The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851
by Duke of Arthur Wellesley Wellington · English · Gutenberg #35532 · 326,279 chars · public domain (US)
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.
Title: The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851
Author: Duke of Arthur Wellesley Wellington
Editor: Christine Terhune Herrick
Release date: March 9, 2011 [eBook #35532]
Most recently updated: January 7, 2021
Language: English
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/35532
Credits: Produced by Steven Gibbs and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LETTERS OF THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON TO MISS J., 1834-1851 ***
Produced by Steven Gibbs and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
THE LETTERS OF THE
DUKE OF WELLINGTON
TO MISS J.
1834-1851
EDITED, WITH EXTRACTS FROM THE DIARY OF THE LATTER,
BY CHRISTINE TERHUNE HERRICK
LONDON
T. FISHER UNWIN
26 PATERNOSTER SQUARE
University Press:
JOHN WILSON AND SON, CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A.
Transcriber's Note: In this e-text, superscripted characters are
represented by being preceded by a carat, e.g., D^r and 13^th.
PREFACE.
The effort of the Editor throughout this volume has been to repress
fancy rather than to exercise it. There has not been a word added to or
taken from the letters of the Duke, even the occasional eccentricities
of orthography and punctuation having been preserved.
The editing that was absolutely necessary to render coherent some
of Miss J.'s lucubrations has been restricted to the excision of
superfluous passages of Scripture that added nothing to the sense of
the text, and the correction of the very erratic punctuation both of
her diary and of the copies she has left of her own letters.
Miss J.'s copies of the Duke's epistles have been verified by
comparison with the originals. In every case where the needful books
and journals of reference were attainable, the Duke's statements in the
letters of his comings and goings and occupations have been
corroborated by contemporary data.
The particulars of Miss J.'s personal history have been derived from
private family sources.
CHRISTINE TERHUNE HERRICK.
BROOKLYN, March 18, 1889.
CONTENTS.
CHAP. PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. FIRST INTERVIEWS 10
III. THE FIRST DISCORD 21
IV. SMOOTH WATERS 39
V. FRESH DIFFICULTIES 55
VI. COMPARATIVE CALM 79
VII. ASPIRATIONS AND REBUFFS 98
VIII. A PEACEFUL PERIOD 120
IX. MISUNDERSTANDINGS 149
X. A BREATHING SPACE 166
XI. THE FINAL RUPTURE 183
XII. CONCLUSION 210
APPENDIX 221
THE LETTERS OF WELLINGTON.
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTION.
These hitherto unpublished Letters from the Duke of Wellington to Miss
J., and the Diary of the latter, have lain for years in a trunk in the
attic of a country-house within thirty miles of New York city. Their
publication is permitted through the kindness of a friend with whose
family Miss J. was remotely connected. The facts with regard to Miss
J.'s life and character have been in part obtained through those who
knew her personally, but mainly through her own Diary,--a worn volume
once handsome, that at the first glance would be taken for a Bible.
This book is supplied with a spring-lock. Its hundreds of pages are
closely covered with a minute handwriting, and the ink with which they
were traced has faded to a yellowish brown, indistinct in places, but
never quite undecipherable. The Duke's letters are written in a
peculiar, irregular hand, very difficult to read, and becoming more
crabbed as he advanced in years. While the spelling is almost
invariably correct, the construction of the sentences is often
involved, and the punctuation follows no known method.
At the time Miss J.'s correspondence with the Duke of Wellington
opened, she was a very beautiful woman about twenty years of age. Her
parents were from among the smaller English gentry, and in her girlhood
she, with her elder sister, attended one of the best schools in
England. Many of her companions were of noble birth, and the
associations then formed were continued in later years. Miss J.'s
father died while she was little more than a child, and not long after
the mother followed. At her death the daughter writes that a vision was
vouchsafed to her of the heaven her mother was entering.
The elder sister married an American physician and came with him to
this country, leaving Miss J. with a companion and in the nominal care
of her guardian, who seems to have confined himself to supplying her
with the funds accruing from the investments made of the property left
by her mother. Miss J. lived now in lodgings, now in a rented house, in
company with a devoted elderly friend to whom she constantly alludes in
her Diary, and made many visits to the country-houses of former
schoolmates. She appears never to have had any taste for general
society. A woman of deeply devotional nature, her fervor in spiritual
matters had been heightened by associations into which she had been
thrown soon after quitting school, and further strengthened by the
example and precepts of her bosom companion, Mrs. L. But while the
latter evidently possessed strong common-sense and a well-balanced
mind, Miss J. was impulsive, enthusiastic, undisciplined. Whatever she
did was done with all her might. In her sight there could be no middle
course, no half-way measures. By much introspection and pondering of
the Scriptures she developed into a religious zealot, fanatically
anxious for the conversion of those about her. And this conversion was
in her mind nothing less than the turning aside from all worldly
pursuits, and the entire dedication of time and self to religious
avocations. She shrank with horror from what she called "The World,"
and interpreted this to mean public offices, wealth, and honors
conferred by the State. All these she considered as snares to draw the
soul from the contemplation of God and eternity, and bind it down to
the things of time and sense.
While little more than a girl, she had had a love-affair with a young
man, of whom she writes as "Henry," or "H." Although attached to him,
he fell short of her standard in matters spiritual, and she therefore
gave him up. She describes with feeling her deep anxiety for his
salvation, the prayers she offered for him, and her trembling hope that
he might become converted and they might yet be happy together. As the
young man still clung to "The World," she nerved herself to break the
bond between them and to crush down her affection for him. For a while
she seemed to succeed; but the victory over herself was not complete.
In her Diary she writes:--
"A few days ago, while Mary was at the harp, in a moment a feeling
of tenderness seemed to return towards H.; but I could not
certainly say it _was_ so until two days after, when Mary returned
from her visit and alluded to him, adding she had looked at Selby
and prayed it may become an abode of _righteousness_, or words to
this effect,--when I was at once overcome, and burst into tears.
This, indeed, verified my suspicion; and what could I say to such
things but this: 'Thy will, O God, be done!'"
Resolved that she would not let her mind dwell upon one who had "never
known a new _birth_ unto _righteousness_," she devoted herself to good
works, to instructing the school-children in the village, visiting the
poor and afflicted, teaching two gypsy boys, in whom she was much
interested, to read and to pray, writing letters on religious topics to
her friends, and adapting hymns for the harp. She was an earnest
student of the Bible, and held firm faith in the doctrine that even the
most trivial events in one's life are directed by an overruling
Providence. She carried this belief so far that when in doubt as to
what to do in any matter, she would open her Bible at random, read the
first text that caught her eye, and shape her course by the direction
she found there.
That her friends deprecated such fanaticism--for it really amounted to
that--in so young and beautiful a girl, is apparent from passages in
her Diary, where she states, with evident enjoyment, that she had
undergone "persecution for righteousness' sake," and laments that
certain friends should so evidently be "laboring under the power of
Satan."
During the month of June, 1833, while staying with a friend, of whom
she speaks as "Mary," in the village of S., intelligence was brought to
Miss J. of a hardened criminal who was confined in the county jail. He
had been convicted of murder, and was to be executed shortly. Both
Catholic and Protestant clergymen had been with him, and had endeavored
in vain to make some impression upon him by prayers and exhortation.
Here was Miss J.'s opportunity. She and her friend Mary went to the
prisoner, and by their ministrations produced such an effect that he
made full confession of his guilt and professed repentance and
conversion. In her Diary Miss J. tells how she dreaded her first
expedition to the jail, the prayers she uttered for strength, and the
direct answers she received. Of a later visit to "poor Cook" she
writes:
"Oh, what a glorious change was there! The stony heart become a
heart of flesh! Great God, thy mercies are indeed infinite, and thy
ways past finding out!" A few days later she says: "Went again to
S.; found poor Cook rapidly ripening for that eternal kingdom into
which through his Saviour's righteousness he will soon be
gloriously received."
The two girls kept up their visits, in face of a command to discontinue
them from Mary's parents.
"Mary received such an angry letter, prohibiting her visiting poor
Cook,--to whom, notwithstanding, we of _course_ went, saw him, and
the next day were at chapel with him (being Sunday); after which he
said he would like _then_ to fall asleep in the Lord, etc. On
Monday evening we had singing and prayers with him. On Tuesday saw
his chains taken off, and remained with him until he left the
prison. On Wednesday were at court, and left S., feeling our work
was done,--grateful, I trust, for such manifold mercies, and more
anxious than ever to glorify our heavenly Lord. Today, the 10th,
poor Cook suffered; and I can now fancy him a glorious spirit,
hovering near, ministering to those that are to be heirs of
salvation."
