Occultism and common-sense
by Beckles Willson · English · Gutenberg #36730 · 353,670 chars · public domain (US)
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Occultism and common-sense
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.
Title: Occultism and common-sense
Author: Beckles Willson
Author of introduction, etc.: Sir William Barrett
Release date: July 14, 2011 [eBook #36730]
Language: English
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36730
Credits: Produced by Suzanne Shell, Mary Meehan and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK OCCULTISM AND COMMON-SENSE ***
Produced by Suzanne Shell, Mary Meehan and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
OCCULTISM AND COMMON-SENSE
BY BECKLES WILLSON
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY
PROF. W. F. BARRETT, F.R.S.
_Past President of the Society for Psychical Research_
LONDON
T. WERNER LAURIE
CLIFFORD'S INN
E.C.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION VII
I. SCIENCE'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE "SUPERNATURAL"
II. THE HYPNOTIC STATE
III. PHANTASMS OF THE LIVING
IV. DREAMS
V. HALLUCINATIONS
VI. PHANTASMS OF THE DEAD
VII. ON "HAUNTINGS" AND KINDRED PHENOMENA
VIII. THE DOWSING OR DIVINING ROD
IX. MEDIUMISTIC PHENOMENA
X. MORE PHYSICAL PHENOMENA
XI. THE MATERIALISATION OF "GHOSTS"
XII. SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY
XIII. CLAIRVOYANCE
XIV. MRS PIPER'S TRANCE UTTERANCES
AFTERWORD
NOTE
The following chapters, together with Professor Barrett's comment
thereupon, which now figures as an Introduction, originally appeared in
the columns of _The Westminster Gazette_.
INTRODUCTION
_By Professor W. F. Barrett, F.R.S._
_Those of us who took part in the foundation of the Society for
Psychical Research were convinced from personal investigation and from
the testimony of competent witnesses that, amidst much illusion and
deception, there existed an important body of facts, hitherto
unrecognised by science, which, if incontestably established, would be
of supreme interest and importance._
_It was hoped that by applying scientific methods to their systematic
investigation these obscure phenomena might eventually be rescued from
the disorderly mystery of ignorance; (but we recognised that this would
be a work, not of one generation but of many.) Hence to preserve
continuity of effort it was necessary to form a society, the aim of
which should be, as we stated at the outset, to bring to bear on these
obscure questions the same spirit of exact and unimpassioned inquiry
which has enabled science to solve so many problems once not less
obscure nor less hotly debated. And such success as the society has
achieved is in no small measure due to the wise counsel and ungrudging
expenditure both of time and means which the late Professor Henry
Sidgwick gave, and which Mrs Sidgwick continues to give, to all the
details of its work._
_Turning now to the author of the following pages, everyone must
recognise the industry he has shown and the fairness of spirit he has
endeavoured to maintain. With different groups of phenomena, the
evidential value varies enormously. The testimony of honest and even
careful witnesses requires to be received with caution, owing to the
intrusion of two sources of error to which untrained observers are very
liable. These are unconscious_ mal-observation _and unintentional_
mis-description. _I cannot here enter into the proof of this statement,
but it is fully established. Oddly enough, not only a credulous observer
but a cynical or ferocious sceptic is singularly prone to these errors
when, for the first time, he is induced to investigate psychical
phenomena which, in the pride of his superior intelligence, he has
hitherto scorned. I could give some amusing illustrations of this within
my own knowledge. For instance, a clever but critical friend who had
frequently scoffed at the evidence for thought-transference published in
the "Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research," one day
seriously informed me he had been converted to a belief in
thought-transference by some conclusive experiments he had witnessed.
Upon inquiring where these experiments took place I found it was at a
public performance of a very inferior Zancig who was then touring
through the provinces!_
_Mr Beckles Willson frankly tells us that "the light heart and open
mind" with which he set forth on his inquiry deserted him before he drew
his labours to a close. For, entering upon the subject as a novice, he
found himself unexpectedly confronted by the mass of evidence and the
numerous and profoundly difficult problems which the Psychical Society
have had to face. His conclusions are derived from a study of the
available evidence, and this study has convinced him--as it has
convinced, so far as I know, every other painstaking and honest
inquirer--that no theories based on fraud, illusion, nor even on
telepathy, are adequate to account for the whole of the phenomena he has
reviewed. Contrary to his prepossessions, Mr Willson tells us that he
has been led to the conclusion that the only satisfactory explanation of
these phenomena is the action of discarnate human beings--that is to
say, the Spiritualistic hypothesis._
_I can hardly suppose he means to apply this statement to more than the
small residue of phenomena which he finds inexplicable on any other
hypothesis. Assuming this restricted view to be meant, the question
arises, Is the evidence on which it is based sufficiently_ abundant,
trustworthy, _and_ conclusive, _to warrant such a far-reaching
statement? Here we must turn from the author to ascertain what has been
the conclusion arrived at by those who have given long years to a
searching experimental investigation of these phenomena, and who have
approached the subject in a scientific and judicial spirit. The most
noteworthy instance is the testimony of that shrewd and able
investigator, the late Dr Hodgson. His patient and laborious inquiry
into the trance phenomena of Mrs Piper ultimately led him to the
conclusion arrived at by Mr Willson. Dr Hodgson's well-known exposure of
Madame Blavatsky and other fraudulent mediums and his sane and cautious
judgment render his opinion of great weight. Then, again, we find that
this also was the conclusion to which Frederic Myers was gradually
driven. And long prior to this it was the conclusion arrived at by that
acute thinker, the late Professor de Morgan, and it is the conclusion
strongly held by the great naturalist, Dr A. R. Wallace, and held also
by several other eminent investigators I might name._
_So momentous a conclusion, if capable of such complete verification as
to be universally accepted by science, would obviously throw all other
discoveries into the background. I say if capable of being verified by
scientific methods, but, although the weight of opinion will, in my
opinion, ultimately lead to a very wide acceptance of this conclusion,
yet it seems to me highly probable that the experimental discovery of
the survival of human personality after death will always elude
conclusive scientific demonstration. This particular field of psychical
investigation belongs to an order other than that with which science
deals; and, this being so, it can never be adequately investigated with
the limited faculties we now possess._
_In any case, as I said in a letter published in_ The Times, _so long
ago as September 1876, before science is in a position to frame any
satisfactory hypothesis of the so-called Spiritualistic phenomena, a
number of antecedent questions will have to be investigated and decided.
Prominent among these, I urged more than thirty years ago, was the
question whether ideas or information can be voluntarily or
involuntarily transferred from one mind to another independently of the
recognised organs of perception. Experiments I had then recently made
led me to the conclusion that something new to science, which might
provisionally be called thought-transference, now known in its wider
aspect as telepathy, did really exist. This, if established, would, as I
pointed out, unquestionably solve some of the so-called spirit
communications which had so puzzled investigators. But the idea of
thought-transference was at that time just as obnoxious to official
science as Spiritualism. Mr Willson quotes the implacable disbelief,
even in the possibility of telepathy, which that great man Helmholtz
expressed to me. And it is amusing now to recall the fierce outcry
aroused by the paper I read at the British Association meeting in 1876,
when, after narrating certain apparently transcendental phenomena I had
witnessed, I asked that a committee of scientific men should be
appointed to investigate preliminary question of the possibility of
thought-transference.[1] It is true the evidence on behalf of telepathy
has since become so abundant that now few deny its probability, but even
telepathy has not yet taken its place among the recognised scientific
verities. I hope this recognition will not be long delayed, but until it
occurs it is almost as illegitimate to use telepathy, as some do so
freely, for the foundation of their theories of transcendental phenomena
as to use the spiritualistic hypothesis itself._
[Footnote 1: The Spectator, _I believe, alone, generously supported me,
and in an editorial article on 30th September 1876 expressed the hope
that "the British Association would really lake some action on the
subject of the paper, in spite of the protests of the party, which we
may call the party of superstitious incredulity_."]
_To those who have carefully studied the evidence there is, however,
little doubt that telepathy does afford an adequate explanation of
certain well-attested phenomena, such as phantasms of the living or
dying person. And telepathy, which may now be considered as highly
probable, leads on to the evidence for man's survival after death--to
this I will return later on._
_Then, again, recent investigations have established the fact that the
range of human personality must be extended to include something more
than our normal self-consciousness. Our Ego is not the simple unitary
thing older psychologists taught, but a composite structure embracing a
self that extends far beyond the limit of our conscious waking life.
Just as experimental physics has shown that each pencil of sunlight
embraces an almost endless succession of invisible rays as well as the
visible radiation we perceive, so experimental psychology has shown
that each human personality embraces an unconscious as well as a
conscious self. Mr Myers, using Du Perl's conception of a threshold, has
termed the former our_ subliminal self. _And just as the invisible
radiation of the sun can only be rendered perceptible by some agency
outside our vision, so this subliminal self reveals itself only by some
agency outside our own volition. The subliminal self not only contains
the record of unheeded past impressions--a latent memory--but also has
activities and faculties far transcending the range of our conscious
self. In this it also resembles the invisible radiation of the sun,
which is the main source of life and energy in this world._
_Certainly the everyday processes of the development, nutrition, and
repair of our body and brain, which go on automatically and
unconsciously within us, are far beyond the powers of our conscious
personality. All life shares with us this miraculous automatism. No
chemist, with all his appliances, can turn breadstuff into brainstuff or
hay into milk. Further, the subliminal self seems to have faculties
which can be emancipated from the limitations of our ordinary life.
Glimpses of this we get when the conscious self is in abeyance, as in
sleep, hypnosis, and trance. Here and there we find certain individuals
through whom this sub- or supra-liminal self manifests itself more
freely than through others; they have been termed "mediums," a word, it
is true, that suggests Browning's "Sludge." But, as scientific
investigation has shown all mesmerists and dowsers are not charlatans,
so it has shown all mediums are not rogues._
_This extension of human faculty, revealing, as it does, more profoundly
the mysterious depths of our being, enables us to explain many phenomena
that have been attributed to discarnate human beings. The question
arises, Does it explain all so-called Spiritualistic phenomena? In my
opinion, and in that of others who have given more time to their
critical investigation than I have, it does not. At present we have to
grope our way, but the ground is being cleared, and the direction which
the future explorer of these unknown regions has to take is becoming
more evident._
Occultism and Common-Sense
CHAPTER I
SCIENCE'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE "SUPERNATURAL"
When I first ventured into the wide and misty domain of Occultism, with
a light heart I set forth and an open mind. My sole aim was to
ascertain, as far as the means at the disposal of an ordinary man with
little of the mystic in his composition would allow, what degree of
probability attached to published phenomena, which the ordinary laws of
Nature, as most of us understand them, could not satisfactorily explain.
At the threshold of my inquiry, one prominent and, as it seemed to me,
disconcerting fact confronted me--namely, that although for a couple of
generations "supernatural" manifestations had been promiscuously
exhibited before the public, challenging full investigation and inviting
belief; although almost every day the newspapers report some striking
case of spirit apparition or materialisation, coincident dreams,
clairvoyance, trance utterances, or possession, often seemingly well
attested; yet in spite of all this testimony academic science continued
to dispute the very basis of such phenomena. Any investigator must needs
recognise here a very anomalous situation. On the one hand are, let us
say, half-a-million people, often highly intelligent, cultured, sane
people, firmly protesting that they have witnessed certain astonishing
occult manifestations, and on the other hand the Royal Society and the
British Association, and other organised scientific bodies established
for the investigation of truth, absolutely refusing to admit such
evidence or to regard it seriously. Forty years ago Faraday, besought to
give his opinion, in this wise wrote: "They who say they see these
things are not competent witnesses of facts. It would be condescension
on my part to pay any more attention to them." Faraday's attitude was
that of Huxley, Spencer, Tyndall, and Agassiz. The first-named, however,
rather gave away his prejudice by saying: "Supposing the phenomena to be
genuine, they do not interest me." Tyndall's utterance also deserves to
be recalled: "There are people amongst us who, it is alleged, can
produce effects before which the discoveries of Newton pale. There are
men of science who would sell all that they have, and give the proceeds
to the poor, for a glimpse of phenomena which are mere trifles to the
spiritualist." He added: "The world will have religion of some kind,
even though it should fly for it to the intellectual whoredom of
spiritualism." Spencer's words were: "I have settled the question in my
own mind on a priori grounds." Professor Carpenter called spiritualism
"a most mischievous epidemic delusion, comparable to the witchcraft
delusion of the seventeenth century."
What, then, has happened to strengthen the case of the believers in
ghosts, clairvoyance, thought-transference, sensory automatism, in,
say, the last quarter of a century? What new evidence exists which would
make the mid-Victorian scientific men reconsider their position? Suppose
Faraday and Huxley, Spencer and Tyndall, were alive to-day, would they
see reason to alter their opinions?
I remember once--and I now give it as typical--overhearing a psychical
experience. It was in a first-class compartment on a train coming from
Wimbledon. One of my fellow-passengers, an intelligent, well-spoken man
of about thirty-five, was relating to three friends the following
extraordinary story. As nearly as I can recollect, I give the narrator's
own words:--
"One week ago last Tuesday, at eleven o'clock at night, my
wife, who had just retired to bed upstairs, called out to me:
'Arthur! Arthur!' in a tone of alarm. I sprang up and ran
upstairs to see what was the matter. The servants had all gone
to bed. 'Arthur,' said my wife, 'I've just seen mother,' and
she began to cry. 'Why,' I said, 'your mother's at
Scarborough.' 'I know,' she said; 'but she appeared before me
just there' (pointing to the foot of the bed) 'two minutes ago
as plainly as you do.' Well, the next morning there was a
telegram on the breakfast-table: 'Mother, died at eleven last
night.' Now, how do you account for it?"
There was silence for a full minute.
"A wonderful coincidence. Your wife's hallucination coincided with her
mother's death!"
Another occupant of the carriage caught up the word:
"Yes, coincidence. A thing which mightn't happen once in a million
years."
Nobody else ventured a remark. Yet they seemed unconvinced. There was no
one to tell them--even I did not know then--that these "coincidences"
were constantly happening, every year, perhaps every month; that an
intelligent body of men--the Society for Psychical Research--has made a
census of such hallucinations, all apparently well attested; that
newspapers devoted to occult matters constantly record these things;
that volumes--monthly, weekly, almost--fairly pour from the press
detailing, expounding, dissecting, elaborating such evidence; that the
theory of coincidence has already been rejected by many men of the first
rank of science; and that official science itself is reluctantly
reconsidering its position in more than one direction.
Yet so slowly do the masses move in intellectual life, so tardily do
truths, concerning not merely occult but physical and material
investigation, percolate through to the workaday world, that the
researches, the activities, the ascertained truths of students of
psychical phenomena are as a closed book. Perhaps the attitude of apathy
with which occult phenomena and occult science are regarded by the
average man is not unnatural. To him all miracles that are not
Scriptural and ancient and, as it were, institutional are highly
improbable, if not impossible. All super-naturalism, he will tell you,
is morbid. "There may be something in these things," he says, "but it is
not proved. As for spiritualism, my belief is that mediums are
impostors. Most of the spiritualists I have seen are 'cranks'--they are
certainly dupes--and I have no doubt that if I interested myself in
these matters I should end by becoming also a 'crank.'"
This I maintain is the position of the ordinarily educated normal man.
"The moment," wrote Lord Lytton, "one deals with things beyond our
comprehension, and in which our own senses are appealed to and baffled,
we revolt from the probable, as it appears to the senses of those who
have not experienced what we have." Now, that is just what the candid
inquirer must avoid throughout his inquiry. It is often difficult to
resist employing supernormal hypotheses; but, until normal hypotheses
are exhausted, the resistance must be made. On the other hand, it is
well to bear in mind Mr Andrew Lang's timely remark, "there is a point
at which the explanations of common-sense arouse scepticism."
At all events, not even the most materialistic man-in-the-music-hall,
with two eyes in his head, can deny that the great wave of occultism,
which twenty years ago seemed to be receding, is again returning with
greater force and volume, submerging many of the old sceptical theories
and wetting even the utterly callous and ignorant with its spray. It is
not so long ago that the very fact of hypnotism was doubted--Mesmer was
long regarded as a mere quack--but to-day the induced trance is
universally credited. To hypnotism must the miracle of telepathy now be
added? Has it really been ascertained, after a thousand experiments and
beyond the possibility of error, that a mode of apprehension exists
which has no connection with the five senses? For twenty-five years the
members of the Society of Psychical Research have carried on their
investigations of both sleeping and waking subjects, under every
conceivable condition, and are at last fain to announce that such a
mystic faculty does exist by which brain can communicate with brain
without any known sensory agency.
As to the kind of "ghost" story recorded above, what an exact analogy
it bears to the following, to be found in a recent volume of the
"Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research!" The statement was
received from a Madame Broussiloff, of St Petersburg:--
"On the 16th (28th) of February of this year, between nine and
ten o'clock in the evening, I, the undersigned, was sitting in
our drawing-room--the small one--facing the large drawing-room,
which I could see in its entire length. My husband, his
brother, with his wife, and my mother, were also sitting in the
same room with me round a large round table. I was writing down
my household accounts for the day, while the others were
carrying on some gay conversation. Having accidentally raised
my head and looked into the large drawing-room, I noticed, with
astonishment, that a large grey shadow had passed from the door
of the dining-room to that of the antechamber; and it came into
my head that the figure I had seen bore a striking resemblance
in stature to Colonel Ave-Meinander, an acquaintance of ours,
who had lived in this very lodging for a long time. At the
first moment, I wished to say at once that a ghost had just
flashed before me, but stopped, as I was afraid of being
laughed at by my husband's brother and his wife, and also of
being scolded by my husband, who, in view of the excitement
which I showed when such phenomena were taking place, tried to
convince me that they were the fruits of my fancy. As I knew
that Meinander was alive and well, and was commander of the
Malorossuesky 40th Regiment of Dragoons, I did not say anything
then; but when I was going to bed I related to my mother what I
had seen, and the next morning could not refrain from
mentioning it to my husband.
"Our astonishment was extreme when, on the 18th of February
(2nd of March), we learned Nicholas Ottovitch Ave-Meinander had
actually died after a short illness on the 16th (28th) of
February at nine o'clock in the evening, in the town of
Strashovo, where his regiment is stationed.
"The above account is confirmed by the percipient's mother,
Marie von Hagemeister, and by the husband, Colonel Alexis
Alexeievitch Broussiloff. Both state solemnly that Colonel
Meinander died at nine P.M. on the evening of 16th February
(28th) at Stashovo, 1200 versts from St Petersburg."
To explain this phenomenon in the terms of telepathy, the grey shadow
seen by Madame Broussiloff was not a ghost, not the "bodiless spirit in
the likeness of a man," but "a waking dream projected from the brain of
the seer under the impulse of the dying man's thought."
But telepathy itself requires consideration and explanation. Sir William
Crookes has repeatedly given publicity to his theory of brain-waves and
to a kindred conception of ether substance, along which intelligence can
be transmitted at an almost incalculable rate of speed to virtually
interminable distances.
That mind should effect mind in a new mode may mean no more than that
brain can act upon brain by means of ethereal vibrations hitherto
unsuspected. The power itself may be but a lingering vestige of our
inheritance from primeval times, a long-disused faculty "dragged from
the dim lumber-room of a primitive consciousness, and galvanised into a
belated and halting activity."
Or, on the other hand, may not such faculty be regarded not as
vestigial, but as rudimentary? Telepathy, if we follow the gifted author
of "Human Personality," is a promise for the future, not an idle
inheritance from the past.
