list in July victories, with Pittsburgh third,
the latter making a good rally in July; Indianapolis, too, played well
this month and stood fourth, Washington being fifth, and Chicago sixth,
the latter taking a bad tumble, Philadelphia and Boston being the two last
in July victories, Boston winning but five victories out of twenty-two
games, that club's worst monthly record.
_In August_ Boston rallied in brilliant style, scoring 16 victories out
of 22 games, quite a contrast to their poor work in July; New York was
second, and Pittsburgh third, the latter doing better, even, than in July;
Philadelphia stood fourth, Chicago fifth, Washington sixth, with
Indianapolis seventh and Detroit last, the latter only winning five
victories out of 21 games in August.
_In September_ Chicago rallied well and went to the front in the record
of the month's victories, Pittsburgh being second, New York third, Detroit
fourth--the latter rallying; Philadelphia sixth, with Indianapolis and
Washington bringing up the rear. By the close of the month New York had
virtually settled the question of the championship, and the only struggle
left was that for second place.
_In October_ Philadelphia made its usual "spurt" at the finish, and that
club won eight out of nine games in October, after giving Chicago a close
fight for second place, and came in a good third in the pennant race. New
York was second in the October victories, Boston third, Pittsburgh and
Washington tied for fourth, Chicago was sixth--that club gaining second
position in the pennant race; Indianapolis and Washington being the two
last. Here is the full record of the monthly victories and defeats of the
campaign:
|April| May | June| July| Aug.|Sept.| Oct.||Totals.
------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----++---------
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|P.
New York | 5| 3|12| 9|13|11|18| 5|16| 8|13| 8| 7| 3||84|47|131
Chicago | 6| 2|15| 7|14| 8|10|14|12|13|16| 9| 4| 5||77|58|135
Philadelphia| 2| 7|12| 7|13|10| 9|15|15| 9|10|12| 8| 1||69|61|130
Boston | 9| 0|11|13|12|11| 5|17|16| 6|12|12| 5| 5||70|64|134
Detroit | 3| 5|14| 8|16| 6|14|10| 5|16|13|11| 3| 7||68|63|131
Pittsburg | 5| 3| 7|14| 5|15|13| 9|16| 9|15|12| 5| 6||66|68|134
Indianapolis| 2| 6| 8|14| 7|14|13|11| 6|21|10|13| 4| 6||50|85|135
Washington | 1| 7| 7|14| 9|14|11|12|10|14| 5|19| 5| 6||48|86|134
[Illustration: A. C. Anson. ]
THE LEADING PLAYERS OF THE LEAGUE.
Looking over the League averages, and taking those players who have taken
part in a majority of the championship contests of the season, we find the
appended names among those occupying the leading positions at the bat and
in the field.
Of those who played in one hundred games and over in the League
championship arena, the following comprise the first ten batsmen:
|BATSMEN. |CLUB. |Games.|Per cent. of
| | | |Base Hits.
--+---------+--------+------+---------
1|Anson |Chicago | 134 | .343
2|Ryan |Chicago | 130 | .331
3|Kelly |Boston | 105 | .318
4|Brouthers|Detroit | 129 | .306
5|Ewing |New York| 103 | .306
6|White |Detroit | 125 | .298
7|Johnston |Boston | 135 | .295
8|Tiernan |New York| 113 | .293
9|Connor |New York| 134 | .291
10|Nash |Boston | 135 | .283
Of those who played in one hundred games and over in the League campaign,
the following are the first seven in fielding averages:
FIELDERS. |POSITION. |CLUB. |Games.|Fielding|Per cent.
| | | |Average.| of
| | | | |Base Hits.
----------+--------------+---------+------+--------+----------
Anson |First Baseman |Chicago | 134 | .985 | .343
Richardson|Second Baseman|New York | 135 | .942 | .226
Nash |Third Baseman |Boston. | 104 | .913 | .283
Glasscock |Short Stop |Ind'polis| 109 | .900 | .269
Hornung |Left Fielder |Boston | 107 | .947 | .239
Slattery |Center Fielder|New York | 103 | .917 | .245
Tiernan |Right Fielder |New York | 113 | .959 | .293
Of the pitchers who took part in 50 games and over, the following led in
fielding averages:
No pitcher or catcher played in 100 games.
PITCHERS.|CLUB. |Games.|Fielding|Per cent.
| | |Average.| of
| | | |Base Hits.
---------+---------+------+--------+----------
Keefe |New York | 51 | .785 | .127
Galvin |Pittsburg| 50 | .758 | .143
Morris |Pittsburg| 54 | .732 | .102
Clarkson |Boston | 54 | .678 | .195
Of the catchers who took part in 60 games and over, the following led in
fielding averages:
CATCHERS.|CLUB. |Games.|Fielding|Per cent.
| | |Average.| of
| | | |Base Hits.
---------+------------+------+--------+----------
Bennett |Detroit | 72 | .941 | .263
Daly |Chicago | 62 | .880 | .191
Clements |Philadelphia| 84 | .874 | .247
Ewing |New York | 78 | .861 | .306
Mack |Washington | 79 | .843 | .186
Miller |Pittsburg | 68 | .805 | .277
Kelly |Boston | 74 | .796 | .318
THE BASE RUNNING RECORD.
Those of the League championship players who are credited with not less
than 50 stolen bases in the pennant race, are as follows:
BASERUNNERS.|CLUB. |Games.|Stolen Bases.
------------+------------+------+-----------
Hoy |Washington | 136 | 82
Seery |Indianapolis| 133 | 80
Sunday |Pittsburg | 119 | 71
Pfeffer |Chicago | 136 | 64
Ryan |Chicago | 130 | 60
Fogarty |Philadelphia| 120 | 58
Kelly |Boston | 105 | 56
Ewing |New York | 103 | 53
Tiernan |New York | 113 | 52
The above are the leaders in seven of the eight League clubs. Hanlon led
in the Detroit team, but he only scored 38 stolen bases in 108 games. The
Detroit team was singularly weak in this respect.
Mr. R.M. Larner of Washington has made up an interesting table from the
figures of the League averages, which presents some very interesting
statistics of the base running in the League during the championship
season of 1888. Mr. Larner says:
"The official averages of League players contain the number of bases
stolen by each player during the season, but furnish no means of
comparison between the clubs in that most important department of the
game. A glance, however, shows that the three tail-end clubs possess the
three most successful base-runners in the League, in Hoy of the
Washingtons, Seery of Indianapolis, and Sunday of Pittsburgh, the latter
of whom would probably have finished first had an accident not prevented
him from playing during the last two weeks of the season."
The following table includes in its first column all those methods of
reaching first base, except the force-outs, which cannot be ascertained,
and would not materially affect the record, in this comparison.
Indianapolis and Washington still lead, Pittsburgh comes well to the
front, pushing the next three clubs down a peg each, and the Phillies and
Detroits keep their places at the foot:
CLUBS. |Reached 1st Base.|Stolen Bases.|Percentages.
------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------
Indianapolis| 1,589 | 350 | .220
Washington | 1,515 | 331 | .218
Pittsburg | 1,474 | 282 | .191
New York | 1,772 | 315 | .178
Boston | 1,719 | 292 | .170
Chicago | 1,720 | 285 | .166
Philadelphia| 1,569 | 246 | .157
Detroit | 1,843 | 193 | .105
Mr. Larner says. "The simple total of bases stolen is misleading as to a
club's proficiency in base running, since the strong batting clubs having
more men who reach first base have more chances to steal, and hence excel
in totals, while in percentages they fall below clubs which are weaker in
batting. The true measure is the relation between the number of bases
stolen and the number of chances offered for the attempt, which is the
whole number of those who reach first base, whether on hits, balls,
errors, hits by pitcher, illegal delivery, or force-outs."
THE CLUB RECORD OF STOLEN BASES.
The record in stolen bases in championship games, showing the first man
of each club in base stealing for 1888 is appended.
WASHINGTON. ||PITTSBURG.
| | |Stolen|| | | |Stolen
|PLAYERS.|Games.|Bases.|| |PLAYERS.|Games.|Bases.
-+--------+------+------++-+--------+------+-------
1|Hoy | 136 | 82 ||1|Sunday | 119 | 71
2|Wilmot | 119 | 46 ||2|Smith | 130 | 32
3|Donnelly| 117 | 44 ||3|Dunlap | 81 | 24
4|Daily | 110 | 44 ||4|Mider | 103 | 27
5|Mack | 85 | 31 ||5|Beckley | 71 | 20
6|Schock | 90 | 23 ||6|Carroll | 96 | 18
7|Myers | 132 | 20 ||7|Kuehne | 137 | 17
8|Irwin | 37 | 15 ||8|Coleman | 115 | 15
9|O'Brien | 133 | 10 ||9|Fields | 44 | 9
-+--------+------+------++-+--------+------+-------
Total | 315 ||Total | 228
NEW YORK. || PHILADELPHIA.
| | |Stolen|| | | |Stolen
|PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.|| |PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.
-+----------+------+------++-+-------=-+------+-------
1|Ewing | 105 | 53 ||1|Fogart | 120 | 58
2|Tiernan | 113 | 52 ||2|Delahanty| 74 | 38
3|Ward | 122 | 38 ||3|Andrews | 123 | 35
4|Richardson| 135 | 35 ||4|Farrar | 130 | 21
5|Connor | 134 | 27 ||5|Wood | 105 | 20
6|Slattery | 103 | 26 ||6|Irwin | 124 | 19
7|O'Rourke | 107 | 25 ||7|Mulvey | 99 | 18
8|Gore | 64 | 9 ||8|Sanders | 57 | 13
9|Whitney | 90 | 8 ||9|Bastian | 80 | 12
-+----------+------+------++-+---------+------+-------
Total | 280 ||Total | 234
Taking the total bases stolen by each club nine as the criterion,
Indianapolis takes the lead, with Washington second and New York third,
followed by Chicago, Boston, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Detroit in
regular order, the latter club being the weakest of the eight League teams
in base running. Here is the record in full:
INDIANAPOLIS. || BOSTON.
| | |Stolen|| | | |Stolen
|PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.|| |PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.
-+----------+------+------++-+---------+------+-------
1|Seery | 133 | 80 ||1|Kelly | 105 | 56
2|McGeachy | 118 | 49 ||2|Brown | 107 | 46
3|Glasscock | 112 | 48 ||3|Johnston | 135 | 35
4|Denny | 126 | 32 ||4|Wise | 104 | 33
5|Hines | 132 | 31 ||5|Hornung | 107 | 29
6|Myers | 66 | 28 ||6|Morrill | 134 | 21
7|Bossett | 128 | 24 ||7|Nash | 135 | 20
8|Daily | 57 | 15 ||8|Quinn | 38 | 12
9|Esterbrook| 64 | 11 ||9|Sutton | 28 | 10
-+----------+------+------++-+---------+------+-------
Total | 318 ||Total | 263
CHICAGO. || DETROIT.
| | |Stolen|| | | |Stolen
|PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.|| |PLAYERS. |Games.|Bases.
-+-----------+------+------++-+----------+------+-------
1|Pfeffer | 136 | 64 ||1|Hanlon | 108 | 38
2|Ryan | 130 | 60 ||2|Brouthers | 129 | 34
3|Burns | 134 | 34 ||3|Campau | 70 | 27
4|Anson | 134 | 28 ||4|Twitchell | 130 | 14
5|Williamson | 132 | 25 ||5|Richardson| 57 | 13
6|Van Haltren| 81 | 21 ||6|White | 125 | 12
7|Duffy | 71 | 13 ||7|Ganzell | 93 | 12
8|Daly | 65 | 10 ||8|Rowe | 105 | 10
9|Sullivan | 75 | 9 ||9|Getzein | 45 | 6
-+-----------+------+------++-+----------+------+-------
Total | 264 ||Total | 166
The following table is for immediate reference. It shows the winning club
for each season from 1871 to 1888 inclusive; as also the manager of each
of the champion clubs of each year:
Year.|WINNING CLUB.|MANAGER. |Victories.|Defeats.|Games
| | | | |Played.
-----+-------------+---------+----------+--------+-------
1871 |Athletic |Hayhurst | 22 | 7 | 29
1872 |Boston |H. Wright| 39 | 8 | 47
1873 |Boston |H. Wright| 43 | 16 | 59
1874 |Boston |H. Wright| 52 | 18 | 70
1875 |Boston |H. Wright| 71 | 8 | 79
1876 |Chicago |Spalding | 52 | 14 | 66
1877 |Boston |H. Wright| 31 | 17 | 48
1878 |Boston |H. Wright| 41 | 19 | 60
1879 |Providence |G. Wright| 55 | 23 | 78
1880 |Chicago |Anson | 67 | 18 | 84
1881 |Chicago |Anson | 56 | 28 | 84
1882 |Chicago |Anson | 55 | 29 | 84
1883 |Boston |H. Wright| 63 | 35 | 98
1884 |Providence |Bancroft | 84 | 28 | 112
1885 |Chicago |Anson | 87 | 25 | 112
1886 |Chicago |Anson | 90 | 34 | 124
1887 |Detroit |Watkins | 79 | 45 | 124
1888 |NewYork |Mutrie | 84 | 47 | 131
It will be seen that in the old Professional Association the Boston club
won the pennant four times, and the Athletics once, while in the League
the Chicago Club won it six times, the Boston Club three times, the
Providence Club twice, and the Detroit and New York once each. The best
percentage of victories was made by the Boston Club in 1875, that being
the best on record in professional club history.
THE CHAMPION LEAGUE TEAM OF 1888.
Though the New York Club's team for 1888 included over twenty different
players, only seven of them took part in one hundred championship matches
and over, and these were Richardson, 135; Connor, 134; Ward, 122; Tiernan,
113; O'Rourke, 107; Ewing, 103, and Slattery, 103. Whitney took part in
90; Gore in 64; Keefe in 51; Welch in 47; Foster in 37; Murphy in 28;
Hatfield in 27; Titcomb in 23; Brown in 17, and Crane in but 11. All the
others played in less than ten games. The first nine were Keefe p, Ewing
c, Connor 1b, Richardson 2b, Whitney 3b, Ward ss, O'Rourke lf, Slattery
cf, and Tiernan, rf, these playing the nine positions respectively. The
appended table presents an interesting epitome of the work done on the
field by the New
York team in the championship contests of the past season:
NEW YORK. vs.
| | P | | | | I | ||
| | h | | | | n | ||
| | i | | | | d | W ||
| | l | | | P | i | a ||
| | a | | | i | a | s ||
| C | d | | D | t | n | h ||
| h | e | B | e | t | a | i || T
| i | l | o | t | s | p | n || o
| c | p | s | r | b | o | g || t
| a | h | t | o | u | l | t || a
| g | i | o | i | r | i | o || l
| o | a | n | t | g | s | n || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
--------------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---
Victories | 8 |14 |12 |11 |10 |14 |15 || 84
Defeats |11 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 || 47
Drawn Games | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 || 7
Series Won | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 || 5
Series Lost | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 || 1
Series Unfinished | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 || 6
Victories by Forfeit| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 || 1
"Chicago" Victories | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 || 19
"Chicago" Defeats | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 || 3
Single Figure | 5 |12 |10 |11 | 8 |11 |14 || 71
Victories | | | | | | | ||
Single Figure |11 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 || 44
Defeats | | | | | | | ||
Double Figure | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 || 13
Victories | | | | | | | ||
Double Figure | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 || 4
Defeats | | | | | | | ||
Extra Inning Games | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 || 9
Victories at Home | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 || 43
Defeats at Home | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 || 23
Victories Abroad | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 || 40
Defeats Abroad | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 || 24
THE PITCHING RECORD.
The pitching record of the champion team of 1888 is worthy of note in
regard to the figures showing the victories won and defeats sustained by
each pitcher in his games with the seven opposing clubs. Here is the
record in full, the names being given in the order of percentage of
victories. Despite this method of estimating the pitching strength there
is no questioning the fact of the superiority of Keefe, Welch and Titcomb
according to the record each made against the clubs they were opposed to:
[Illustration: NEW YORK TEAM.