The result of Miss J.'s success with this unfortunate man naturally
strengthened her in her devotion to a religious life; and the effect
was deepened by the commendations of her pious friends. It was not so
common then as now to make pets of condemned criminals; and the success
of this young girl in subduing a man with whom priests and parsons had
hopelessly labored, created a sensation and called forth comment from
the press. It would have been almost phenomenal had the girl's head not
been turned. Her devotion to the advancement of the cause of Christ as
she understood it, was strong and genuine. Surrounded by judicious
advisers, she might have manifested her zeal in a different fashion. As
it was, she now felt she had been especially called of God to do a
great work. Looking around her for an object, her attention was drawn
to the Duke of Wellington. She seemed to have known more of him as the
public man than as the soldier; for she expressly states at a later
period that when she first wrote to him she was not aware that he was
the conqueror of Bonaparte, and did not even know when the Battle of
Waterloo took place,--a statement that leads to the inference that
instruction in the fashionable schools of that day dealt more with
playing on the harp and similar showy accomplishments than with a
knowledge of English history.
Miss J. leaves in her Diary a list of the letters received from the
Duke, prefacing them with the following introduction:--
"Seeing that I have adverted in the former part of this book to the
feelings experienced on our return from poor Cook, which induced me
to look up to the Lord, enquiring what next HE would have me to do,
receiving this precious reply, 'Greater things than these, that
they may marvel;' and considering such words must have had a
reference to his condescending dealings a few months afterwards in
influencing me to write to the Duke upon the necessity of a new
_birth_ unto righteousness,--I am solicitous to devote a portion of
this book to his letters, remarking thereon as the list thereof
proceeds: May the Lord be with me, inclining my heart and pen to
perform all his good will and pleasure, be that whatever it may,
for his holy name' sake. Amen."
The Duke of Wellington was at this time (1834) a man sixty-five years
old. He was in the prime of strength and health, with a capacity for
work which the roughing and the hard service he had undergone in
earlier life had not in the least impaired. In spite of the passing
unpopularity due to his opposition to the Reform Bill, that led to his
being publicly hooted in 1832, he had had many high offices bestowed
upon him. He had now been a widower for three years.
CHAPTER II.
FIRST INTERVIEWS.
Miss J.'s first letter to the duke was written on the 15th of January,
1834, from Devonshire, where she was spending several months. She was
greatly encouraged by receiving an answer from the duke by return post.
This letter is unfortunately missing, nor does Miss J. give extracts
from it, as from many others, but she indulges in a few comments upon
it.
"It was," she says, "dated from Hartford Bridge, Jan. 18, 1833,
instead of 1834,--a remarkable circumstance for one so accurate in
such particulars. It had also a mistake in one place and a blot in
two,--betraying consequently, I should imagine, feelings which
overwhelmed him on the receipt of my Epistle; and since it is not
at all unlikely that the same Lord who worked in me to write may
('His eyes being in every place') have allowed him to participate
in the same in some way known only to Himself, in order to effect
His purposes."
Stimulated by this reception of her first venture, Miss J. proceeded
further, and on the 24th of April carried a Bible to the town-house of
the Duke, and with her own hand gave it into the charge of the servant.
She writes a minute account of this occurrence:--
"After earnest prayer the Bible was taken by me, with a fluttering,
agitated feeling, to the Duke's gates and delivered into the
porter's hands, after asking him if the Duke were at home. He
replied, 'Yes, ma'am.' I then asked, 'Is he engaged?' He told me
Lord--I forget his name--and Sir Thomas Somebody were with him. I
then inquired, 'Who delivers parcels into His Grace's hands?' He
respectfully said, 'I do, ma'am.' I rejoined, 'Then you will
deliver that,'--returning home, marvelling wherefore such things
were permitted, and what the end thereof would be. Of course a
suitable note accompanied The Bible."
The Duke was not as prompt in acknowledging "The Bible" as he had been
in replying to the first note, for he did not write until the 27th of
August. Even then the letter was delayed by a mistake he made in the
address, directing the envelope to Mrs., instead of Miss J. She says,
"I presume he was in doubt on the subject whether I was a married or
single lady, as my signature could not decide on that point." In this
note the Duke asks if he may not have the pleasure of meeting her; and
Miss J., acting under the advice of her friend Mrs. L., grants his
request and expresses her own desire to know him,--"considering it may
be The Lord's will to permit personal interviews, proposing under such
circumstances to use my influence with him; accordingly craving the
Divine blessing thereon."
From the Duke's reply, which follows, it is evident that she had
corrected his uncertainty as to whether she was married or single:
WALMER CASTLE, Oct. 24, 1834.
The Duke of Wellington presents his compliments to Miss J. The
Duke has received her Letter in which she expresses a desire to
see the Duke and that he should call upon her.
The Duke has certainly received one, if not more, letters from
Miss J., all written upon the same important subject and with the
same beneficent object in view, although the desire to see the
Duke was not expressed in them; and the Duke lately acknowledged
the receipt of one, and of the book, etc., accompanying it.
Although the Duke is not in the habit of visiting young unmarried
ladies with whom he is not acquainted, he will not decline to
attend Miss J. He is at present at a distance from London, and he
will be detained at Walmer Castle by business in this part of the
county for more than a fortnight.
Miss J. will probably write to the Duke again, and will let him
know whether she will be in London in a fortnight or three weeks
from this time.
This was followed by a note, dated November 8, renewing the expressions
of the Duke's desire to meet one who took such an interest in his
welfare, and informing Miss J. of his intention to call upon her the
twelfth of the month. She was then with her friend Mrs. L. in lodgings
in London, and here the Duke presented himself.
The interview was most curious, and is fully described in Miss J.'s
Diary. It seems to furnish the key to this correspondence, that lasted
over seventeen years. Even the pietistic phrases with which Miss J.'s
account is thickly interspersed are of value as demonstrating the
woman's real character, and making plain how completely all that
concerned her was subordinated to her conception of what constituted
the glory of God. The full statement was not written immediately after
the Duke's visit, although the main facts were noted in her Diary. The
following narrative was committed to paper some years after the
occurrence it reports. Her motive in giving particulars is, as she
herself states, to protect herself, lest at her death some question
might arise as to the precise relations that had existed between the
Duke and herself.
She writes:--
"I was about to enter further into a copy of the list of the Duke's
letters, in the book with the lock and key, without comment on the
past; but I am not permitted to do so, considering the Lord is too
jealous for his holy name to suffer me to be exposed to censure
which a full knowledge of circumstances would explain and prevent.
Consequently, however reluctant (_recoiling from the_ TASK _as I
do_) to enter into such, the honor due to the holy name so justly
declared to be above every name demands the _effort_; and may _HE_,
as I have upon my knees especially implored him, be with my pen
accordingly, influencing it to write only what is agreeable to his
unerring will, and likely to obtain the end in view above alluded
to, for his holy _name's_ sake! Since he must have influenced the
Duke of Wellington to love me above every other lady upon earth
from the first moment he beheld me, I am not afraid, as in his
sight, to imply such feelings were permitted to exist towards one,
through the workings of his power, for the accomplishment of his
own ends, be they _whatever_ they may,--_which_ ends, _however_
varying from those I had naturally anticipated, will, I trust,
redound far more to _His Glory_ than my anticipations, if realized,
could possibly have done.
"I say _naturally anticipated!_ And who can presume to think such
were not _justifiable_ when the individual _thus_ brought into my
presence by 'the Lord of Lords' for the purpose of receiving
instruction from his holy word, never spoke, all power of speech
seeming to be withdrawn, until he was compelled to exclaim: 'Oh,
_how_ I _love_ you! _how_ I _love_ you!' repeating the same over
and over and over again with increasing energy.
"I will proceed to describe this visit, which took place through a
declaration on _his part_ in a former letter that the desire to see
me sprang from the consideration evinced _by me_ concerning his
_everlasting welfare_. This induced me to receive him accordingly,
praying to God to be with me every moment of the time, directing
even my dress. This He did, letting me be dressed on the occasion
as HE pleased, which, as my Diary relates, was in my old _turned_
dark green merino gown, _daily_ worn,--not permitting me to be
decorated in any way likely to attract notice, which, as the
employment in view was of so sacred a nature, was neither required
nor obtained.