Our business now is, all mystic speculations apart, to consider the
phenomena in the order in which, if not yet actually accepted, they
would seem to evoke least opposition from the academic science of the
day. What is the net result of the evidence for all classes of
supernormal phenomena? That I shall endeavour to point out, as concisely
and lucidly as I can, in the following chapters.
CHAPTER II
THE HYPNOTIC STATE
Not least of the wonders of modern psychical research is the discovery
that nothing in all the phenomena is new--that under other names and by
other races every sort of manifestation was familiar to the most remote
peoples. This would certainly seem to meet the argument of the
physicist--it is not necessary to refer again to Professor Tyndall's
uncomplimentary phraseology--who declares that all this popular
occultism is a product of the last generation or two. Take hypnotism.
Hypnotism (or mesmerism) was formerly alleged to be an emanation from
the body--an effluence of intense will-power. The belief in such an
emanation is centuries old. "By the magic power of the will," wrote
Paracelsus, "a person on this side of the ocean may make a person on the
other side hear what is said on that side ... the ethereal body of a
man may know what another man thinks at a distance of 100 miles or
more." Twenty years ago this creed was laughed out of court by Huxley,
Tyndall, and other leading men of science. To-day we are told by those
who have witnessed the experiments of Charcot, Janet, and others that
"the existence of an aura of spirit-force surrounding the body like an
atmosphere, in some cases at all events, can be proved as a physical
fact."
Whatever the explanation, whatever the definition of this miraculous
agency, hypnotism is now universally accepted. The manifestations of its
power must convince the most sceptical. A spell-bound subject is
frequently made to share the sensations of the hypnotist, his ocular
perceptions and his sense of touch. In the hypnotic sleep the subject
easily becomes insensible to pain. A member of the Society reports that
he has seen a youth in this condition who suffered gladly the most
injurious attacks upon his own person--who would allow his hair to be
pulled, his ears pinched, his fingers even to be scorched by lighted
matches. But the same youth would next moment indignantly resent the
slightest injury upon his hypnotiser, who would at the time be standing
at the other end of the room.
One thing in common all the hypnotic methods appear to possess, the
diversion of attention from external surroundings and the working of a
sub-consciousness in a manner not characteristic of the ordinary life of
the subject. In cases described by Mr Greenwood no difficulty was
encountered in impersonations suggested to the subject unless they
savoured too much of the ridiculous. "Thus," he writes, "a suggestion
that M., the subject, was myself and that I was he succeeded; and in his
reverse capacity he continued the course of experiments upon himself,
devising several original and ingenious varieties to which I, for the
sake of the experiment, acquiesced in subjecting myself. He also behaved
with considerable dignity and verve as King Edward VII., until I threw a
match at his head, a proceeding which appeared to conflict so strongly
with dramatic verisimilitude that he lapsed back into his ordinary
hypnotic condition, nor could I reinduce the impersonation. On the other
hand, statements that he was the Emperor of China, and that he was a
nurse and I a baby, failed to carry any conviction, being either
received with passive consent or rejected with scorn." It is interesting
to note that in the waking state of the subject he explained that he was
only conscious that he was not the characters he was bidden to assume,
and if asked would have said as much, but that he was irresistibly
impelled to act as though he were.
The production of sleep in the subject at a distance is one of the
latest attested marvels of hypnotism. The long series of experiments
made in France by Professor Richet and Professor Janet would appear to
attest this power. In some trials made at Havre, in which the
experimenters were Professor Janet and Dr Gibert, the subject of the
experiment was a certain Madame B. or "Leonie," then a patient of Dr
Gibert. The facts were recorded by the late F. W. Myers and his
brother, Dr A. T. Myers, who were present:
"We selected (he states) by lot an hour (eleven A.M.) at which
M. Gibert should will, from his dispensary (which is close to
his house), that Madame B. should go to sleep in the Pavilion.
It was agreed that a rather longer time should be allowed for
the process to take effect, as it had been observed that she
sometimes struggled against the influence and averted the
effect for a time by putting her hands in cold water, etc. At
11.25 we entered the Pavilion quietly, and almost at once she
descended from her room to the _salon_, profoundly asleep. We
did not, of course, mention M. Gibert's attempt of the previous
night. But she told us in her sleep that she had been very ill
in the night, and repeatedly exclaimed: 'Pourquoi M. Gibert
m'a-t-il fait souffrir? Mais j'ai lave les mains
continuellement.' This is what she does when she wishes to
avoid being influenced.
"In the evening (22nd) we all dined at M. Gibert's, and in the
evening M. Gibert made another attempt to put her to sleep at
a distance from his house in the Rue Sery--she being at the
Pavilion, Rue de la Ferme--and to bring her to his house by an
effort of will. At 8.55 he retired to his study; and MM.
Ochorowicz, Marillier, Janet, and A. T. Myers went to the
Pavilion, and waited outside in the street, out of sight of the
house. At 9.22 Dr Myers observed Madame B. coming half way out
of the garden gate, and again retreating. Those who saw her
more closely observed that she was plainly in the
somnambulistic state and was wandering about and muttering. At
9.25 she came out with eyes persistently closed, so far as
could be seen, walked quickly past MM. Janet and Marillier
without noticing them, and made for M. Gibert's house, though
not by the usual or shortest route. (It appeared afterwards
that the bonne had seen her go into the _salon_ at 8.45 and
issue thence asleep at 9.15; had not looked in between those
times.) She avoided lamp-posts, vehicles, etc., but crossed and
recrossed the street repeatedly. No one went in front of her or
spoke to her. After eight or ten minutes she grew more
uncertain in gait, and paused as though she would fall. Dr
Myers noted the moment in the Rue Faure; it was 9.35. At about
9.40 she grew bolder, and at 9.45 reached the street in front
of M. Gibert's house. There she met him, but did not notice
him, and walked into his house, where she rushed hurriedly from
room to room on the ground floor. M. Gibert had to take her
hand before she recognised him. She then grew calm.
"On the 23rd M. Janet lunched in our company and retired to his
own house at 4.30 (a time chosen by lot), to try to put her to
sleep from thence. At 5.5 we all entered the _salon_ of the
Pavilion, and found her asleep with shut eyes, but sewing
vigorously (being in that stage in which movements once
suggested are automatically continued). Passing into the
talkative stage, she said to M. Janet: 'C'est vous qui m'avez
fait dormir a quatre heures et demi.' The impression as to the
hour may have been a suggestion received from M. Janet's mind.
We tried to make her believe that it was M. Gibert who had
sent her to sleep, but she maintained that she had felt that it
was M. Janet.
"On 24th April the whole party chanced to meet at M. Janet's
house at three P.M., and he then, at my suggestion, entered his
study to will that Madame B. should sleep. We waited in his
garden, and at 3.20 proceeded together to the Pavilion, which I
entered first at 3.30, and found Madame B. profoundly sleeping
over her sewing, having ceased to sew. Becoming talkative, she
said to M. Janet: 'C'est vous qui m'avez commande.' She said
that she fell asleep at 3.5 P.M."
Of the twenty-five trials made in the course of two months, eighteen
were wholly and four partially successful.
This somnolent state might, it is thought, have been induced by
telepathy; in fact, as we shall see, telepathy will in some quarters
have to bear the burden of most, if not all, of the phenomena under
investigation.
Not only is the hypnotic subject frequently induced to do the will of
the operator, but he may actually have presented to his intelligence
certain ideas or images, material or imaginary, known only to the
hypnotiser. After following carefully all the experiments conducted by
the late Professor Sidgwick and others, in the presence of witnesses of
repute, I do not see how it is possible to deny the fact of telepathy.
In these experiments the subject or percipient was always hypnotised,
remaining so to a varying degree throughout the experiment.
Albeit, even as regards this thought-transference, we must be on our
guard against a too rash acceptance of unknown or supernormal agencies
in every bona-fide experiment. Certainly all experiments of the
hypnotiser do not _ipso facto_ prove that any new method of apprehension
has been employed. The hypnotised subject is extremely susceptible to
suggestions, and might even glean an indication of what is proceeding
through the look, the gestures, the very breathing, of those present.
The utmost precautions, therefore, were taken by the Society for
Psychical Research when it began its experimental inquiries.
The subject of the picture was always carefully chosen by one of the
experimenters--Mrs Sidgwick or Miss Alice Johnson. Any possibility of
the percipient being able to guess at the subject through chance,
association, or ideas was rigorously excluded. To prevent any hint being
unconsciously imparted by the third experimenter, Mr G. A. Smith,
silence was enjoined upon him, and he was placed behind the percipient
or in another room; yet the percipient actually saw and described the
projecting impression as if it were a real picture before his eyes. When
Mr Smith went downstairs with Miss Johnson he was asked by her to think
of an eagle pursuing a sparrow. Mrs Sidgwick, who remained upstairs with
P., the percipient, in a few minutes induced him to see a round disc of
light on the imaginary lantern-sheet, and then he saw in it "something
like a bird," which disappeared immediately. He went on looking (with
closed eyes, of course), and presently he thought he saw "something
like a bird--something like an eagle." After a pause he said: "I thought
I saw a figure there--I saw 5. The bird's gone. I see 5 again; now it's
gone. The bird came twice." Mr Smith then came upstairs, and P. had
another impression of an eagle. He was told that the eagle was right,
and there was something else besides, no hint being given of what the
other thing was. He then said that the first thing he saw "was a little
bird--a sparrow, perhaps--he could not say--about the size of a sparrow;
then that disappeared, and he saw the eagle. He had told Mrs Sidgwick so
at the time."
We see the mental machinery at work in another case, where the subject
agreed upon was "The Babes in the Wood." To begin with, P. sat with
closed eyes, but, when no impression came, Mr Smith opened his eyes,
without speaking, and made him look for the picture on a card. After we
had waited a little while in vain, Mr Smith said to him: "Do you see
something like a straw hat?" P. assented to this, and then began to
puzzle out something more: "A white apron, something dark--a child. It
can't be another child, unless it's a boy--a boy and a girl--the boy to
the right and the girl to the left. Little girl with white socks on and
shoes with straps." Mr Smith asked: "What are they doing? Is it two
children on a raft at sea?" P.: "No; it's like trees in the
background--a copse or something. Like a fairy-story--like babes in a
wood or something."
We see it in an even more pronounced degree where the subject sat on a
sailing boat. Miss Johnson, who did not know what the subject of the
picture was, asked Miss B. whether it was anything like an animal. Miss
B. said: "No; got some prong sort of things--something at the bottom
like a little boat. What can that be up in the air? Cliffs, I
suppose--cliffs in the air high up--it's joining the boat. Oh, sails!--a
sailing-boat--not cliffs--sails." This was not all uttered
consecutively, but partly in answer to questions put by Miss Johnson;
but, as Miss Johnson was ignorant of the supposed picture, her questions
could, of course, give no guidance.
Many experiments have been made in the transference of imaginary scenes,
where both operator and subject have attempted to attain a conscious
unity of ideas by means of rough drawings. A slight sketch was made,
which was then projected to the brain of the percipient, who proceeded
to reproduce the unseen, often with amazing fidelity.
In these experiments actual contact was forbidden, to avoid the risk of
unconscious indications by pressure. In many cases, however, the agent
and percipient have been in the same room, and there has therefore still
been some possible risk of unconscious whispering; but this risk has
been successfully avoided. It yet remains doubtful how far close
proximity really operates in aid of telepathy, or how far its advantage
is a mere effect of self-suggestion--on the part either of agent or
percipient. Some experimenters--notably the late Mr Kirk and Mr
Glardon--have obtained results of just the same type at distances of
half-a-mile or more. In the case of induction of hypnotic trance, Dr
Gibert, as we have seen, attained at the distance of nearly a mile
results which are commonly believed to exact close and actual presence.
Hypnotic agencies, according to Myers, may be simplified into suggestion
and self-suggestion. The same author defines suggestion as "successful
appeal to the subliminal self." Many striking cases of moral reforms
produced by this means have been recorded by Dr Auguste Voisin. For
instance:
"In the summer of 1884 there was at the Salpetriere a young
woman of a deplorable type. Jeanne Sch---- was a criminal
lunatic, filthy in habits, violent in demeanour, and with a
lifelong history of impurity and theft. M. Voisin, who was one
of the physicians on the staff, undertook to hypnotise her on
31st May, at a time when she could only be kept quiet by the
strait jacket and _bonnet d'irrigation_, or perpetual cold
douche to the head. She would not--indeed, she could not--look
steadily at her operator, but raved and spat at him. M. Voisin
kept his face close to hers and followed her eyes wherever she
moved them. In about ten minutes a stertorous sleep ensued, and
in five minutes more she passed into a sleep-waking state, and
began to talk incoherently. The process was repeated on many
days, and gradually she became sane when in the trance, though
she still raved when awake. Gradually, too, she became able to
obey in waking hours commands impressed on her in the
trance--first trivial orders (to sweep the room and so forth),
then orders involving a marked change of behaviour. Nay, more;
in the hypnotic state she voluntarily expressed repentance for
her past life, made a confession which involved more evil than
the police were cognisant of (though it agreed with facts
otherwise known), and finally of her own impulse made good
resolves for the future. Two years later (31st July 1886) M.
Voisin wrote that she was then a nurse in a Paris hospital, and
that her conduct was irreproachable. It appeared then that this
poor woman, whose history since the age of thirteen had been
one of reckless folly and vice, had become capable of the
steady, self-controlled work of a nurse at a hospital, the
reformed character having first manifested itself in the
hypnotic state, partly in obedience to suggestion, and partly
as the natural result of the tranquilisation of morbid
passions."
There is a mass of evidence to testify to the marvellous cures that have
been effected in this way. Kleptomania, dipsomania, nicotinism,
morphinomania, and several varieties of phobies have all been known to
yield to hypnotic suggestion. Nor is it always necessary that the mind
of the patient should be influenced by another person; self-suggestion
is at times equally efficacious. Here is a case in point, taken from
"Proceedings," vol. xi. p. 427. The narrator is Dr D. J. Parsons.
"Sixteen years ago I was a little sick; took half-a-grain of
opium, and lay down upon the bed. Soon, as I began to feel the
tranquillising effect of the opium, I saw three men approaching
me; the one in front said: 'You smoke too much tobacco.' I
replied: 'I know I do.' He then said: 'Why don't you quit it?'
I answered by saying: 'I have been thinking about it, but I am
afraid I can't.' He extended his right arm, and placing his
forefinger very near my face gave it a few very significant
shakes, said, in a very impressive manner: 'You will never want
to use tobacco any more as long as you live.' He continued by
saying: 'You swear sometimes.' I answered: 'Yes.' He said:
'Will you promise to quit?' I intended to say 'Yes,' but just
as I was about to utter the word yes, instantly a change came
over me, and I felt like I had been held under some unknown
influence, which was suddenly withdrawn or exhausted. I had
been a constant smoker for more than twenty years.
"Since the occurrence of the above incident I have not touched
tobacco; have felt ever since like it would poison me, and I
now feel like one draw at the pipe would kill me instantly. My
desire for tobacco was suddenly and effectually torn out by the
roots, but perhaps I shall never know just how it was done.
"D. J. PARSONS, M.D.
"_Sweet Springs, Missouri._"
It would seem in the above case that the suggestibility was heightened
by the use of opium, which at the same time developed a monitory
hallucination.
Leading men of science now hold that the popular belief in the dangers
of hypnotism is grossly exaggerated, it being far less open to abuse
than chloroform. Nevertheless some danger is only too manifest, and
Parliament may yet be asked to do what Continental governments have
done--viz. to make the practice of hypnotism, save under proper medical
supervision, a punishable offence. As an illustration of these dangers I
may mention the testimony of an operator given before the Psychical
Research Society. Owing to the ready susceptibility of one subject he
began to fear that he might acquire an influence which might be
inconvenient to both, and so enjoined that he should be unable to
hypnotise him unless he previously recited a formula asking the operator
to do so. After several failures he states: "I eventually succeeded in
impressing this so strongly upon him that it became absolutely
effective, and the formula became requisite, for I could not, even with
the utmost co-operation on his part, influence him in the least. One
night, however, after retiring to bed I was surprised by his entering
the room with the request that I should waken him. I expressed
astonishment and asked whether he was really asleep. He assured me that
he was, and explained that while he had been conversing in the
drawing-room after dinner, other persons being present, he had
experimentally recited the formula _sotto voce_ and had immediately,
unperceived by myself or others in the room, gone off in the hypnotic
state and could not get out of it again. I protested that this was an
extremely unfair trick both on himself and on me, and to guard against
its recurrence I enjoined that in future a mere repetition of the
formula should not suffice, but that it should be written down, signed
and handed to me. This has hitherto proved completely successful, and in
the absence of the document no efforts on the part of either of us has
had any effect whatever."
It would seem, however, that the hypnotic subject is by no means
entirely at the mercy of the operator. Thus Dr Milne Bramwell, in
"Proceedings," vol. xii. pp. 176-203, cites a number of cases in which
suggestions had been refused by hypnotic subjects. He also mentions two
subjects who had rejected certain suggestions and accepted others. A
Miss F., for example, recited a poem, but would not help herself to a
glass of water from the sideboard; while a Mr G. would play one part,
but not others, and committed an imaginary crime. Dr Bramwell comes to
the following conclusion:--
"The difference between the hypnotised and the normal subject,
as it appears to me from a long series of observed facts, is
not so much in conduct as in increased mental and physical
powers. Any changes in the moral sense, I have noticed, have
invariably been for the better, the hypnotised subject evincing
superior refinement. As regards obedience to suggestion, there
is apparently little to choose between the two. A hypnotised
subject, who has acquired the power of manifesting various
physical and mental phenomena, will do so, in response to
suggestion, for much the same reasons as one in the normal
condition.... When the act demanded is contrary to the moral
sense, it is usually refused by the normal subject, and
invariably by the hypnotised one."
The hypnotic state evinces an extraordinary extension of faculty. Dr
Bramwell's remarkable series of experiments on "time appreciation" shows
that orders were carried out by the subject at expiration of such
periods as 20,290 minutes from the beginning of the order. In her normal
state the female subject of this experiment was incapable of correctly
calculating how many days and hours 20,290 minutes would make, and even
in her hypnotised condition could reckon only with errors; yet, what is
singular to relate, even when a blunder was made in the former
calculation the order of the hypnotist was none the less fulfilled when
the correct period expired. The conclusion is not easy to avoid: that
beneath the stratum of human consciousness brought to the surface by
hypnotism there is one--perhaps two--"subliminal" strata more alert and
more capable than our ordinary workaday ego.
What light this theory of a "subliminal" self will shed on our subject
we will see when we come to discuss clairvoyance and the trance
utterances of the spiritualistic "medium."
CHAPTER III
PHANTASMS OF THE LIVING
We have seen that the hypnotic agent is able to project from his own
brain certain thoughts and images into the mind of the percipient.
"When," writes Professor Barrett, "the subject was in the state of
trance or profound hypnotism, I noticed that not only sensations, but
also ideas or emotions, occurring in the operator appeared to be
reproduced in the subject without the intervention of any sign, or
visible or audible communication.... In many other ways I convinced
myself that the existence of a distinct idea in my own mind gave rise to
some image of the idea in the subject's mind, not always a clear image,
but one that could not fail to be recognised as a more or less distorted
reflection of my own thought. The important point is that every care was
taken to prevent any unconscious muscular action of the face, or
otherwise giving any indication to the subject."