1 TITCOMB 2 KEIFE* 3 WHITNEY 4 * 5 WARD 6 RICHARDSON 7
FOSTER
8 WELCH 9 MUIRIL * 10 CRANE 11 GEORGE 12 EWING 13 CONNOR 14
HATFIELD.
15 GORE 16 O'ROURKE 17 TIERNAN 18 MURPHY 19 BROWN]
[**Proofreaders note: In some cases the caption identifying the players
was indecipherable. These are marked with an *]
| | P | | | | I | || |P
| | h | | | | n | || |e
| | i | | | | d | W || |r
| | l | | | P | i | a || | V
| | a | | | i | a | s || |c i
| C | d | | D | t | n | h || |e c
| h | e | B | e | t | a | i || T |n t
| i | l | o | t | s | p | n || o |t o
| c | p | s | r | b | o | g || t |. r
| a | h | t | o | u | l | t || a | i
| g | i | o | i | r | i | o || l |o e
| o | a | n | t | g | s | n || s |f s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || . | .
-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----++-----+-----
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.||W.|L.|
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+-----
Keefe | 3| 4| 5| 1| 5| 4| 5| 0| 3| 1| 8| 2| 6| 0||35|12|.744
George | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 2| 1|.666
Titcomb| 1| 1| 2| 0| 1| 1| 3| 3| 2| 2| 1| 0| 4| 1||14| 8|.636
Welsh | 3| 6| 5| 4| 6| 3| 1| 2| 4| 2| 3| 1| 4| 1||26|19|.577
Weidman| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 1| 1|.500
Crane | 1| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 1| 0| 2| 1| 2|| 5| 6|.450
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--++--+--+-----
Totals | 8|11|14| 5|12| 8|11| 7| 9| 7|14| 5|15| 4||83|47|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |[1]
[Footnote 1: The game forfeited by Pittsburg is, of course, not included.]
In the pitching averages, based on the existing method of estimating
earned runs off the pitching, the record stands as follows:
Pitchers.|Per cent. earn'd|Per cent. of
|Runs per Game. |Base Hits.
Keefe | 1.4* | .198
| [B] |
Welch | 1.47 | .201
Titcomb | 1.82 | .212
[**Proofreaders note B: * undecipherable number**]
The other three pitchers did not pitch in a dozen games.
THE FULL LEAGUE RECORD.
The following record presents the scores of the total victories won by
every League Club each year since the National League was organized, the
table presenting the figures of thirteen consecutive seasons from 1876 to
1888 inclusive:
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Y
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | r
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | s
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | .
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
Chicago | 52| 18| 30| 44| 67| 56| 55| 59| 62| 87| 90| 71| 77|13
Boston | 39| 31| 41| 49| 40| 38| 45| 63| 73| 46| 56| 61| 70|13
Providence | --| --| 38| 55| 52| 47| 52| 58| 84| 53| --| --| --| 8
Detroit | --| --| --| --| --| 41| 42| 40| 28| 41| 87| 79| 68| 8
Buffalo | --| --| --| 44| 24| 45| 45| 52| 64| 38| --| --| --| 7
Cleveland | --| --| --| 24| 47| 36| 42| 55| 35| --| --| --| --| 6
New York | --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 46| 62| 85| 75| 68| 84| 6
Philadelphia| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 17| 39| 56| 71| 75| 69| 6
St Louis | 45| 19| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 38| 43| --| --| 4
Cincinnati | 9| --| 37| 38| 21| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 4
Troy | --| --| --| 19| 41| 39| 35| --| --| --| --| --| --| 4
Worcester | --| --| --| --| 40| 32| 18| --| --| --| --| --| --| 3
Washington | --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 26| 46| 48| 3
Indianapolis| --| --| 24| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 37| 59| 3
Hartford | 47| 24| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 2
Louisville | 30| 28| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 2
Pittsburg | --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 55| 66| 2
Athletic | 14| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 1
Mutual | 21| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 1
Syracuse | --| --| --| 15| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 1
Milwaukee | --| --| 15| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 1
Kansas City | --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| --| 29| --| 1
------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---
Totals |257|120|185|288|332|334|334|390|447|444|448|521|541|
THE COMPLETE RECORD.
Following is a summary showing the results of each year's campaign since
the organization of the League:
1876.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 52 | 14 | .788
Hartford | 47 | 21 | .691
St. Louis | 45 | 19 | .703
Boston | 39 | 31 | .557
Louisville | 30 | 36 | .455
Mutual | 21 | 35 | .375
Athletic | 14 | 45 | .237
Cincinnati | 9 | 56 | .135
1877.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Boston | 31 | 17 | .648
Louisville | 28 | 20 | .583
Hartford | 24 | 24 | .500
St. Louis | 19 | 29 | .396
Chicago | 18 | 30 | .375
1878.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-------------+----+----+--------
Boston | 41 | 19 | .707
Cincinnati | 37 | 23 | .617
Providence | 33 | 27 | .550
Chicago | 30 | 30 | .500
Indianapolis | 24 | 36 | .400
Milwaukee | 15 | 45 | .250
1879.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Providence | 55 | 23 | .705
Boston | 49 | 29 | .628
Chicago | 44 | 32 | .579
Buffalo | 44 | 32 | .579
Cincinnati | 38 | 36 | .514
Cleveland | 24 | 53 | .312
Troy | 19 | 56 | .253
Syracuse | 15 | 27 | .357
1880.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 67 | 17 | .798
Providence | 52 | 32 | .619
Cleveland | 47 | 37 | .559
Troy | 41 | 42 | .494
Worcester | 40 | 43 | .482
Boston | 40 | 44 | .474
Buffalo | 24 | 58 | .293
Cincinnati | 21 | 59 | .263
1881.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 56 | 28 | .667
Providence | 47 | 37 | .559
Buffalo | 45 | 38 | .542
Detroit | 41 | 43 | .488
Troy | 39 | 45 | .464
Boston | 38 | 45 | .458
Cleveland | 36 | 48 | .429
Worcester | 32 | 50 | .390
1882.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
-----------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 55 | 29 | .655
Providence | 52 | 32 | .619
Buffalo | 45 | 39 | .536
Boston | 45 | 39 | .536
Cleveland | 42 | 40 | .512
Detroit | 42 | 41 | .506
Troy | 35 | 48 | .422
Worcester | 18 | 66 | .214
1883.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
Boston | 63 | 35 | .643
Chicago | 59 | 39 | .602
Providence | 58 | 40 | .592
Cleveland | 55 | 42 | .567
Buffalo | 52 | 45 | .539
New York | 46 | 50 | .479
Detroit | 40 | 58 | .408
Philadelphia| 17 | 81 | .173
1884.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
Providence | 84 | 28 | .750
Boston | 73 | 38 | .658
Buffalo | 64 | 47 | .577
Chicago | 62 | 50 | .554
New York | 62 | 50 | .554
Philadelphia| 39 | 73 | .348
Cleveland | 35 | 77 | .313
Detroit | 28 | 84 | .250
1885.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 87 | 25 | .776
New York | 85 | 27 | .758
Philadelphia| 56 | 54 | .509
Providence | 53 | 57 | .481
Boston | 46 | 66 | .410
Detroit | 41 | 67 | .379
Buffalo | 38 | 74 | .339
St. Louis | 36 | 72 | .333
1886.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
Chicago | 90 | 34 | .725
Detroit | 87 | 36 | .707
New York | 75 | 44 | .630
Philadelphia| 71 | 43 | .622
Boston | 56 | 61 | .478
St. Louis | 43 | 79 | .352
Kansas City | 30 | 91 | .247
Washington | 28 | 92 | .233
1887.
|Won|Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
Detroit | 79 | 45 | .637
Philadelphia| 75 | 48 | .610
Chicago | 71 | 50 | .587
New York | 68 | 55 | .553
Boston | 61 | 60 | .504
Pittsburg | 55 | 69 | .444
Indianapolis| 46 | 76 | .377
Washington | 37 | 89 | .294
1888.
|Won |Lost|Per cent.
------------+----+----+--------
New York | 84 | 47 | .641
Chicago | 77 | 58 | .510
Philadelphia| 69 | 61 | .531
Boston | 70 | 64 | .522
Detroit | 68 | 63 | .519
Pittsburg | 66 | 68 | .493
Indianapolis| 50 | 85 | .370
Washington | 48 | 86 | .358
A summary of the above shows that the Chicago club won the championship
six times; the Boston club three times; the Providence club twice, and the
Detroit and New York clubs once each. The Chicago club has the best record
of a single season--90 victories and 34 defeats-and the highest percentage
of victories .798. The only clubs which played in every single season were
the Chicago and Boston clubs.
THE LEAGUE AVERAGES FOR 1888.
The following is the official batting record of players members of League
Clubs who have taken part in fifteen or more championship games.
SEASON OF 1888.
[**Proofreaders note: Table has been split into two parts in order to fit
on page.**]
| | | G | T | |
| | | a | i | R |
| | | m | m | u |
| | | e | e | n |
| | | s | s | s |
| | | | | |
| | | P | a | S |
| | | l | t | c |
R | | | a | | o |
a | | | y | B | r |
n | | | e | a | e |Ave.
k | | | d | t | d |per
. |NAME. |CLUB | . | . | . |Game.
--+------------+------------+---+---+---+-----
1| Anson |Chicago |134|515|101| 0.75
2| Beckley |Pittsburg | 71|283| 35| 0.49
3| Ryan |Chicago |130|549|115| 0.88
4| Kelly |Boston |105|440| 85| 0.81
5|{Ewing |New York |103|415| 83| 0.80
|{Brouthers |Detroit |129|522|118| 0.91
6| Quinn |Boston | 38|156| 19| 0.50
7| White |Detroit |125|527| 75| 0.60
8| Johnston |Boston |135|585|102| 0.75
9| Tiernan |New York |113|443| 75| 0.66
10| Connor |New York |134|481| 98| 0.63
11| Richardson |Detroit | 57|266| 60| 1.05
12|{Van Haltren|Chicago | 81|318| 46| 0.56
|{Nash |Boston |135|526| 71| 0.52
13| Duffy |Chicago | 71|298| 60| 0.84
14| Thompson |Detroit | 55|238| 51| 0.92
15| Hines |Indianapolis|132|513| 84| 0.63
16|{Rowe |Detroit |105|451| 62| 0.59
|{Miller |Pittsburg |103|404| 50| 0.48
17| Conway |Detroit | 44|167| 28| 0.63
18| Hoy |Washington |136|503| 77| 0.56
19|{Buckley |Indianapolis| 71|260| 27| 0.38
|{O'Rourke |New York |107|409| 50| 0.46
20| Brown |New York | 17| 59| 4| 0.23
21| Glasscock |Indianapolis|112|442| 63| 0.56
22|{Hanlon |Detroit |108|459| 64| 0.59
|{McGuire |Phil. & | 15| 64| 17| 0.46
| |Detr't. | | | |
23| Bennett |Detroit | 72|258| 32| 0.44
24|{Dunlap |Pittsburg | 81|317| 41| 0.50
|{Denny |Indianapolis|126|524| 92| 0.73
25| Nicholson |Detroit | 24| 85| 11| 0.46
26| Sutcliffe |Detroit | 49|191| 17| 0.34
27| Pettit |Chicago | 43|169| 24| 0.56
28| Ward |New York |122|510| 70| 0.57
29|{Williamson |Chicago |132|452| 75| 0.57
|{Beaton |Detroit | 16| 56| 8| 0.50
30| Pfeffer |Chicago |135|517| 90| 0.66
31| Ganzell |Detroit | 93|386| 45| 0.48
32|{Clements |Philadelphia| 85|323| 26| 0.30
|{Brown |Boston |107|426| 62| 0.58
|{Ray |Boston | 50|206| 26| 0.52
33| Farrar |Philadelphia|130|504| 53| 0.40
34|{Sanders |Philadelphia| 57|236| 27| 0.47
|{Getzein |Detroit | 45|167| 14| 0.31
|{Slattery |NewYork |103|391| 49| 0.47
35| Twitchell |Detroit |130|524| 71| 0.54
36| Carroll |Pittsburg | 90|362| 61| 0.63
37| Bassett |Indianapolis|128|481| 57| 0.44
38|{Hornung |Boston |107|431| 61| 0.57
|{Wise |Boston |104|417| 66| 0.63
39|{Burns |Chicago |134|483| 60| 0.44
|{Andrews |Philadelphia|123|524| 74| 0.60
|{Myers |Indianapolis| 66|248| 35| 0.53
40| Shoeneck |Indianapolis| 48|169| 15| 0.31
41|{Sullivan |Chicago | 75|314| 40| 0.53
|{Fogarty |Philadelphia|120|451| 71| 0.59
42| Kuhne |Pittsburg |137|520| 60| 0.44
43| Sunday |Pittsburg |119|501| 68| 0.57
44| Farrell |Chicago | 63|241| 34| 0.54
45|{Wood |Philadelphia|105|429| 67| 0.63
|{Coleman |Pittsburg |115|434| 48| 0.41
46|{Tate |Boston | 40|148| 18| 0.45
|{Healy |Indianapolis| 37|131| 14| 0.38
47| Delehanty |Philadelphia| 74|290| 40| 0.54
48| Richardson |New York |135|561| 82| 0.60
49|{Daily |Washington |110|453| 56| 0.50
|{O'Brien |Washington |133|528| 42| 0.31
50|{Wilmot |Washington |119|473| 61| 0.51
|{Dalrymple |Pittsburg | 56|223| 19| 0.33
51| Irwin |Washington | 37|126| 14| 0.38
52|{Irwin |Philadelphia|124|444| 51| 0.41
|{Seery |Indianapolis|133|500| 87| 0.65
|{Gore |New York | 64|254| 37| 0.57
53|{McGeachy |Indianapolis|118|452| 45| 0.38
|{Esterbrook |Indianapolis| 64|246| 21| 0.32
|{Whitney |NewYork | 90|328| 28| 0.31
54|{Sutton |Boston | 28|110| 16| 0.57
|{Daily |Indianapolis| 57|202| 14| 0.24
55|{Mulvey |Philadelphia| 99|394| 37| 0.37
|{Radbourne |Boston | 24| 79| 6| 0.25
56|{Cleveland |N.Y.& Pitts.| 40|145| 17| 0.42
|{Shomberg |Indianapolis| 29|112| 11| 0.38
57| Darling |Chicago | 20| 75| 13| 0.65
58| Maul |Pittsburg | 73|255| 21| 0.29
59|{Myers |Washington |132|502| 47| 0.35
|{Smith |Pittsburg |130|477| 61| 0.44
60| Hallman |Philadelphia| 16| 63| 5| 0.31
61| Gleason |Philadelphia| 23| 83| 4| 0.17
62| Campau |Detroit | 70|251| 28| 0.40
63|{Scheffler |Detroit | 27| 94| 17| 0.63
|{Burdock |Boston | 21| 79| 5| 0.24
64| Donnelly |Washington |122|428| 43| 0.35
65| Widner |Washington | 15| 60| 4| 0.26
66| Morrill |Boston |134|486| 60| 0.44
67| Arundel |Washington | 16| 51| 2| 0.12
68|{Clarkson |Boston | 54|205| 20| 0.37
|{Fields |Pittsburg | 44|169| 22| 0.50
69|{Schriver |Philadelphia| 39|134| 15| 0.38
|{McShannic |Pittsburg | 26| 98| 5| 0.19
70| Bastian |Philadelphia| 80|275| 31| 0.38
71| Daily |Chicago | 65|219| 34| 0.52
72| Welch |New York | 47|169| 16| 0.34
73| Mack |Washington | 85|300| 49| 0.57
74| Schock |Washington | 90|317| 46| 0.51
75|{Fuller |Washington | 49|170| 11| 0.22
|{Shreve |Indianapolis| 36|115| 10| 0.28
76|{Flint |Chicago | 22| 77| 6| 0.27
|{Hatfield |New York | 27|105| 7| 0.26
77| O'Rourke |Boston | 20| 74| 3| 0.15
78| Buffinton |Philadelphia| 44|156| 13| 0.29
79| Whitney |Washington | 42|141| 13| 0.31
80| Murphy |New York | 28|106| 11| 0.39
81| Klusman |Boston | 28|107| 9| 0.32
82|{Madden |Boston | 19| 67| 7| 0.36
|{Krock |Chicago | 39|134| 9| 0.23
83|{Deasley |Washington | 34|127| 6| 0.17
|{Wells |Detroit | 16| 57| 5| 0.31
84| Glenn |Boston | 19| 65| 8| 0.42
85| Casey |Philadelphia| 33|118| 11| 0.33
86| Baldwin |Chicago | 30|106| 11| 0.37
87|{Sowders |Boston | 35|122| 14| 0.40
|{Burdick |Indianapolis| 20| 68| 6| 0.30
|{Foster |New York | 37|136| 15| 0.40
88| Boyle |Indianapolis| 37|125| 13| 0.35
89| Galvin |Pittsburg | 50|175| 6| 0.12
90| Gruber |Detroit | 27| 92| 8| 0.29
91| O'Day |Washington | 47|166| 6| 0.12
92| Staley |Pittsburg | 24| 85| 6| 0.25
93| Keefe |New York | 51|181| 10| 0.19
94| Titcomb |New York | 23| 82| 6|0.26
95| Morris |Pittsburg | 54|186| 12|0.22
| | F | | | | |
| | I | | | | |
| | r | | | | |
| | s | | | | B |
| | t | | T | | a |
| | | P | o | | s |
| | B | e | t | | e |
| | a | r | a | | s |
| | s | c | l | | |
| | e | e | | | S |
| | | n | B | | t |
R | | H | t | a | | o |
a | | i | a | s | | l |
n | | t | g | e |Ave. | e |Ave.
k | | s | e | s |per | n |per
. |NAME. | . | . | . |Game.| . |Game.