"Having committed myself on my knees into his gracious hand, 'whose
I am and whom I serve,' to do with me whatever seemed agreeable to
His unerring will, I descended the stairs after the Duke was
announced, with these words from dear Mrs. L. following me: 'Now if
the Lord should send his arrow into his soul!' (She had fancied
from the commencement that God intended to exalt me for the purpose
of showing forth _his_ praise, so that this impression must
necessarily have been powerfully strengthened by what followed.)
"I entered the Parlour, where, standing before the fire, I beheld
anything but the kind of individual personally imagined. I had not
had the slightest idea that the Duke has such a beautiful, silver
head, such as I always from my childhood admired, inducing me as I
approached to offer my hand with additional pleasure, saying, 'This
is very kind of Your Grace!' He received my hand graciously and
respectfully,--but spoke not a word. I then requested him to be
seated, two chairs having been placed for that purpose each side of
the fire,--and occupied one of them myself; when recollecting the
purport of his visit, I immediately rose, saying, 'I will show you
_my Treasure_!' He also rose, standing until I re-seated myself
with this _large_ beautiful Bible in my arms. I placed it upon the
table between us, opening it at the Third Chapter of Saint John's
Gospel, announcing the same. On arriving at the seventh verse
thereof, containing this MOMENTOUS passage, flowing from the divine
lips of him who spoke as never man spake, '_Ye_ MUST _be born
again_,' I, as is usual with me, raised my hand, pointing my finger
emphatically, with the solemnity so important an occasion demanded,
being desirous to impress the same on his mind, when to my
astonishment he eagerly _seized_ my hand, exclaiming, as before
described: 'Oh, _how_ I _love_ you!' This was his first
utterance!...
"Should any one consider strange the expression of _agonizing_
applied to the Duke's feelings at the time he seized my hand, and
exclaimed as written, I can only say that such an expression seems
hardly doing justice thereto in my estimation. Nor can I find _any_
language adequate to display the same, for God appeared to have
struck the Duke dumb on beholding me, giving him no power of speech
until he _betrayed_ the effect such had on him. He seemed
determined from first to last to overcome or conceal these
feelings; yet on one occasion, with great solemnity of voice and
manner, on my questioning him concerning who caused him to feel
thus towards me, he replied,
"'GOD ALMIGHTY.'"
One hesitates how to comment upon this singular interview. As has been
said, the Duke was at the time of its occurrence sixty-five years old,
a father and a grandfather. Under no circumstances was he a man likely
to fall in love at first sight, even with so beautiful and interesting
a woman as Miss J. Yet the length of time that the correspondence
endured, as well as the tone he generally observed of interest in her
plans, of solicitude for her health, and the readiness with which he
renewed his letters when some misunderstanding had for a while
interrupted them, all go to prove that he must have had a feeling for
her of more than common interest. Miss J. does not demur at avowing her
affection for him again and again. In later years, when there had been
a decided break between them, she writes of him constantly as "my
still-loved, precious Duke."
That the Duke did not have a general reputation for softness of heart,
even among those who knew him well, may be gathered from Greville's
comments. He styles the Duke:--
"A man of great energy, decision, and authority. The Duke is a very
_hard_ man; he takes no notice of any of his family, he never sees
his mother, has only visited her two or three times in the last few
years, and has not now been to see Lady Anne, though she has been
in such affliction for the death of her only son, and he passes her
door every time he goes to Strathfieldsaye.... He is a very
extraordinary man certainly, and with many contradictions in his
character.... He will not endure any one who will not be
subservient to him."
Several passages in the Duke's letters to Miss J. written when there
had been deaths among his friends or in his family, lead one to modify
the estimate made of him by Greville, who was always too apt to let his
personal prejudices color his statements. M'Carthy declares that while
the Duke was cold and brusque in manner, his affections were warm and
enduring. This softer side of his nature was evidently that shown to
Miss J. The oddest part of the affair was that he should have betrayed
it on such short acquaintance.
On parting from Miss J. the Duke told her he should be absent from town
for several days, but would call upon her on his return. At his request
she promised to write to him. This she afterwards found "the Lord of
Lords" would not permit.
"I attempted to fulfil my promise repeatedly; but felt so
restrained that I was obliged at length to relinquish all thought
of doing so, considering such was not the will of God."
A letter from the Duke dated December 5 inquires the reason of this
silence, and proposes calling again. To this Miss J. sent no answer;
but in spite of her silence she received another note, dated London,
December 22, announcing the Duke's return, and informing her that he
would wait upon her the next day at three o'clock. The following
account of this call is from Miss J.'s Diary:--
"During the next visit from the Duke he exclaimed, speaking of his
feeling for me, 'This must be for life!' twice over successively.
He then asked me if I felt sufficient for him to be with him a
whole life, to which I replied: '_If it be the will of God_.' I
observed much excitement about him, and he in a very hurried manner
told me that he was going on a visit to the King. This led me to
reply, 'I wish you were going on a visit to _The King_,' which he
evidently interpreted to mean The King of kings. He left me
hastily, saying he purposed returning in a short time. In the
interim I locked my door and knelt down, beseeching God to be with
me and protect me, showing me what he would have me do under such
marvellous circumstances. Forgetting that the door was fastened, I
was obliged on the Duke's return to explain wherefore, stating that
it is written, 'When thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father
which is in secret, and thy Father which seeth in secret shall
reward thee openly;' adding, '_Therefore_ I locked the door when
you were gone, Your Grace, to kneel down and ask God to take care
of me.' On hearing this his eyes dropped, but he said nothing. On
his asking me why I had not written to him during his absence from
town, I replied, 'Because _God_ would not let me;' when his eyes
again fell, and he was silent."
CHAPTER III.
THE FIRST DISCORD.
The Duke was again summoned out of town before he had the opportunity
to repeat his call. He promised, however, to attend Miss J. upon his
return at the end of a week. He was detained longer than he had
anticipated, and meanwhile reflection appears to have made Miss J.
doubt the propriety of her meeting him again. She writes an account of
her meditations upon this subject in her Diary, and follows it with a
copy of the letter she wrote to the Duke:--
"It is now this day a fortnight since the Duke paid me the visit
attended by the circumstances described, which not only occasioned
suffering immediately after his departure of no common nature, but
daily brought with it an increasing unwillingness to submit to
another interview. As this at _length_ approached I was led to
dread it and consequently to meditate on what The Will of the
Lord might be. Whilst thus employed and looking up for help and
guidance, these blessed promises came, 'In Me is the Help.' '_I
will uphold_ _thee_,' after which I slept in peace. The following
morning, (yesterday) I rose, much strengthened in spirit and prayed
that I might be given grace to fulfil all the good pleasure of God
with regard to one inexpressibly dear to my soul.
"I then rose from my knees, dressed me, and without the slightest
idea what I was about to do descended into the parlor, which I had
no sooner entered than a powerful feeling possessed me to write
to the Duke, and entreat he would desist visiting me, which
accordingly I was compelled to do. In order to know whether he was
in town, I sent for a Newspaper, thereby learning that he arrived
the day before, consequently that in two hours I could prevent a
visit. As the time he mentioned as that of his stay from Town had
doubly elapsed I concluded he would in all probability call that
day and thus subject me to another trying visit, if immediate
measures were not taken to prevent it. Therefore, I wrote on the
letter 'Put in before 4 o'clock,' in which case it is to be hoped
he would receive it at 6,--or at the furthest 8 o'clock, and I thus
feel myself delivered from the anticipation of a visit which under
present circumstances could only have been productive of a
repetition of feelings I am most anxious to avoid."
Saturday, Jan. 10, 1835.
MY LORD DUKE,--Finding my peace, that perfect peace which for so
many years I have almost uninterruptedly enjoyed interfered with
by your visits,--visits which under present circumstances I
cannot feel justified in receiving, as they are of so different a
nature from those I anticipated when I gave you permission to
call upon me,--I think it my DUTY to entreat they should cease.
My agitation on Sunday week during and after your departure
called forth _reflections_ which actuate my present conduct. I do
not consider it right personally to place myself so fully and
confidentially in the power of one, who, however honorable and
noble, occasionally seems to forget he is confided in by a Being
who _feels_ herself entitled even in the sight of God, not only
to the appellation of virtuous, in the strictest acceptation of
the word,--but RIGHTEOUS. This appellation as far exceeds the
former in _value_ as the heavens do the earth, as the one is to
be found, I trust, frequently in the unregenerate, whilst the
_latter_ springs SOLELY from _above_.