This presumed mode of communication between one individual and another,
without the intervention of any known sense, Professor Barrett, arguing
on electrical analogies, is inclined to suggest might be due to some
form of nervous induction. But is this faculty restricted in its
operation to a hypnotised subject? If it were, the significance of the
phenomena would be very much lessened. We should leave telepathy out of
our account. But it is not so restricted. The ideas and images are
capable of being projected not only to a hypnotised person, but to one
who is apparently not under any hypnotic influence whatever. Yet we
still must be careful of how we call in the aid of any "supernatural"
agency to account for the influences I am about to relate--the
translation of ideas and motor impulses from one person to another
without the aid of any known sense. The transference of pictures which
we described in the last article has been achieved in hundreds of cases
by an agent upon a hypnotised percipient. Here we have telepathy
apparently at work, but not, however, at any great distance, nor
successful in conjuring up really vivid or ominous hallucinations. The
scientific term for these is "sensory automatisms," and many instances
of these are given by Edmund Gurney, author of "Phantasms of the
Living."
At an early period the Society for Psychical Research began a "Census of
Hallucinations," which, with Gurney's book, now renders it possible for
us to consider these phenomena with some certainty. The net result of
all this investigation would seem to demonstrate that a large number of
sensory automatisms occur amongst sane and healthy persons. We will
later consider what difficulty lies in the way of attributing to
telepathy the bulk of these phenomena. There is a widely accepted theory
that telepathy is propagated by brain-waves, or, in Sir W. Crooke's
phraseology, by ether-waves, of even smaller amplitude and greater
frequency than those which carry X-rays. Such waves are supposed to pass
from one brain to another, arousing in the second brain an excitation
of image similar to the excitation or image from which they start in the
first place. It has been pointed out that on this view there is no
theoretical reason for limiting telepathy to human beings. Why may not
the impulse pass between men and the lower animals, or between the lower
animals themselves?
I myself have exhumed from the records a case in point. General J. C.
Thompson describes a remarkable apparition of a dog, with every mark of
reality, at the time when the dog was killed in a city more than a
hundred miles distant. General Thompson says:
"Jim, the dog whose ghost I refer to, was a beautiful collie,
the pet of my family, residing at Cheyenne, Wyoming. His
affectionate nature surpassed even that of his kind. He had a
wide celebrity in the city as 'the laughing dog,' due to the
fact that he manifested his recognition of acquaintances and
love for his friends by a joyful laugh, as distinctively such
as that of any human being.
"One evening in the fall of 1905, about 7.30 P.M., I was
walking with a friend on Seventeenth Street in Denver,
Colorado. As we approached the entrance to the First National
Bank, we observed a dog lying in the middle of the pavement,
and on coming up to him I was amazed at his perfect likeness to
Jim in Cheyenne. The identity was greatly fortified by his
loving recognition of me, and the peculiar laugh of Jim's
accompanying it. I said to my friend that nothing but the 105
miles between Denver and Cheyenne would keep me from making
oath to the dog being Jim, whose peculiarities I explained to
him.
"The dog astral or ghost was apparently badly hurt--he could
not rise. After petting him and giving him a kind adieu, we
crossed over Stout Street and stopped to look at him again. He
had vanished. The next morning's mail brought a letter from my
wife saying that Jim had been accidentally killed the evening
before at 7.30 P.M. I shall always believe it was Jim's ghost I
saw."
This story, circumstantially narrated by an American general, recalls Mr
Rider Haggard's celebrated dream that he saw his dog, Bob, in a dying
condition, probably about three hours after the dog's death.
But we need not pause on such bypaths as these.
Perhaps the simplest form of thought-transference at a distance is that
in which we find a vague mental unrest, unaccompanied by any visual or
auditory hallucination. Cases are not infrequently met with where the
patient suffers from acute depression and anxiety which are not
connected at the time with any definite event. _The Journal of the
Society for Psychical Research_, July, 1895, yields the following.
Miss W. writes:
"On January 17th of this year (1895) I was haunted all day with
an indefinable dread, amounting to positive terror if I yielded
in the least to its influence. A little before six o'clock I
went to my maid's room and casually inquired of her whether
she believed in presentiments. She answered: 'Don't let them
get hold of you; it is a bad habit.' I replied: 'This is no
ordinary presentiment. All day long I have felt that something
terrible is impending; of what nature I do not know. I have
fought against it, but to no purpose. It is a terror I am
positively _possessed_ with.' I was proceeding to describe it
in fuller detail, when my mother entered the room with a
telegram in her hand. One glance at her face told me that my
foreboding had not been a groundless depression. The telegram
was to the effect that my brother had been taken very ill at
Cambridge and needed my mother at once to nurse him.
"I presume that the intensity of my foreboding was due to the
very serious nature of his illness.
"I experienced at different times what are in common parlance
termed 'presentiments'; but only on one other occasion has the
same peculiar _terror_ (a chilling conviction of impending
trouble) beset me."
This is corroborated both by the maid and Miss W.'s brother, an
undergraduate at King's College, Cambridge, who had met with a serious
accident the same afternoon. The affection between brother and sister
was, it is related, very close.
Of a well-known type of case the following is a good example. The Hon.
Mrs Fox Powys is the narrator:--
"July 1882.
"I was expecting my husband home, and shortly after the time he
ought to have arrived (about ten P.M.) I heard a cab drive up
to the door, the bell ring, my husband's voice talking with the
cabman, the front door open and his step come up the stairs. I
went to the drawing-room, opened it, and to my astonishment saw
no one. I could hardly believe he was not there, the whole
thing was so vivid, and the street was particularly quiet at
the time. About twenty minutes or so after this my husband
_really_ arrived, though nothing sounded to me more real than
it did the first time. The train was late, and he had been
thinking I might be anxious."
In response to further inquiries, Mrs Powys added:
"To me the whole thing was very noisy and real, but no one else
can have heard anything, for the bell I heard ring was not
answered. It was a quiet street in town, and there was no
vehicle of any kind passing at the time; and on finding no one
on the landing as I expected, I went at once to the window, and
there was nothing to be seen, and no sound to be heard, which
would have been the case had the cab been driven off."
Here the expectation of Mr Fox Powys' arrival seems to have caused an
auditory hallucination. In other cases of a similar nature the
hallucination is visual, the percipient actually seeing the figure of
the expected person.
The authors of "Phantasms of the Living" give the following case as an
"interesting puzzle" and invite the reader to decide whether or not it
affords evidence for telepathy. The narrator, Mr W. A. S., is described
as an unexceptionable witness who has never had any other visual
hallucination.
"January 14th, 1883.
"In the month of April 1871, about two o'clock in the
afternoon, I was sitting in the drawing-room of my father's
house in Pall Mall. The window of the room fronted south; and
the sun was shining brightly in at the window. I was sitting
between the fireplace and the window, with my back to the
light; my niece was sitting on the opposite side of the
fireplace; and opposite me at the farther corner of the room
was a door partly open, leading directly to the staircase. I
saw what I supposed at the first moment to be dirty soapy water
running in at the door; and I was in the act of jumping up to
scold the housemaid for upsetting the water, when I saw that
the supposed water was the tail or train of a lady's dress. The
lady glided in backwards, as if she had been slid in on a
slide, each part of her dress keeping its place without
disturbance. She glided in till I could see the whole of her,
_except the tip of her nose, her lips and the tip of her chin,
which were hidden by the edge of the door_. Her head was
slightly turned over her shoulder, and her eye also turned, so
that it appeared fixed upon me. She held her arm, which was a
very fine one, in a peculiar way, as if she were proud of it.
She was dressed in a pale blue evening dress, worked with white
lace. I instantly recognised the figure as that of a lady whom
I had known some twenty-five years or more before; and with
whom I had frequently danced. She was a bright, dashing girl, a
good dancer, and we were good friends, but nothing more. She
had afterwards married and I had occasionally heard of her, but
do not think I had seen her for certainly more than twenty or
twenty-five years. She looked much as I used to see her--with
long curls and bright eyes, but perhaps something stouter and
more matronly.
"I said to myself: 'This is one of those strange apparitions I
have often heard of. I will watch it as carefully as I can.' My
niece, who did not see the figure, in the course of a minute or
two exclaimed: 'Uncle A., what is the matter with you? You
look as if you saw a ghost!' I motioned her to be quiet, as I
wished to observe the thing carefully; and an impression came
upon me that if I moved, the thing would disappear. I tried to
find out whether there was anything in the ornaments on the
walls, or anything else which could suggest the figure; but I
found that all the lines close to her cut the outline of her
figure at all sorts of angles, and none of these coincided with
the outline of her figure, and the colour of everything around
her strongly contrasted with her colour. In the course of a few
minutes, I heard the door bell ring, and I heard my brother's
voice in the hall. He came upstairs and walked right through
the figure into the room. The figure then began to fade away
rather quickly; and though I tried I could in no way recall it.
"I frequently told the story in society, treating it always as
something internal rather than external and supposing that the
lady was still alive; and rather making a joke of it than
otherwise. Some years afterwards I was staying with some
friends in Suffolk and told the story at the dinner-table,
saying that it was no ghost as the lady was still alive. The
lady of the house said: 'She is not alive, as you suppose, but
she has been dead some years.' We looked at the peerage and
found she had died in 1871. (I afterwards found out that she
had died in November, whereas the apparition was in April.) The
conversation continued about her, and I said: 'Poor thing, I am
sorry she is dead. I have had many a merry dance with her. What
did she die of?' The lady of the house said: 'Poor thing
indeed, she died a wretched death; she died of cancer in the
face.' She never showed me the front of her face; it was always
concealed by the edge of the door."
I will now concern myself with the power of an agent to project himself
phantasmally--that is, to make his form and features manifest to some
percipient at a distance as though he were actually present. In Gurney's
"Phantasms of the Living" is given at length a case of a simple nature.
Here there was not one but two percipients.
On a certain Sunday evening in November 1881, having been
reading of the great power which the human will is capable of
exercising, I determined with the whole force of my being that
I would be present in spirit in the front bedroom on the second
floor of a house situated at 22 Hogarth Road, Kensington, in
which room slept two ladies of my acquaintance--viz. Miss L. S.
V., and Miss E. C. V., aged respectively twenty-five and eleven
years. I was living at this time at 23 Kildare Gardens, a
distance of about three miles from Hogarth Road, and I had not
mentioned in any way my intention of trying this experiment to
either of the above ladies, for the simple reason that it was
only on retiring to rest upon this Sunday night that I made up
my mind to do so. The time at which I determined I would be
there was one o'clock in the morning, and I also had a strong
intention of making my presence perceptible.
"On the following Thursday I went to see the ladies in
question, and in the course of conversation (without any
allusion to the subject on my part) the elder one told me that
on the previous Sunday night she had been much terrified by
perceiving me standing by her bedside, and that she screamed
when the apparition advanced towards her, and awoke her little
sister, who saw me also.
"I asked her if she was awake at the time, and she replied most
decidedly in the affirmative, and upon my inquiring the time of
the occurrence she replied about one o'clock in the morning.
"This lady, at my request, wrote down a statement of the event
and signed it.
"This was the first occasion upon which I tried an experiment
of this kind, and its complete success startled me very much.
"Besides exercising my power of volition very strongly, I put
forth an effort which I cannot find words to describe. I was
conscious of a mysterious influence of some sort permeating in
my body, and had a distinct impression that I was exercising
some force with which I had been hitherto unacquainted, but
which I can now at certain times set in motion at will.
"S. H. B."
The account given by Miss Verity is as follows:--
"January 18th, 1883.
"On a certain Sunday evening, about twelve months since, at our
house in Hogarth Road, Kensington, I distinctly saw Mr B. in my
room, about one o'clock. I was perfectly awake and was much
terrified. I awoke my sister by screaming, and she saw the
apparition herself. Three days after, when I saw Mr B., I told
him what had happened; but it was some time before I could
recover from the shock I had received, and the remembrance is
too vivid to be ever erased from my memory.
"L. S. Verity."
Miss E. C. Verity says:
"I remember the occurrence of the event described by my sister
in the annexed paragraph, and her description is quite correct.
I saw the apparition which she saw, at the same time and under
the same circumstances.
"E. C. Verity."
* * * * *
"The witnesses (comments Gurney) have been very carefully
cross-examined by the present writer. There is not the
slightest doubt that their mention of the occurrence to S. H.
B. was spontaneous. They had not at first intended to mention
it; but when they saw him their sense of its oddness overcame
their resolution. Miss Verity is a perfectly sober-minded and
sensible witness, with no love of marvels, and with a
considerable dread and dislike of this particular form of
marvel."
On another occasion the agent announced privately to the investigator
that he would project himself at a stated time. He did so; and the lady
wrote as follows:--
"44 Norland Square, W.
"On Saturday night, March 22nd, 1884, at about midnight, I had
a distinct impression that Mr S. H. B. was present in my room,
and I distinctly saw him whilst I was quite widely awake. He
came towards me, and stroked my hair. I _voluntarily_ gave him
this information when he called to see me on Wednesday, April
2nd, telling him the time and the circumstances of the
apparition, without any suggestion on his part. The appearance
in my room was most vivid and quite unmistakable.
"L. S. Verity."
Mr B.'s own account runs thus:
"On Saturday, March 22nd, I determined to make my presence
perceptible to Miss V., at 44 Norland Square, Notting Hill, at
twelve midnight, and as I had previously arranged with Mr
Gurney that I should post him a letter on the evening on which
I tried my next experiment (stating the time and other
particulars), I sent a note to acquaint him with the above
facts.
"About ten days afterwards I called upon Miss V., and she
voluntarily told me that on March 22nd, at twelve o'clock
midnight, she had seen me so vividly in her room (whilst
widely awake) that her nerves had been much shaken, and she had
been obliged to send for a doctor in the morning.
"S. H. B."
Another case of a similar nature is reported by the American branch of
the Society for Psychical Research:
"On July 5th, 1887, I left my house in Lakewood to go to New
York to spend a few days. My wife was not feeling well when I
left, and after I had started I looked back and saw her
standing in the door looking disconsolate and sad at my
leaving. The picture haunted me all day, and at night, before I
went to bed, I thought I would try to find out, if possible,
her condition. I had undressed, and was sitting on the edge of
the bed, when I covered my face with my hands and willed myself
in Lakewood at home to see if I could see her. After a little
while I seemed to be standing in her room before the bed, and
saw her lying there looking much better. I felt satisfied she
was better, and so spent the week more comfortably regarding
her condition. On Saturday I went home. When she saw me she
remarked: 'I don't know whether I am glad to see you or not,
for I thought something had happened to you. I saw you standing
in front of the bed the night (about 8.30 or before 9) you
left, and as plain as could be, and I have been worrying myself
about you ever since. I sent to the office and to the depot
daily to get some message from you.' After explaining my effort
to find out her condition, everything became plain to her. She
had seen me when I was trying to see her and find out her
condition. I thought at the time I was going to see her and
make her see me.
"B. F. Sinclair."
The foregoing is corroborated by Mrs Sinclair. She states that she saw
her husband, not as he was dressed at the moment of the experiment, but
"in a suit that hung in a closet at home." The apparition caused her
great anxiety, so that her husband's view of her improved appearance was
not really true. The son, Mr George Sinclair, avers that in his
mother's vision his father's face was "drawn and set, as if he was
either dead or trying to accomplish something which was beyond him."
Another case investigated by the Society is also striking. The date is
1896.
"'One night, two or three years ago, I came back from the
theatre to my mother's flat at 6 S---- Street; and after I had
been into her bedroom and told her all about it, I went to bed
about one A.M. I had not been asleep long when I started up
frightened, fancying that I had heard someone walk down the
passage towards my mother's room; but, hearing nothing more,
went to sleep again. I started up alarmed in the same way three
or four times before dawn.
"'In the morning, upon inquiry, my mother (who was ill at the
time) only told me that she had had a very disturbed night.
"'Then I asked my brother, who told me that he had suffered in
the same way as I had, starting up several times in a
frightened manner. On hearing this my mother then told me that
she had seen an apparition of Mr Pelham. Later in the day Mr
Pelham came in, and my mother asked him casually if he had been
doing anything last night; upon which he told us that he had
come to bed willing that he should visit and appear to us. We
made him promise not to repeat the experiment.'
"Mrs E., the mother, states that she was recovering from
influenza at the time. At half-past ten, as she lay reading:
"'A strange, creepy sensation came over me, and I felt my eyes
were drawn towards the left-hand side of the room. I felt I
must look, and there, distinct against the curtain, was a blue
luminous mist.
"'This time I was impelled to cast my eyes downward to the side
of my bed, and there, creeping upwards towards me, was the same
blue luminous mist. I was too terrified to move, and remember
keeping the book straight up before my face, as though to ward
off a blow, at the same time exerting all my strength of will
and determination not to be afraid--when, suddenly, as if with
a jerk, above the top of my book came the brow and eyes of Mr
Pelham.'
"Instantly her fears ceased. She 'remembered that Mr Pelham had
experimented on her before at night'; and 'in one moment mist
and face were gone.'
"For his part, Mr Pelham explains that he 'carefully imagined'
himself going down the steps of his house, and so along the
streets, to Mrs E.'s flat, and to her drawing-room and bedroom;
he then went to bed with his mind fixed on the visit and soon
fell asleep. He has made other trials, but without any positive
success, though during one of them Mrs E. was wakened suddenly
by the feeling that someone was in the room, and it occurred to
her that Mr Pelham was again experimenting."
The occurrences above related are most significant, if true, and I am
bound to say the _bona fides_ of the narrators seems to me indisputable.
Is it a spirit showing itself partially dissociated from the living
organism; evincing independence, a certain intelligence and a certain
permanence? Or is this a mere image of the agent, conceived in his own
brain and projected telepathically to the brain of the percipient? So
far, we are merely groping our way. Yet, is it not possible that we have
laid hands upon a credible explanation of the eternal mystery of
"ghosts"? We shall see.
CHAPTER IV
DREAMS
Having partially discussed the subject of phantasms projected from the
brain of the agent to that of the percipient, I must now briefly
describe another group for which the evidence is very abundant--that of
"veridical" dreams. This is a term used to describe apparitions
coinciding with other events in such a manner as to suggest a
connection. Your dream or hallucination is said to be veridical when it
conveys an idea which is both true and previously unknown to you.
Making every allowance for the element of chance, there is a mass of
evidence which mere coincidence cannot explain away. Yet we must not
overlook the frequency of dreams, even of a striking character, which
may once or twice in a million times actually hit on the coincident
event. But besides coincidence, there is at times another normal
explanation. Mr Podmore relates how a neighbour of his on the night of
24th June 1894 dreamed President Carnot had been assassinated. He told
his family before the morning paper announcing the news had been opened.
As has been pointed out, in a case of that kind it seems possible that
the information may have reached the sleeper in his dreams from the
shouts of a newsboy, or even from the conversation of passers-by in the
street.
Before any supernormal theory, we must admit the possibility of a normal
communication, however far-fetched it may seem. In each of the instances
about to be related the fact of the dream was either recorded by the
dreamer or related to a friend before the fact of any coincidence was
suspected.
One of the best-known cases is that of Canon Warburton, who writes:
"Somewhere about the year 1848 I went up from Oxford to spend a
day or two with my brother, Acton Warburton, then a barrister,
living at 10 Fish Street, Lincoln's Inn. When I got to his
chambers I found a note on the table apologising for his
absence, and saying that he had gone to a dance somewhere in
the West End, and intended to be home soon after one o'clock.
Instead of going to bed I dozed in an arm-chair, but started up
wide awake exactly at one, ejaculating: 'By Jove! he's down!'
and seeing him coming out of a drawing-room into a brightly
illuminated landing, catching his foot in the edge of the top
stair, and falling headlong, just saving himself by his elbows
and hands. (The house was one which I have never seen, nor did
I know where it was.) Thinking very little of the matter, I
fell a-doze again for half-an-hour and was awakened by my
brother suddenly coming in and saying, 'Oh, there you are! I
have just had as narrow an escape of breaking my neck as I ever
had in my life. Coming out of the ballroom I caught my foot,
and tumbled full-length down the stairs.'