--+------------+---+----+---+-----+---+-----
1| Anson |177|.343|252| 1.88| 28| 0.20
2| Beckley | 97|.342|121| 1.70| 20| 0.28
3| Ryan |182|.331|285| 2.19| 60| 0.46
4| Kelly |140|.318|205| 1.95| 56| 0.53
5|{Ewing |127|.306|195| 1.89| 53| 0.51
|{Brouthers |160|.306|270| 1.86| 34| 0.26
6| Quinn | 47|.301| 43| 1.92| 12| 0.31
7| White |157|.298|200| 1.60| 12| 0.09
8| Johnston |173|.295|276| 2.04| 35| 0.26
9| Tiernan |130|.293|182| 1.61| 52| 0.46
10| Connor |140|.291|224| 1.67| 27| 0.20
11| Richardson | 77|.289|117| 2.05| 13| 0.23
12|{Van Haltren| 90|.283|130| 1.60| 21| 0.26
|{Nash |149|.283|209| 1.54| 20| 0.15
13| Duffy | 84|.282|121| 1.70| 13| 0.18
14| Thompson | 67|.281|111| 2.02| 5| 0.09
15| Hines |144|.280|186| 1.40| 31| 0.23
16|{Rowe |125|.277|168| 1.60| 10| 0.09
|{Miller |112|.277|139| 1.35| 27| 0.26
17| Conway | 46|.275| 59| 1.34| 1| 0.02
18| Hoy |138|.274|171| 1.26| 82| 0.60
19|{Buckley | 71|.273| 95| 1.33| 4| 0.05
|{O'Rourke |112|.273|154| 1.44| 25| 0.23
20| Brown | 16|.271| 17| 1.00| 1| 0.06
21| Glasscock |119|.269|145| 1.29| 48| 0.43
22|{Hanlon |122|.265|157| 1.45| 38| 0.35
|{McGuire | 17|.265| 23| 1.35| 0| 0.00
23| Bennett | 68|.263|102| 1.41| 4| 0.05
24|{Dunlap | 83|.261|106| 1.30| 24| 0.29
|{Denny |137|.261|220| 1.74| 32| 0.25
25| Nicholson | 22|.259| 33| 1.37| 6| 0.25
26| Sutcliffe | 49|.257| 59| 1.20| 6| 0.12
27| Pettit | 43|.254| 62| 1.44| 7| 0.16
28| Ward |128|.251|154| 1.26| 38| 0.31
29|{Williamson |113|.250|175| 1.32| 25| 0.19
|{Beaton | 14|.250| 25| 1.56| 1| 0.06
30| Pfeffer |129|.249|193| 1.43| 64| 0.47
31| Ganzell | 96|.248|119| 1.28| 12| 0.13
32|{Clements | 80|.247|100| 1.17| 3| 0.03
|{Brown |104|.247|155| 1.45| 46| 0.43
|{Ray | 51|.247| 65| 1.30| 7| 0.14
33| Farrar |124|.246|155| 1.19| 21| 0.17
34|{Sanders | 58|.245| 74| 1.29| 13| 0.22
|{Getzein | 41|.245| 50| 1.11| 6| 0.13
|{Slattery | 96|.245|122| 1.18| 26| 0.25
35| Twitchell |128|.244|167| 1.28| 14| 0.10
36| Carroll | 88|.243|117| 1.22| 18| 0.19
37| Bassett |116|.241|147| 1.15| 24| 0.19
38|{Hornung |103|.239|134| 1.25| 29| 0.27
|{Wise |100|.239|155| 1.49| 33| 0.31
39|{Burns |115|.238|152| 1.13| 34| 0.25
|{Andrews |125|.238|157| 1.27| 35| 0.28
|{Myers | 59|.238| 72| 1.09| 28| 0.42
40| Shoeneck | 40|.237| 44| 0.91| 11| 0.23
41|{Sullivan | 74|.235|117| 1.56| 9| 0.12
|{Fogarty |106|.235|137| 1.14| 58| 0.48
42| Kuhne |122|.234|175| 1.28| 34| 0.25
43| Sunday |117|.233|140| 1.18| 71| 0.59
44| Farrell | 56|.232| 80| 1.27| 8| 0.12
45|{Wood | 99|.230|154| 1.46| 20| 0.19
|{Coleman |100|.230|118| 1.02| 15| 0.13
46|{Tate | 34|.229| 44| 1.10| 3| 0.07
|{Healy | 30|.229| 42| 1.10| 5| 0.13
47| Delehanty | 66|.227| 82| 1.10| 38| 0.51
48| Richardson |127|.226|176| 1.30| 35| 0.26
49|{Daily |102|.225|139| 1.26| 44| 0.40
|{O'Brien |119|.225|167| 1.25| 10| 0.08
50|{Wilmot |106|.224|146| 1.22| 46| 0.38
|{Dalrymple | 50|.224| 64| 1.14| 7| 0.12
51| Irwin | 28|.222| 36| 0.97| 15| 0.40
52|{Irwin | 98|.220|115| 0.92| 19| 0.15
|{Seery |110|.220|163| 1.23| 80| 0.60
|{Gore | 56|.220| 72| 1.12| 11| 0.17
53|{McGeachy | 99|.219|115| 0.97| 49| 0.41
|{Esterbrook | 54|.219| 61| 0.95| 11| 0.17
|{Whitney | 72|.219| 87| 0.96| 7| 0.07
54|{Sutton | 24|.218| 32| 1.14| 10| 0.35
|{Daily | 44|.218| 52| 0.91| 15| 0.26
55|{Mulvey | 85|.215|105| 1.06| 18| 0.12
|{Radbourne | 17|.215| 18| 0.75| 4| 0.16
56|{Cleveland | 31|.214| 51| 1.27| 4| 0.10
|{Shomberg | 24|.214| 33| 1.13| 6| 0.20
57| Darling | 16|.213| 27| 1.35| 0| 0.00
58| Maul | 54|.211| 71| 0.97| 9| 0.12
59|{Myers |104|.207|139| 1.05| 20| 0.15
|{Smith | 99|.207|131| 1.00| 37| 0.27
60| Hallman | 13|.206| 19| 1.19| 1| 0.06
61| Gleason | 17|.205| 20| 0.87| 3| 0.13
62| Campau | 51|.203| 65| 0.93| 27| 0.38
63|{Scheffler | 19|.202| 24| 0.89| 4| 0.15
|{Burdock | 16|.202| 16| 0.76| 1| 0.05
64| Donnelly | 86|.201|104| 0.85| 44| 0.36
65| Widner | 12|.200| 12| 0.80| 1| 0.06
66| Mo*rill | 96|.197|135| 1.00| 21| 0.15
67| Arundel | 10|.196| 12| 0.75| 1| 0.06
68|{Clarkson | 40|.195| 53| 0.98| 5| 0.09
|{Fields | 33|.195| 47| 1.07| 9| 0.20
69|{Schriver | 26|.194| 36| 0.92| 2| 0.05
|{McShannic | 19|.194| 20| 0.77| 3| 0.11
70| Bastian | 53|.192| 62| 0.77| 12| 0.15
71| Daily | 42|.191| 54| 0.83| 10| 0.15
72| Welch | 32|.189| 42| 0.89| 4| 0.08
73| Mack | 56|.186| 77| 0.90| 31| 0.36
74| Schock | 58|.183| 77| 0.85| 23| 0.25
75|{Fuller | 31|.182| 38| 0.77| 6| 0.12
|{Shreve | 21|.182| 24| 0.66| 5| 0.14
76|{Flint | 14|.181| 17| 0.77| 1| 0.04
|{Hatfield | 19|.181| 20| 0.74| 8| 0.29
77| O'Rourke | 13|.175| 13| 0.65| 2| 0.10
78| Buffinton | 27|.173| 32| 0.72| 1| 0.02
79| Whitney | 24|.170| 27| 0.64| 3| 0.07
80| Murphy | 18|.169| 20| 0.71| 3| 0.10
81| Klusman | 18|.168| 28| 1.00| 3| 0.11
82|{Madden | 11|.164| 11| 0.58| 4| 0.21
|{Krock | 22|.164| 25| 0.64| 1| 0.02
83|{Deasley | 20|.157| 23| 0.67| 2| 0.06
|{Wells | 9|.157| 10| 0.63| 0| 0.00
84| Glenn | 10|.154| 12| 0.63| 0| 0.00
85| Casey | 18|.152| 22| 0.66| 2| 0.06
86| Baldwin | 16|.151| 24| 0.80| 4| 0.13
87|{Sowders | 18|.147| 20| 0.57| 1| 0.03
|{Burdick | 10|.147| 11| 0.55| 0| 0.00
|{Foster | 20|.147| 27| 0.73| 13| 0.35
88| Boyle | 18|.144| 21| 0.57| 1| 0.03
89| Galvin | 25|.143| 31| 0.62| 4| 0.08
90| Gruber | 13|.141| 17| 0.63| 0| 0.00
91| O'Day | 23|.138| 25| 0.53| 3| 0.06
92| Staley | 11|.129| 12| 0.50| 2| 0.08
93| Keefe | 23|.127| 33| 0.64| 3| 0.06
94| Titcomb | 10|.122| 13| 0.56| 5| 0.21
95| Morris | 19|.102| 23| 0.42| 2| 0.04
FIELDING RECORD.
Of Players, Members of League Clubs, who have taken part in fifteen or
more Championship Games, Season of 1888.
FIRST BASEMEN.
| | | | | T | F | | P
| | | | N | i | i | | e
| | | | u | m | e | T | r
| | | G | m | e | l | o | c
| | | a | b | s | d | t | e
| | | m | e | | i | a | n
| | | e | r | A | n | l | t
| | | s | | s | g | | a A
| | | | P | s | | C | g c
| | | P | u | i | E | h | e c
| | | l | t | s | r | a | e
R | | | a | | t | r | n | p
a | | | y | O | i | o | c | t
n | | | e | u | n | r | e | e
k | | | d | t | g | s | s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | . | . | . | . | . | .
--+-----------+------------+---+----+---+---+----+-----
1| Anderson |Chicago |134|1314| 65| 20|1399| .985
2| Connor |New York |133|1337| 43| 26|1406| .981
3| Beckley |Pittsburg | 71| 744| 19| 16| 779| .979
| Farrar |Philadelphia|130|1345| 53| 30|1428| .979
| Morrill |Boston |134|1398| 72| 31|1501| .979
4| Esterbrook|Indianapolis| 61| 628| 20| 16| 654| .976
5| Coleman |Pittsburg | 25| 235| 4| 6| 245| .975
| O'Brien |Washington |132|1272| 38| 33|1343| .975
6| Shoeneck |Indianapolis| 48| 501| 16| 14| 531| .973
7| Brouthers |Detroit |129|1345| 48| 42|1435| .970
8| Maul |Pittsburg | 37| 392| 9| 13| 414| .968
9| Shomberg |Indianapolis| 15| 136| 0| 5| 141| .964
SECOND BASEMEN.
| | | | | T | F | | P
| | | | N | i | i | | e
| | | | u | m | e | T | r
| | | G | m | e | l | o | c
| | | a | b | s | d | t | e
| | | m | e | | i | a | n
| | | e | r | A | n | l | t
| | | s | | s | g | | a A
| | | | P | s | | C | g c
| | | P | u | i | E | h | e c
| | | l | t | s | r | a | e
R | | | a | | t | r | n | p
a | | | y | O | i | o | c | t
n | | | e | u | n | r | e | e
k | | | d | t | g | s | s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | . | . | . | . | . | .
--+-----------+------------+---+----+---+---+----+-----
1| Bastian |Philidelphia| 65| 145|258| 23| 427| .946
2| Richardson|New York |135| 321|423| 46| 790| .942
3| Danlap |Pittsburg | 81| 237|276| 33| 546| .939
4| Nicholson |Detroit | 24| 44| 71| 8| 123| .935
5| Pfeffer |Chicago |135| 421|457| 65| 943| .931
6| Richardson|Detroit | 57| 173|185| 29| 387| .925
7| Bassett |Indianapolis|128| 250|423| 57| 730| .921
8| Meyers |Washington |132| 271|399| 60| 730| .918
9| Kinsman |Boston | 28| 63| 75| 13| 151| .914
10| Quinn | " | 38| 97|115| 20| 232| .913
11| Smith |Pittsburg | 56| 131|184| 33| 348| .905
12| Nash |Boston | 31| 90|108| 21| 219| .904
13| Burdock | " | 21| 53| 68| 13| 134| .903
14| Ganzell |Detroit | 51| 110|168| 31| 309| .899
15| Delehanty |Philadelphia| 56| 129|170| 44| 343| .871
THIRD BASEMEN.
| | | | | T | F | | P
| | | | N | i | i | | e
| | | | u | m | e | T | r
| | | G | m | e | l | o | c
| | | a | b | s | d | t | e
| | | m | e | | i | a | n
| | | e | r | A | n | l | t
| | | s | | s | g | | a A
| | | | P | s | | C | g c
| | | P | u | i | E | h | e c
| | | l | t | s | r | a | e
R | | | a | | t | r | n | p
a | | | y | O | i | o | c | t
n | | | e | u | n | r | e | e
k | | | d | t | g | s | s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | . | . | . | . | . | .
--+-----------+------------+---+----+---+---+----+-----
1| Nash |Boston |104| 139|250| 37| 426| .913
2| Kuhne |Pittsburg | 74| 95|166| 26| 287| .909
3| McShannie | " | 26| 39| 49| 9| 97| .907
4| Burns |Chicago |134| 194|273| 49| 516| .905
5| Denny |Indianapolis| 96| 158|214| 44| 416| .894
6| Mulvey |Philadelphia| 99| 87|174| 32| 293| .890
7| Whitney |New York | 90| 90|184| 35| 309| .886
8| Donnelly |Washington |117| 126|230| 51| 407| .874
9| Sutton |Boston | 27| 82| 47| 13| 92| .858
10| White |Detroit |125| 146|244| 65| 455| .857
11| Ewing |New York | 21| 32| 29| 15| 76| .802
12| Buckley |Indianapolis| 21| 17| 28| 12| 57| .789
13| Cleveland |NY & Pitts'g| 40| 27| 57| 23| 107| .785
SHORT STOPS.
| | | | | T | F | | P
| | | | N | i | i | | e
| | | | u | m | e | T | r
| | | G | m | e | l | o | c
| | | a | b | s | d | t | e
| | | m | e | | i | a | n
| | | e | r | A | n | l | t
| | | s | | s | g | | a A
| | | | P | s | | C | g c
| | | P | u | i | E | h | e c
| | | l | t | s | r | a | e
R | | | a | | t | r | n | p
a | | | y | O | i | o | c | t
n | | | e | u | n | r | e | e
k | | | d | t | g | s | s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | . | . | . | . | . | .
--+-----------+------------+---+----+---+---+----+-----
1| Denny |Indianapolis| 23| 65| 88| 14| 167| .916
2| Kuhne |Pittsburgh | 63| 112|159| 25| 296| .915
3| Smith |Pittsburgh | 74| 90|246| 37| 373| .900
3|{Glasscock |Indianapolis|109| 201|334| 59| 594| .900
|{Irwin |Philadelphia|121| 204|374| 64| 642| .900
|{Shock |Washington | 52| 84|168| 28| 280| .900
|{Sutcliffe |Detroit | 24| 39| 88| 14| 141| .900
4| Williamson|Chicago |132| 120|375| 62| 557| .888
5| Wise |Boston | 89| 179|271| 57| 507| .887
6| Ray |Boston | 47| 58|130| 26| 214| .878
7| Rowe |Detroit |103| 133|312| 72| 517| .860
8| Irwin |Washington | 27| 54| 87| 23| 164| .859
9| Ward |New York |122| 185|331| 86| 602| .857
10| Fuller |Washington | 47| 67|140| 38| 245| .854
FIELDERS
| | | | | T | F | | P
| | | | N | i | i | | e
| | | | u | m | e | T | r
| | | G | m | e | l | o | c
| | | a | b | s | d | t | e
| | | m | e | | i | a | n
| | | e | r | A | n | l | t
| | | s | | s | g | | a A
| | | | P | s | | C | g c
| | | P | u | i | E | h | e c
| | | l | t | s | r | a | e
R | | | a | | t | r | n | p
a | | | y | O | i | o | c | t
n | | | e | u | n | r | e | e
k | | | d | t | g | s | s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | . | . | . | . | . | .
--+------------+------------+---+----+---+---+----+-----
1|{O'Rourke |New York | 87| 136| 13| 6| 149| .959
|{Tiernan |New York |113| 174| 16| 8| 198| .959
2| Glenn |Boston | 19| 42| 2| 2| 46| .956
3| Sanders |Philadelphia| 25| 38| 5| 2| 46| .955
4| Hornung |Boston |107| 151| 10| 9| 170| .947
5| Maul |Pittsburgh | 34| 59| 8| 4| 71| .943
6| Seery |Indianapolis|133| 258| 19| 18| 295| .939
7| Sunday |Pittsburgh |119| 292| 27| 21| 340| .938
8|{Campau |Detroit | 70| 101| 10| 8| 119| .932
|{McGeachy |Indianapolis|117| 194| 27| 16| 237| .932
9| Petit |Chicago | 43| 46| 8| 4| 58| .931
10| Fogarty |Philadelphia|116| 239| 26| 20| 285| .929
11|{Sullivan |Chicago | 75| 114| 13| 10| 137| .927
|{Coleman |Pittsburgh | 90| 160| 20| 14| 194| .927
12|{Slattery |New York |103| 187| 16| 18| 221| .918
|{Hanlon |Detroit |108| 230| 7| 21| 258| .918
13| Miller |Pittsburgh | 32| 58| 7| 6| 71| .915
14| Daily |Washington |100| 179| 19| 19| 217| .912
15| Hines |Indianapolis|124| 255| 13| 26| 294| .911
15| Delehanty |Philadelphia| 17| 28| 3| 3| 34| .911
16| Duffy |Chicago | 67| 103| 19| 12| 134| .910
17| Dalrymple |Pittsburgh | 57| 80| 9| 9| 98| .908
18| Wood |Philadelphia|103| 175| 15| 20| 210| .904
19| Andrews |Philadelphia|123| 210| 23| 25| 258| .903
20| Johnston |Boston |135| 286| 30| 36| 352| .897
20| Hoy |Washington |136| 296| 26| 37| 359| .897
21| Brown |Boston |107| 172| 18| 22| 212| .896
22| Shock |Washington | 35| 59| 7| 8| 74| .892
23| Fields |Pittsburgh | 29| 49| 6| 7| 62| .887
24| Twitchell |Detroit |129| 195| 13| 27| 235| .885
25| Farrell |Chicago | 31| 50| 3| 7| 60| .883
26| Thompson | Detroit | 55| 86| 4| 12| 102| .882
27| Ryan |Chicago |125| 217| 84| 35| 286| .877
28| Van Haltren|Chicago | 54| 73| 9| 12| 94| .872
28| Wilmot |Washington |119| 260| 19| 41| 320| .872
29| Foster |New York | 37| 64| 5| 12| 81| .851
30| Scheffler |Detroit | 27| 49| 1| 9| 59| .847
31| Gore |New York | 64| 88| 4| 18| 110| .836
32| Carroll |Pittsburg | 38| 45| 2| 10| 57| .824
33| Kelly |Boston | 31| 28| 4| 12| 44| .727
CATCHERS' AVERAGES.
| | | | | T | F| | | P
| | | | N | i | i| | | e
| | | | u | m | e| | T | r
| | | G| m | e | l| P| o | c
| | | a| b | s | d| a| t | e
| | | m| e | | i| s| a | n
| | | e| r | A | n| s| l | t
| | | s| | s | g| e| | a A
| | | | P | s | | d| C | g c
| | | P| u | i | E| | h | e c
| | | l| t | s | r| B| a | e
R | | | a| | t | r| A| n | p
a | | | y| O | i | o| L| c | t
n | | | e| u | n | r| L| e | e
k | | | d| t | g | s| S| s | d
. |NAME. |CLUB. | .| . | . | .| .| . | .
--+----------+------------+--+---+---+--+--+---+-----
1| Bennett |Detroit |72|424| 94|18|14|550| .941
2| Ganzell |Detroit |25|156| 41| 9|15|221| .891
3| Daily |Chicago |69|400|107|33|36|576| .880
4| Clements |Philadelphia|84|494|104|47|39|684| .874
5| Ewing |New York |78|480|143|35|65|723| .861
6| Wells |Detroit |16| 96| 25|11| 9|141| .858
7| Myers |Indianapolis|46|211| 63|21|27|322| .851
8| Flint |Chicago |22| 96| 42|11|14|163| .846
9| Mack |Washington |79|361|152|47|48|608| .843
10|{Deasley |Washington |31|177| 60|20|25|282| .840
|{Murphy |New York |28|186| 56|23|23|288| .840
11| Darling |Chicago |20|139| 26|12|21|198| .833
12| Buckley |Indianapolis|48|213| 60|31|28|332| .822
13| Miller |Pittsburg |68|268| 76|35|48|427| .805
14| O'Rourke |Boston |20| 89| 37|17|14|157| .803
15| Tate |Boston |40|188| 64|43|19|314| .802
16| Kelly |Boston |74|367|146|77|54|644| .796
17| Carroll |Pittsburg |53|265| 58|37|46|406| .795
18| Daily |Indianapolis|42|215| 69|34|41|359| .791
19| Brown |New York |17|134| 24|19|26|203| .778
20| Farrell |Chicago |31|171| 50|32|34|287| .770
21| Schriver |Philadelphia|27|148| 39|28|29|244| .760
22| Arundel |Washington |16| 63| 16|15|21|115| .687
PITCHERS' RECORD IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
[**Proofreaders note: To fit the page I broke this chart into 2 tables*]
| | |T |R | |R | |F M|
| | |I |u | |u | |i a|
| | |m |n | |n | |r d|
| | |e |s | |s | |s e|
| | |s | | | | |t |
| | G| o |S b| |E b| | b|
| | a|a f |C y| |a y| |B y|
| | m|t |o | |r | |a | P
| | e| O |r O| |n O| |s O| e
| | s|B p |e p| |e p| |e p| r
| | |a p |d p| |d p| | p| c
| | P|t o | o| | o| |H o| e
| | l| n | n| | n| |i n| n
| | a| e | e| | e| |t e| t
| | y| n | n| | n| |s n| a
| | e| t | t|Ave. | t|Ave. | t| g
| | d| s | s|per | s|per | s| e
NAME. |CLUB. | .| . | |Game.| .|Game.| .| .
-----------+-------------+--+-----+----+-----+----+-----+----+----
Buffinton |Philadelphia |44|1492 | 134|3.04 | 72| 1.63| 321|.215
Baldwin |Chicago |28| 960 | 125|4.46 | 65| 2.32| 233|.242
Burdick |Indianapolis |20| 700 | 88|4.40 | 52| 2.60| 167|.238
Boyle | " " |37|1294 | 181|4.89 | 90| 2.43| 317|.245
Conway |Detroit |44|1508 | 168|3.82 | 84| 1.81| 315|.208
Clarkson |Boston |53|1885 | 239|4.51 | 120| 2.26| 436|.231
Casey |Philadelphia |32|1141 | 153|4.78 | 86| 2.69| 296|.259
Getzein |Detroit |45|1626 | 224|4.98 | 137| 3.04| 402|.247
Gleason |Philadelphia |23| 791 | 106|4.61 | 57| 2.48| 200|.252
Galvin |Pittsburg |50|1760 | 193|3.86 | 123| 2.46| 437|.248
Gruber |Detroit |27| 934 | 124|4.59 | 57| 2.11| 199|.213
Healy |Indianapolis |37|1326 | 204|5.51 | 128| 3.46| 357|.269
Krock |Chicago |39|1294 | 143|3.66 | 74| 1.89| 293|.226
Keefe |New York |50|1643 | 149|2.99 | 75| 1.50| 329|.200
Madden |Boston |19| 648 | 84|4.42 | 53| 2.79| 154|.237
Morris |Pittsburg |54|1911 | 213|3 94 | 114| 2.11| 459|.240
O'Day |Washington |46|1545 | 215|4.67 | 108| 2.34| 374|.242
Radbourne |Boston |24| 791 | 110|4.58 | 67| 2.79| 192|.242
Shreve |Indianapolis |35|1235 | 210|6.00 | 134| 3.82| 356|.2*8
Sowders |Boston |35|1219 | 155|4.43 | 69| 1.97| 283|.232
Staley |Pittsburg |24| 774 | 103|4.29 | 58| 2.41| 186|.240
Sanders |Philadelphia |31|1097 | 113|3.64 | 57| 1.84| 247|.225
Titcomb |New York |23| 756 | 97|4.21 | 41| 1.78| 159|.210
Van Haltren|Chicago |27| 967 | 160|5.92 | 81| 3 00| 264|.273
Welch |New York |47|1592 | 156|3.32 | 80| 1.70| 330|.207
Whitney |Washington |39|1309 | 181|4.64 | 94| 2.41| 317|.242
| | | T | F| |B | |P
| | N| i | i| |a | |e
| | u| m | e| |s o | T |r
| | m| e | l| W|e p c| o |c
| | b| s | d| i|s p a| t |e
| | e| | i| l| o l| a |n
| | r| A | n| d|g n l| l |t
| | | s | g| |i e e| |a A
| | P| s | | P|v n d| C |g c
| | u| i | E| i|e t | h |e c
| | t| s | r| t|n s b| a | e
| | | t | r| c| a| n | p
| | O| i | o| h| o l| c | t
| | u| n | r| e| n l| e | e
| | t| g | s| s| s| s | d
NAME |CLUB | .| . | .| .| .| . | .
-----------+------------+--+---+--+--+-------+---+-----
Buffinton |Philadelphia|31|322|10|12| 62 |437| .808
Baldwin |Chicago |11|208| 5|18| 99 |341| .642
Burdick |Indianapolis|14| 87| 5|14| 44 |164| .616
Boyle | " " |14|180| 7|20| 59 |280| .692
Conway |Detroit |10|267| 7|12| 57 |353| .784
Clarkson |Boston |24|351|22|37| 119 |553| .678
Casey |Philadelphia|15|176| 9|15| 48 |263| .726
Getzein |Detroit |29|276|16|24| 52 |397| .768
Gleason |Philadelphia| 6|128|13|14| 53 |214| .626
Galvin |Pittsburg |23|224|10|11| 58 |326| .758
Gruber |Detroit | 4|121| 8|14| 42 |189| .661
Healy |Indianapolis| 5|206|15|22| 81 |329| .641
Krock |Chicago | 4|217|12|18| 45 |296| .746
Keefe |New York |29|410|17|24| 86 |566| .775
Madden |Boston | 4| 95| 4| 8| 28 |139| .712
Morris |Pittsburg |20|240| 8|17| 70 |355| .732
O'Day |Washington |19|252| 7|23| 123 |424| .639
Radbourne |Boston |14|104| 6| 9| 44 |177| .666
Shreve |Indianapolis| 7|173|16|31| 94 |321| .560
Sowders |Boston |23|192| 8|16| 71 |310| .693
Staley |Pittsburg | 8|127| 5| 8| 52 |200| .675
Sanders |Philadelphia|17|194| 7|10| 34 |262| .805
Titcomb |New York | 1|157| 8| 9| 48 |223| .708
Van Haltren|Chicago |25|181| 5|24| 53 |288| .715
Welch |New York |16|248|17|20| 113 |414| .637
Whitney |Washington |24|145|11|10| 60 |250| .676
BATTING AND FIELDING RECORD
Of Clubs, Members of the National League of Professional B. B. Clubs.
* * * * *
SEASON OF 1888.
[**Proofreaders note: Table split into three parts to fit on page]
R | | | ||BATTING
a | | | ||Times| |Ave.| |Ave.
n | |Games |Games||at |Runs |per |Runs |per
k |CLUB |Played|Won ||Bat |Scored|Game|Earned|Game
--+------------+------+-----++-----+------+----+------+-----
1|New York | 137 | 84 || 4751| 659 |4.81| 334 | 2.44
2|Chicago | 135 | 77 || 4616| 734 |5.43| 441 | 3.26
| | | [1]|| | | | |
3|Philadelphia| 130 | 69 || 4496| 535 |4.11| 272 | 2.09
4|Boston | 137 | 70 || 4835| 669 |4.88| 355 | 2.59
5|Detroit | 134 | 68 || 4859| 721 |5.38| 423 | 3.15
6|Indianapolis| 137 | 66 || 4678| 531 |3.87| 308 | 2.27
| | | [2]|| | | | |
7|Pittsburg | 136 | 50 || 4626| 600 |4.41| 269 | 1.97
8|Washington | 136 | 48 || 4548| 482 |3.54| 225 | 1.65
[Footnote 1: 1 game forfeited to Philadelphia]
[Footnote 2: 1 game forfeited to New York]
|BATTING
|First| | |Ave. | |Ave.
|Base |Per- |Total| per |Bases |per
CLUB |Hits |centage|Bases| Game |Stolen|Game
------------+-----+-------+-----+------+------+------
New York |1150 | .242 |1581 |11.54 | 314 | 2.29
Chicago |1202 | .260 |1753 |12.98 | 292 | 2.16
Philadelphia|1017 | .226 |1298 | 9.98 | 246 | 1.89
Boston |1180 | .244 |1673 |12.21 | 292 | 2.13
Detroit |1268 | .261 |1724 |12.86 | 192 | 1.43
Indianapolis|1061 | .226 |1359 | 9.92 | 287 | 2.09
Pittsburg |1112 | .240 |1443 |10.61 | 351 | 2.58
Washington | 944 | .207 |1233 | 9.06 | 336 | 2.47
|FIELDING
| | T | F | | | |P
| | i | i | | | |e
| | m | e | | | |r
| | e A | l | | | |c A
| | s s | d | | | |e c
| | s | i | | | |n c
| | i | n E| | | |t e
| | s | g r|Passed |Bases | |a p
| | t | r|Balls |given | |g t
|Number| i | o|and |Opponents| |e e
| Put | n | r|Wild |on Called|Total | d
CLUB | Out | g | s|Pitches|Balls |Chances|
------------+------+------+-----+-------+---------+-------+-----
New York | 3633 | 2349 | 432 | 205 | 302 | 6921 |.864
Chicago | 3549 | 2305 | 409 | 200 | 289 | 6752 |.867
Philadelphia| 3469 | 2189 | 429 | 144 | 200 | 6431 |.879
Boston | 3652 | 2288 | 520 | 162 | 270 | 6892 |.861
Detroit | 3579 | 2172 | 474 | 128 | 181 | 6534 |.880
Indianapolis| 3581 | 2048 | 408 | 159 | 225 | 6421 |.876
Pittsburg | 3545 | 2097 | 453 | 189 | 296 | 6580 |.857
Washington | 3497 | 2062 | 522 | 173 | 313 | 6567 |.846
TIE GAMES.--New York 7, Chicago 1, Philadelphia 1, Boston 3, Detroit 3,
Pittsbnrg 4, Indianapolis 1, Washington 2.