Pray do not imagine by the step now taken that I am incapable of
duly appreciating your valued affection!--for I hesitate not to
declare there breathes not the Being so dear to me as yourself.
Yet, whilst I make this declaration and consequently admit that
all the world are as nothing in comparison with you,--I consider
it equally my duty to _add_ that however dear GOD may have made
you to me--(and I feel it is His Work, Why or Wherefore time must
explain) _you_ are as nothing in comparison with CHRIST, Whose
honor I consider concerned, being, I glory to say His openly
acknowledged, however unworthy, servant, And for Whose sake
_consequently_ I have come to the determination of exercising the
_self denial_ herein required.
That you could ever think of ME, notwithstanding your occasional
forgetfulness,--with any other than the _most_ honorable of
feelings, would of course be as impossible as to imagine you
could at pleasure bring the heavens down under your feet or turn
the Sun out of his course, since _both_ would be more likely than
that I could even for a single moment forget the _high_ END for
which I was created, namely, to _glorify His Holy Name Who_ HAS
REDEEMED _me with His precious Blood_, and _rather_ than dishonor
it I should prefer the sufferings of ETERNAL torments!
Trusting that the step thus taken may be received by Your Grace
in the light _duty_ both to God and myself demand, I will not
intrude upon your time further than to assure you that should any
_spiritual_ advice from me be considered needful either in
sickness or health, it will _always_ be at your service.
With an assurance of remembering you from time to time when I
approach _His Throne_ (Who is of purer eyes than to behold
iniquity) and Who looketh into the _deepest_ recesses of the
_human heart_, I beg to subscribe myself that which in reality I
trust you believe I am, namely,
Your Grace's Most faithful friend
In The Lord.
A. J.
The Duke's answer was a strong contrast to this effusion.
LONDON, Jan. 10, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your letter and enclosures. I
beg to remind you of what I said to you the second day that I saw
you; and if you recollect it you will not be surprised at my
telling you that I entirely concur in the intention which you
have communicated to me.
I am obliged to you for what you have sent me; and I am
Ever Yours Most Sincerely,
WELLINGTON.
This note, although courteous in form and substance, brought forth from
Miss J. a reply that, beginning mildly, ended in scathing terms.
Monday, Jan. 12, 1835.
MY LORD DUKE,--I have endeavored in vain to recollect what you
allude to as having said on the second visit paid me, remembering
nothing but what appeared honorable. I supposed it impossible
that there breathed a being who could dare presume to make any
profession of affection for me under opposite circumstances,
feeling as I do, that I should confer as high an honor on a
Prince in bestowing my hand on him as he could on me in receiving
it--but if it be really possible that I have mistaken Your
Grace's feelings I should only degrade my own by adding more than
that I deliver you into His Hands that "judgeth righteously" who
declares to His children the following words--"Ye are the temples
of the Holy Ghost," to which is immediately added "Whosoever
therefore defileth the Temple of God, him will I destroy"
again,--"Take heed that ye offend not one of these little ones,"
"Whoso shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me
it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his
neck and that he were drowned in the depths of the sea."
Trusting that the Lord will bestow upon you that repentance which
is not to be repented of I submit the foregoing scriptures to
your prayerful consideration and subscribe myself that which it
is the highest honor to be considered, however unworthy of the
same I may be and am,
A Servant of Christ,
A. J.
Having on further consideration, I fear found out that to which
you have alluded with such cool, insulting, presuming
deliberation in your note, as being uttered during your second
visit, I have at its remembrance risen in the night with all
those indignant feelings insult demands, to assure you that had I
understood the motives which actuated you to make such an
abhorrent, disgraceful enquiry, one I could not degrade my pen or
self by giving place on paper, however Your Grace may and have
degraded yourself by utterance of the same, I should at the
moment such escaped your lips have spurned you from me as a
serpent whose sting was capable of producing not only
instantaneous but Eternal death! Such a horror should I have had
of one who until now has possessed a share of my affection even
surprising to myself--an affection as pure and sincere as it was
disinterested, but Alas! under present circumstances with the
vail withdrawn from my eyes what a change of feeling exists! such
as would incline me if I did not believe that it was the will of
God we should have met to mourn deeply at ever having desired it.
In again however reluctantly alluding to the hateful enquiry
above noticed--one at the bare utterance of which it is a mercy
that God "in whose hands your breath is" knowing your despicable
motives (since all hearts are open in His sight and from whom no
secrets are hid however ignorant I may have been and was of the
same) did not in His wrath strike you dead at my feet. I beg to
remind you of my answer which ought, yea, must in itself have
convinced you at the time of my misunderstanding your meaning--it
being in the following words--"_If it be the will of God_;" for
surely you could never for a moment suppose it to be His will
whose purity is such that he charges even His angels with folly
that I, his devoted child and servant, should bring such deep
dishonor on His holy name as to--but my pen with every feeling
of my offended nature recoils from even _writing_, much less
submitting to such abhorrent degradation which none but most
polluted lips could ever dare to vent.
The answer was given thus hesitatingly although at the time I was
laboring under impressions of its being called forth by the
highest and most honorable intentions on your part. And why thus
hesitatingly? you would ask. Because I was not and am not quite
satisfied that under any circumstances the regenerate soul can be
justified in the sight of God in uniting itself to the
unregenerate, it being written "Be not unequally yoked with
unbelievers," also, "How can two walk together unless they be
agreed?"
Thus you will perceive that when laboring under the most
favorable impression of your upright intentions, notwithstanding
your rank, etc., all of which with me are beheld in the utter
nothingness such empty things deserve, I should have hesitated
until I perceived in you that change of heart so necessary to
salvation, without which "no man can see the Lord," fearing I
ought not to consent even under the most flattering circumstances
to partake in any outward honors likely to bring the
disapprobation of God.
When I reflect on my view of the case and then in a moment the
distressing thought of one so sinful on your part darts like a
dagger into my offended spirit, I feel that I should not be
surprised (although rest assured, I do not desire it,) at any
vengeance God saw fit to shower down for such a dreadful
intention upon Your Grace's head. Oh may His Holy Spirit convince
you of the heinousness of the sin in question, leading you from
darkness to light and from "the power of Satan" (under whose
influence you so evidently at present are,) "unto God" in order
that your transgressions may be blotted out in the Blood of the
Lamb--and that consequently the present--and if I mistake not the
greatest sin as far as thought may be concerned in God's sight,
it being of so aggravated a nature arising from the consideration
of the motives which first actuated me to address you and
afterwards receive Your Grace--namely, your eternal
happiness--may never be laid to your charge. In order that such
may not be the case it will be necessary that you should
experience that "Repentance unto life not to be repented of"
which, if felt, would bring with it an unhesitating desire to
apologize with remorse and anguish for the iniquity herein
noticed and which can never be erased from my memory until you
do, feeling it a respect due to myself and Religion. I deliver
you on this second and last occasion,--for of course I here take
a final leave of one I can never wish to behold again under
present circumstances,--once more into His Hands who "is no
respecter of persons," beseeching Him to grant you not only
repentance but forgiveness. I subscribe myself by a title as far
exceeding any Your Grace can possess as the Heavens do the earth
and which I would neither exchange nor resign to become the
Empress of a thousand worlds,
A Servant of Christ and a Child of God,
A. J.
"After I had written this letter and was meditating, these precious
words came 'FEAR NOT, for I am with thee, be not dismayed, for I am
thy God, I will strengthen thee, I will help thee, yea, I will
uphold thee with the Right Arm of My Righteousness'--and _thus_
upheld who can faint? _thus_ upheld who can despair? O my Heavenly
Father, strengthen me in the 'inner man' more and more, I beseech
Thee, to endure this and any other trial Thou in Thine unerring
wisdom mayest see fit; anxious for nothing but to fulfil Thy will
in all things, knowing that the path of duty is the path of peace:
also that it is through 'much tribulation we must enter the
Kingdom' that glorious Kingdom where 'the wicked cease from
troubling and the weary are at rest.' Sharp as this trial is, I
have to repeat my frequently acknowledged experience of finding my
strength equal to my day--or in other words the fulfilment of this
Scripture 'Thy strength is made perfect in weakness.'