"That is all. It may have been 'only a dream,' but I always
thought it must have been something more."
A member of the Society for Psychical Research narrates that on 7th
October 1900 he woke abruptly in the small hours of the morning with a
painful conviction upon him that his wife, who was that night sleeping
in another part of the house, had burst a varicose vein in the calf of
her leg, and that he could feel the swelled place three inches long:
"I wondered whether I ought to get up and go down to her room
on the first floor, and considered whether she would be able to
come up to me; but I was only partly awake, though in acute
distress. My mind had been suddenly roused, but my body was
still under the lethargy of sleep. I argued with myself that
there was sure to be nothing in it, that I should only disturb
her, and so shortly went off to sleep again.
"On going to her room this morning I said I had had a horrid
dream, which had woke me up, to the effect that she had burst a
varicose vein, of which just now care has to be taken. 'Why,'
she replied, 'I had just the same experience. I woke up at
2.15, feeling sure the calf of my leg was bleeding, and my
hand seemed to feel it when I put it there. I turned on the
light in alarm, noticing the time, and wondered if I should be
able to get up to thee, or whether I should have to wake the
housekeeper. Thou wast in the dream out of which I woke,
examining the place.'
"Though I did not note the hour, two o'clock is about the time
I should have guessed it to be; and the impression on my mind
was vivid and terrible, knowing how dangerous such an accident
would be."
The foregoing is thus corroborated by the lady:
"I felt twinges of pain in my leg off and on in my sleep
without being entirely roused till about 2.15 A.M. Then, or
just before, I dreamt or had a vivid impression that a vein had
burst, and that my husband, who was sleeping in another room up
another flight of stairs, was there and called my attention to
it. I thought it felt wet, and trickling down the leg as if
bleeding, passed my hand down, and at first thought it seemed
wet; but on gaining fuller consciousness found it all right,
and that it was not more painful than often when I got out and
stood on it. Thought over the contingency of its actually
bursting, and whether I could so bandage it in that case as to
make it safe to go up to my husband's room, and thought I could
do so.
"Looking at my watch, found it about 2.20."
As to dreams in which a death occurs there is a vast mass of testimony.
The late Dr Hodgson, on 19th July 1897, received the following letter:--
"DEAR HODGSON,--Five minutes ago Mr J. F. Morse, who has all
his life had dreams which were more or less verified later,
came to my room and said: 'I believe my wife died last night,
for I had a dream of a most remarkable nature which indicates
it. I shall be able to let you know soon, for I shall get word
at my office when I reach there. I will then send you word.'
His wife is in a country place in Delaware Co. Pa. She is ill,
but he had no idea she would not live for months, as the
enclosed letter of July 15th will show; but she was ill, and
would be likely to decline slowly and gradually. I will get
this off or in the mail before I hear any more.
"Mr Morse in his appearance looks like one who had just lost a
dear friend, and is in a state of great mental depression, with
tears in his eyes....
"M. L. HOLBROOK."
On the evening of the same day a telegram was received announcing the
unexpected death of Mrs Morse at 9.15 on the evening of Friday, 16th
July.
A prominent Chicago journalist, Mr F. B. Wilkie, reported that his wife
asked him one morning in October 1885, while still engaged in dressing,
and before either of them had left their sleeping-room, if he knew
anyone named Edsale or Esdale. A negative reply was given and then a
"Why do you ask?" She replied: "During the night I dreamt that I was on
the lake-shore and found a coffin there, with the name of Edsale or
Esdale on it, and I am confident that someone of that name has recently
been drowned there." On opening the morning paper the first item that
attracted his attention was the report of the mysterious disappearance
from his home in Hyde Park of a young man named Esdale. A few days
afterwards the body of a young man was found on the lake-shore.
This case was carefully investigated and authenticated by Dr Hodgson,
and bears some unusual features.
Of dreams that may be reasonably regarded as telepathic the following is
a striking example. It is contributed to "Phantasms of the Living" by a
Mrs Hilton--a lady engaged in active work, and not in any respect a
"visionary."
"234 Burdett Road, E.
"April 10th, 1883.
"The dream which I am about to relate occurred about two years
ago. I seemed to be walking in a country road, with high grassy
banks on either side. Suddenly I heard the tramp of many feet.
Feeling a strange sense of fear I called out: 'Who are these
people coming?' A voice above me replied: 'A procession of the
dead.' I then found myself on the bank, looking into the road
where the people were walking five or six abreast. Hundreds of
them passed by me--neither looking aside nor looking at each
other. They were people of all conditions and in all ranks of
life. I saw no children amongst them. I watched the long line
of people go away into the far distance, but I felt no special
interest in any of them, until I saw a middle-aged Friend,
dressed as a gentleman farmer. I pointed to him and called out:
'Who is that, please?' He turned round and called out in a loud
voice: 'I am John M., of Chelmsford.' Then my dream ended. Next
day when my husband returned from the office he told me that
John M., of Chelmsford, had died the previous day.
"I may add that I only knew the Friend in question by sight and
cannot recollect ever speaking to him.
"MARIE HILTON."
About a year later Mrs Hilton experienced a dream of a similar kind,
again coincident with the death of an acquaintance seen in the phantom
procession. It is worth noting "remarks Mr Gurney," that these
dreams--for all their _bizarrerie_--seem to belong to a known type.
In another category of phenomena belong precognitive dreams in which
certain events, especially deaths, are foretold. Mr Alfred Cooper, of 9
Henrietta Street, Cavendish Square, W., states, and his statement is
attested by the Duchess of Hamilton, that:
"A fortnight before the death of the late Earl of L----, in
1882, I called upon the Duke of Hamilton in Hill Street to see
him professionally. After I had finished seeing him we went
into the drawing-room where the Duchess was, and the Duke said
to me: 'Oh, Cooper, how is the Earl?'
"The Duchess said: 'What Earl?' and on my answering: 'Lord
L----,' she replied, 'That is very odd. I have had a most
extraordinary vision. I went to bed, but after being in bed a
short time, I was not exactly asleep, but thought I saw a scene
as if from a play before me. The actors in it were Lord L----,
in a chair, as if in a fit, with a man standing over him with a
red beard. He was by the side of a bath, over which bath a red
lamp was distinctly shown.'
"I then said: 'I am attending Lord L---- at present; there is
very little the matter with him; he is not going to die; he
will be all right very soon.'
"Well, he got better for a week and was nearly well, but at the
end of six or seven days after this I was called to see him
suddenly. He had inflammation of both lungs.
"I called in Sir William Jenner, but in six days he was a dead
man. There were two male nurses attending him; one had been
taken ill. But when I saw the other the dream of the Duchess
was exactly represented. He was standing near a bath over the
Earl, and, strange to say, his beard was red. There was the
bath with the red lamp over it, it is rather rare to find a
bath with a red lamp over it, and this brought the story to my
mind.
"The vision seen by the Duchess was told two weeks before the
death of Lord L----. It is a most remarkable thing. This
account, written in 1888, has been revised by the late Duke of
Manchester, father of the Duchess of Hamilton, who heard the
vision from his daughter on the morning after she had seen it.
"MARY HAMILTON.
"ALFRED COOPER."
Mr Myers adds:
"The Duchess only knew Lord L---- by sight, and had not heard
that he was ill. She knew she was not asleep, for she opened
her eyes to get rid of the vision, and, shutting them, saw the
same thing again.
"An independent and concordant account has been given to me (F.
W. H. M.) orally by a gentleman to whom the Duchess related the
dream on the morning after its occurrence."
One of the most interesting and well-authenticated cases of dreams
foretelling a death is that of Mr Fred Lane, understudy to that popular
actor the late William Terriss. His statement is as follows:--
"Adelphi Theatre,
"December 20th, 1897.
"In the early morning of December 16th, 1897, I dreamt that I
saw the late Mr Terriss lying in a state of delirium or
unconsciousness on the stairs leading to the dressing-rooms in
the Adelphi Theatre. He was surrounded by people engaged at the
theatre, amongst whom were Miss Millward and one of the footmen
who attend the curtain, both of whom I actually saw a few hours
later at the death scene. His chest was bare and clothes torn
aside. Everybody who was around him was trying to do something
for his good. This dream was in the shape of a picture. I saw
it like a tableau on which the curtain would rise and fall. I
immediately after dreamt that we did not open at the Adelphi
Theatre that evening. I was in my dressing-room in the dream,
but this latter part was somewhat incoherent. The next morning,
on going down to the theatre for rehearsal, the first member of
the company I met was Miss H----, to whom I mentioned this
dream. On arriving at the theatre I also mentioned it to
several other members of the company including Messrs Creagh
Henry, Buxton, Carter Bligh, etc. This dream, though it made
such an impression upon me as to cause me to relate it to my
fellow-artists, did not give me the idea of any coming
disaster. I may state that I have dreamt formerly of deaths of
relatives and other matters which have impressed me, but the
dreams have never impressed me sufficiently to make me repeat
them the following morning, and have never been verified. My
dream of the present occasion was the most vivid I have ever
experienced; in fact, lifelike, and exactly represented the
scene as I saw it at night."
Three members of the company--Mr Carter Bligh, Mr Creagh Henry, and Miss
H---- --made statements that Mr Lane related his dream in their presence
on the morning of 16th December. Mr Lane was in the vicinity of the
Adelphi Theatre when the murderer, named Prince or Archer, who had been
employed as a super at the theatre, stabbed Terriss at the stage
entrance to the theatre. The actor was taken to the Charing Cross
Hospital, where he died almost immediately. It is interesting to note
that it was Lane himself who ran to the hospital for the doctor, and on
his return looked in at the stage entrance and saw Terriss lying on the
stairs just as he had seen him in the dream.
While I am fully alive to the possibilities of coincidence, there
certainly does not seem to be much besides levity in the theory that "it
happened to be Jones's hour to see a hallucination of Thompson when it
happened to be Thompson's hour to die," especially when, as frequently
happens, the hallucination occurs more than once to the same percipient.
A Parisian journalist, M. Henri Buisson, sends to "The Annals of
Psychical Science" an account of three premonitory dreams all of which
were told to others before they were fulfilled. In the first, which
occurred on June 8th, 1887, M. Buisson saw his grandmother "stretched
dead on her bed, with a smile on her face as if she slept." Above the
bed, in a brilliant sun, he read the date, "June 8th, 1888," just a
year later; and on that day his grandmother died quite suddenly, with
her face as calm as he had seen it in his dream.
On another occasion M. Buisson saw his mother, not dead, but very ill,
and attended by a doctor, who had died more than a year before, after
having been the family physician for thirty years. The next day M.
Buisson received a telegram saying that his mother was ill, and, in
fact, she died during the day.
In April 1907, M. Buisson dreamt that he received notice to quit his
house on pretence of a message from the Prefect of Police, and that on
looking out of the window he saw the Prefect in the street, dressed in a
leather jacket, with a soft hat, and a slipper on one foot. He also
dreamt that a fire had broken out. On the evening of the next day he
heard the fire-engines, and on following them he found the Prefect on
the spot, dressed just as in the dream, having hurt one foot, he had to
go about in a slipper.
Of still another type is the clairvoyant dream. The following is
related by Mr Herbert J. Lewis, of Cardiff:--
"In September 1880 I lost the landing-order of a large steamer
containing a cargo of iron ore, which had arrived in the port
of Cardiff. She had to commence discharging at six o'clock the
next morning. I received the landing-order at four o'clock in
the afternoon, and when I arrived at the office at six I found
that I had lost it. During all the evening I was doing my
utmost to find the officials of the Customs House to get a
permit, as the loss was of the greatest importance, preventing
the ship from discharging. I came home in a great degree of
trouble about the matter, as I feared that I should lose my
situation in consequence.
"That night I dreamt that I saw the lost landing-order lying in
a crack in the wall under a desk in the Long Room of the
Customs House.
"At five the next morning I went down to the Customs House and
got the keeper to get up and open it. I went to the spot of
which I had dreamt, and found the paper in the very place. The
ship was not ready to discharge at her proper time, and I went
on board at seven and delivered the landing-order, saving her
from all delay.
"I can certify to the truth of the above statement,
"HERBERT J. LEWIS,
"THOMAS LEWIS
"(Herbert Lewis's father).
"H. WALLIS."
(Mr E. J. Newell, of the George and Abbotsford Hotel, Melrose, adds the
following corroborative note.)
"August 14th, 1884.
"I made some inquiries about Mr Herbert Lewis's dream before I
left Cardiff. He had been searching throughout the room in
which the order was found. His theory as to how the order got
in the place in which it was found is that it was probably put
there by someone (perhaps with malicious intent), as he does
not see how it could have fallen so.
"The fact that Mr H. Lewis is exceedingly short-sighted adds
to the probability of the thing which you suggest, that the
dream was simply an unconscious act of memory in sleep. On the
other hand, he does not believe it was there when he searched.
"E. J. NEWELL."
Now, it seems to me in the above case that the dreamer's subliminal self
may have taken note of the lost landing-order without his
super-consciousness being aware of it, and that the fact returned to him
in his dream.
In R. L. Stevenson's "Across the Plains" may be found a striking chapter
on dreams. It contains an account of some of the most successful dream
experiments ever recorded. Stevenson's dreams were of no ordinary
character; they were always of great vividness, and often of a markedly
recurrent type. This faculty he developed to an unusual degree--to such
an extent, indeed, that it became of great assistance to him in his
work. By self-suggestion before sleep, we are told, the great novelist
would secure "a visual and dramatic intensity of dream-representation
which furnished him with the motives of some of his most striking
romances." But "R. L. S." is not the only one who has secured assistance
of dreams. Here is an account given by a German, Professor Hilprecht, of
an experience of a similar nature ("Human Personality," i. 376):
"One Saturday evening, about the middle of March 1893, I had
been wearying myself, as I had done so often in the weeks
preceding, in the vain attempt to decipher two small fragments
of agate, which were supposed to belong to the finger-rings of
some Babylonian. The labour was much increased by the fact that
the fragments presented remnants only of characters and lines,
that dozens of similar small fragments had been found in the
ruins of the temple of Bel at Nippur with which nothing could
be done, that in this case furthermore I never had the
originals before me, but only a hasty sketch made by one of the
members of the expedition sent by the University of
Pennsylvania to Babylonia. I could not say more than that the
fragments, taking into consideration the place in which they
were found and the peculiar characteristics of the cuneiform
characters preserved upon them, sprang from the Cassite period
of Babylonian history (_circa_ 1700-1140 B.C.); moreover, as
the first character of the third line of the first fragment
seemed to be KU, I ascribed this fragment, with an
interrogation point, to King Kurigalzu, while I placed the
other fragment as unclassifiable with other Cassite fragments
upon a page of my book where I published the unclassifiable
fragments. The proofs already lay before me, but I was far from
satisfied. The whole problem passed yet again through my mind
that March evening before I placed my mark of approval under
the last correction in the book. Even then I had come to no
conclusion. About midnight, weary and exhausted, I went to bed
and was soon in deep sleep. Then I dreamed the following
remarkable dream. A tall, thin priest of the old pre-Christian
Nippur, about forty years of age and clad in a simple abba, led
me to the treasure chamber of the temple, on its south-east
side. He went with me into a small low-ceiled room, without
windows, in which there was a large wooden chest, while scraps
of agate and lapis-lazuli lay scattered on the floor. Here he
addressed me as follows:--'The two fragments which you have
published separately upon pages 22 and 26, belong together, are
not finger-rings, and their history is as follows. King
Kurigalzu (_circa_ 1300 B.C.) once sent to the temple of Bel,
among other articles of agate and lapis-lazuli, an inscribed
votive cylinder of agate. Then we priests suddenly received the
command to make for the statue of the god Ninib a pair of
earrings of agate. We were in great dismay, since there was no
agate as raw material at hand. In order to execute the command
there was nothing for us to do but cut the votive cylinder into
three parts, thus making three rings, each of which contained a
portion of the original inscription. The first two rings served
as earrings for the statue of the god; the two fragments which
have given you so much trouble are portions of them. If you
will put the two together you will have confirmation of my
words. But the third ring you have not yet found in the course
of your excavations and you never will find it.' With this the
priest disappeared. I awoke at once and immediately told my
wife the dream, that I might not forget it. Next
morning--Sunday--I examined the fragments once more in the
light of these disclosures, and to my astonishment found all
the details of the dream precisely verified in so far as the
means of verification were in my hands. The original
inscription on the votive cylinder read: 'To the god Ninib, son
of Bel, his lord, has Kurigalzu, pontifex of Bel, presented
this.' The problem was at last solved."
CHAPTER V
HALLUCINATIONS
From the occurrence in a dream of the ideas of events which happen to
coincide with actual events, let us turn to apparitions occurring during
the waking hours of the percipient.
The late Professor Sidgwick, at the head of a committee, sent out the
following question to 17,000 educated persons not known to have had
hallucinations:--"Have you ever, when believing yourself to be
completely awake, had a vivid impression of seeing or being touched by a
living being or inanimate object, or of hearing a voice, which
impression, so far as you could discover, was not due to any external
physical cause?"
The replies demonstrate how frequent are hallucinations amongst healthy,
normal-minded persons. No fewer than 1684, or one in ten, of the
persons interrogated, had had visual and auditory and even tactile
hallucinations, realistic human phantoms, and other apparitions. We find
that, according to the age classification, of 1295 visual hallucinations
72 occurred while the percipients were under ten years of age, 217
between the ages of ten and nineteen, 300 between twenty and
twenty-nine, 143 between thirty and thirty-nine, 81 between forty and
forty-nine, 40 between fifty and fifty-nine, 22 between sixty and
sixty-nine, 5 later than seventy, and 415 at unstated ages. Some of the
hallucinations occurred immediately after waking, others while the
percipients were awake in bed; but the great bulk occurred in a fully
awakened state, and a large number appeared out of doors.
Of hallucinations of which we may say that they are due to a projection
from the agent's mind, commonly to a dying man or woman, to that of the
percipient, perhaps one of the most famous is that of Lord Charles
Beresford, as described by him to the Society for Psychical Research:
"It was in the spring of 1864, whilst on board H.M.S. _Racoon_,
between Gibraltar and Marseilles, that I went into my office on
the main deck to get a pipe; and as I opened the door I saw my
father lying in his coffin as plainly as I could. It gave me an
awful jerk and I immediately told some of the fellows who were
smoking just outside the usual place between the guns, and I
also told dear old Onslow, our chaplain. A few days after we
arrived at Marseilles, and I heard of my father's death, and he
had been buried that very day and at the time, half-past twelve
in the day. I may add that at the time it was a bright, sunny
day, and I had not been fretting about my father, as the latest
news I had of him was that although very ill he was better. My
dear old father and I were great chums, more so than is usual
between a man of seventy-two and a boy of twenty, our
respective ages then."
The evidence is so bulky that we may quote only a case here and there at
random:
"On December 9th 1882 Mr T. G. Keulemans was living with his
family in Paris. The outbreak of an epidemic of smallpox caused
him to remove three of his children, including a favourite
little boy of five, to London, whence he received in the course
of the ensuing month several letters giving an excellent
account of their health.