THE VETERANS OF THE LEAGUE.
Those of the players who have taken part in League contests for not less
than ten years are entitled to the honor of belonging to the ranks of the
veterans of the League, and they include the following representative
players, the majority of whom are now in League Clubs:
|Number |Number | | |
|of |of | |First |
|Seasons|Games |Times | Base | Perc-
Name. |played.|played.|at bat.| hits.| entage
-----------------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------
Adrian C. Anson | 13 | 1173 | 4904 | 1751 | .357
James O'Rourke | 13 | 1133 | 4832 | 1519 | .314
James L. White | 13 | 1101 | 4610 | 1439 | .312
Paul Hines | 13 | 1184 | 5112 | 1591 | .311
E. B. Sutton | 13 | 1007 | 4196 | 1216 | .289
John F. Morrill | 13 | 1194 | 4685 | 1253 | .267
John J. Burdock | 13 | 871 | 3584 | 911 | .254
M. J. Kelly | 11 | 1080 | 4370 | 1421 | .325
A. Dalrymple | 11 | 909 | 4041 | 1198 | .296
Joseph Start | 11 | 776 | 3366 | 995 | .295
E. N. Williamson | 11 | 1071 | 4163 | 1133 | .274
Geo. F. Gore | 10 | 886 | 3689 | 1157 | .313
Hardy Richardson | 10 | 910 | 3974 | 1230 | .309
John W. Glasscock| 10 | 952 | 3847 | 1089 | .283
Chas. W. Bennett | 10 | 709 | 2720 | 761 | .279
Joseph Hornung | 10 | 858 | 3706 | 988 | .266
F. S. Flint | 10 | 708 | 2759 | 669 | .242
Jas. McCormick | 10 | 499 | 1957 | 464 | .237
D. W. Force | 10 | 746 | 2873 | 598 | .208
Of these Sutton, Dalrymple, Burdock, and Force are in the service of
minor League Clubs, while the retired players include Start and McCormick.
Those who have played for less than ten years and not less than seven
include the following second class of veterans, the first class being
limited to players who have a credit of a decade of service:
|Number |Number | | |
|of |of | |First |
|Seasons|Games |Times | Base | Perc-
Name. |played.|played.|at bat.| hits.| entage
-----------------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------
Dennis Brouthers | 9 | 845 | 3578 | 1267 | .354
Rodger Connor | 9 | 943 | 3870 | 1309 | .338
J. C. Howe | 9 | 827 | 3548 | 1067 | .300
Geo. A. Wood | 9 | 854 | 3677 | 1024 | .278
M. C. Dorgan | 9 | 660 | 2719 | 756 | .277
Thomas Burns | 9 | 900 | 3597 | 990 | .275
Edwin Hanlon | 9 | 893 | 3629 | 972 | .267
Jno. M. Ward | 9 | 1046 | 4403 | 1169 | .265
A. A. Irwin | 9 | 796 | 3136 | 796 | .254
Jno. Farrell | 9 | 729 | 3048 | 776 | .254
M. Welch | 9 | 491 | 1817 | 433 | .238
B. Gilligan | 9 | 510 | 1848 | 380 | .209
Jos. F. Galvin | 9 | 524 | 2000 | 418 | .208
Wm. Ewing | 8 | 640 | 2708 | 812 | .299
Fred Dunlap | 8 | 707 | 2972 | 867 | .292
P. Gillespie | 8 | 703 | 2907 | 817 | .278
Thomas York | 8 | 566 | 2291 | 617 | .269
Robert Ferguson | 8 | 538 | 2209 | 596 | .269
Jas. E. Whitney | 8 | 525 | 2085 | 555 | .266
Jeremiah Denny | 8 | 824 | 3308 | 881 | .266
Chas. Radbourn | 8 | 530 | 2092 | 517 | .247
George Shaffer | 7 | 521 | 2137 | 602 | .281
Sam W. Wise | 7 | 698 | 2826 | 785 | .277
Jno. E. Clapp | 7 | 398 | 1688 | 465 | .275
W. A. Purcell | 7 | 500 | 2136 | 559 | .261
J P. Cassidy | 7 | 416 | 1718 | 433 | .252
J. J. Gerhardt | 7 | 565 | 2182 | 489 | .224
Geo. E. Weidman | 7 | 338 | 1273 | 22* | .1*4
| | | | [A] | [A]
[**Proofreaders note A: * Indecipherable number**]
Of the above Gillespie, Dorgan, Clapp, York, Ferguson and Cassidy have
retired from field service.
One of the most interesting records of the games played in the
professional arena during the past eighteen years of the existence, first
of the old National Association from 1871 to 1875 inclusive, and then of
the National League from 1876 to 1888 inclusive, is that of the contests
each year between the rival Boston and Chicago clubs, the former winning
the pennant in 1872, '73, '74, '75, '77 and '78, and also in 1883; while
Chicago won it in 1876 and in 1880, '81, '82, '85 and '86. As a matter for
interesting reference, we give below the full record of victories and
defeats scored by the two clubs from 1871 to 1888 inclusive. The Chicago
Club did not play in 1872 and 1873, having been burned out in the great
fire of '71.
|1871 |1872 |1873 |1874 |1875 |1876 |1877 |1878 |1879
-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--
Boston |22|10|39| 8|43|16|52|18|71| 8|39|31|31|17|41|19|49|20
Chicago|20| 9| -| -| -| -|27|31|30|37|52|14|18|30|30|30|44|32
|1880|1881|1882|1883|1884|1885|1886|1887|1888
-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.
-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--
Boston |40|44|38|45|45|39|63|35|73|38|46|66|56|61|61|60|70|64
Chicago|67|17|56|28|55|29|59|39|62|50|87|25|90|31|71|50|77|58
THE LEAGUE'S PRESIDENT.
The close of the League campaign of 1888 saw the President of the League,
Mr. N. E. Young, enter upon a new era in the history of his official
duties, first as Secretary, then as President-Secretary, two positions he
has so faithfully and efficiently filled since the organization of the
League. Mr. Young was prominent in organizing the first professional
National Association; and but for him Mr. Chadwick would not have been
able to have carried out his project of dividing the baseball fraternity
into the two officially recognized classes which he did when he started
the first professional Association in 1871. From that year to 1875
inclusive, Mr. Young acted as Secretary of the old National Association,
and when it was superseded by the National League in 1876 he was elected
Secretary of the new organization, Mr. Bulkely, the present Governor of
Connecticut, being the League's first President. Mr. Young was also
Secretary under the Presidency of Mr. A. G. Mills, and when that gentleman
resigned, the worthy Secretary was elected to the joint offices of
President, Secretary and Treasurer of the League, and this position he has
most capably filled ever since.
A Washington journalist has this well-merited compliment to say of the
veteran:
"The rugged honesty of the League president is a matter with which those
interested in base ball have long been familiar. His residence is in
Washington, and he was for years a player and umpire, having all the ups
and downs usual to their lot, but he is now in very comfortable
circumstances. The duties of his office require a cool-headed man, able to
do justice to all without fear or favor. It is singularly trying at times,
but though the intense rivalry of the different clubs sometimes causes the
managers to lose their heads and charge unfairness against the umpires,
not a word has ever been said that would in any way compromise Nick Young.
It is an honor and credit to the baseball magnates that they have such a
man at the head of the League."
THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE AND THEIR WORK.
[Illustration: N.E. Young.]
The work accomplished by the Joint Rules Committee of the National League
and the American Association at their meeting in New York in November,
1888, ranks with the best on record in the revision of the playing rules
of the game, and the successful results achieved in improving the code was
largely due to the marked efficiency evinced by the chairman of the
Committee, Mr. Chas. H. Byrne, the president of the Brooklyn club, who was
indefatigable in doing the large amount of revisory work which was thrown
upon the committee. In the face of a very noisy and sensational demand for
radical changes in the rules governing the game, the committee, as a
whole, manifested a wise conservatism in several respects, which cannot
help but be of material assistance in advancing the welfare of the game at
large. In the first place, by reducing the powers of the attack nearer to
an equality with those of the defence--which result was accomplished when
they reduced the number of called balls from five to four--they not only
adopted a rule which will moderate the dangerous speed in delivering the
ball to the bat, but they thereby afforded the batsman an additional
chance for more effective work at the bat. This latter point, too, has
been aided by reducing the number of outs the batsman has hitherto been
unfairly subjected to. The rule which puts batsmen out on catches of foul
balls, which, since the game originated, has been an unfair rule of play,
has seen its best day; and this year the entering wedge to its ultimate
disappearance has been driven in, with the practical result of the repeal
of the foul tip catch. This improvement, too, is in the line of aiding the
batting side, as it gets rid of one of the numerous ways of putting the
batsman out.
The argument brought to bear in favor of the elimination of outs from
foul balls from the code was in the main as follows:
When the batsman hits a fair ball, while at the same time that he gives
the fielders a chance to put him out, he himself is also given an equal
chance of making a base or of scoring a run; but when he hits a foul ball,
while he affords the fielders an opportunity to catch him out, no such
compensating advantage is given him in the way of earning a base or a run
as in the case of a fair hit ball; and it is in this that the working of
the foul ball rule becomes so palpably unjust. It is sufficient punishment
for hitting a foul ball that he, as batsman, be deprived of making a base,
without adding the unjust penalty of an out. This one sided condition of
things, too, is increased when a double play is made on the catch of a
foul ball, for not only is the batsman unfairly punished, but also the
base runner who may have made the base by a clean hit.
It is this latter unfair rule which the committee repealed in getting rid
of the foul fly tip; and now a batsman who has earned his base by a safe
hit and who runs to the next base on a foul fly tip ball caught by the
catcher, can no longer be put out on the double play, as he is now allowed
to return to the base he left on the hit, as in the case of a foul ball
not caught.
Another step in advance was made by the committee when they officially
recognized a sacrifice hit as a factor in team work at the bat. Hitherto
far too great stress has been laid upon the alleged skill of the batsman
in making extra hits--two and three baggers and home runs--at the cost of
giving due credit to the batting which forwards base runners and sends in
runs. The work of the slugging batsman who, nearly every time he goes to
the bat when no one is on the bases, makes an extra hit, does not compare
with that of the team worker who either by a single base hit or a
sacrifice hit forwards a runner round the bases, or sends a run in. Here
is where the batting averages prove to be complete failures so far as
affording a criterion of a batsman's value in team work is concerned;
which work, by the way, is neither more nor less than that of forwarding
base runners or sending runs in by batting--for one batsman may make four
extra base hits in a game without forwarding a runner or sending in a run
in a single instance, while another batsman may make but one safe hit and
three sacrifice hits, and yet either forward as many runners or send in as
many runs.
Probably the best piece of work done by the committee was the amendment
they made to the rules governing the umpire, wherein, in defining the
powers of an umpire to impose a fine of not less than $5 nor more than $25
for abusive, threatening or improper language to the umpire, an amendment
was made as follows:
"A repetition of the offence shall subject such player to a removal from
the game, and the immediate substitution of another player then in
uniform."
Lastly, the rule admitting of an extra substitute being allowed to play
in the game, at the option of the captain of either of the contesting
teams, though an experiment, gives promise of being a desirable amendment.
The classifying of the code of rules so as to facilitate the finding of
any special rule during the hurry of a contest in progress, was also a
desirable improvement. Take it altogether, the present committee did
excellent work at their Fall meeting of 1888.
OVERRUNNING THE BASES.
Twenty odd years ago George Wright suggested to the Chairman of the old
National Association's Committee of Rules that it would be a good plan to
allow base runners to overrun first base, giving them the privilege to
return and touch the base again without being put out, before attempting
to make another base. The suggestion was adopted, and the rule went into
effect in 1870, and it has been in operation ever since. When the
amendment was presented at the convention of 1869, a delegate wanted the
rule applied to all bases, but the majority preferred to test the
experiment as proposed at first base. The rule of extending the
over-running to all the bases was advocated at the last meeting in
1888 of the Joint Committee of Rules, but it was not adopted. The rule
is worthy of consideration, in view of the constant sprains and
injuries of one kind and another arising from sliding to bases. There has
not been a single instance of an injury occurring from the working of the
rule of overrunning first base since the rule was adopted, while serious
injuries are of daily occurrence in match games, arising from collisions at
other bases than first, and these are due entirely to the absence of the
overrunning rule. The most irritating disputes caused by questions involved
in sliding to bases and in running up against base players, are also due to
the same cause. Why not put a stop to these injuries and these disputes by
giving the base runner the same privileges in overrunning second, third and
home bases that he now has in overrunning first base? In every way will the
adoption of the rule suggested be an improvement, and not the least of its
advantages will be its gain to base running, which is, next to fielding,
the most attractive feature of our game.
THE PATRONS OF BALL GROUNDS.
There are two classes of the patrons of professional baseball grounds
which club Presidents and Directors have their choice in catering to for
each season, and these are, first, the reputable class, who prefer to see
the game played scientifically and by gentlemanly exemplars of the
beauties of the game; and second, the hoodlum element, who revel in noisy
coaching, "dirty ball playing," kicking against the umpires, and exciting
disputes and rows in every inning. The Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston
Clubs in the League have laid out nearly $200,000 within the past two
years in constructing their grounds for the express purpose of eliciting
the very best patronage of their respective cities. The Brooklyn Club have
excelled in this respect in the American Association by constructing their
grounds for a similar class of patrons. But all of the clubs have not
followed this example, the majority committing the blunder of considering
only the tastes and requirements of the hoodlum class apparently in
catering for patronage. This is a great financial mistake. Experience has
shown conclusively that it pays best to cater solely for the best class of
patronage. The work in doing this is so much more satisfactory for one
thing, and it is sure to be the most remunerative. If there is any sport
which yields a fair equivalent in the special attractions it presents for
an admission fee of half a dollar, it is such ball playing as was
exhibited during the past season on the grounds of the leading clubs of
the National League. A feature of the attendance at the League games of
1888 was the presence of the fair sex in such goodly numbers. Where the
ladies congregate as spectators of sports a refining influence is brought
to bear which is valuable to the welfare of the game. Besides which, the
patronage of ladies improves the character of the assemblages and helps to
preserve the order without which first-class patronage cannot be obtained.
THE VALUE OF TEAM WORK.