"_Tuesday, Jan. 13, 1835._ Last night after experiencing and
penning the feelings herein described, I retired to rest and slept
sweetly and peacefully until about three o'clock--when I awoke with
a disinclination to sleep again--consequently adverted in thought
to my late distressing trials and whilst thus occupied felt assured
what I had suggested must have been _that_ to which the Duke
alludes with such daring effrontery! I then rose, put on my
dressing gown and wrote the language of my indignant soul as far as
such could be painted! but a faint picture at best! Alas! that one
so esteemed should give such cause to show his unworthiness. But it
is doubtlessly permitted for some end which poor blind mortals
cannot penetrate, therefore let me not murmur, but bless God who
has thought me worthy whilst so _un_worthy to rank among that
blessed number described by the angel to Saint John as having 'come
out of much tribulation and washed their robes and made them white
in the Blood of The Lamb.' This may stand as the greatest trial I
ever had! Yet I am so wonderfully upheld, agreeably to the gracious
promise previously given, that I can hardly believe such degrading
circumstances exist! Oh! What an awful thing that one so high in
power is afraid to do that which can call forth the gaze and
disapprobation of a sinful, dying, misjudging world, yet fearless
of committing the most dreadful crime before Him 'Who is of purer
eyes than to behold iniquity.' O may the letter just about to be
sent be permitted to sink deep into his rebellious soul calling it
from darkness to light and from the power of Satan unto God. Then
indeed we shall have cause to declare the goodness of God in thus
permitting (however revolting and distressing,) late occurrences to
take place! And since He can bring good out of evil, I submit all
that has transpired to His gracious, condescending and unerring
governance for this purpose, knowing that He can bring 'light out
of darkness and make crooked things straight.' O I can never be
sufficiently grateful for the powerful strength which so powerfully
upholds me! and trust the same will be a means among His other
innumerable, unmerited blessings of causing me to glorify His Holy
Name with the best powers of my soul and body under whatever trials
or sorrows may be yet in store for me! Oh may each and all tend to
ripen me 'for an inheritance among the saints in light for Christ's
sake!'
"Since the above was written I have indeed in a few hours had
additional cause for gratitude and love to God, having received a
letter from the Duke apologizing in every way I could expect,
considering all circumstances, for occasioning my displeasure. Oh!
how gracious is the Lord of Heaven and Earth thus to undertake for
so unworthy a worm! for which I praise Thee, I bless Thee, I
magnify Thee to Whom all power, majesty and dominion belong!"
The Duke's letter of apology is full of calm dignity, but one regrets
that the accusation was not dismissed with a show, at least, of
righteous indignation.
LONDON, Jan. 13, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I beg your pardon if I have written a line or
used an expression which could annoy you. Believe me; it is the
thing of all others that I would wish to avoid! And that there is
nobody more strongly impressed than I am with veneration for your
Virtues, attainments and Sentiments!
Believe me Ever Yours
Most sincerely,
WELLINGTON.
This quarrel is of chief interest as indicating that Miss J.'s anxiety
for the Duke's soul was not altogether disinterested. If it had been,
her resentment at his gallantry would hardly have been expressed in
this manner. It is evident that to her mind, the Duke had been trifling
with her. His kindly reception of her efforts to promote his
"everlasting welfare" had raised hopes that would have seemed absurd to
any one of every-day common-sense. She asserts openly in several places
in her Diary that she believed it was the will of God that she should
become the wife of the Duke.
In this persuasion she was confirmed by her friend Mrs. L.; and to her
and to Miss J. there was nothing unreasonable in the expectation. The
latter considered herself no whit inferior to the Duke in any respect,
as she takes pains to affirm. Instances of this may be given from her
Diary. She says:--
"I was impressed throughout my correspondence with and knowledge of
the Duke with a feeling that the end God had in view was my
exaltation for His Glory, or in other words to show forth His
power.... I attach so little importance to rank or worldly
grandeur, that I should have considered I conferred as high an
honor on the Duke in bestowing my hand as he would in receiving it,
of which he was well aware!"
Miss J. judged herself to be actuated by no worldly motives in her
desire for such promotion. She cleverly concealed the mundane nature of
her aspirations even from herself. Throughout, her declaration is that
her sole aim in life has invariably been, "Glorify Thyself in Me!" By
her elevation to a position where she will be a centre of observation
she hopes to influence those ungodly souls by whom she will be
surrounded, and to imbue them with true piety. She writes:--
"I in my turn was permitted to love the Duke, but the honor and
glory of God were ever my consideration. Consequently such
affection of mine being of so opposite a nature to his own was
principally displayed in my watchful solicitude for his everlasting
welfare, concerning which I was firm and faithful throughout,
believing God would convert him _eventually_, causing him to shine
forth gloriously in His adorable service. As in that case the
erroneous impressions in my mind would in all probability have been
verified, I looked forward to becoming as 'a city set on a hill
which cannot be hid,' conceiving such exaltation would admit of
showing forth _His_ praises _openly_ before men. But I doubt not
that I am _far_ happier thus situated, enjoying a lively sense of
His Divine, Adorable presence than I could possibly have had under
the turmoil attending more exalted circumstances. As the poor Duke
evidently did everything in his power to overcome the feelings
referred to, I am aware the _World_ could form no idea of the
extent or power of the same without this explanation from my pen."
The Duke's affection for Miss J. can hardly have been altogether the
work of her imagination. Besides the interview copied in her Diary,
there is the evidence of the correspondence. True, his epistles are
lacking in open protestations of devotion. Miss J. herself remarks that
the Duke's letters were always cautiously written. He was too much a
man of the world to run the risk of compromising himself in black and
white. But the very existence of this correspondence, extending over a
period of seventeen years, is a strong argument in favor of his having
felt for her a remarkably warm friendship at the least.
It can hardly be supposed that the Duke seriously intended to marry
Miss J. As he himself writes to her,--
"I should not treat you as I should wish to be treated myself. The
commands of all others which we ought to obey are those dictated to
us by our social relations. What would be said, if I, a man of
seventy years of age, nearly, were to take in marriage a lady young
enough to be my Granddaughter?"
Upon this Miss J. comments:--
"_Alas! Alas!_ how deceitful is the human heart! For I am convinced
that although the Duke _wrote_ thus, there was not a moment during
our acquaintance when if I had _not_ been _by the Grace of God_
what I was and am that he would have thought I was too young to bow
down before me with the most sinful adulation."
What was either a flirtation or a manifestation of fatherly fondness on
the part of the Duke was a grand passion to Miss J. Perhaps her vanity
was as deeply touched as her heart; but those who knew her best
declared that never until the Duke's death did she resign all hope of
becoming the Duchess of Wellington.
In another part of her Diary she writes, with the diffuseness and
reiteration that mark her style:--
"That I loved the Duke I am not ashamed to say, God knows, and that
too with the purest affection. Consequently when he asked me if I
felt sufficient to be with him a whole life, (which was the
question referred to in that odious letter, for odious indeed it
still appears in my sight, yea, increasingly so with time, for I
recoil with unspeakable horror from the thought that I could be
thus enquired of without being clearly comprehended), I replied to
the same in the following words, '_If it be the will of God_,' not
supposing for a moment, as expressed, that such an enquiry could be
made of one with God's Holy Book before me, to which I had been
attracting his attention with all the reverence and veneration so
holy an employment demanded, except under intentions the most
honorable. This idea many would perhaps say must have arisen from
my want of knowledge of mankind and the world etc. But in that case
how was it that dear Mrs. L----, a perfect woman of the world in
her early life, could think the same and consequently encourage
such views?"
Long after the Duke had wearied of his passing fancy Miss J. clung to
the idea that she could yet draw him to her. Her secluded life, given
up to good works and pious meditations, and still later her confirmed
ill-health, heightened her unworldliness, and rendered it more than
ever difficult for her to see the impossibility of what in the eyes of
the Duke and his family and friends would have been a misalliance.
It is perhaps uncharitable to suppose that Miss J. intended by her
assumed reluctance to grant the Duke a third interview to force him to
make a formal declaration of his intentions and ask her hand in
marriage. If this, however, was her plan, it met with a signal failure.
Clearly nothing was farther from the Duke's thoughts than to make
himself the butt of popular ridicule by taking a wife forty-five years
younger than himself, and of retired even though perfectly respectable
social position. Besides that, it can hardly be wondered at if the
Duke, a man free from binding domestic ties, were not in a humor to
place permanently at his elbow so strict a mentor as Miss J., no matter
how pretty she might be. The prudishness and piety that were
fascinating in a beautiful woman seldom seen, would wax wearisome in
the most charming creature bound to him by indissoluble ties.