"On the 24th of January 1881, at half-past seven in the
morning, I was suddenly awoke by hearing his voice, as I
fancied, very near me. I saw a bright opaque white mass before
my eyes, and in the centre of this light I saw the face of my
little darling, his eyes bright, his mouth smiling. The
apparition, accompanied by the sound of his voice, was too
short and too sudden to be called a dream; it was too clear,
too decided, to be called an effect of the imagination. So
distinctly did I hear his voice that I looked round the room to
see whether he was actually there. The sound I heard was that
of extreme delight, such as only a happy child can utter. I
thought it was the moment he woke up in London, happy and
thinking of me. I said to myself: 'Thank God, little Isidore
is happy as always.' Mr Keulemans describes the ensuing day as
one of peculiar brightness and cheerfulness. He took a long
walk with a friend, with whom he dined; and was afterwards
playing a game at billiards when he again saw the apparition of
his child. This made him seriously uneasy, and in spite of
having received within three days the assurance of his child's
perfect health he expressed to his wife a conviction that he
was dead. Next day a letter arrived saying that the child was
ill; but the father was convinced that this was only an attempt
to break the news; and, in fact, the child had died, after a
few hours' illness, at the exact time of the first apparition."
Another case as recited by Madame D----, of St Gaudens, is to be found
in "Posthumous Humanity." She says:
"I was still a young girl, and slept with my elder sister. One
evening we had just retired to bed and blown out the light. The
smouldering fire on the hearth still feebly lighted the room.
Upon turning my eyes towards the fireplace I perceived, to my
amazement, a priest seated before the fire and warming himself.
He had the corpulence, the features, and the general appearance
of one of our uncles who lived in the neighbourhood, where he
was an archbishop. I at once called my sister's attention. She
looked in the same direction, and saw the same apparition. She
also recognised our uncle. An indescribable terror seized us
both, and we cried 'Help!' with all our might. My father, who
slept in an adjoining room, awakened by these desperate cries,
jumped out of bed and ran in with a candle in his hand. The
phantom had disappeared, and we saw no one in the room. The
next morning a letter was received informing us that our uncle
had died the previous evening.
"At Wiesbaden, Professor Ebenan, whose old sister kept his
house, stated that he had a friend residing forty or fifty
miles off--likewise a professor--who was very poor and had a
large family. On hearing that his wife was dying, Mr E---- went
to see them, and brought back their eldest boy, for whom a
little bed was put up in Mr E----'s room.
"One morning, about ten days after, Mr E---- called and asked
me: 'Do you believe that at the moment of death you may appear
to one whom you love?' I replied: 'Yes, I do.' 'Well,' he said,
'we shall see. I have noted the day and the hour, for last
night after I went to bed the child said sweetly (in German):
"Yes, dear mamma, I see you." To which I replied: "No, dear
boy, it is I; I am come to bed." "No," he said, "it is dear
mamma, she is standing there smiling at me," pointing to the
side of the bed.' On his next visit Mr Ebenan told us that he
had received a letter informing him that at that time, and on
that evening, the wife had breathed her last."
In some cases a vague shadowy form is seen which gradually acquires
definiteness. Here is an interesting example contributed to
"Proceedings," vol. x., by a Mr T. A.:--
"9th May 1892.
"I saw a darkish vapour leave my father's head when he died,
about twelve years ago, and it formed into a figure full-sized,
and for seven consecutive nights (I) saw it in my room, and saw
it go each night into the next room, in which he died. It
became more distinct each night and brighter each night, till
it was quite brilliant, even dazzling, by the seventh night. It
lasted, say, one and a half minutes. It was quite dark when the
phantom used to appear. I was quite awake, going to bed; [age]
thirty two."
In other cases what is first seen is a glow of light--the apparition
subsequently appearing in it.
Mr R. W. Raper, of Trinity College, Oxford, made the following statement
to the Society for Psychical Research:--
"'Just before Christmas 1894 I went over to Liverpool with one
of my brothers and my sister. It was a very fine clear day and
there was a great crowd of people shopping in the streets. We
were walking down Lord-street, one of the principal streets,
when, passing me, I saw an old uncle of mine whom I knew very
little, and had not seen for a very long time, though he lived
near me. I saw three distinct shapes hobbling past (he was
lame), one after another, in a line. It didn't seem to strike
me at the moment as being in the least curious, not even there
being three shapes in a line. I said to my sister: "I have just
seen Uncle E----, and I am sure he is dead." I said this, as it
were, mechanically, and not feeling at all impressed. Of course
my brother and sister laughed. We thought nothing more about it
while in Liverpool. The first thing my mother said to us when
getting home was: "I have some news"; and then she told us that
this uncle had died early that morning. I don't know the
particular hour. I saw the three shapes at about twelve in the
morning. I felt perfectly fit and well, and was not thinking of
my uncle in the least, nor did I know he was ill. Both my
brother and my sister heard me say that I had seen him and
believed he was dead, and they were equally astonished at
hearing of his death on our return home. My uncle and I knew
each other very little. In fact, he hardly knew me by sight,
although he knew me well when I was a small child.'
"The corroboration from the percipient's mother and sister is
quite ample; the day of the agent's death coincided with the
apparition, but the hour is not certainly known."
Another well-known case is that of Prince Victor Duleep Singh, who
writes:
"On Saturday, October 21st, 1893, I was in Berlin with Lord
Carnarvon. We went to a theatre together and returned before
midnight. I went to bed, leaving, as I always do, a bright
light in the room (electric light). As I lay in bed I found
myself looking at an oleograph which hung on the wall opposite
my bed. I saw distinctly the face of my father, the Maharajah
Duleep Singh, looking at me, as it were, out of this picture;
not like a portrait of him, but his real head. The head about
filled the picture frame. I continued looking, and still saw my
father looking at me with an intent expression. Though not in
the least alarmed, I was so puzzled that I got out of bed to
see what the picture really was. It was an oleograph
commonplace picture of a girl holding a rose and leaning out of
a balcony, an arch forming the background. The girl's face was
quite small, whereas my father's head was the size of life and
filled the frame."
The Prince's father had been in ill-health for some time, but nothing
alarming was to be expected. On the day following the dream he mentioned
it to Lord Carnarvon, and on the evening of that day Lord Carnarvon
handed him a telegram announcing the elder Prince's death. He had had an
apoplectic seizure on the previous evening and never recovered. It is
interesting to note that he had often said that he would try to appear
to his son at death if they happened to be apart. The account is
confirmed by Lord Carnarvon.
It sometimes happens that the point of hallucination is not quite
reached. The following instance, communicated to the Society for
Psychical Research, is straightforward enough:
"'20 Rankeillor Street, Edinburgh,
"'December 27th, 1883.
"'In January 1871 I was living in the West Indies. On the 7th
of that month I got up with a strong feeling that there was
something happening at my old home in Scotland. At seven A.M. I
mentioned to my sister-in-law my strange dread, and said even
at that hour what I dreaded was taking place.
"'By the next mail I got word that at eleven A.M. on the 7th of
January my sister died. The island I lived in was at St Kitts,
and the death took place in Edinburgh. Please note the hours
and allow for the difference in time, and you will notice at
least a remarkable coincidence. I may add I never knew of her
illness.
"'A. C----N.'
"In answer to inquiries, Mr C----n adds: 'I never at any other
time had a feeling in any way resembling the particular time I
wrote about. At the time I wrote about I was in perfect
health, and in every way in comfortable circumstances.'"
There is nothing unreasonable in the assumption that telepathy is the
agency primarily concerned in these manifestations. The idea having been
received, a hallucination is built up, so to speak, by the percipient. A
truly hallucinable person can suggest to himself his own hallucinations
with no external aid, but a non-hallucinable personage cannot induce
these hallucinations at all. Dr Hugh Wingfield stated to the Society for
Psychical Research that the case of one of his patients proved that
hallucinations could be produced by self-suggestion. "He could, by a
simple effort of the mind, himself believe almost any delusion--_e.g._
that he was riding on horseback, that he was a dog, or anything else, or
that he saw snakes--if left to himself the delusion vanished slowly.
Anyone else could remove it at once by a counter-suggestion. He made,"
he adds, "these experiments without my consent, as I consider them
unsafe."
Hallucination is at times accompanied by curious organic effects. One of
the commonest of these is a feeling of cold--generally described as a
"chill" or "cold shudder." The following example is taken from the
Census of Hallucinations of the Society for Psychical Research:--
FROM MISS K. M.
(_The account was written in 1889._)
"[About twenty years ago] I was about ten years old, and was
staying with friends in Kensington. Between the hours of eight
and nine P.M., we were all sitting in the drawing-room with the
door open, [it] being a very warm evening. Suddenly I
experienced a cold shudder, and on looking through the door
opposite which I was sitting, I saw the figure of a little old
lady dressed in a long brown cloak with a large brown hat,
carrying a basket, glide down the stairs and disappear in the
room next the drawing-room. The impression was that of someone
I had never seen. I was talking on ordinary subjects, neither
ill, in grief, or anxiety. There were several other people in
the room, but no one noticed anything but myself. I have never
had any experience of this kind before or since."
Occasionally, but very rarely, pain is described as resulting from a
hallucination. Other effects include fainting fits and tactile
impressions. Noise would appear in some cases to produce visual
hallucinations, by creating in the hearer a strong expectation of seeing
something corresponding to it, or that may account for it. From
"Phantasms of the Living" we glean the following:--
"Between sleeping and waking this morning, I perceived a dog
running about in a field (an ideal white and tan sporting dog),
and the next moment I heard a dog barking outside my window.
Keeping my closed eyes on the vision, I found that _it came and
went with the_ barking of the dog outside; getting fainter,
however, each time."
A weak state of health on the part of the percipient would seem to be
conducive to hallucinatory visions. Here is a case in point contributed
to the "Society for Psychical Research Proceedings," vol. x., by a
Professor G----:
"Saw an old woman with red cloak, nursing a child in her arms.
She sat on a boulder. Place: a grassy moor or upland, near
Shotts, in Lanarkshire. Date: over twenty years ago. Early
autumn, in bright sunny weather. Made several attempts to reach
her, but she always vanished before I could get up to the
stone. Place far from any dwelling, and no spot where anyone
could be concealed.
"[I was] walking; had been slightly troubled with insomnia
which afterwards became worse. Age about thirty.
"No one [was with me]. I heard a vague report that a woman with
red cloak was sometimes seen on the moor. Can't now remember
whether I had heard of that report before I saw the figure--but
think I had not.
"Saw many years ago (age about twenty-one), a dog sitting
beside me in my room: saw this only once: was troubled slightly
with insomnia at the time which afterwards became worse."
The percipient's own view, the collector tells us, is that the
experience on the moor was entirely due to "nerves," as both then and
previously when he saw the dog he had been much overworked, and in each
case a severe illness followed.
Not always does a visual hallucination take the form of a living human
form. Occasionally the object seen or the sound heard is non-human in
character. In insanity and in diseases such cases are frequently met
with, the hallucination being often of a grotesque or horrible sort.
Thus we have a case in which a young child beheld a vision of dwarfish
gnomes dancing on the wall. Among the phantasms of inanimate objects in
the collection of the late E. Gurney were a star, a firework bursting
into stars, a firefly, a crown, landscape vignettes, a statue, the end
of a draped coffin coming in through the door, and a bright oval
surrounding the words "Wednesday, October 15, Death." Geometrical
patterns, sometimes taking very complicated forms, comprise another
known type of hallucination.
As to a theory for hallucinations, the most acceptable one is that they
have their origin in the brain, and that the senses are made to share in
the deception. There is little doubt that William Blake's hallucinations
were voluntary. Gurney refers to a friend, a painter, who was able to
project a vision of his sitter out into space and paint from it. We have
already seen that a hypnotic agent can cause his subject not merely to
see things but to feel them, even to the extent of crying out with pain
when an imaginary lighted match is applied to his finger.
CHAPTER VI
PHANTASMS OF THE DEAD
Thus far I have devoted myself to an investigation of phenomena for
which the theory of telepathy is not inapplicable. It is, however, when
we come to discuss hallucinations from which the idea of a living agent
is apparently excluded that I feel myself entering on even more delicate
and mysterious territory. Having dealt with phantasms of persons at the
point of death, I now propose to deal with phantasms of persons already
dead. Where, indeed, the death has been very recent, the telepathic
theory still serves, for the reception conveyed by the dying agent might
conceivably remain dormant in the sub-consciousness of the percipient,
and only be aroused in a dream or during a propitious waking moment.
This would apply to the case of a lady who saw the body of a well-known
London physician, about ten hours after death, lying in a bare
unfurnished room, which turned out to be a cottage hospital abroad. Mr
Myers, in his "Human Personality," has collected a large number of
examples of apparitions of departed spirits, upon which he lays the
utmost stress, because they, more than any other kind of evidence, tend
to support his great theory of the survival of personality. If, he
reasons, we can gain a number of well-authenticated cases of
hallucinations projected telepathically from an agent before death, an
equal amount of evidence of hallucinations projected by an agent after
death would prove the continuance of life beyond the grave! And some of
the cases which the Society of Psychical Research, both in this country
and America, have collected are certainly of an impressive character.
Unhappily, most of the best and most convincing cases are too long to be
given here; they cannot even profitably be summarised.
In one instance Mr F. G. of Boston, whose high character and good
position are vouched for by Professor Royce and Dr Hodgson, states that
nine years after the death of a favourite sister an apparition appeared
before him:
"The hour was high noon, and the sun was shining cheerfully
into my room. While busily smoking my cigar and writing out my
orders, I suddenly became conscious that someone was sitting on
my left, with one arm resting on the table. Quick as a flash I
turned, and distinctly saw the form of my dead sister, and for
a brief second or so looked her squarely in the face; and so
sure was I that it was she, that I sprang forward in delight,
calling her by name, and as I did so the apparition instantly
vanished."
But that is not the most extraordinary part of the story. The visitation
so impressed the percipient that he took the next train home and related
to his parents what had occurred. He particularly mentioned a bright red
line or scratch on the right-hand side of his sister's face, which he
had distinctly seen:
"... When I mentioned this, my mother rose trembling to her
feet, and nearly fainted away, and as soon as she sufficiently
recovered her self-possession, with tears streaming down her
face, she exclaimed that I had indeed seen my sister, as no
living mortal but herself was aware of the scratch, which she
had accidentally made while doing some little act of kindness
after my sister's death.... In proof, neither my father nor any
of our family had detected it, and positively were unaware of
the incident, yet _I saw the scratch as bright as if just
made_. So strangely impressed was my mother, that even after
she had retired to rest she got up and dressed, came to me, and
told me _she knew_ that I had seen my sister. A few weeks later
my mother died."
Now, is it not a little singular that, although both Dr Hodgson and Mr
Myers record this incident, the theory of telepathy between a living
agent and a living percipient does not occur to them? Is it not
conceivable that the mother, on whose mind the incident of the scratch
on the features of the corpse had admittedly preyed, should have
unwittingly communicated her secret to her son? In other words, the
mother projected a phantasm of her dead daughter to the mind of her son.
In the "Proceedings of the Society" there is a case which, according to
Mr Stead, "appears to suggest that the deceased are continuing to take
an interest in mundane affairs." The story is communicated by Miss
Dodson. On Sunday, 5th June 1887, close upon midnight, Miss Dodson was
roused by hearing her name called three times. She answered twice,
thinking it was her uncle. The third time she recognised the voice of
her mother, who had been dead sixteen years. "I said," continued Miss
Dodson, "'Mamma!'"
"She then came round a screen near my bedside with two children
in her arms and placed them in my arms and put the bedclothes
over them, and said: 'Lucy, promise me to take care of them,
for their mother is just dead.' I said: 'Yes, mamma.' She
repeated: '_Promise_ me to take care of them.' I replied: 'Yes,
I promise you,' and added, 'Oh, mamma, stay and speak to me, I
am so wretched.' She replied: 'Not yet, my child,' then she
seemed to go round the screen again and I remained, feeling the
children to be still in my arms and fell asleep. When I awoke
there was nothing. Tuesday morning, 7th June, I received the
news of my sister-in-law's death. She had given birth to a
child three weeks before, which I did not know till after her
death."
Professor Sidgwick says, as the result of an interesting conversation
with Miss Dodson, that the children were of the ages corresponding with
the ages of the children of her sister-in-law; they seemed to be a
little girl and a baby newly born. The only way an ingenious sceptic can
get round this case is by supposing that a telepathic impulse from the
living brother might conceivably embody itself in the form of his
mother. But the idea of a brother in Belgium being able to transmit a
telepathic message in the assumed shape and with the voice of his
mother, who had been dead for sixteen years, and also to telepath into
existence in London the two little children who were living in his house
at Bruges, is rather a clumsy hypothesis. But what other have we?
"Mr Theobald, an Australian, forwards to the Society a paper
discovered amongst the effects of his uncle, now dead. The
apparition, as will be seen, occurred on October 24th, 1860,
and the account is endorsed on 9th November by the percipient's
father. Further particulars sent to Mr B---- by the percipient
(who is here called Mr D----) are dated November 13th, 1860.
The first account seems to have been sent by the percipient to
his father, and by the father to Mr B----"
The percipient had been identified, and confirms, as will be seen, this
early narrative, which is as follows:--
"On the evening of Wednesday, October 24th, 1860, having
retired to bed about nine o'clock, I had slept, I conclude,
about two hours, making it then about eleven o'clock P.M. I was
awoke from my sleep by a hand touching my forehead, and the
well-known voice of Mrs B---- pronouncing my name, E----. I
started up and sat in bed, rubbed my eyes, and then saw Mrs
B----. From the head to the waist the figure was distinct,
clear, and well defined; but from the waist downwards it was
all misty, and the lower part transparent. She appeared to be
dressed in black silk. Her countenance was grave and rather
sad, but not unhappy.
"The words she first uttered were: 'I have left dear John.'
What followed related entirely to myself, and she was permitted
by a most kind Providence to speak words of mercy, promise, and
comfort, and assurance that what I most wished would come to
pass. She came to me in an hour of bitter mental agony, and was
sent as a messenger of mercy...."
Occasionally there is a curious variant, when the phantasm is auditory
and not visible. In the case published in "Proceedings of the Society
for Psychical Research," vol. iii. p. 90, Mr Wambey heard a phantasmal
voice as though in colloquy with his own thought. He was planning a
congratulatory letter to a friend, when the words "What, write to a dead
man? write to a dead man?" sounded clearly in his ears. The friend had
been dead for some days.
Gurney was much impressed by the unexpectedly large proportion of cases
where the percipient informed us that there had been a _compact_ between
himself and the deceased person that whichever passed away first should
try to appear to the other. "Considering," he adds, "what an extremely
small number of persons make such a compact, compared with those who do
not, it is difficult to resist the conclusion that its existence has a
certain efficacy."
A characteristic case is thus reported by a Mr Bellamy:
"When a girl at school my wife made an agreement with a
fellow-pupil, Miss W., that the one of them who died first
should, if divinely permitted, appear after her decease to the
survivor. In 1874 my wife, who had not seen or heard anything
of her former school friend for some years, casually heard of
her death. The news reminded her of her former agreement, and
then, becoming nervous, she told me of it. I knew of my wife's
compact, but I had never seen a photograph of her friend, or
heard any description of her." (Mr Bellamy told Gurney in
conversation that his mind had not been in the least dwelling
on the compact.)
"A night or two afterwards, as I was sleeping with my wife, a
fire brightly burning in my room and a candle alight, I
suddenly awoke and saw a lady sitting by the side of the bed
where my wife was sleeping soundly. At once I sat up in the bed
and gazed so intently that even now I can recall her form and
features. Had I the pencil or the brush of a Millais I could
transfer to canvas an exact likeness of the ghostly visitant. I
remember that I was much struck, as I looked intently at her,
with the careful arrangement of her coiffure, every single hair
being most carefully brushed down. How long I sat and gazed I
cannot say, but directly the apparition ceased to be, I got
out of bed to see if any of my wife's garments had by any means
optically deluded me. I found nothing in the line of vision but
a bare wall. Hallucination on my part I rejected as out of the
question, and I doubted not that I had really seen an
apparition. Returning to bed, I lay till my wife some hours
after awoke, and then I gave her an account of her friend's
appearance. I described her colour, form, etc., all of which
exactly tallied with my wife's recollection of Miss W. Finally
I asked, 'But was there any special point to strike one in her
appearance?' 'Yes,' my wife promptly replied, 'we girls used to
tease her at school for devoting so much time to the
arrangement of her hair.' This was the very thing which I have
said so much struck me. Such are the simple facts.