Nothing has been more gratifying to the admirers of the game in the
practical experience of improved points of play realized during the season
of 1888, than the growing appreciation, by the most intelligent patrons of
the game, of the value of team work at the bat, and its great superiority
as an element of success in winning pennants, to the old school plan of
record batting as shown in the efforts to excel solely in home run hitting
and the slugging style of batting.
So intent have been the general class of batsmen on making big batting
averages that the science of batting and the advantages to be derived from
"playing for the side of the bat" have been entirely lost sight of until
within the past year. Now, however, the best judges of play in the game
have begun to "tumble to" the benefits and to the attractions of team work
at the bat, as illustrated by skillful sacrifice hits, batting to help
base-runners around and to bring runs in, and not that of going to the bat
with the sole idea of trying to "hit the ball out of the lot," or "knock
the stuffing out of it," in the effort to get in the coveted home run.
with its costly expenditure of physical strength in the 120 yards spurt in
running which it involves.
There is one thing the season's experience has shown, and that is that
field captains of intelligence and judgment, like Anson, Comiskey, Ward,
Irwin, et al. have come to realize the fact that team batting is a very
important element in bringing about pennant winning, and by team batting
is meant the rule which makes everything secondary in the work of the
batsman to the important point to forward men around the bases and to
bring runs in. The batsman who excels in the essentials of the art of
batting is the true leader, though he may not make a three-bagger or a
home run more than half a dozen times in a season's batting. And a part of
team work at the bat is sacrifice hitting--sacrifice hits being hits
which, while they result in the striker's retirement, nevertheless either
forward runners to the bases or bring runs in. After a batsman has become
a base-runner, whether by a hit, a fielding error, or a battery error, if
he be forwarded to second by a safe bunt or a neat tap of the ball, both
being base hits; or by a sacrifice hit, the batsman is equally entitled to
credit if he forward a runner by such hit.
In regard to the slugging tactics which the batsman goes in for extra
hits at all costs, it may partly be regarded as a very stupid piece of
play at the bat to endeavor to make a home run when there is no one on the
bases to benefit by it, and for the reason that it subjects the batsman to
a violent sprinting of 120 yards, and professional sprint-runners who
enter for runs of that distance, even when in training for the effort,
require a half-hour's good rest before making another such effort. And yet
there are batsmen who strive to make hits which necessitate a 120 yards
run two or three times in a single game. Do field captains who go in for
this sluggish style of batting ever think of the wear and tear of a
player's physical strength in this slugging business?
EVILS IN THE PROFESSIONAL ARENA.
The two great obstacles in the way of the success of the majority of
professional ball players are wine and women. The saloon and the brothel
are the evils of the baseball world at the present day; and we see it
practically exemplified in the failure of noted players to play up to the
standard they are capable of were they to avoid these gross evils. One day
it is a noted pitcher who fails to serve his club at a critical period of
the campaign. Anon, it is the disgraceful escapade of an equally noted
umpire. And so it goes from one season to another, at the cost of the loss
of thousands of dollars to clubs who blindly shut their eyes to the costly
nature of intemperance and dissipation in their ranks. We tell you,
gentlemen of the League and Association, the sooner you introduce the
prohibition plank in your contracts the sooner you will get rid of the
costly evil of drunkenness and dissipation among your players. Club after
club have lost championship honors time and again by this evil, and yet
they blindly condone these offences season after season. The prohibition
rule from April to October is the only practical rule for removing
drunkenness in your teams.
PRIVATE SIGNALS IN COACHING.
The coaching of base runners by private signals is an improvement in the
game which is bound to come into vogue eventually. The noisy method of
coaching which disgraced most of the American Association club teams in
1888 is doomed to die out. In the case of the coaching of deaf mutes, like
Hoy and others, private signals had to be employed, and it can readily be
seen how effective these can be made to be when properly systematized.
There is not a single point in noisy verbal coaching which aids
base-runners. In fact, in five cases out of six, it is a detriment to
the runner. The fact is, the whole object of rowdy coaching is to annoy
and confuse the battery players and not to help base-running. The way to
rattle both the catcher and pitcher with the best effect, and to do it
legitimately, is by private coaching. In this way a pitcher is more likely
to get bothered in his endeavors to interpret the private signals than by
the noisiest of verbal coaching.
[Illustration: Brooklyn Grounds.]
THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION.
THE CHAMPIONSHIP CAMPAIGN OF 1888.
The championship campaign of the American Association in 1888 proved to
be exceptionally interesting in one respect, and that was in the close
contest for the lead between the St. Louis, Brooklyn, Athletic and
Cincinnati Clubs. Another feature was the fact that the best managed and
most ably captained team of the eight clubs deservedly bore off the
championship honors of the season; and that, too, against the strong team
of picked star players which the Brooklyn Club gathered together at such
cost to oppose the champions. The season was also made specially
noteworthy by the fact that the St. Louis Club came in victors in the race
for the fourth consecutive season, a record no other club except the
Boston has ever been able to equal, and in the case of the Boston Club it
was done before the organization of the National League. The pennant race
was commenced on April 18, on which date the Louisville team began play at
St. Louis, and the Cincinnatis at Kansas City in the West; while the
Cleveland team opened at Brooklyn, and the Baltimore at Philadelphia in
the East, the victors being the St. Louis, Cincinnati, Brooklyn, and
Baltimore teams. By the end of April the Cincinnati and Athletic teams led
in the West and East, with St. Louis and Brooklyn occupying fourth and
fifth positions respectively, in the race. Before the end of May, while
Cincinnati stood in the van, St. Louis had pulled up to second place, and
Brooklyn had secured third position, the Athletics being fourth. In June
Cincinnati fell off and St. Louis went to the front, with Brooklyn a close
second, and the Athletics third. In July, Cincinnati rallied well and
pushed the Athletics down to fourth place, while St. Louis and Brooklyn
still occupied the leading positions. It was during the week ending July
15 that Brooklyn held first place with a percentage of .676 to
St. Louis .639; before the month ended, however, St. Louis pulled up
to .662, while Brooklyn stood at .641.
August proved to be a fatal month for Brooklyn, they only winning 8 games
out of 22 won and lost this month, the result of their tumble being their
retirement to fourth place, Cincinnati rallying well this month, while St.
Louis began to look sure for the pennant, the Athletics ending the month a
good third in the race. In September the Athletics pressed the Cincinnatis
hard, and drove them out of second place, and before the month ended it
was made evident that the closing part of the campaign would see a hot
fight for the second position in the race between the Athletic and
Brooklyn teams, September seeing the St. Louis team a fixture for first
place, while Cincinnati was kept back in fourth position. By the close of
September, St. Louis held first with a percentage of .691; the Athletics
were second, with .615; Brooklyn third with .606, and Cincinnati fourth
with .574. October saw a close struggle between the Athletic and Brooklyn
teams for second place, and had the former team been kept temperate they
would have finished second; but they "boozed" too much in October, and
this gave Brooklyn the chance to take the position from them, and when the
campaign ended on the 17th of October the record left the eight clubs
occupying the following relative positions:
| Won. | Lost. | Per Ct.
----------+------+-------+-------
St. Louis | 92 | 43 | .681
Brooklyn | 88 | 52 | .629
Athletic | 81 | 52 | .609
Cincinnati| 80 | 54 | .597
Baltimore | 57 | 80 | .416
Cleveland | 50 | 82 | .378
Louisville| 48 | 87 | .355
Kans. City| 43 | 89 | .326
In the above record the Athletic Club is credited with one victory and
Baltimore with one defeat less than they were given credit for in the
records published at the close of the season. The game was taken out of
the record by the following order of President Wikoff:
NEW YORK, October 16.
W.S. KAMES, Esq, Secretary Athletic Base Ball Club, Philadelphia:
_Dear Sir:_--I find on examination that the Baltimore Athletic game of
June 10, 1888, played at Gloucester, N.J., and won by your club, and
which
has been counted in the regular championship series as a postponed game
of
April 21, was irregular, for the reason that the said postponed game of
April 21 was played off by your club in Philadelphia as per authority of
my official circular No. 36, on May 16, 1888. Therefore, the game won by
the Athletic Club on June 10 cannot be counted in the regular
championship
series. Yours truly,
WHEELER C. WIKOFF, Secy.
It will be seen that the St. Louis Club won the championship, and for the
fourth consecutive time, thus breaking the record. The Brooklyns, by a
liberal expenditure of money toward the close of the season, succeeded in
strengthening sufficiently to head off the Athletics for second place, and
the latter had to be content with third position. The Cincinnatis did good
work toward the close, despite the sale of several valuable players, and
almost succeeded in closing the gap between fourth and third places; as it
was, they ended a close fourth. Baltimore secured fifth place by a goodly
margin over the sixth club, Cleveland. Louisville finished seventh, the
lowest position the club ever occupied. Kansas City, though the
tail-ender, nevertheless made an excellent first-season record. Neither
the St. Louis nor Brooklyn Clubs lost a series. They split even with ten
victories each in their games, and Brooklyn stood alone in winning the
series from every other club. The Brooklyn Club alone played its full
schedule of 140 games.
The following is a full and complete summary of the work done by the
eight clubs in the championship arena during 1888:
| | | | | | | | K
| | | | C | | | L | a
| S | | | I | B | C | o | n
| t | B | A | n | a | l | u | s
| . | r | t | c | l | e | i | a
| | o | h | i | t | v | s | s
| L | o | l | n | i | e | v |
| o | k | e | n | m | l | i | C
| u | l | t | a | o | a | l | i
| i | y | i | t | r | n | l | t
| s | n | c | i | e | d | e | y
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | .
-----------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----
Victories | 92| 88| 81| 80| 57| 50| 48| 43
Defeats | 43| 52| 52| 54| 80| 82| 87| 89
Drawn Games | 2| 3| 3| 3| 0| 3| 4| 0
Total Played | 137| 143| 136| 137| 137| 135| 139| 132
Per Cent. of Victories |.681|.629|.609|.597|.416|.378|.355|.326
Series Won | 4| 6| 4| 3| 2| 0| 1| 0
Series Lost | 0| 0| 1| 1| 4| 3| 5| 6
Series Tied | 1| 1| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0
Series Unfinished | 2| 0| 1| 2| 1| 4| 1| 1
"Chicago" Victories | 12| 9| 13| 9| 3| 5| 6| 4
"Chicago" Defeats | 4| 9| 5| 7| 8| 12| 6| 10
Home Victories | 60| 52| 51| 56| 30| 32| 26| 25
Home Defeats | 21| 20| 20| 24| 26| 27| 29| 33
Victories Abroad | 29| 36| 30| 24| 27| 18| 22| 18
Defeats Abroad | 22| 32| 32| 50| 31| 23| 58| 56
Extra Innings Victories| 3| 7| 5| 8| 3| 1| 2| 1
Extra Innings Defeats | 6| 3| 7| 4| 3| 1| 5| 2
Extra Innings Drawn | 2| 2| 2| 2| 0| 1| 1| 0
Single Figure Victories| 73| 74| 57| 56| 48| 37| 37| 32
Single Figure Defeats | 38| 46| 46| 44| 59| 58| 62| 65
Double Figure Victories| 19| 14| 24| 24| 9| 13| 11| 11
Double Figure Defeats | 5| 6| 6| 10| 21| 24| 25| 24
Batting Average |.250|.243|.263|.240|.231|.235|.248|.221
Fielding Average |.930|.924|.934|.940|.928|.941|.913|.921
Highest Score in a Game| 18| 18| 28| 18| 12| 23| 18| 26
Worst Defeat | 5-0| 7-0| 8-0|12-0|14-0|15-0| 9-0|14-0
Won by One Run | 15| 20| 11| 19| 16| 14| 11| 16
Lost by One Run | 18| 15| 15| 14| 10| 19| 10| 15
Total Runs Scored | 790| 757| 828| 734| 653| 641|.678| 578
Total Stolen Bases | 526| 413| 568| 464| 374| 399| 368| 266
THE CHAMPION CLUB TEAM OF 1888.
There were fourteen players of the St. Louis team who took part in forty
games and over, the first nine being as follows:
King, pitcher, 65 games; Boyle, catcher, 71 games; Comiskey, first
baseman, 137 games; Robinson, second baseman, 134 games; Latham, third
baseman, 133 games; White, shortstop, 109 games; O'Neill, left field, 130
games; Lyons, center field, 123 games; and McCarthy, right field, 131
games. The other battery players were Hudson, pitcher, 55 games; Milligan,
catcher, 63 games; Chamberlain, pitcher, 40 games; Herr, shortstop, 43
games, and McGarr, second base, 35 games. The other players are not named
in the official averages. The first nine who played in one hundred games
and over, and who led in batting averages, were O'Neill, McCarthy,
Comiskey, Latham, Robinson, White, and Lyons; Hudson, Milligan, Boyle,
King and Chamberlain, all of whom played in less than one hundred games,
following in order.
In fielding averages, Comiskey, Milligan, O'Neill, Boyle, McCarthy,
Lyons, Robinson and Latham.
The feature of the work of the team in winning the pennant was the
ability shown by Captain Comiskey in his position; the fine infield work,
too, of Latham and Robinson, and the outfielding of O'Neill and McCarthy
greatly aiding the batteries of the team. The full summary of the team's
work is given below:
| | | | | | | K ||
| | | C | | | L | a ||
| | | i | B | C | o | n ||
| B | A | n | a | l | u | s ||
| r | t | c | l | e | i | a ||
| o | h | i | t | v | s | s || T
| l | l | n | i | e | v | || o
| k | e | n | m | l | i | C || t
| l | t | a | o | a | l | I || a
| y | i | t | r | n | l | t || l
| n | c | i | e | d | e | y || s
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . || .
-----------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----++---
Victories | 10| 10| 10| 14| 16| 16| 16|| 92
Defeats | 10| 7| 8| 6| 4| 4| 4|| 43
Drawn Games | 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 2
Series Won | 0| 0| 0| 1| 1| 1| 1|| 4
Series Tied | 1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 1
Series Unfinished | 0| 1| 1| 0| 0| 0| 0|| 2
"Chicago" Victories | 3| 2| 0| 2| 4| 1| 0|| 12
"Chicago" Defeats | 1| 1| 1| 0| 1| 0| 0|| 4
Single Figure Victories| 9| 10| 8| 11| 13| 10| 14|| 75
Single Figure Defeats | 9| 5| 7| 6| 4| 3| 4|| 38
Double Figure Victories| 1| 0| 2| 3| 4| 6| 2|| 18
Double Figure Defeats | 1| 2| 1| 0| 0| 1| 0|| 5
Extra Innings Games | 2| 2| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0|| 5
Victories at Home | 6| 6| 6| 8| 9| 11| 14|| 60
Defeats at Home | 4| 3| 4| 3| 1| 2| 3|| 21
Victories Abroad | 4| 4| 4| 6| 7| 5| 2|| 32
Defeats Abroad | 6| 4| 4| 2| 3| 2| 1|| 22
Won by One Run | 2| 3| 2| 0| 3| 4| 1|| 15
Lost by One Run | 5| 1| 4| 4| 1| 1| 2|| 18
Highest Score in a Game|13-4| 8-1|17-5|16-9|14-4|18-1|14-5|
Worst Defeat |2-11| 0-5|1-10| 2-6| 2-8|4-10| 7-9|
The pitching record of the champion team for 1888 is appended:
[**Proofreaders note: Table split into two parts to fit on page]
| | | | | | | K
| | | C | | | L | a
| | | i | B | C | o | n
| B | A | n | a | l | u | s
| r | t | c | l | e | i | a
| o | h | i | t | v | s | s
| l | l | n | i | e | v |
| k | e | n | m | l | i | C
| l | t | a | o | a | l | i
| y | i | t | r | n | l | t
| n | c | i | e | d | e | y
| . | . | . | . | . | . | .
------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---
|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.