CHAPTER IV.
SMOOTH WATERS.
LONDON, June 2, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I received your Note. We perfectly understand
each other; and with your permission I will call upon you
to-morrow at three o'clock.
There is only one point that I wish to explain in reference to
our last meeting. There might have been a difference of Manner.
There was none of feeling.
You told me that you had written to me; and I certainly was
anxious to possess your Letters. You certainly wished to take
them out of the Paquet; but if I had thought that your reluctance
to give them was deeply felt, you may rely upon it that I would
not have pressed to have them.
At all events my perusal of them has occasioned an explanation
which can do no Harm.
Believe me ever Yours most sincerely
W.
From this it appears that the personal interviews had recommenced. The
letters now follow one another closely.
LONDON, June 15, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your Letter of this Day, for
which I return many thanks.
I was not able to go to see you last week as I intended. I was
confined to my Home by Indisposition for some days; and I was
much occupied. I am going out of town to-morrow. But I hope to be
able to go to see [_sic_] on Saturday at three o'clock if you
should not at that time have left town for the Seaside?
I will bring with me the Letters and Books which you lent me. I
have read that one which you wish that I should return to you.
If you should go before I shall see you again I hope that you
will let me know where.
Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely
WELLINGTON.
Miss J. states that the book here alluded to was an account of the
conversion of the criminal Cook, and touches upon her instrumentality
in bringing about this result.
LONDON, June 22nd, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have read all your Letters since I saw you on
Saturday. Why do you not send each of them to me when you write
it?
I think that you will have perceived on Saturday that you was
mistaken in the Notion under which you wrote some of them.
We may differ in opinion and I may be in Error. But I assure you
that I cannot feel otherwise than grateful to you for your
kindness to me; and respect and veneration for the Motives for
it.
Let me know before you go out of town that I may not misdirect a
Letter to you.
Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely,
WELLINGTON.
In the latter part of June Miss J. went to Ramsgate. The Duke's letter
of July 1st is directed there:--
LONDON, July 1st, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I am very sorry if in my Letter of Monday I
should have said a Word which could have hurt your feelings. I
think that by this time you ought to be convinced that I could
not intend to do so.
I might have done so erroneously. I might have been misled by
circumstances. But I could not willingly hurt the feelings of any
body.
In this particular case you forget that you asked the Question
whether your letters were not overweight. I told you that they
were.
I likewise informed you of a Rule which we are all under the
necessity of adopting; that is of returning Letters over weight;
because too many Persons are in the habit of thinking that they
may inclose their Letters to a well known Person; and the Charge
becomes enormous. Under these circumstances my Porter has the
usual order not to take in Letters overweight; which he generally
returns; unless I should happen to be in the House when he
enquires. I stated the fact very shortly, as I generally do; in
answer to a question from yourself; and I pointed out to you that
if you desired to write to me more than you could put in two
Sheets, you should put your Letter in two or three or more
covers.
You must not be so susceptible. Rely upon it, that many many
Years will pass over your Head; before I shall intentionally
offend you.
Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely
W.
July 7, 1835.
I have received your two Letters My Dear Miss J., and according
to your desire I write immediately.
My writing is not very legible by a person not accustomed to it.
But I never could have intended to apply the word mistrust to
you.
You expressed apprehension that your Letters might be seen by a
third person; as they might have been returned to the Post
Office.
I did not write the word _relatives_ but _relations_, and that
not in the meaning of relatives. I adverted to your ordinary
relations with other persons, which I said must be attended by
some observance of their Habits and Customs.
However, there is an end of this matter. I hope that your writing
to me will never be disturbed again by any checks or
difficulties; or expressions which I assure you can never be
intended to convey any meaning but one of kindness towards you,
and of admiration of your Talents, your character and your
Devotion to what is good. Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely
W.
Of the following letters Miss J. gives extracts in her Diary. There are
few of his epistles in which the Duke fails to express his thanks to
Miss J. for her kindness in writing to him. However gratifying this may
have been to her, the constant repetition becomes monotonous to the
indifferent reader. Miss J. writes:--
"The next letter from His Grace is dated July 11th, 1835, in which
he writes--'You are mistaken in thinking that I at all disapprove
of the independence of character and conduct which I had observed.
I hope that you may never feel otherwise towards me than in the
State of Independence to say and write to me whatever your mind may
suggest.'
"In his letter of July 18th the Duke writes--'I thank you for your
Letter received this morning. What I meant by reflection was not to
call your attention to anything particularly passing in the world,
but to the impressions made upon your own mind by any circumstance
you might have observed.----You will tell me that God will direct
you. So He will. But He has given us a Mind, the power of comparing
and reflecting, of deciding what is true and what is false and He
requires us to exercise our judgment in Matters on which He has
given us the capability of forming judgment. You'll tell me that I
am acting your part and teaching you instead of attending to you.
But I beg you observe it is only in explanation of what I wrote to
you in a former letter upon the subject of your change of opinion
respecting an individual at Ramsgate.'
"The Duke here refers to a Preacher who had spoken in the open air
at Ramsgate of whom I had previously written."
"The Duke's next letter implies that he understood I was about to
return to Town, inducing him to express an intention of calling on
me but such was not the will of The Lord of Lords, therefore I did
not accede to it, but proceeded expeditiously from Ramsgate to
Harrowgate. Here His Grace's letters followed me."
LONDON, July 24th, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I received your Letter by the Post written on
Wednesday; and have this day received that written in London to
inform me that you was about to go to Harrowgate. I am much
obliged to you for both.
It is true that I am in the habit of writing Answers to all
Letters. But I feel great satisfaction in writing to some; to
those in particular from whom I am desirous of receiving Letters;
and who express a Desire to hear from me.
I am very glad that you corrected your first Impressions
respecting your Preacher. I believe that we cannot too frequently
pass in review our opinions upon what passes before us. We shall
find ourselves frequently in Error.
I sincerely hope that the Waters of Harrowgate, may have the
effect of restoring Your Health entirely. Believe me Ever Yours
most sincerely
W.
LONDON, August 3, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your letter of the 31st and I
am really much concerned to learn that I have again created a
feeling of displeasure in your Mind by having omitted to notice
the Inconvenience which you felt upon your Journey to Harrowgate.
There is always Inconvenience in travelling in a Stage Coach. It
cannot be otherwise. Indeed it is wonderful that there should be
so little; and I must observe that there is less of a physical
and personal Nature in travelling in this Manner in England than
elsewhere. The Inconvenience felt in England is of a moral and
mental description. It is formed of the trash and nonsense which
a traveller is condemned to hear in these vehicles; because every
body talks; and says not what he thinks but what the fancy of the
Moment suggests. For this which was the particular Inconvenience
which you suffered upon this Journey, there is no remedy, but
_Patience;_ and I would add _Silence_.
You would practice neither. You would not sit _patiently_ and
hear the stupid Irreligion of the Talker; you would reply to Him;
and this occasioned much of the Annoyance which occurred.
I find that I am again taking your part, instead of my own. I do
so in my own satisfaction. If you are not satisfied with my
observations, you will at least perceive that I had read, nay
more reflected upon your Letter and the account you gave of
yourself.
But why should you torment yourself by thinking that I did not
read, and did not care for what you represented that you
suffered. You must be aware that you are mistaken! Believe me
Ever Yours most sincerely
W.
"I presume from the Duke's next letter that I had given him a
description of my interview and acquaintance with Major and Mrs. P.
as he therein writes--'I am very happy that you have again seen
Major and Mrs. P. I don't wonder that they should have been
desirous of finding you.'
"In his next, dated the 4th, he writes--'I hope, indeed I am
certain that you will not cease to write to me what you feel and
that you will excuse me if I sometimes venture to act your part
although not exactly in your department. I came down to the house
of Lords directly after the Post arrived and I am writing to you
from thence.' Judging by the next letter, dated August 6th, I had
made some enquiry concerning Major P. as the Duke replies thus, 'I
don't recollect Major P. But as nearly every officer in the Army
who has served has served with me I don't doubt that he has. Ask
him in what regiment he served.'"
LONDON, August 7, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I beg pardon again for having omitted to notice
the personal Inconvenience you suffered in your Journey to and
your arrival in Harrowgate. I should have thought the impertinent
Blasphemy of the Travellers in the Stage Coach would have annoyed
you more than any personal inconvenience.