"I will only add that till 1874 I had never seen an apparition,
and that I have not seen one since.
"ARTHUR BELLAMY."
The following case, from "Proceedings," vol. viii. p. 178, bears a
distinct resemblance to the old-fashioned ghost stories. Mrs M., the
informant, writes under date 15th December 1891:
"Before relating my experience of having seen a ghost, I should
like my readers thoroughly to understand that I had not the
slightest idea that the house in which my husband and I were
living was haunted, or that the family residing there for many
years before us had had any family troubles. The house was
delightfully situated [etc.]. The house being partly new and
partly old we occupied the old part for our sleeping
apartments. There were two staircases leading to them, with a
landing and window, adjoining a morning sitting-room. One night
on retiring to my bedroom about 11 o'clock, I thought I heard a
peculiar moaning sound, and someone sobbing as if in great
distress of mind. I listened very attentively, and still it
continued; so I raised the gas in my bedroom, and then went to
the landing window of which I have spoken, drew the blind
aside; and there on the grass was a very beautiful young girl
in kneeling posture before a soldier, in a general's uniform,
sobbing and clasping her hands together, entreating for pardon;
but alas! he only waved her away from him. So much did I feel
for the girl, that without a moment's hesitation I ran down the
staircase to the door opening upon the lawn, and begged her to
come in and tell me her sorrow. The figures then disappeared!
Not in the least nervous did I feel then;--went again to my
bedroom, took a sheet of writing paper and wrote down what I
had seen. [Mrs M. has found and sent us this paper. The
following words are written in pencil on a half sheet of
notepaper:--"March 13th, 1886. Have just seen visions on
lawn:--a soldier in general's uniform,--a young lady kneeling
to him. 11.40 P.M."] My husband was away from home when this
event occurred, but a lady friend was staying with me, so I
went to her bedroom and told her that I had been rather
frightened by some noises;--could I stay with her a little
while? A few days afterwards I found myself in a very nervous
state; but it seemed so strange that I was not frightened at
the time.
"It appears the story is only too true. The youngest daughter
of this very old proud family had had an illegitimate child;
and her parents and relatives would not recognise her again,
and she died broken-hearted. The soldier was a near relative
(also a connection of my husband's); and it was in vain she
tried to gain his--the soldier's--forgiveness. [In a subsequent
letter Sir X. Y.'s career is described. He was a distinguished
officer.]
"So vivid was my remembrance of the features of the soldier
that some months after the occurrence, when I happened to be
calling with my husband at a house where there was a portrait
of him, I stepped before it and said: 'Why, look! There is the
General!' And sure enough it _was_."
In a subsequent letter Mrs M. writes:
"I did see the figures on the lawn after opening the door
leading on to the lawn; and they by no means disappeared
instantly, but more like a dissolving view--viz. gradually; and
I did not leave the door until they had passed away. It was
impossible for any real persons to act such a scene.... The
General was born and died (in the house where I saw him).... I
was not aware that the portrait of the General was in that room
(where I saw it); it was the first time I had been in that
room. The misfortune to the poor girl happened in 1847 or
1848."
Mrs M. then mentions that a respectable local tradesman hearing of the
incident remarked: "That is not an uncommon thing to see _her_ about the
place, poor soul! She was a badly used girl."
Mr M. writes as follows under date 23rd December 1891:--
"I have seen my wife's letter in regard to the recognition of
Sir X. Y.'s picture at ----. Nothing was said by me to her on
the subject; but knowing the portrait to be a remarkably good
likeness I proposed calling at the house (which was that of a
nephew of Sir X. Y.'s), being anxious to see what effect it
would have upon my wife. Immediately on entering the room she
almost staggered back, and turned pale, saying--looking hard
at the picture--'Why, there's the General!' ... Being a
connection of the family I knew all about the people, but my
wife was then a stranger, and I had never mentioned such things
to her; in fact they had been almost forgotten."
Here is a case where the phantasm was visible to several persons at the
same time. It is given by Mr Charles A. W. Lett, of the Military and
Royal Naval Club, Albemarle Street, W.
"December 3rd, 1885.
"On the 5th April 1873 my wife's father, Captain Towns, died at
his residence, Cranbrook, Rose Bay, near Sydney, N. S. Wales.
About six weeks after his death my wife had occasion one
evening about nine o'clock to go to one of the bedrooms in the
house. She was accompanied by a young lady, Miss Berthon, and
as they entered the room--the gas burning all the time--they
were amazed to see, reflected as it were on the polished
surface of the wardrobe, the image of Captain Towns. It was
barely half figure, the head, shoulders, and part of the arms
only showing--in fact, it was like an ordinary medallion
portrait, but life-size. The face appeared wan and pale, as it
did before his death, and he wore a kind of grey flannel
jacket, in which he had been accustomed to sleep. Surprised and
half-alarmed at what they saw, their first idea was that a
portrait had been hung in the room, and that what they saw was
its reflection; but there was no picture of the kind.
"Whilst they were looking and wondering, my wife's sister, Miss
Towns, came into the room, and before either of the others had
time to speak, she exclaimed, 'Good gracious! Do you see papa?'
One of the housemaids happened to be passing downstairs at the
moment, and she was called in and asked if she saw anything,
and her reply was, 'Oh, miss! the master.' Graham--Captain
Towns' old body-servant--was then sent for, and he also
immediately exclaimed, 'Oh, Lord save us! Mrs Lett, it's the
captain!' The butler was called, and then Mrs Crane, my wife's
nurse, and they both said what they saw. Finally, Mrs Towns
was sent for, and, seeing the apparition, she advanced towards
it with her arm extended as if to touch it, and as she passed
her hand over the panel of the wardrobe the figure gradually
faded away, and never again appeared, though the room was
regularly occupied for a long time after.
"These are the simple facts of the case, and they admit of no
doubt; no kind of intimation was given to any of the witnesses;
the same question was put to each one as they came into the
room, and the reply was given without hesitation by each. It
was by the merest accident that I did not see the apparition. I
was in the house at the time, but did not hear when I was
called."
"C. A. W. LETT."
"We the undersigned, having read the above statement, certify
that it is strictly accurate, as we were both witnesses of the
apparition.
"SARA LETT,
"SIBBIE SMYTH
"(_nee_ TOWNS.)"
"Mrs Lett assures me," wrote Gurney, "that neither she nor her sister
ever experienced a hallucination of the senses on any other occasion.
She is positive that the recognition of the appearance on the part of
each of the later witnesses was _independent_, and not due to any
suggestion from the persons already in the room."
The following, taken from the "Report on the Census of Hallucinations,"
may belong to either the ante-mortem or post-mortem category:--
"At Redhill on Thanksgiving Day, between eight and nine in the
evening, when I was taking charge of the little daughter of a
friend, during my friend's absence on that evening, I left the
child sleeping in the bedroom, and went to drop the blinds in
two neighbouring rooms, being absent about three minutes. On
returning to the child's room in the full light of the
gas-burner from above I distinctly saw, coming from the child's
cot, a white figure, which figure turned, looked me full in the
face, and passed down the staircase. I instantly followed,
leaned over the banisters in astonishment, and saw the
glistening of the white drapery as the figure passed down the
staircase, through the lighted hall, and silently through the
hall door itself, which was barred, chained, and locked. I felt
for the moment perfectly staggered, went back to the bedroom,
and found the child peacefully sleeping. I related the
circumstance to the mother immediately on her return late that
night. She was incredulous, but said that my description of the
figure answered to that of an invalid aunt of the child's. The
next morning came a telegram to say that this relation who had
greatly wished to see her niece had died between eight and nine
the previous evening.
"I had just put down the 'Pickwick Papers,' with which I had
been whiling away the time, was free from trouble and in good
health."
Sister Bertha, Superior of the House of Mercy at Bovey Tracey, Newton
Abbot, states:
"On the night of November 10th, 1861, I was up in my bed
watching, because there was a person not quite well in the next
room. I heard a voice which I recognised at once as familiar to
me, and at first thought of my sister. It said in the brightest
and most cheerful tone, 'I am here with you.' I answered,
looking and seeing nothing, 'Who are you?' The voice said, 'You
mustn't know yet.' I heard nothing more and saw nothing, and am
certain that the door was not opened or shut. I was not in the
least frightened, and felt convinced it was Lucy's [Miss Lucy
Gambier Parry's] voice.
"I have never doubted it from that moment. I had not heard of
her being worse. The last account had been good, and I was
expecting to hear that she was at Torquay. In the course of the
next day (the 11th), mother told me that she had died on the
morning of the 10th, rather more than twelve hours before I
heard her voice."
A case reported by Mr John E. Husbands, of Melbourne House, Town Hall
Square, Grimsby, is interesting:
"I was sleeping in a hotel in Madeira in January 1885. It was a
bright moonlight night. The windows were open, and the blinds
up. I felt someone was in my room. On opening my eyes I saw a
young fellow about twenty-five, dressed in flannels, standing
at the side of my bed, and pointing with the first finger of
his right hand to the place where I was lying. I lay for some
seconds to convince myself of someone being really there. I
then sat up and looked at him. I saw his features so plainly
that I recognised them in a photograph which was shown me some
days afterwards. I asked him what he wanted. He did not speak,
but his eyes and hands seemed to tell me that I was in his
place. As he did not answer, I struck at him with my fist as I
sat up, but did not reach him, and as I was going to spring out
of bed he slowly vanished through the door, which was shut,
keeping his eyes upon me all the time. Upon inquiry I found
that the young fellow who appeared to me died in the room I was
occupying."
There is, too, the famous case of Mrs de Freville and the gardener Bard.
The percipient, who had formerly been in the employ of this somewhat
eccentric lady, who was especially morbid on the subject of tombs and so
forth, was in the churchyard of Hinxton, Saffron Walden, on Friday, 8th
May 1885. He happened to look at the square De Freville stone vault,
when, to his amazement, he distinctly saw the old lady, with a white
face, leaning on the rails. When he looked again she was gone, although
it puzzled him to know how she could have got out of the churchyard, as,
in order to reach any of the gates, she must have passed him. Next day
he was told that Mrs de Freville was dead. As the apparition was seen
about seven and a half hours after death, it could, as I have suggested,
be considered a telepathic impression transmitted at the moment of death
and remaining latent in the brain of the percipient; otherwise, the
case belongs to the category of Haunting, which we will glance at in the
next chapter.
CHAPTER VII
ON "HAUNTINGS" AND KINDRED PHENOMENA
"Do I believe in ghosts?" asks Mr Andrew Lang. "One can only answer:
'How do you define a ghost?' I do believe, with all students of human
nature, in hallucinations of one, or of several, or even of all the
senses. But as to whether such hallucinations among the sane are ever
caused by physical influence from the minds of others, alive or dead,
not communicated through the ordinary channels of sense, my mind is in a
balance of doubt. It is a question of evidence."
If the evidence of "hauntings" were measurable by bulk alone, no phase
of occultism would be more completely demonstrated. It is only when we
come to examine the quality of the available data that we realise how
formidable a task it is we have undertaken. In nothing, perhaps, have
credulity and superstition been allowed so wide a scope; nowhere is it
more difficult to winnow the grain of reliable testimony from the chaff
of mythology and invention. For we must remember that the belief in
ghosts is as old as the hills themselves. It is common to all countries
and to all nations, and in the literature of every language are to be
found tales of the supernatural scarcely less plausible than many which
assail our ears to-day.
What I now set myself to investigate is that class of phenomena
seemingly attached to various localities and comprising, besides
apparitions, sights and sounds of various kinds and degrees. According
to Mr E. T. Bennett, for twenty years assistant secretary of the
Psychical Research Society, the records of the Society contain
descriptions of "a large number of cases in which the evidence of the
reality of phenomena incapable of ordinary explanation is absolutely
conclusive."
When the sounds are intelligible, or a sentence is spelt out in response
to the inquiry of the auditor, the _raison d'etre_ of the manifestation
is more or less obvious. But there is evidence of a large number of
so-called "hauntings" where steps are heard, or noises which convey no
intelligible information. Sometimes, also, we are told that
simultaneously with the death of a friend bangs have been heard, which,
but for the coincidence of their occurrence in association with a death,
are without meaning. M. Flammarion cites several cases of this sort. The
following will serve as an illustration:--[2]
[Footnote 2: It will be found on page 178 of "L'Inconnu et les Problemes
Psychiques."]
M. E. Deschaux relates that his grandfather "was awakened one
evening at eleven P.M. by three very distinct raps on the door
of his room. Astonished, he rose, lit the lamp, opened the
door, but saw no one. Supposing that some trickster had been
the cause of his disturbance, he returned to bed grumbling, but
again three knocks were heard on the door. He got up quickly,
intending that the culprit should pay dearly for his untimely
joke, but in spite of careful search, both in the passage and
on the staircase, he could not discover where this mysterious
culprit had disappeared to. A third time, when he was again in
bed, three raps were audible on the door. This time the
grandfather had a presentiment that the sound was caused by the
spirit of his mother, although nothing in the tidings he had
previously received from his family incited him to this
supposition. Five or six days after this manifestation a letter
arrived from his own country announcing the death of his mother
which had occurred precisely at the hour at which he had heard
the knocks. At the moment of her death, his mother, who had a
particular affection for him, had insisted that a dress which
her 'boy in Paris' had some time before sent her as a present
should be brought and placed on her bed."
Here we seem to have a distinct motive for the visitation; but on the
other hand observe how many cases we come across where the phenomena
appears to be due solely to the wanton and mischievous impulses of the
invisible agents.
There is for example the case of a house in which spiritual
manifestations, often of a disturbing character, were continually being
produced, related by Mr Inkster Gilbertson in _The Occult Review_ on the
authority of a West End physician who is called Dr Macdonald. The swish
of a silk dress and the slamming of doors were among the least important
of the phenomena from a psychical point of view, though the sound of
someone coming through a skylight and dropping on to the landing was
certainly calculated to terrify the ladies, who "came up from the
drawing-room screaming and shouting, expecting to find some dreadful
tragedy being enacted." These manifestations consisted entirely of
sounds, but at the regular sittings which were held in the house a
drawer was taken from its place in the bedroom and left on the hall
stand, the loose wooden leaves which converted a billiard-table into a
dining-table were slid off the end and deposited on the floor, and a
screen was several times seen to fold itself up without being touched.
The most peculiar occurrences, however, were the antics of certain keys
belonging to doors in the house. "The door of the front bedroom was
often found locked, and the key would disappear." The doctor kept his
eye on the key and presently saw it move round, locking the door, and
then "he saw the last of the key disappearing through the hole." At
another time the lady of the house, her children, and the maid were
locked in for some hours. "The key would be kept away for days; then it
would suddenly appear. One day it was found in Mrs Macdonald's lap; once
it was quietly laid on the doctor's head," and so forth. On one occasion
when the key was not given up the doctor called out: "Won't you send us
down the key before we go?" They were passing down the stairs and,
before they reached the bottom, the key was gently dropped on the
doctor's head. The most careful observations failed to discover the
known means by which the feats could be accomplished. The evidence of
the intelligence and of the mischievous disposition of these uncanny
tricksters was borne out by sounds of dancing being heard outside the
door just afterwards.
"The possible non-ghostly explanations," says Mrs Sidgwick, "of what
pass as ghostly phenomena may be conveniently classed with reference to
the various sorts of error by which the evidence to such phenomena is
liable to be affected. I should state these as (1) hoaxing, (2)
exaggeration or inadequate description, (3) illusion, (4) mistaken
identity, (5) hallucination.... I think, however, that anyone who has
read the evidence will at once discard the first of these alternatives
so far as the great mass of the first-hand narratives is concerned."
There are not a few cases, however, where the ghostly manifestations
have been found to be due to human agency. The following instance was
brought to my notice by a well-known firm of estate agents at Tunbridge
Wells:--
"There is an old Manor House in this district which is locally
known as the 'Haunted House.' The original mansion was,
according to Hasted, one of the homes of the Colepepers. In
the reign of Charles II. the mansion was rebuilt in the style
of the period. It has, however, outlived its purpose, is out of
repair and was for many years let in tenements to labourers. It
is now untenanted. Some few months ago the lurid tales of
ghostly visitors induced a local spiritualist, encouraged by
some mischievous friends, to hold a _seance_ in the house at
midnight, and to perambulate the rambling building from time to
time during the night. The spirits lived up to their reputation
and gave all kinds of manifestations which included streams of
water from invisible buckets that met the investigator as he
groped up the staircase and along the passages. In the end the
whole thing was found to be a hoax and to have been organised
by the spiritualist's friends. He is not communicative on the
subject. The old house still stands empty and deserves a better
fate."
The classic case of haunting in England is, perhaps, that of Willingdon
Mill. Other spectre-ridden edifices in the kingdom there may well be,
but their stories, however grim and ghastly, are apt to relapse into
insignificance beside those narrated of this famous Tyneside building.
Willingdon Mill, which is situated in Northumberland nearly half-way
between Newcastle and North Shields, was built about the year 1800.
When, thirty-four years later, certain unaccountable noises and other
phenomena began to attract attention the occupants consisted of a worthy
Quaker, Joseph Proctor by name, his wife, servants and family. Joseph
Proctor used to keep a diary wherein he chronicled the strange
happenings in his house. The greater portion of this was published in
_The Journal of the Society for Psychical Research_, vol. v., but full
accounts of the affair have appeared in many publications, among which
may be mentioned Howitt's "Visits to Remarkable Places," Crowe's "Night
Side of Nature," "The Local Historian's Table Book," and Stead's "Real
Ghost Stories."
It was a servant girl that first called attention to the mysterious
noises. She positively affirmed that she had heard "a dull heavy tread
on the boarded floor of the room unoccupied above, commonly pacing
backwards and forwards and, on coming over to the window, giving the
floor such a shake as to cause the windows of the nursery to rattle
violently in their frames." This disturbance usually lasted about ten
minutes at a time. At first the girl's tale was discredited, but before
many days had elapsed every member of the family had heard precisely
what the girl described. The room was vigorously searched but no clue to
the phantom footsteps was forthcoming. Even the expedient of covering
the floor with flour was without result; the "dull, heavy tread" left no
traces upon the whitened boards.
It was not long before other unaccountable noises were heard all over
the house and ghostly figures were seen by several persons. To
illustrate the kind of occurrence that was constantly going on in the
house, and which, indeed, became so frequent that they were thought very
little of, I quote the following extracts from Joseph Proctor's
diary:--
"7 mo., 14th, 1841:--J. and E. P. heard the spirit in their own
room, and in the room overhead, making a noise as of something
heavy being hoisted or rolled, or like a barrel set down on its
end; also noises in the Camproom of various and unaccountable
character.
* * * * *
"8 mo., 3rd.--Since the last night there have been few nights
during which some branch of the family has not heard our
visitor. One night, J. P. was awoke and heard something hastily
walk, with a step like that of a child of 8 or 10 years, from
the foot of the bed towards the side of the room, and come back
seemingly towards the door, in a run; then it gave two stamps
with one foot; there was a loud rustling as if of a frock or
night-dress. I need scarcely say the door was locked, and I am
quite certain there was no other human being in the room save
E. P., who was asleep. The two stamps aroused E. P. out of her
sleep. About this time Joseph, on two or three occasions, said
he had heard voices from underneath his bed and from other
parts of the room, and described seeing on one occasion a boy
in a drab hat much like his own, the boy much like himself too,
walking backwards and forwards between the windows and the
wardrobe. He was afraid, but did not speak.