------------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--
King | 8| 4| 6| 3| 5| 4| 6| 5| 1| 6| 3| 6| 1| 1
Hudson | 1| 3| 3| 2| 2| 0| 5| 1| 7| 2| 6| 0| 2| 2
Chamberlain | 1| 1| 1| 1| 3| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 2| 0
Devlin | 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 2| 0| 0| 1| 0| 1| 0| 4| 1
Knauff | 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| 2| 2| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0| 2| 0
Freeman | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0
------------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--
Totals |10|10|10| 7|10| 8|14| 6|16| 4|16| 4|16| 4
| |Per
| |Cent
| |of
|Totals. |Victories.
------------+--------------+---------
| W. | L. | P. |
------------+----+----+----+---------
King | 44 | 21 | 65 | .671
Hudson | 26 | 10 | 36 | .722
Chamberlain | 11 | 2 | 13 | .853
Devlin | 6 | 5 | 11 | .545
Knauff | 5 | 4 | 9 | .555
Freeman | 0 | 1 | 1 | .000
------------+----+----+----+---------
Totals | 92 | 43 |135 |
The appended record of the six years' work in the American Association
championship arena, showing the winning clubs and their managers, as also
their victories, defeats and percentage of victories, will be found
interesting:
|WINNING | | | | |
YEAR.|CLUB. |MANAGER.|Victories.|Defeats.|Games.|Percentage.
-----+------------+--------+----------+--------+------+-----------
1882 |Cincinnati |Thorner | 55 | 25 | 80 | .680
1883 |Athletic |Simmons | 66 | 32 | 98 | .670
1884 |Metropolitan|Mutrie | 75 | 32 | 107 | .700
1885 |St. Louis |Comiskey| 79 | 33 | 112 | .705
1886 |St. Louis |Comiskey| 93 | 46 | 139 | .669
1887 |St. Louis |Comiskey| 95 | 40 | 135 | .704
1888 |St. Louis |Comiskey| 92 | 43 | 135 | .681
THE MONTHLY RECORD.
The record of the victories and defeats scored each month of the
championship campaign is appended, by which it will be seen that the
record of the Brooklyn team for October surpassed that of any other club's
monthly record of the season. Cincinnatis led in April, Brooklyn in May,
the Athletics in June, Cincinnatis in July, St. Louis in August, while in
September St. Louis and Brooklyn tied, Brooklyn leading in October. St.
Louis's best month's work was done in August, Brooklyn's in October, the
Athletics' in June, the Cincinnatis' in July, the Baltimores' in
September, the Clevelands' in September, the Louisvilles' in July, and the
Kansas Citys' in August. Kansas City was the only club which failed in at
least one month to score more victories than defeats, their best record
for any month being a tie in victories and defeats. Here is the table in
full:
|April.|May. |June.|July.|Aug. |Sept. |Oct. ||Totals.
-----------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-------+-----++-------
|W.| L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.|W.|L.| W.|L. |W.|L.|| W.|L.
-----------+--+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+--+--++---+---
St. Louis | 5| 3 |14| 5|16| 7|15|12|18| 3| 18| 8| 6| 5|| 92| 43
Brooklyn | 7| 5 |18| 4|14| 9|12|11| 8|14| 18| 8|11| 1|| 88| 52
Athletic | 7| 4 | 7|11|18| 4|12|11|16| 6| 14| 12| 7| 4|| 81| 52
Cincinnati | 8| 3 |15| 6| 9|13|16| 7|12| 9| 11| 14| 9| 2|| 80| 54
Baltimore | 6| 4 | 7|11|12|12| 9|17| 7|17| 13| 12| 3| 8|| 57| 80
Cleveland | 2| 9 | 9|11| 6|15|12|13| 6|12| 12| 12| 3|10|| 50| 82
Louisville | 4| 7 | 5|16| 7|15|13|10| 8|14| 7| 18| 4| 7|| 47| 87
Kansas City| 2| 6 | 5|16| 7|14| 9|17|11|11| 8| 15| 2| 8|| 43| 89
-----------+--+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+---+---+--+--++---+---
Totals |41|41 |80|80|89|89|98|98|86|86|100|100|45|45||539|539
The Athletics' victory over Baltimore on June 10, is not counted in the
above table.
The official record of the American Association for the season of 1888 as
sent us by President Wikoff, will be found in full below:
BATTING RECORD.
(In the following, no in or outfielders' record is given unless twenty
games have been played in the position, and no pitcher or catcher's record
is given unless fifteen games have been played.)
[**Proofreaders note: Table split into two parts to fit on page]
| | |No. of
Rank| Name. | Club. |Games.
----+-----------+------------------------+------
1| O'Neill |St. Louis | 130
2| Stovey |Athletic | 130
3| Lyons |Athletic | 111
4| Reilly |Cincinnati | 126
5| Collins |Louisville and Brooklyn | 126
6| Browning |Louisville | 99
7| Orr |Brooklyn | 95
8| Burns |Baltimore and Brooklyn | 129
9| Wolf |Louisville | 127
10| McKean |Cleveland | 130
11|{Tucker |Baltimore | 136
|{Welch |Athletic | 136
12| Corkhill |Cincinnati and Brooklyn | 137
13|{Foutz |Brooklyn | 140
|{Larkin |Athletic | 135
14| Bierbauer |Athletic | 134
15| Sullivan |Athletic | 28
16| McCarthy |St. Louis | 131
17|{Trott |Baltimore | 31
|{O'Brien |Brooklyn | 136
18| Weaver |Louisville | 26
19| Comiskey |St. Louis | 137
20| Carpenter |Cincinnati | 135
21|{Robinson |Athletic | 67
|{Mattimore |Athletic | 41
22|{Davis |Kansas City | 122
|{Herr |St. Louis | 43
|{Stratton |Louisville | 65
23| Smith |Athletic and | 35
| |Baltimore |
24|{Latham |St. Louis | 133
|{Fantz |Cleveland | 120
25| Hudson |St. Louis | 55
26| Griffin |Baltimore | 137
27| Pinkney |Brooklyn | 143
28| Hecker |Louisville | 55
29|{Kappell |Cincinnati | 35
|{Terry |Brooklyn | 30
30| Milligan |St. Louis | 63
31|{McTamany |Kansas City | 110
|{Mullane |Cincinnati | 51
32|{Hamilton |Kansas City | 35
|{Zimmer |Cleveland | 63
|{Goodfellow|Cleveland | 69
|{Hotaling |Cleveland | 97
33| Smith |Louisville | 56
34|{Boyle |St. Louis | 71
|{Clark |Brooklyn | 45
35| Cline |Kansas City | 73
36| Donohue |Kansas City | 87
37| Kerins |Louisville | 81
38|{Nicol |Cincinnati | 134
|{Hogan |Cleveland | 77
39| Phillips |Kansas City | 129
40| Gilks |Cleveland | 118
41|{Robinson |St. Louis | 134
|{Stricker |Cleveland | 126
42|{McPhee |Cincinnati | 110
|{Carruthers|Brooklyn | 94
43| Keenan |Cincinnati | 84
44|{Tebean |Cincinnati | 121
|{Mack |Louisville | 110
45|{Goldsby |Baltimore | 44
|{Poorman |Athletic | 85
46| Esterbrook|Louisville | 23
47|{O'Brien |Baltimore | 57
|{Radford |Brooklyn | 91
48|{Gleason |Athletic | 123
|{Purcell |Baltimore | 119
| |and Athletic |
49| White |Louisville | 109
| |and St Louis. |
50|{Barkley |Kansas City | 116
|{Smith |Cincinnati | 40
|{_Bushong__|Brooklyn | 69
|{Baldwin |Cincinnati | 66
51|{Weybing |Athletic | 49
|{Fagan |Kansas City | 18
52| Gunning |Athletic | 23
53|{Shindle |Baltimore | 135
|{Snyder |Cleveland | 63
54|{McClellan |Brooklyn and | 97
| |Cleveland |
|{Sommer |Baltimore | 79
|{Allen |Kansas City | 37
55| _Smith_ |Brooklyn | 103
56| Cross |Louisville | 47
57| King |St. Louis | 65
58| Werrick |Louisville | 109
| |No. of|No. of|
| |Base |Stolen|Av. B.H.
Rank| Name. |Hit. |Bases.|to A.B.
----+-----------+------+------+-------
1| O'Neill | 176 | 24 | .332
2| Stovey | 171 | 156 | .318
3| Lyons | 145 | 45 | .325
4| Reilly | 167 | 80 | .324
5| Collins | 164 | 91 | .318
6| Browning | 120 | 39 | .313
7| Orr | 119 | 16 | .303
8| Burns | 158 | 48 | .298
9| Wolf | 159 | 40 | .298
10| McKean | 161 | 66 | .297
11|{Tucker | 152 | 49 | .291
|{Welch | 160 | 121 | .291
12| Corkhill | 159 | 41 | .285
13|{Foutz | 159 | 40 | .283
|{Larkin | 154 | 19 | .283
14| Bierbauer | 148 | 56 | .279
15| Sullivan | 31 | 8 | .277
16| McCarthy | 141 | 109 | .276
17|{Trott | 30 | 3 | .275
|{O'Brien | 147 | 68 | .275
18| Weaver | 31 | 12 | .274
19| Comiskey | 156 | 77 | .271
20| Carpenter | 147 | 56 | .269
21|{Robinson | 67 | 15 | .268
|{Mattimore | 38 | 14 | .268
22|{Davis | 131 | 45 | .266
|{Herr | 46 | 9 | .266
|{Stratton | 64 | 15 | .266
23| Smith | 31 | 3 | .265
24|{Latham | 150 | 124 | .264
|{Fantz | 124 | 68 | .264
25| Hudson | 51 | 6 | .262
26| Griffin | 141 | 53 | .261
27| Pinkney | 150 | 56 | .260
28| Hecker | 53 | 23 | .255
29|{Kappell | 35 | 22 | .254
|{Terry | 29 | 13 | .254
30| Milligan | 55 | 8 | .252
31|{McTamany | 130 | 56 | .251
|{Mullane | 44 | 13 | .251
32|{Hamilton | 32 | 23 | .250
|{Zimmer | 53 | 18 | .250
|{Goodfellow| 68 | 7 | .250
|{Hotaling | 103 | 33 | .250
33| Smith | 48 | 48 | .246
34|{Boyle | 63 | 15 | .245
|{Clark | 37 | 12 | .245
35| Cline | 71 | 30 | .243
36| Donohue | 80 | 12 | .241
37| Kerins | 74 | 20 | .239
38|{Nicol | 128 | 104 | .236
|{Hogan | 63 | 35 | .236
39| Phillips | 120 | 11 | .235
40| Gilks | 110 | 19 | .232
41|{Robinson | 106 | 62 | .231
|{Stricker | 113 | 68 | .231
42|{McPhee | 104 | 53 | .230
|{Carruthers| 77 | 33 | .230
43| Keenan | 72 | 8 | .225
44|{Tebean | 95 | 33 | .228
|{Mack | 100 | 23 | .228
45|{Goldsby | 37 | 19 | .227
|{Poorman | 87 | 43 | .227
46| Esterbrook| 21 | 6 | .226
47|{O'Brien | 44 | 15 | .224
|{Radford | 70 | 36 | .224
48|{Gleason | 112 | 37 | .224
|{Purcell | 105 | 25 | .224
49| White | 104 | 30 | .221
50|{Barkley | 106 | 16 | .220
|{Smith | 29 | 3 | .220
|{_Bushong__| 55 | 11 | .220
|{Baldwin | 58 | 2 | .220
51|{Weybing | 40 | 8 | .219
|{Fagan | 14 | 0 | .219
52| Gunning | 20 | 15 | .217
53|{Shindle | 111 | 59 | .216
|{Snyder | 50 | 10 | .216
54|{McClellan | 75 | 29 | .215
|{Sommer | 64 | 15 | .215
|{Allen | 29 | 5 | .215
55| _Smith_ | 86 | 31 | .214
56| Cross | 39 | 9 | .213
57| King | 42 | 5 | .212
58| Werrick | 86 | 21 | .210
A mistake is made in the above record in placing the names of batsmen
whose averages are alike, in the wrong order. Thus, Pratt who played in
but 31 games is placed ahead of O'Brien, who played in 136, both making
the same batting averages.
The official record of the American Association for the season of 1888 as
sent us by President Wikoff, will be found in full below:
BATTING RECORD.
(In the following, no in or outfielders' record is given unless twenty
games have been played in the position, and no pitcher or catcher's record
is given unless fifteen games have been played.)
R | | | | | |Av.
a | | | |No. of|No. of|B.H.
n | | |No. of|Base |Stolen|to
k | Name. | Club. |Games.|Hit. |Bases.|A.B.