I see no chance of my quitting London; or of having one moment's
respite from Business. I passed twelve Hours yesterday; and I am
going to pass twelve Hours this day in the House of Peers. I hope
therefore that I shall see you even though your stay in
Harrowgate should be prolonged more than you expect.
Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely
W.
This, with the other letters given entire, is copied from the original
MS. in the Duke's handwriting. Miss J. quotes only a line from the
above, and goes on to one written the next day:--
"In that dated the 8th of August the Duke writes 'I don't consider
with you that it is necessary to enter into a disputation with
every wandering Blasphemer--much must depend upon the
circumstances. But I must say that the Meekness of the Christian is
better displayed by silence on such an occasion, and more good is
done by contempt than by any disputation. However I may be wrong
and you right and I only suggest my own opinion.'
"In the Duke's letter dated August 8th he alludes kindly to my
health, adding 'I am very much flattered by your letters but I hope
that you will not think it necessary to write when it will produce
pain or uneasiness to make such an exertion. As long as your
silence will not be attributed to your being offended at anything I
may have done or written, or may have omitted I shall regret it as
it will prove to me that you are indisposed but I shall not feel
that you are displeased.' By the Duke's next letter, dated August
12th, I presume I had referred to his time being so much occupied
as he in reply writes 'It is true that I am very much occupied, and
cannot tell when I shall be less so. But I am at all times happy to
hear from you and to write you an answer in return.'
"In the Duke's little lecturing letter of the 13th of August he
writes; 'I beg you not to hesitate about writing to me whenever it
can be agreeable to you. I am not capable of answering you and
quoting Chapter and verse in support of my answer but I take from
your own letter a word which I think supports my opinion, "Charity
beareth all things." You will quote much to show that you ought to
enter the lists upon every occasion that offers or rather that is
intruded upon you, etc, etc, etc. You see that I am fast taking
your part from you.'
"O that you could! for it was my desire that the Duke should become
a Paul in his generation, sitting at his feet accordingly.
"In the Duke's letter of the 14th of August he writes--'My
attendance in the House of Lords is not at this moment so constant
as it was some days ago. Yet its business occupies much of my time
in the morning but I have some for other purposes.'
"By the Duke's letter of the 17th I must have assured him of my
intention to return to Town--for he writes--'I shall not have left
London when you will return and I will certainly call upon you as
soon as I shall have heard where you will be. I shall still be as I
am now, much occupied with the Business of Parliament but I don't
doubt that I shall be able to find a moment to call upon you either
in the morning or the evening.'
"In the Duke's letter of the 18th he kindly advises me not to
travel at night fearing it may prove injurious adding 'I have more
experience than most persons in travelling.'
"In the Duke's letter of August 19th he writes as follows--'I write
to you constantly in return for your letters and I find time to do
so without inconvenience, but I am afraid that I shall not be able
to go to see you with so much fidelity. A visit takes time, to
write a letter is an affair of a few minutes. I am never in Town
excepting during the sitting of Parliament and then only when there
is much business to be transacted which occupies my whole time.'
"By the Duke's of the 20th I must have complained of the
worldliness, etc. around me for he writes after remarking thereon;
'But if you should recover your health there you must not mind the
annoyance of the irregularities of what is called the Company.' The
Duke kindly says in his next, dated August 21st, 'I hope you are
not coming away sooner than is good for you.'
"In the Duke's next letter of the 22nd of August he writes--'I
shall expect to hear from you when you will arrive and will be
settled in London and I will pay you a visit as soon afterwards as
it will be in my power.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated August 26th, implying he
proposed calling when in his power, but adds 'You arrive at a
moment in which I am much occupied. You are at some distance from
hence; and I don't think that from nine in the morning till 12 at
night I could easily find half an hour which I can call my own and
at my disposition.'
"In the Duke's letter of the 27th he writes; 'I will endeavor to
call upon you this day before three. I cannot afterwards. If I
should call when you don't expect me I will send up that I am the
Gentleman to whom you wrote; unless I should previously hear from
you that I may mention my Name.'
"Which of course I did not allow, as it was not my desire to be
noticed in the neighborhood, shrinking from it then, as I do now,
when it can be avoided. I recollect the Duke's visit well for he
had to wait until I was dressed by dear Mrs. L. who was in the
house at the time, as usual, for I think he came earlier than I had
expected. Consequently in his next of the 29th he writes; 'I don't
see why you are to take the trouble of dressing to receive me. But
that is your own affair. If you should do so I can wait with
Patience.'
"This was very pretty in His Grace, but as my dress was always very
simple, it did not require any great exercise of that virtue.
"By the Duke's next letter of Sept. 1st I fear another letter is
missing as he writes therein 'Mine of yesterday morning will have
informed you that I was obliged to attend the King at Windsor on
Saturday and a part of His family at Kew on Sunday.--I did not say
that _all_ my time was passed in the House of Lords. Much of it is
certainly passed out of the House, but a great part of it is passed
in receiving and talking to the Hundreds, I may say, of the persons
who have business in the House and come to converse on the business
with me.'
"In the Duke's next letter of Sept. 4th he writes; 'I received this
morning your letter of yesterday, but have not received the Tract
that you mention. It is possibly too heavy for the 2nd Post.'
"Perhaps this was the case, as I do not recollect hearing any more
of it. The next letter from His Grace is dated the same, Sept. 4th,
Noon, in which he writes; 'I will endeavor to fix and let you know
the time in which I can wait upon you again.'
"The Duke's next is dated Sept. 5th, in which he writes; 'I was in
the House of Lords from 5 in the evening till two this morning. I
am much obliged to you for the Tract which I will return as soon as
I shall have perused it.' I presume this must have been a little
book entitled The Joy of Israel as I only _lent_ that to people,
its having been a Gift, for it is still in my possession. In the
Duke's next, dated Sept. 7th, the Duke writes--'I have received
your letter written on Saturday for which I return you many thanks.
I am very sorry that I am so much occupied as to be unable to make
my acknowledgments in person.'
"The Duke's next letter of Sept. 9th acknowledges one from me
wherein I presume I have shown submission to the Divine will
concerning the difficulty attending his visits for he writes;
"'This could not be otherwise. In the mean time be assured that I
am anxious to have the pleasure and benefit of conversing with you
as often as it may be in my power to see you.'"
A few passages taken from Miss J.'s Diary at this time are interesting
as displaying the intimate friendship that at this period existed
between her and the Duke. On the 6th of September she writes:--
"I have been here (in London,) nearly a fortnight, yet have seen
the Duke only twice, but receive letters daily,--and last night a
particularly kind one. I have been expecting him, but he comes not,
being so occupied with his Parliamentary business. What can I say
to such things but this,--'Shall not the Judge of all the earth do
right?' and, 'Has HE not a right to do what HE will with His own?'
"_September 10th._ I wrote to the Duke to-day and hope the Lord
will permit him to receive and answer it kindly. The Subject on
which I addressed him was on Christ becoming sin for us and bearing
the wrath of the Father. O Lord, I pray Thee, have mercy upon his
precious soul!
"_September 14th._ I shall have been here three weeks to morrow,
during which I have seen the Duke four times, and will just allude
to the subjects introduced during each visit.
"The first brought with it remarks on TRUE Nobility, obliging me to
declare it is to be found only in _Christ_ and _His Righteousness_
in man. I mentioned what St. Paul said when contrasting the Bereans
with the Thessalonians, namely, 'These were more NOBLE than those
_in Thessalonica in that they received the word with all readiness_
of mind, and _searched the Scriptures_ DAILY, _whether these things
were so_.'
"During the second visit, I read to him the 49th Psalm and
particularly called his attention to the last verse thereof thus
written--'Man that is in honour and understandeth not, is like the
beasts that perish,' reminding him they were GOD'S _Words_.
"During his third visit I told him I should like to be hated of all
men for Christ's sake! and during his fourth and last that he did
not believe Christ to be The Son of God! since which I have written
to him daily and the first reply I receive is one calculated to
produce another check to my feelings, all of which I give up
entirely to the Lord, imploring Him to govern and actuate them just
as HE sees His own honor and glory require, causing me to make
nothing a consideration in comparison therewith."