"Noises as of a band-box falling close at hand, as of someone
running upstairs when no one was there, and like the raking of
a coal rake, were heard about this time by different members of
the family."
* * * * *
"8 mo., 6th.--On the night of the third, just after the
previous memorandum was written, about 10.30 P.M., the servants
having all retired to bed, J. and E. P. heard a noise like a
clothes horse being thrown down in the kitchen. Soon the noises
became louder and appeared as though some persons had burst
into the house on the ground floor and were clashing the doors
and throwing things down. Eventually J. P. got one of the
servants to go downstairs with him, when all was found right,
no one there, and apparently nothing moved. The noises now
began on the third storey, and the servants were so much
alarmed that it was difficult to get them to go to bed at all
that night.
* * * * *
"8 mo., 6th to 12th.--My brother-in-law, George Carr, was with
us. He heard steppings and loud rumblings in the middle of the
night, and other noises."
A curious feature in this case was the number of apparitions seen. Thus
we have clear testimony of the presence of a lady in a lavender silk
dress, of an old bald-headed man in a flowing robe like a surplice, of a
lady in grey, and of a horrid eyeless spectre who glared fixedly at the
world through empty eyeholes. Added to these there were animals of all
sorts and descriptions, cats, monkeys, rabbits and sheep.
"On one occasion, during the period that Thomas was courting
Mary, he was standing at the window outside (no followers being
allowed inside, lest fabulous reports were sent abroad). He had
given the usual signal. The night was clear, and the stars
beamed forth their light from a cloudless sky. Suddenly
something appeared which arrested my father's attention.
Looking towards the mill, which was divided from the house by
an open space, he beheld what he supposed was a whitish cat. It
came walking along in close proximity to his feet. Thinking
Miss Puss very cheeky he gave her a kick; but his foot felt
nothing and the cat quietly continued its march, followed by my
father, until it suddenly disappeared from his gaze. Still the
ghost was not thought of by him. Returning to the window and
looking in the same direction, he again beheld it suddenly come
into existence. This time it came hopping like a rabbit, coming
quite as close to his feet as before. He determined to have a
good rap at it, and took deliberate aim; but, as before, his
foot went through it and felt nothing. Again he followed it,
and it disappeared at the same spot as its predecessor. The
third time he went to the window, and in a few moments it made
its third appearance, not like unto a cat or a rabbit, but
fully as large as a sheep, and quite luminous. On it came and
my father was fixed to the spot. All muscular power seemed for
the moment paralysed. It moved on, disappearing at the same
spot as the preceding apparitions. My father declared that if
it was possible for 'hair to stand on end' his did just then.
Thinking that for once he had seen sufficient, he went home,
keeping the knowledge of this scene to himself."
It is not to be wondered at if the queer doings at Willingdon Mill began
to be rumoured abroad. They reached the ears of a certain Dr Edward
Drury of Sunderland, who was, not unnaturally, rather sceptical. He
asked and obtained permission to sit up alone in the house one night
accompanied only by his faithful dog and with a pair of pistols in his
pocket. His opportunity came in July, 1840, when all the family, with
the exception of Joseph Proctor himself, was away from the mill. The
night was fruitful with horror, and the following letter addressed to
the miller nearly a week after the event tells its own tale:--
"Monday Morning,
"6th July, 1840.
"_To_ MR PROCTOR.
"DEAR SIR,--I am sorry I was not at home to receive you
yesterday, when you kindly called to inquire for me. I am happy
to state that I am really surprised that I have been so little
affected as I am after that horrid and most awful affair. The
only bad effect I feel is a heavy dulness in one of my
ears--the right one. I call it a heavy dullness, because I not
only do not hear distinctly but feel in it a constant noise.
This I never was affected with before; but I doubt not it will
go off. I am persuaded that no one went to your house at any
time _more disbelieving in respect to seeing anything
peculiar_; now no one can be more satisfied than myself. I
will, in the course of a few days, send you a full detail of
all I saw and heard. Mr Spence and two other gentlemen came
down to my house in the afternoon to hear my detail; but, sir,
could I account for these noises from natural causes, yet, so
firmly am I persuaded of the horrid apparition, that I would
affirm that what I saw with my eyes was a punishment to me for
my scoffing and unbelief; that I am assured that, as far as the
horror is concerned, they are happy that believe and have not
seen ... it will be a great source of joy to me if you never
allow your young family to be in that horrid house again.
Hoping you will write a few lines at your leisure, I remain,
dear sir, yours very truly,
"EDWARD DRURY."
To this letter the sturdy Quaker sent a characteristic reply.
"Willingdon,
"7th mo., 9, 1840.
"Respected Friend, E. DRURY,--Have been at Sunderland, I did
not receive thine of the 6th till yesterday morning. I am glad
to hear thou art getting well over the effects of thy
unlooked-for visitation. I hold in respect thy bold and manly
assertion of the truth in the face of that ridicule and
ignorant conceit with which that which is called the
supernatural, in the present day, is usually assailed.
"I shall be glad to receive thy detail, in which it will be
needful to be very particular in showing that thou couldst not
be asleep, or attacked by nightmare, or mistake a reflection of
the candle, as some sagaciously suppose. I remain,
respectfully, thy friend,
"JOSH. PROCTOR.
"_P.S._--I have about thirty witnesses to various things which
cannot be satisfactorily accounted for on any other principle
than that of spiritual agency."
Four days later Dr Drury wrote out a full account of his experience.
"Sunderland,
"13th July 1840.
"DEAR SIR,--I hereby, according to promise in my last letter,
forward you a true account of what I saw and heard at your
house, in which I was led to pass the night from various
rumours circulated by most respectable parties, particularly
from an account by my esteemed friend, Mr Davison, whose name I
mentioned to you in a former letter. Having received your
sanction to visit your mysterious dwelling, I went, on the 3rd
of July, accompanied by a friend of mine, T. Hudson. This was
not according to promise, nor in accordance with my first
intent, as I wrote you I would come alone; but I felt gratified
at your kindness in not alluding to the liberty I had taken, as
it ultimately proved for the best. I must here mention that,
not expecting you at home, I had in my pocket a brace of
pistols, determining in my mind to let one of them drop before
the miller, as if by accident, for fear he should presume to
play tricks upon me; but after my interview with you, I felt
there was no occasion for weapons, and did not load them, after
you had allowed us to inspect as minutely as we pleased every
portion of the house. I sat down on the third storey landing,
fully expecting to account for any noises that I might hear, in
a philosophical manner. This was about eleven o'clock P.M.
About ten minutes to twelve we both heard a noise, as if a
number of people were pattering with their bare feet upon the
floor; and yet, so singular was the noise, that I could not
minutely determine from whence it proceeded. A few minutes
afterwards we heard a noise, as if someone was knocking with
his knuckles among our feet; this was followed by a hollow
cough from the very room from which the apparition proceeded.
The only noise after this, was as if a person was rustling
against the wall in coming upstairs. At a quarter to one I told
my friend that, feeling a little cold, I would like to go to
bed, as we might hear the noise equally well there; he replied
he would not go to bed till daylight. I took up a note which I
had accidentally dropped and began to read it, after which I
took out my watch to ascertain the time, and found that it
wanted ten minutes to one. In taking my eyes from the watch
they became riveted upon a closet door, which I distinctly saw
open, and saw also the figure of a female attired in greyish
garments, with the head inclining downwards, and one hand
pressed upon the chest as if in pain, and the other--viz. the
right hand--extended towards the floor, with the index finger
pointing downward. It advanced with an apparently cautious
step across the floor towards me; immediately as it approached
my friend, who was slumbering, its right hand was extended
towards him; I then rushed at it, giving, as Mr Proctor states,
a most awful yell; but instead of grasping it I fell upon my
friend, and I recollected nothing distinctly for nearly three
hours afterwards. I have since learned that I was carried
downstairs in an agony of fear and terror.
* * * * *
"I hereby certify that the above account is strictly true and
correct in every respect.
"EDWARD DRURY."
So intolerable became life in this uncanny house that, in 1847, Joseph
Proctor and his family moved to South Shields. For the last night of
their residence was reserved a more than usually turbulent
demonstration. "There were," says Mr Edmund Proctor, "continuous noises
during the night, boxes being apparently dragged with heavy thuds down
the now carpetless stairs, non-human footsteps stumped on the floors,
doors were, or seemed to be, clashed, and impossible furniture corded
at random or dragged hither and thither by inscrutable agency; in short,
a pantomimic or spiritualistic repetition of all the noises incident to
a household flitting. A miserable night my father and mother had of it,
as I have often heard from their own lips; not so much from terror at
the unearthly noises, for to these they were habituated, as dread lest
this wretched fanfaronade might portend the contemporary flight of the
unwelcome visitors to the new abode. Fortunately for the family this
dread was not realised."
After undergoing various vicissitudes, the house was finally divided
into small tenements, in which condition it still remains. But of late
years nothing has been seen or heard of the ghostly visitors. Perhaps,
smitten with dismay by the deterioration of their former dwelling-place,
they have taken up their abode elsewhere. For Willingdon Mill, formerly
gay with flowers and creepers, is now a wreck of its former self. The
mill is used as a warehouse; the stables and outhouses have been pulled
down; while the house stands out gaunt and forbidding, a picture of
desolation and decay.
Mr W. T. Stead, in his "Real Ghost Stories," has given us many thrilling
examples of nocturnal apparitions, and of these the uncanny experience
of the Rev. H. Elwyn Thomas, of 35 Park Village East, N. W., is well
worth repeating.
Mr Thomas, after having conducted a service at the church at Llangynidr,
accompanied three young friends of his for about half-a-mile on their
homeward way.
"When I wished good-night to my friends, it was about twenty
minutes to nine, but still light enough to see a good distance.
The subject of our conversation all the way from the chapel
until we parted was a certain eccentric old character who then
belonged to the Crickhowell church. Many laughable incidents in
his life had been related by my friends for my amusement, at
which I laughed heartily again and again. I walked a little
farther down the road than I intended, in order to hear the end
of a very amusing story about him and the vicar of a
neighbouring parish. Our conversation had no reference whatever
to ghosts or ghostly things. Neither were we in the mood
befitting a ghostly visitation. Personally I was a strong
disbeliever in ghosts, and invariably ridiculed those who I
then thought superstitious enough to believe in them.
"When I had walked about a hundred yards away from my friends I
saw on the bank of the canal (which runs parallel with the road
for six or seven miles) what I thought at the moment was an old
beggar. The spot was a very lonely one. The nearest house was a
good quarter of a mile away. The night was as silent as death.
Not a single sound broke upon the silence from any quarter. I
could not help asking myself where this old man had come from
to such a place. I had not seen him in going down the road.
"I then turned round quite unconcernedly to have another look
at him, and had no sooner done so than I saw within half-a-yard
of me one of the most remarkable and startling sights I hope
it will ever be my lot to see. Almost on a level with my own
face I saw that of an old man, over every feature of which the
putty-coloured skin was drawn tightly, except the forehead
which was lined with deep wrinkles. The lips were extremely
thin, and appeared perfectly bloodless. The toothless mouth
stood half open. The cheeks were hollow and sunken like those
of a corpse, and the eyes, which seemed far back in the middle
of the head, were unnaturally luminous and piercing. This
terrible object was wrapped in two bands of old yellow calico,
one of which was drawn under the chin and over the cheeks and
tied at the top of the head, the other was drawn round the top
of the wrinkled forehead and fastened at the back of the head.
So deep and indelible an impression it made on my mind, that
were I an artist I could paint that face to-day, and reproduce
the original (excepting, perhaps, the luminous eyes) as
accurately as if it were photographed.
"What I have thus tried to describe in many words, I saw at a
glance. Acting on the impulse of the moment, I turned my face
again towards the village, and ran away from the horrible
vision with all my might for about sixty yards. I then stopped
and turned round to see how far I had outdistanced it, and, to
my unspeakable horror, there it was still face to face with me,
as if I had not moved an inch. I grasped my umbrella and raised
it to strike him, and you can imagine my feelings when I could
see nothing between the face and the ground except an irregular
column of intense darkness, through which my umbrella went as a
stick goes through water!
"I am sorry to confess that I again took to my heels with
increasing speed. A little farther than the place of this
second encounter, the road which led towards my host's house
branched off the main road, the main road itself running right
through the centre of the village, in the lower end of which it
ran parallel with the churchyard wall. Having gone a few yards
down the branch road, I reached a crisis in my fear and
confusion when I felt I could act rationally: I determined to
speak to the strange pursuer whatever he was, and I boldly
turned round to face him for the third time, intending to ask
him what he wanted, etc.,
"He had not followed me after I left the main road, but I could
see the horribly fascinating face quite as plainly as when it
was close by. It stood for two or three minutes looking
intently at me from the centre of the main road. I then
realised fully it was not a human being in flesh and blood; and
with every vestige of fear gone I quickly walked towards it to
put my questions. But I was disappointed, for no sooner had I
made towards it than it moved quickly in the direction of the
village. I saw it moving along, keeping the same distance from
the ground, until it reached the churchyard wall; it then
crossed the wall, and disappeared near where the yew-tree stood
inside. The moment it disappeared I became unconscious. When I
came to myself, two hours later, I was lying in the middle of
the road, cold and ill. It took me quite an hour to reach my
host's house, which was less than half-a-mile away, and when I
reached it I looked so white and strange that my host's
daughter, who had sat down with her father to wait my return,
uttered a loud scream. I could not say a word to explain what
had happened, though I tried hard several times. It was five
o'clock in the morning when I regained my power of speech; even
then I could only speak in broken sentences. The whole of the
following week I was laid up with great nervous prostration.
"The strangest part of my story remains yet to be told. My
host, after questioning me closely in regard to the features of
the face, the place I had first seen it and the spot where it
disappeared, told me that fifteen years before that time an old
recluse, answering in every detail to my description (calicoes,
bands and all), lived in a house whose ruins still stand close
by where I first saw it, that he was buried in the exact spot
in the churchyard where I saw the face disappearing, and that
he was a very strange character altogether.
"I should like to add that I had not heard a syllable about
this old man before the night in question, and that all the
persons referred to in the above story are still alive."
Here is a curious story which recently attracted my attention in
_Light_. The narrator is a Colonel X.
"When I was a young chap I was on guard at the Tower. One night
the sentry came to tell me that there was something very
extraordinary going on in the White Chapel, which, in those
days, was used as a storeroom.
"I went out with him, and we saw the windows lit up. We climbed
up and looked in, and saw a chapter with an altar brilliantly
lit up, and presently priests in vestments and boys swinging
silver censers came in and arranged themselves before an altar.
Then the large entrance doors opened and a procession of
persons in old quaint costumes filed in. Walking alone was a
lady in black, and behind her was a masked man, also in black,
who carried an axe. While we looked it all faded away, and
there was utter darkness.
"Of course, I talked about this vision everywhere and got so
laughed at that I resolved to keep it to myself. One day a
gentleman introduced himself as the keeper of the records of
the Tower, and said that he had heard my story, but wished to
hear it again from my own lips; and when I had told it he
remarked: 'Strange to say, that very same vision has been seen
by someone every thirty years since Anne Boleyn's death.'"
It not infrequently happens that houses reputed to be haunted figure in
a court of law. The late Dr Frederick Lee, in "Sights and Shadows,"
gives an account of such a case which occurred in Ireland in the year
1890.
"A house on the marsh at Drogheda had been let by its owner,
Miss Weir, to a Mr and Mrs Kinney, at an annual rental of L23.
"The last-named persons took possession of it in due course;
but two days subsequently they became aware of the presence of
a spirit or ghost in their sleeping chamber, which, as Mrs
Kinney asserted, 'threw heavy things at her,' and so alarmed
and inconvenienced her, that in a very short period both
husband and wife were forced to quit their abode.
"This they did shortly after they had taken possession of it;
and, because of occurrences referred to, were legally advised
to decline to pay any rent. The landlady, however, refusing to
release them from their bargain, at once claimed a quarter's
rent; and when this remained for sometime unpaid, sued them for
it before Judge Kisby.
"A solicitor, Mr Smith, of Drogheda, appeared for the tenants,
who, having given evidence of the facts concerning the ghost in
question, asked leave to support their sworn testimony by that
of several other people. This, however, was disallowed by the
judge.
"It was admitted by Miss Weir that nothing either on one side
or the other had been said regarding the haunting when the
house was let; yet that the rent was due and must be paid.
"A judgment was consequently entered for the landlady although
it had been shown indirectly that unquestionably the house had
the reputation of being haunted, and that previous tenants had
been much inconvenienced and affrighted."
Another case is chronicled which took place in Dublin in 1885. Dr Lee's
account is confirmed by _The Evening Standard_ of February 23rd of that
year.
"Mr Waldron, a solicitor, sued his next-door neighbour, one
Kiernan, a mate in the merchant service, to recover L500 for
damages done to his house. Kiernan altogether denied the
charges, but asserted that Waldron's residence was notoriously
haunted. Witnesses proved that every night from August 1884, to
January 1885, stones were thrown at the windows and doors and
other serious damage done--in fact that numerous extraordinary
and inexplicable occurrences constantly took place.
"Mrs Waldron, wife of the plaintiff, swore that one night she
saw one of the panes of glass of a certain window cut through
with a diamond, and a white hand inserted through the hole. She
at once caught up a bill-hook and aimed a blow at the hand,
cutting off one of the fingers. Neither this finger, however,
could be found nor were any traces of blood seen.
"A servant of hers was sorely persecuted by noises and the
sound of footsteps. Mr Waldron, with the aid of detectives and
policemen, endeavoured to find the cause, but with no avail.
The witnesses in this case were closely cross-examined, but
without shaking their testimony. The facts appeared to be
proved, so the jury found for Kiernan, the defendant. At least
twenty persons had testified on oath to the fact that the house
had been known to have been haunted."
The possible agency of small boys in the matter of stone-throwing is
apparently overlooked, while it can be easily imagined that a servant
girl, well aware of the uncanny reputation of the house she lived in,
would very soon develop a capacity for hearing mysterious sounds and
footsteps on the smallest provocation. Then again the testimony of the
plaintiff's wife was surely very damaging to her own case since she was,
presumably, endeavouring to prove that the whole of the "extraordinary
and inexplicable occurrences" were due to some mad freak on the part of
her neighbour.
On the whole I can find no class of occult phenomena of greater
antiquity and persistence than that of haunting. Even though the ghost
may not be as visible as that of Hamlet's father, yet the idea of a
perturbed spirit revisiting its former haunts or the scene of its bodily
murder finds credence amongst all peoples and epochs in the world's
history. Fable is usually the dulled image of the truth: just as what we
call presentiment or rumour is a kind of aura or van-wind of truth. On
these grounds alone I should be inclined to take the legendary evidence
for haunting seriously, just as every man who investigates its
astonishing history now perceives that witchcraft is not to be dismissed
as a mere groundless superstition. Indeed, I lay it down as a
proposition that any belief which spontaneously and universally arises
and persistently survives must have truth in the web of it. But the
modern authentic testimony for haunting is so clear and strong and the
attestors so clear-headed and indeed inexpugnable that we must really
believe the physical sounds, with their revealed significance, actually
occurred and do occur. Hallucination I put here out of the question.
Neither will the theory of telepathy between the living serve to account
for anything here.