--+---------------+-----------+------+------+------+-----
1| O'Neill |St. Louis | 130 | 176 | 24 | .332
2| Stovey |Athletic | 130 | 171 | 156 | .318
3| Lyons |Athletic | 111 | 145 | 45 | .325
4| Reilly |Cincinnati | 126 | 167 | 80 | .324
5| Collins |Louisville | 126 | 164 | 91 | .318
| |and | | | |
| |Brooklyn | | | |
6| Browning |Louisville | 99 | 120 | 39 | .313
7| Orr |Brooklyn | 95 | 119 | 16 | .303
8| Burns |Baltimore | 129 | 158 | 48 | .298
| |and | | | |
| |Brooklyn | | | |
9| Wolf |Louisville | 127 | 159 | 40 | .298
10| McKean |Cleveland | 130 | 161 | 66 | .297
11|{Tucker |Baltimore | 136 | 152 | 49 | .291
|{Welch |Athletic | 136 | 160 | 121 | .291
12| Corkhill |Cincinnati | 137 | 159 | 41 | .285
| |and | | | |
| |Brooklyn | | | |
13|{Foutz |Brooklyn | 140 | 159 | 40 | .283
|{Larkin |Athletic | 135 | 154 | 19 | .283
14| Bierbauer |Athletic | 134 | 148 | 56 | .279
15| Sullivan |Athletic | 28 | 31 | 8 | .277
16| McCarthy |St. Louis | 131 | 141 | 109 | .276
17|{Trott |Baltimore | 31 | 30 | 3 | .275
|{O'Brien |Brooklyn | 136 | 147 | 68 | .275
18| Weaver |Louisville | 26 | 31 | 12 | .274
19| Comiskey |St. Louis | 137 | 156 | 77 | .271
20| Carpenter |Cincinnati | 135 | 147 | 56 | .269
21|{Robinson |Athletic | 67 | 67 | 15 | .268
|{Mattimore |Athletic | 41 | 38 | 14 | .268
22|{Davis |Kansas City| 122 | 131 | 45 | .266
|{Herr |St. Louis | 43 | 46 | 9 | .266
|{Stratton |Louisville | 65 | 64 | 15 | .266
23| Smith |Athletic | 35 | 31 | 3 | .265
| |and | | | |
| |Baltimore | | | |
24|{Latham |St. Louis | 133 | 150 | 124 | .264
|{Fantz |Cleveland | 120 | 124 | 68 | .264
25| Hudson |St. Louis | 55 | 51 | 6 | .262
26| Griffin |Baltimore | 137 | 141 | 53 | .261
27| Pinkney |Brooklyn | 143 | 150 | 56 | .260
28| Hecker |Louisville | 55 | 53 | 23 | .255
29|{Kappell |Cincinnati | 35 | 35 | 22 | .254
|{Terry |Brooklyn | 30 | 29 | 13 | .254
30| Milligan |St. Louis | 63 | 55 | 8 | .252
31|{McTamany |Kansas City| 110 | 130 | 56 | .251
|{Mullane |Cincinnati | 51 | 44 | 13 | .251
32|{Hamilton |Kansas City| 35 | 32 | 23 | .250
|{Zimmer |Cleveland | 63 | 53 | 18 | .250
|{Goodfellow |Cleveland | 69 | 68 | 7 | .250
|{Hotaling |Cleveland | 97 | 103 | 33 | .250
33| Smith |Louisville | 56 | 48 | 48 | .246
34|{Boyle |St. Louis | 71 | 63 | 15 | .245
|{Clark |Brooklyn | 45 | 37 | 12 | .245
35| Cline |Kansas City| 73 | 71 | 30 | .243
36| Donohue |Kansas City| 87 | 80 | 12 | .241
37| Kerins |Louisville | 81 | 74 | 20 | .239
38|{Nicol |Cincinnati | 134 | 128 | 104 | .236
|{Hogan |Cleveland | 77 | 63 | 35 | .236
39| Phillips |Kansas City| 129 | 120 | 11 | .235
40| Gilks |Cleveland | 118 | 110 | 19 | .232
41|{Robinson |St. Louis | 134 | 106 | 62 | .231
|{Stricker |Cleveland | 126 | 113 | 68 | .231
42|{McPhee |Cincinnati | 110 | 104 | 53 | .230
|{Carruthers |Brooklyn | 94 | 77 | 33 | .230
43| Keenan |Cincinnati | 84 | 72 | 8 | .225
44|{Tebean |Cincinnati | 121 | 95 | 33 | .228
|{Mack |Louisville | 110 | 100 | 23 | .228
45|{Goldsby |Baltimore | 44 | 37 | 19 | .227
|{Poorman |Athletic | 85 | 87 | 43 | .227
46| Esterbrook |Louisville | 23 | 21 | 6 | .226
47|{O'Brien |Baltimore | 57 | 44 | 15 | .224
|{Radford |Brooklyn | 91 | 70 | 36 | .224
48|{Gleason |Athletic | 123 | 112 | 37 | .224
|{Purcell |Baltimore | 119 | 105 | 25 | .224
| |and | | | |
| |Athletic | | | |
49| White |Louisville | 109 | 104 | 30 | .221
| |and St. | | | |
| |Louis | | | |
50|{Barkley |Kansas City| 116 | 106 | 16 | .220
|{Smith |Cincinnati | 40 | 29 | 3 | .220
|{_Bushong_ |Brooklyn | 69 | 55 | 11 | .220
|{Baldwin |Cincinnati | 66 | 58 | 2 | .220
51|{Weybing |Athletic | 49 | 40 | 8 | .219
|{Fagan |Kansas City| 18 | 14 | 0 | .219
52| Gunning |Athletic | 23 | 20 | 15 | .217
53|{Shindle |Baltimore | 135 | 111 | 59 | .216
|{Snyder |Cleveland | 63 | 50 | 10 | .216
54|{McClellan |Brooklyn | 97 | 75 | 29 | .215
| |and | | | |
| |Cleveland | | | |
|{Sommer |Baltimore | 79 | 64 | 15 | .215
|{Allen |Kansas City| 37 | 29 | 5 | .215
55| _Smith_ |Brooklyn | 103 | 86 | 31 | .214
56| Cross |Louisville | 47 | 39 | 9 | .213
57| King |St. Louis | 65 | 42 | 5 | .212
58| Werrick |Louisville | 109 | 86 | 21 | .210
59| Raymond |Louisville | 32 | 26 | 6 | .208
60| McGuire |Cleveland | 25 | 18 | 1 | .207
61| Ewing |Louisville | 21 | 16 | 6 | .205
62| Daniels |Kansas City| 61 | 46 | 19 | .205
63| Vaughn |Louisville | 49 | 37 | 5 | .203
64| Greenwood |Baltimore | 113 | 82 | 54 | .202
64| Andrews |Louisville | 27 | 20 | 5 | .202
65| O'Connor |Cincinnati | 36 | 28 | 13 | .201
66| Cook |Louisville | 53 | 35 | 15 | .200
67| _Peoples_ |Brooklyn | 33 | 21 | 9 | .198
68| Farrell |Baltimore | 103 | 79 | 32 | .197
69| Fennelly |Cincinnati | 127 | 96 | 49 | .196
| |and | | | |
| |Athletic | | | |
70| Esterday |Kansas City| 114 | 78 | 18 | .195
70| Rowe |Kansas City| 32 | 24 | 1 | .195
71| Albert |Cleveland | 101 | 69 | 32 | .192
72| Lyons |St. Louis | 123 | 95 | 42 | .190
73| Cunningham |Baltimore | 51 | 33 | 2 | .198
74| McGarr |St. Louis | 35 | 25 | 25 | .187
75| O'Brien |Cleveland | 31 | 20 | 2 | .185
76| McGlone |Cleveland | 55 | 37 | 26 | .183
77| Fulmer |Baltimore | 51 | 30 | 17 | .179
78| Hankinson |Kansas City| 37 | 27 | 2 | .175
79| Brennan |Kansas City| 34 | 20 | 6 | .174
80| Kilroy |Baltimore | 43 | 24 | 12 | .166
81| Cantz |Baltimore | 37 | 21 | 1 | .165
82| Chamberlain |Louisville | 40 | 23 | 12 | .161
| |and St. | | | |
| |Louis | | | |
83| Seward |Athletic | 64 | 35 | 12 | .154
84| Townsend |Athletic | 43 | 24 | 1 | .150
84| Hughes |Brooklyn | 39 | 20 | 3 | .150
85| Tomney |Louisville | 34 | 18 | 12 | .149
86| Porter |Kansas City| 55 | 27 | 1 | .137
87| Bakely |Cleveland | 60 | 25 | 1 | .131
88| Burdock |Brooklyn | 60 | 30 | 9 | .125
89| Ramsey |Louisville | 41 | 17 | 0 | .123
90| Holbert |Brooklyn | 15 | 6 | 1 | .115
91| Sullivan |Kansas City| 28 | 10 | 7 | .109
92| Mays |Brooklyn | 18 | 6 | 2 | .095
93| Viau |Cincinnati | 41 | 12 | 3 | .085
94| Crowell |Louisville | 19 | 5 | 2 | .080
| |and |
| |Cleveland |
FIELDING RECORD.
CATCHERS.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+----------+-----------+------+-------+---------
1 | Donohue |Kansas City| 66 | 395 | .965
2 |(Robinson |Athletic | 66 | 595 | .955
|{Keenan |Cincinnati | 70 | 536 | .955
3 | Milligan |St. Louis | 58 | 429 | .944
4 | Holbert |Brooklyn | 15 | 106 | .934
5 | Boyle |St. Louis | 70 | 539 | .933
6 | Cross |Louisville | 38 | 292 | .928
7 | Snyder |Cleveland | 43 | 334 | .922
8 | Zimmer |Cleveland | 56 | 443 | .921
9 | Trott |Baltimore | 27 | 205 | .917
10 |{Vaughn |Louisville | 25 | 184 | .913
|{Baldwin |Cincinnati | 64 | 483 | .913
11 | Bushong |Brooklyn | 68 | 489 | .9**
| | | | | [A]
12 | Townsend |Athletic | 43 | 330 | .906
13 | O'Brien |Baltimore | 38 | 274 | .905
14 | Fulmer |Baltimore | 46 | 309 | .903
15 | Cook |Louisville | 50 | 316 | .902
16 | Gunning |Athletic | 23 | 192 | .896
17 | Cantz |Baltimore | 33 | 227 | .890
18 | Kerins |Louisville | 30 | 320 | .888
19 | Brennan |Kansas City| 25 | 176 | .887
20 | McGuire |Cleveland | 16 | 131 | .885
21 | Daniels |Kansas City| 31 | 232 | .875
22 | Clark |Brooklyn | 36 | 307 | .857
23 | Peoples |Brooklyn | 26 | 252 | .841
[*Proofreaders Note A: * number indecipherable.]
PITCHERS.
Rank| NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+------------+-----------+------+-------+--------
1 | Chamberlain|Louisville | 37 | 255 | .988
| |and St. | | |
| |Louis | | |
2 | Ewing |Louisville | 21 | 135 | .985
3 | Terry |Brooklyn | 24 | 186 | .978
4 | Mays |Brooklyn | 18 | 12O | .975
5 | Foutz |Brooklyn | 19 | 115 | .974
6 | Sullivan |Kansas City| 24 | 167 | .970
7 | Stratton |Louisville | 34 | 184 | .968
8 |(Hudson |St. Louis | 37 | 230 | .962
|{Kilroy |Baltimore | 42 | 229 | .965
9 |{Hughes |Brooklyn | 39 | 261 | .962
|{King |St. Louis | 65 | 397 | .962
10 |{Crowell |Cleveland | | |
| |and | | |
| |Louisville | 19 | 103 | .961
|{Bakely |Cleveland | 60 | 359 | .961
|{Mullane |Cincinnati | 44 | 284 | .961
|{Viau |Cincinnati | 41 | 257 | .961
11 | Seward |Athletic | 57 | 428 | .957
12 | O'Brien |Cleveland | 29 | 213 | .953
13 | Porter |Kansas City| 55 | 507 | .951
14 |{Weyhing |Athletic | 48 | 328 | .948
|{Smith |Cincinnati | 4O | 211 | .948
15 | Carruthers |Brooklyn | 45 | 273 | .945
16 | Hecker |Louisville | 28 | 154 | .942
17 | Smith |Athletic | 38 | 248 | .940
| |and | | |
| |Baltimore | | |
19 | Cunningham |Baltimore | 51 | 335 | .934
20 | Ramsey |Louisville | 37 | 290 | .924
21 | Mattimore |Athletic | 26 | 162 | .914
81 | Fagan |Kansas City| 17 | 92 | .913
{sic.}|
This table is rendered useless as a criterion of a pitcher's skill as a
fielder, on account of the mixing up of assistances on strikes with
fielding assistances, which are distinct and separate figures for data.
FIRST BASEMEN.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+------------+-----------+------+-------+--------
1 | Andrews |Louisville.| 27 | 302 | .993
2 |{Foutz |Brooklyn | 42 | 371 | .986
|{Faatz |Cleveland | 120 | 1247 | .986
3 | Orr |Brooklyn | 95 | 1044 | .980
4 | Reilly |Cincinnati | 116 | 1313 | .979
5 | Phillips |Kansas City| 119 | 1500 | .977
6 | Tucker |Baltimore | 129 | 1441 | .975
7 | Smith |Louisville | 56 | 578 | .974
8 |{Larkin |Athletic | 121 | 1294 | .972
|{Comiskey |St. Louis | 133 | 1379 | .972
9 | Esterbrook |Louisville | 23 | 238 | .958
10 |Hecker |Louisville | 27 | 294 | .952
SECOND BASEMEN.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+------------+-----------+------+-------+--------
1 | Berkley |Kansas City| 116 | 683 | .941
2 |{Striekler |Cleveland | 122 | 791 | .938
|{McPhee |Cincinnati | 110 | 776 | .938
3 | Bierbauer |Athletics | 122 | 795 | .935
4 | Collins |Louisville | 30 | 170 | .926
| |and | | |
| |Brooklyn | | |
5 | McClellan |Brooklyn | 62 | 346 | .920
| |and | | |
| |Cleveland. | | |
6 | Burdock |Brooklyn | 69 | 431 | .919
7 | Mack |Louisville | 110 | 703 | .915
8 |{Greenwood |Baltimore | 87 | 442 | .914
|{Farrell |Baltimore | 47 | 174 | .913
9 | McGarr |St. Louis | 34 | 193 | .915
10 | Robinson |St. Louis | 100 | 496 | .904
SHORT STOPS.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+---------+-------------+------+-------+--------
1 |Farell |Baltimore | 56 | 395 | .937
2 |Tomney |Louisville | 34 | 174 | .914
3 |Esterday |Kansas City | 114 | 640 | .900
4 |McKean |Cleveland | 75 | 380 | .895
5 |Sommer |Baltimore | 32 | 161 | .885
6 |Herr |St.Louis | 28 | 133 | .872
7 |Fenelly |Cincinnati | 120 | 723 | .871
| |and | | |
| |Athletic | | |
8 |Gleason |Athletic | 121 | 565 | .865
9 |Wolf |Louisville | 38 | 222 | .860
10 |Alberts |Cleveland | 52 | 272 | .857
11 |Burns |Baltimore | 53 | 277 | .848
| |and | | |
| |Brooklyn | | |
12 |Smith |Brooklyn | 103 | 600 | .847
13 |Robinson |St. Louis | 34 | 168 | .845
14 |Greenwood|Baltimore | 26 | 118 | .831
15 |White |Louisville | 96 | 596 | .827
| |and St. Louis| | |
16 |Kapell |Cincinnati | 21 | 107 | .785
LEFT FIELDERS.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+------------+-----------+------+-------+--------
1 |Stovey |Athletic | 117 | 226 | .950
2 |Browning |Louisville | 21 | 35 | .943
3 |Allen |Kansas City| 33 | 80 | .938
4 |O'Neill |St. Louis | 130 | 257 | .934
5 |O'Brien |Brooklyn | 136 | 261 | .931
6 |Collins |Louisville | 57 | 152 | .921
| |and | | |
| |Brooklyn | | |
7 |{Sommer |Baltimore | 30 | 56 | .911
|{Tebeau |Cincinnati | 121 | 235 | .911
8 |Vaughn |Louisville | 20 | 40 | .900
9 |Goldsby |Baltimore | 42 | 58 | .893
10 |McKean |Cleveland | 43 | 88 | .886
11 |{Hogan |Cleveland | 26 | 41 | .878
|{Gilks |Cleveland | 58 | 115 | .878
12 |Burns |Baltimore | 47 | 120 | .833
| |and | | |
| |Brooklyn | | |
13 |Cline |Kansas City| 26 | 46 | .826
14 |Sullivan |Kansas City| 16 | 25 | .800
15 |Stratton |Louisville | 23 | 37 | .730
THIRD BASEMEN.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+---------+-----------+------+-------+--------
1 |Shindle |Baltimore | 135 | 606 | .919
2 |Pinkney |Brooklyn | 143 | 470 | .896
3 |Albert |Cleveland | 48 | 198 | .894
4 |Lyons |Athletic | 111 | 397 | .889
5 |Latham |St. Louis | 132 | 525 | .882
6 |Carpenter|Cincinnati | 135 | 491 | .878
7 |Raymond |Louisville | 31 | 129 | .876
8 |Davis |Kansas City| 114 | 576 | .849
9 |Werrick |Louisville | 89 | 321 | .822
10 |Gilks |Cleveland | 26 | 109 | .798
11 |McGlone |Cleveland | 48 | 198 | .793
RIGHT FIELDERS
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number|Chances|Per Cent.
| | |Games.|Offered|Accepted.
----+----------+-----------+------+-------+---------
1 |Hogan |Cleveland | 51 | 90 | .988
2 |McClellan |Brooklyn | 32 | 52 | .962
| |and | | |
| |Cleveland | | |
3 |Nicol |Cincinnati | 124 | 218 | .959
4 |Hamilton |Kansas City| 29 | 35 | .943
5 |Foutz |Brooklyn | 78 | 251 | .932
6 |McCarthy |St. Louis | 118 | 276 | .924
7 |Purcell |Athletic | 111 | 182 | .923
| |and | | |
| |Baltimore | | |
8 |Carruthers|Brooklyn | 31 | 80 | .900
8 |Cline |Kansas City| 44 | 80 | .900
9 |Poorman |Athletic | 85 | 134 | .896
10 |Wolf |Louisville | 83 | 158 | .892
11 |McTamany |Kansas City| 48 | 92 | .891
12 |Goodfellow|Cleveland | 51 | 100 | .850
13 |Kerins |Louisville | 35 | 61 | .820
CENTER FIELDERS.
Rank|NAME. |CLUB. |Number |Chances |Per Cent.
| | |Games. |Offered |Accepted.
----+--------+-----------+-------+--------+---------
1 |Welch |Athletic | 135 | 309 | .968
2 |Corkhill|Cincinnati | 131 | 320 | .966
| |and | | |
| |Brooklyn |
Showing first 200,000 characters. Full text: gutenberg.org/ebooks/9477