There is some other solution of the mystery. Has it been propounded? We
shall see. Cock Lane is not now to be dismissed derisively. Nor are
these manifestations to be treated in the spirit of one of the
characters in Mr Wells' "Love and Mr Lewisham"--"Even if it be true--it
is all wrong."
CHAPTER VIII
THE DOWSING OR DIVINING ROD
No serious inquirer into the mysteries of occultism should neglect to
study the peculiar human faculty locally known as Dowsing. Science has
hitherto turned a cold shoulder to the skilled wielders of the divining
rod, and at first sight perhaps few subjects appear to be so little
worthy of investigation. To begin with it is a matter of common
geological knowledge that the mode of distribution of underground water
is very different from that imagined by the professional dowser. The
latter will locate a spring in a certain spot and give you scrupulous
details as to its depth and the amount of water it will yield. He may go
on to tell you that a few feet distant is another spring, of a totally
different depth, and that between the two no water will be found. The
assertions are ridiculed by the practical geologist, whose point of
view is admirably expressed in the following letter. The writer is the
Rev. Osmond Fisher, M.A. (author of "Physics of the Earth's Crust").
"Harlton Rectory, Cambridge,
"February 4th, 1896.
"It appears to me that the assumption which underlies the
belief in the divining rod is erroneous. It is only under
exceptional circumstances, as among crystalline rocks, or where
the strata are much disturbed, that underground water runs in
channels like water in a pipe, so that a person can say, 'I am
now standing over a spring,' whereas a few paces off he was not
over one. What is called a spring, such as is reached in a
well, is _usually_ a widely extended water-saturated stratum.
Ordinarily where water can be reached by a well, there are few
spots [in the neighbourhood] where a well would not find it.
"The question which is really worthy of investigation in this
and similar cases seems to be how such an idea ever originated
and to what it owes its vitality."
From the geologist's point of view, then, the so-called "diviner" is the
merest charlatan, who, so far as the finding of water or mineral veins
is concerned, would be equally successful were he to substitute the
dice-box or the coin for his more usual implement the hazel wand. It is,
he argues, a matter of guessing--and nothing more. The question becomes
complicated when we remember that among the ardent devotees of the "rod"
are to be numbered country squires, M.P.'s, doctors, clergymen, and
farmers, who would have nothing to gain by pretending to a power which
they did not possess.
The Society for Psychical Research has devoted a considerable amount of
attention to the subject. So far back as 1884 a paper on "The Divining
Rod," prepared by Mr E. R. Pease, was read at a general meeting of the
Society. The following is an abstract:--
"The Divining Rod is a V-shaped twig, commonly of hazelwood,
but sometimes of steel watchspring, whalebone and other
substances. It first came into use about three centuries ago,
and during the seventeenth century it was the subject of much
controversy and of numerous experiments by the learned men of
the time. Many theories were proposed to explain its action,
but none of them would now be regarded as plausible, and
various test experiments which were made uniformly failed. In
1701, the Inquisition condemned the use of the rod, and after
this date the popularity of divining greatly diminished. In the
seventeenth century it was used to discover murderers and
thieves, buried treasures, lost boundaries, and other hidden
objects, as well as metals and water springs. At present it
appears to be chiefly used in the West of England for the
discovery of water springs, and in America for oil wells and
mines. Mr E. Vaughan Jenkins, of Cheltenham, has made and
presented to the Society for Psychical Research a very valuable
collection of evidence of its use in England for locating
wells. He has communicated with various well-known 'diviners,'
and has received direct from landowners, architects, builders,
commercial firms and others, careful records of the successful
choosing of well sites by diviners in places where professional
geologists or local experts were hopeless of success. It seems
also that diviners travel about the country and 'dowse' in
localities new and strange to them.... The divining rod is
always held in a position of extreme tension, and at the same
time of unstable equilibrium. Slight muscular contractions
produce violent and startling effects. It would seem therefore
that the action of the rod may be caused by unconscious
movements of the diviner's hands, due possibly to a sensation
of chill on reaching water-bearing spots, or perhaps merely to
an unwritten practical science of the surface signs of hidden
water."
Mr Pease eventually came to the conclusion that "the evidence for the
success of dowsing as a practical art is very strong--and there seems to
be an unexplained residuum when all possible deductions have been made."
Fifty years ago Dr Mayo, F.R.S., came to a similar conclusion after
exhaustive experiments with the divining rod, both in England and
abroad, and in 1883, Dr R. Raymond, the distinguished secretary of the
American Institute of Mining Engineers, summed up the result of his
investigations in the following opinion:--"That there is a residuum of
scientific value, after making all necessary deductions for
exaggeration, self-deception and fraud" in the use of the divining rod
for finding springs and deposits of ore.
In 1892, Professor W. F. Barrett, yielding to the earnest request of the
Council of the Society for Psychical Research, began an investigation of
the matter. It was with considerable reluctance that Professor Barrett
undertook the work, since, as he has told us, his own prejudice against
the subject was not less than that of others. He hoped, however, that a
few weeks' work would enable him to relegate it
"Into a limbo large and broad, since called
The Paradise of fools."
Six years later Professor Barrett presented to the Society a voluminous
report, which occupies a considerable part of two volumes of the
"Proceedings." Embodied in this Report, which is a veritable masterpiece
of patient and indefatigable research, is a mass of evidence so vast
that it is only possible to pick out a case here and there at random.
The following case was sent by Miss Grantham:--
"100 Eaton Square, London, S.W.,
"February 1st, 1893.
"My father (Judge Grantham) was going to dig a well on one of
his farms. The Rev. J. Blunt was then residing in our parish,
and as he had previously told us he was able to discover the
presence of water underground by means of a twig, we asked him
to go with us one day to see if he could find water. Mr B.
began by cutting a twig out of the hedge, of hazel or
blackthorn, V-shaped, each side about eight inches long, then
taking hold of one end in each hand between the thumb and first
finger, and pointing the angle to the ground, he walked about
the field in which my father proposed digging a well, and at
two spots the point of the twig turned right up, exactly
reversing its previous position; in fact so strong was its
impulse to point upwards, that we found that unless Mr B.
relaxed his hold the twig broke off near his fingers. We put
small sticks in these spots, and then took a boy about twelve
years old who was in Mr B.'s employment, and who had since
quite a child shown that he possessed this power, over the same
ground; he had not seen the spots at which Mr B.'s twig found
water, neither did we point them out to him, but at these
places his twig behaved in the same way as Mr B.'s. My father,
mother, and four or five others, then cut similar twigs out of
the hedge, but with none of us would they divine water. My
father then took Mr B. over some ground where he knew of the
existence of an underground stream; he did not tell Mr B. this,
but directly Mr B. passed over the places the twig again turned
upwards as it had done before. A well has since been dug at one
of the spots in the first field where the twig indicated water,
and it was found at the depth of fifteen feet. Mr B. and the
boy both said that they did not feel any abnormal influence
whatever when the twig divined water.
"EMMA L. GRANTHAM."
Another case (from Somersetshire) is quoted from in _The Western
Gazette_ of 10th February 1893. Evercreech is at the foot of the
Mendips.
"A well has recently been sunk on the premises of Messrs W.
Roles & Son, of Evercreech Junction, on the site of the
proposed milk factory. Mr Henry Smart, head gardener at Pennard
House, was successful with the divining twig (or rod), and a
well was sunk to a depth of 60 feet, when a spring was found
which yielded no less than 15,000 gallons of water in ten
hours. Water came at such a rate that a powerful pump had to be
erected temporarily by Messrs Hill & Son, of Bruton, and was
kept working day and night in order to keep the water down for
the purpose of walling (the well). At the present time there is
50 feet of water in the well, the supply increasing daily."
Professor Barrett wrote to Messrs Roles to know if a well had been sunk
previously, and if the above statement was correct. They reply that the
account is quite correct, and add: "We had previously sunk a well
without the use of the rod, to nearly the same depth, but it was
_unsuccessful_. Six yards from this useless well the diviner found the
spring which now yields enough to supply a small village if required."
The Rev. Martin R. Knapp, M.A., vicar of Holy Trinity, Dalston, writes
to Professor Barrett as follows:--
"72 Forest Road, Dalston, N.E.,
"November 14th, 1896.
"In the summer of 1892, I entered on the vicarage of North
Wootton in North Somerset, and had reason at once to look for
water. I was advised to try a 'water-finder,' and did so. The
dowser was a retired miller, and came provided with a number of
forked twigs. Holding one he traversed the place, and at
certain points the twig oscillated violently in his hands, and
there, he professed, he should find water.
"There was an interesting sidelight in the matter that I will
tell you of. My builder, who came from Bath, was very sceptical
about the whole thing. Three or four of us who were on the spot
tried to see if the twigs would 'play up' with us.
"We were unsuccessful till this man tried his hand, scoffing
the while. But directly that he came to the spots the dowser
had found the twig showed vigorous signs of animation. When his
hand was being twisted in his efforts to keep the twig steady,
I cried to him to hold fast, with the result that the twig
twisted itself into two pieces.
"At Wells, close by, lived a coachman, who was reported to have
the power to find, not only water but minerals. He carries
neither rod nor twig, and told me when I inquired, that his
sensations are undoubted and extraordinary whenever he is
directly above either water or minerals.
"MARTIN R. KNAPP."
In answer to inquiries Mr Knapp informed Professor Barrett the builder
was a stranger to the locality, and the spots where the rod moved were
unlikely to suggest water below. The twig in the builder's hand, Mr
Knapp says, in every case corroborated the dowser's indications, and
hence he (the builder) was unmercifully chaffed, as he had treated the
whole thing with such contempt. Mr Knapp says it is possible that the
places indicated by the dowser might have been perceived by the builder,
but it was the spontaneous and vigorous movement of the twig, evidently
contrary to the holder's intention and against his will, that excited
their astonishment.
Dr Hutton, F.R.S., the distinguished mathematician--to whom the Royal
Society entrusted the gigantic labour of making an abridgment of the
whole of the Transactions of the Royal Society from its foundation in
1666 to the beginning of this century--gives the following account of
his experiments with the divining rod as used by Lady Milbanke:--
"At the time appointed (eleven A.M., 30th May 1806) the lady,
with all her family, arrived at my house on Woolwich Common,
where, after preparing the rods, etc., they walked to the
grounds, accompanied by the individuals of my own family and
some friends, when Lady Milbanke showed the experiment several
times in different places, holding the rod in the manner
described elsewhere. In the places where I had good reason to
know that no water was to be found the rod was always
quiescent, but in other places, where I knew there was water
below the surface, the rods turned slowly and regularly in the
manner above described, till the twigs twisted themselves off
below the fingers, which are considerably indented by so
forcibly holding the rod between them.[3]
"All the company stood close to Lady M. with all eyes intensely
fixed on her hands and the rods to watch if any particular
motion might be made by the fingers, but in vain; nothing of
the kind was perceived, and all the company could observe no
cause or reason why the rods should move in the manner they
were seen to do.
"After the experiments were ended, everyone of the company
tried the rods in the same manner as they saw Lady M. had done,
but without the least motion from any of them. And in my
family, among ourselves, we have since then, several times,
tried if we could possibly cause the rod to turn by means of
any trick or twisting of the fingers, held in the manner Lady
Milbanke did, but in vain; we had no power to accomplish it."
[Footnote 3: Dr Hutton does not say _how_ he knew that water was, or was
not, below the surface. He was not, however, one likely to make loose
and random statements. According to a footnote in _The Quarterly
Review_, vol. xxii. p. 374, it appears that the ground chosen for the
experiment was a field Dr Hutton had bought, adjoining the new College
at Woolwich, then building.]
The following is a remarkable case, and an important one from an
evidential point of view. It is not known whether the "diviner" in this
case was an amateur or not; he is now dead.
_The Bristol Times and Mirror_ of 16th June 1891 states:
"The Anglo-Bavarian Brewery at Shepton Mallet needed a large
water supply; accordingly excavations had been made to find
water, but without success. About two years since, during an
exceptionally dry season, it became absolutely necessary to
obtain a further supply of brewing water; hence several boring
experiments were made on the property. At the suggestion of a
gentleman in the locality, the services of a 'diviner' were
obtained, and although the principal members of the firm
professed to have no faith in his 'art,' yet he was allowed to
try the fields on the company's property, and those on the
neighbouring estate, and discovered the well now used by the
brewery.... The soothsayer who carried the divining rod, a
hazel branch, was Mr Charles Sims, a local farmer, and a
notable discoverer of wells in the district. Operations were
immediately commenced, and, after excavating and dynamiting
through the rock, to the depth of fifty feet, a magnificent
spring was discovered in a fault of the rock, which proved to
be of exceptionally fine water, and of even a finer quality
than the town's supply."
Professor Barrett wrote to the Secretary of the brewery to make
inquiries and he replied as follows:--
"Shepton Mallet, Somersetshire,
"September 12th, 1896.
"Replying to your letter in regard to a local diviner, we had
one of the name of Sims, from Pilton, who successfully denoted
a spot on our ground where we have had an abundant supply of
water since. This was some eight years ago.
"The writer of this letter also has had some considerable
experience with Mr Lawrence of Bristol, who was one of the most
noted divining rod men in the West of England. He also was
successful in denoting a supply for a Bristol brewery with
which the writer was connected; and in numerous other instances
in the neighbourhood. Mr Lawrence bore a very high reputation.
We believe he died a few months ago at a ripe old age.
"The Anglo-Bavarian Brewery Ltd.,
"J. CLIFFORD,
"_Manager_."
Having written to ask if a previous boring had been made, and if so,
what depth, and with what result, the following reply was received:--
"Shepton Mallet, Somersetshire,
"September 18th, 1896.
"Replying to yours of the 14th, a boring was carried out to the
extent of some 140 feet _without success_ on another portion of
our premises, before it was successfully done at the spot
indicated by the water finder; here, a well was sunk and
abundant water obtained at a depth of 40 feet.
"The Anglo-Bavarian Brewery Ltd.,
"J. CLIFFORD,
"_Manager_."
In the following case, the best advice was obtained and some L1000 spent
fruitlessly searching for an underground spring prior to the dowser's
visit. The first notice of it appeared in a local newspaper, _The West
Sussex Times and Sussex Standard_, from which the following letter is
reprinted:--
"Warnham Lodge, Horsham,
"January 3rd, 1893.
"Having had very great difficulty in the supply of water to
this house, I sent for John Mullins, of Colerne, near
Chippenham, who, by the aid of a twig of hazel, pointed out
several places where water could be found. I have sunk wells in
four of the places and it each case have been most successful.
"It may be said that water can be found anywhere--this is not
my experience. I have had the best engineering advice and have
spent many hundreds of pounds, and hitherto have not obtained
sufficient water for my requirements, but now I have an
abundant supply.
"I certainly should not think of sinking another well without
previously consulting John Mullins.
"HENRY HARDEN."
It is sometimes urged that only springs yielding a limited supply of
water are found by dowsers, who fix on spots where more or less surface
water can be got from shallow wells rather than run the risk of sinking
a deep well. Many of the cases already cited refute this notion, and the
following bears on the same point. It is from Messrs Beamish & Crawford,
the well-known brewers, of Cork.
"Cork Porter Brewery, Cork,
"December 30th, 1896.
"In reply to your letter of 26th inst., we beg to state:
"1. We had an old well yielding a small supply of water. It was
about 30 feet deep.
"2. No new well was fixed on by Mullins. He bored down to a
depth of about 60 feet below the bottom of the old well, and
therefore about 90 feet below the surface of the ground.
"3. The supply of water now obtained from the new pipes sunk by
Mullins is, as nearly as we can estimate, about 10,000 gallons
per hour.
"BEAMISH & CRAWFORD LTD."
It goes without saying that professional dowsers are not always
successful in their quests. "I am inclined," states Professor Barrett,
"to think we may take from ten to fifteen per cent. as the average
percentage of failures which occur with most English dowsers of to-day,
allowing a larger percentage for partial failures, meaning by this that
the quantity of water estimated and the depth at which it is found have
not realised the estimate formed by the dowser."
What then is the secret of the dowser's often remarkable success? The
question is whether, after making every allowance for shrewdness of eye,
chance, coincidence, and local geological knowledge, the dowser has any
instinctive or supernormal power of discovering the presence of
underground water. Professor Barrett, who has perhaps devoted more time
to the subject than any other man living, is inclined to answer in the
affirmative.
"There appears to be evidence," he writes, "that a more profound stratum
of our personality, glimpses of which we get elsewhere in our
'Proceedings,' is associated with the dowser's art; and the latter seems
to afford a further striking instance of information obtained through
automatic means being more remarkable than, and beyond the reach of,
that derived from conscious observation and inference."
In another passage he adds:
"For my own part, I have been driven to believe that some dowsers--
"Whose exterior semblance doth belie
The soul's immensity"
nevertheless give us a glimpse of
"The eternal deep
Haunted for ever by the eternal mind."
CHAPTER IX
MEDIUMISTIC PHENOMENA
In my inquiry so far the reader will note that I have taken one thing
for granted--the fact of telepathy. In order to convince him to the
extent to which this great scientific truth has convinced me, it would
be necessary for me to lead him through a thousand pages of evidence for
telepathic phenomena, attested by some of the leading physicists of the
day. I am aware that there are still sceptics on the subject of
telepathy, but the testimony is overwhelming, and every year sees the
ranks of scepticism growing thinner.
Not many years ago a very learned man, the late Professor von Helmholtz,
although confronted with _prima-facie_ evidence of thought transference
or telepathy, declared: "I cannot believe it. Neither the testimony of
all the Fellows of the Royal Society, nor even the evidence of my own
senses, would lead me to believe in the transmission of them from one
person to another. It is clearly impossible." An opinion in these terms
is very rare to-day. We are apt to express our incredulity in language
far more guarded and less emphatic.
About hallucinations, however, there is no scepticism. We have remarked
sensory hallucinations of an occasional nature; we now come to regard
them as a cult, for I suppose there is no manifestation in the world, no
gift, no prodigy even, that is not prone to the fate of being exploited
for particular ends.
A poet, we will say, by some rare "subliminal uprush," produces a
beautiful poem. He is at once chained to his desk by publishers and
compelled to go on producing poetry for the rest of his life. It is
inevitable that many of his manifestations will be false; and for that
reason, in spite of an occasional jewel of truth, he runs serious risks
of being denounced in the end as no poet.
I have no doubt it is the same with the producers or the agents of
occult phenomena. Sensory hallucinations may be stimulated. They may be
stimulated by intoxication and disease, or they may be stimulated by the
morbid conditions of a spiritualistic _seance_. Everything in these
conditions--the prolonged darkness, the emotional expectancy--promotes
the peculiar frame of mind apparently requisite. Constant
exercise--perpetual aspiration develops the power of seeing visions.
After a time, in well-known cases, they appear to need no inducement to
come spontaneously.
One well-known medium, Mr Hill Tout, confesses that building and
peopling _chateaux en Espagne_ was a favourite occupation of his in his
earlier days. This long-practised faculty is doubtless a potent factor
in all his characterisations, and probably also in those of many another
full-fledged medium.
Hallucinations need not be visual only; they are frequently auditory.
Miss Freer gives an account of one induced by merely holding a shell to
the ear. There is another case of a young woman in whom auditory
hallucinations would be excited on hearing the sound of water running
through a tap. Given the basis of actual sound, the hallucinable person
quickly causes it to become articulate and intelligible. Thus, is it
unreasonable to suppose that the vague, nebulous lights seen at dark
_seances_ would furnish the raw material, so to speak, for sense
deception?
Thus, we have the basis and beginning, from one point of vi
Showing first 200,000 characters. Full text: gutenberg.org/ebooks/36730