One can hardly imagine the Iron Duke, the conqueror of Napoleon, the
representative of the nation in foreign councils, the ex-Prime
Minister, the man upon whom his country delighted to heap honors,
hearkening meekly to these homilies from pretty lips upon what
constituted true nobility. It is impossible to believe that his secret
feelings were not those of amusement, however respectful his outward
semblance. Nor is there much room for question as to whether he would
have listened with as commendable patience had his lecturer been a man
or a plain-faced woman advanced in years.
CHAPTER V.
FRESH DIFFICULTIES.
In spite of the harmonious relations existing between this curious pair
of friends, another storm was brewing. The basis of this was a
ridiculously slight matter. Miss J. was a stickler for all forms of
deference, and carried this weakness to the verge of absurdity. Upon
this was founded the quarrel. On the same day with the last entries
given from her Diary one finds the following:--
"This morning I received the first letter from the Duke since his
departure from Town,--and felt surprised at the alteration in the
Seal,--_being plain!_ and unlike any other before received, which I
consequently acknowledged with the feeling that a want of apparent
respect where the _deepest_ is merited ought to call forth ... My
feelings were I not afraid of offending God would incline me to
seal up all the Duke's letters and return them, conscious that I
merit an increase rather than a diminution of respect. Except such
is bestowed the Duke need not be surprised at any step The Lord may
incline me to take."
One may be pardoned for the suspicion that the feelings attributed to
the Lord were in fact derived from quite another source. The next day
she continues to harp on the same subject:--
"_September 15th._ I rose this morning with the determination to
write to the Duke, and did so before breakfast, when I took it to
the Post Office myself, leaving the result with Him Who doeth all
things well and leaveth nothing after Him."
A copy of the letter is appended:--
Sept. 15th, 1835.
MY DEAR DUKE,--As you only acknowledge in yours of the 13th, two
letters, I beg to say there were addressed to you by yesterday,
three; One, written on Thursday, another on Friday and the last
on Saturday. And I take this opportunity of making two enquiries
respecting which my mind is not at all satisfied.
The first is; Why I am to receive a change of style in the
appearance of your letters with regard to the Seal thereof? and
the next, _called forth thereby_; _Why_ you _ever_ ceased to sign
your _Name_ at the conclusion of your letters? If either of these
changes sprang from disrespect or want of confidence in my
integrity, confidence, Christianity and friendship, I shall
without hesitation or delay return Your Grace every letter I have
in my possession, as in _that_ case they will cease to have any
value in _my_ estimation. I will also beg to decline all further
intercourse, knowing that the sincerity and purity of my
friendship merits both consideration and respect.
You will perhaps wonder at my noticing your omission with regard
to Signature after the receipt of so many letters. I should not
have done so, however incomprehensible the same may have been and
_was_ to me, had not _this additional_ circumstance tended to
_strengthen_ a momentary feeling experienced when your first
letter signed W. reached me. But this I overcame, fancying you
were in the _habit_ of doing so to all your correspondents of any
and every rank, and imagining you superior to the _capability_ of
taking advantage of circumstances. If I am mistaken with regard
to this being a _general habit_, I am _justified_ in asking--Why
such an unwarrantable liberty was taken with me? I assure you
that however great my affection may be, it is not of a nature to
submit to ANY feeling that is not accompanied with the _deepest
respect_ as well as esteem, nor could the latter be either
durable or _acceptable_ under OTHER circumstances.
Waiting your reply before I can decide what further line of
conduct to pursue, praying in the mean time to be directed BY HIM
Who knows _all_ the _secret_, hidden motives of the human heart
without exception, I inscribe myself,
Your sincere Christian friend,
A. J.
P.S. Since writing the above, my antipathy to the omission of
_either_ your NAME OR seal is so _increased_ that I beg to
decline receiving _any_ letter which does not bring with it
_these_ marks of DUE respect.
Not satisfied with sending off this letter, Miss J. followed it with
another no less severe. In her Diary she describes the feelings that
swayed her while she awaited a reply to her missives:
"_September 16th--Morning._ I have risen this morning (my first in
this place--Hampstead--) strong in The Lord and in the power of His
might. I am prepared to meet whatever HE may see fit, casting my
burthen wholly on him and desirous of nothing in comparison with
His honor and glory. O may He be magnified powerfully both in my
life and death, and may every period of my remaining days be
dedicated more devotedly unto Him than any hitherto spent; 'growing
up in Him as a tree planted by the waterside' bringing forth fruit
plentifully, knowing that 'it is written' 'He that abideth in ME
and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruit,'--Be with me
graciously and mightily when I hear from the Duke today--if I
do--and especially tomorrow when the reply comes to that sent off
yesterday, strengthening me 'in the inner man' to treat it as Thou
wouldst have me do in every respect, having no will of my own and
loving Thine above all things. Thou knowest, O Gracious God, what
is in the Duke's heart, and why he has recourse to the ways which
have occasioned my displeasure. Therefore I give him up into Thy
Hands to deal with accordingly, beseeching Thee to have mercy on
his precious Soul, bringing it from darkness to light and from the
power of Satan unto Thyself for Christ's sake!
"_September 16th 1835.--Evening._ The whole of this day has been
marked with such divine strength from Him Who causes me to feel the
force of this passage of Holy Writ 'When I am weak then am I
strong,' that it is impossible to be sufficiently thankful. No
letter has arrived from the Duke. However I suppose tomorrow will
bring with it the anticipated answer. O may I be strengthened
additionally to bear it if unkind! and prove myself ready to pluck
out a right eye or cut off a right arm for Christ's sake! which we
may be understood to do when we resign those dearest upon earth at
His command.
"_Friday September 18th 1835._ It is now between 11 and 12 o'clock
and I am sitting at my pretty window with it open, waiting to know
whether the Lord sees fit to allow me to receive a letter today
from the Duke in reply to my two last which have received no
answers yet. O may I be strengthened 'in the inner man' to receive
whatever is agreeable to the will of God, as His Child, dependent
on Him for all things!
"The paragraph noticed in the paper of yesterday was marked with
that presumption which is ever more or less perceivable in 'the
natural man,' who seems to act without any reference to the will of
God whatever, declaring 'I will do this and that,' instead of
remembering that their lives are in His Hands and that He can
snatch them away at any moment. To see the Duke thus presumptuously
reckoning on several weeks to come proves how little what I have
written on that subject is alluded to, showing me still further the
inefficacy of all man's endeavors until accompanied with the mighty
power of God to the soul. The time I trust is at hand for this
rebellious one when he will doubtlessly exclaim 'Thy mercies are
infinite and Thy ways past finding out,' also 'Lord, what is man
that Thou art mindful of him? or the son of man that Thou visitest
him?'"
The Duke's replies to both Miss J.'s effusions followed one another in
rapid succession:--
STRATHFIELDSAYE, Sept. 17, 1835.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I always understood that the important parts of
a Letter were its Contents. I never much considered the
Signature; provided I knew the handwriting; or the Seal provided
it effectually closed the Letter.
When I write to a Person with whom I am intimate, who knows my
handwriting I generally sign my Initials. I don't always seal my
own Letters; they are sometimes sealed by a Secretary, oftener by
myself.
In any Case as there are generally very many to be sealed; and
the Seal frequently becomes heated, it is necessary to change it;
and by accident I may have sealed a Letter to you with a blank
Seal. But it is very extraordinary if it is so, as I don't
believe I have such a thing! You will find this Letter however
signed and sealed in what you deem the most respectful manner.
And if I should write to you any more; I will take care that they
shall be properly signed and sealed to your Satisfaction.
I am very glad to learn that you intend to send back all the
letters I ever wrote to you. I told you heretofore that I thought
you had better burn them all. But if you think proper to send
them in a parcel to my House; I will save you the trouble of
committing them to the Flames.
Believe me Ever Yours most sincerely
WELLINGTON.
I believe that the letter with the blank seal and signed with my
Initials was sent off last Sunday night from Hartford Bridge and
was franked by me; I hope that this was not deemed disrespectful.
STRATHFIELDSAYE, Sept. 18, 1835.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Compliments to Miss J. The
Duke wrote an answer to Miss J. as soon as he received her Letter
complaining of Disrespect in His having been in the habit of
signing the Initials of His Name to the Letters which he had
written to her; and in having sealed a letter addressed to her
and franked by the Duke, with a plain seal.
If Miss J. had waited till she would receive the answer to a
letter which she wrote on Tuesday she might have been satisfied
with the reasons of the Duke for the Marks of Disrespect of which
Miss J. complained.
The Duke has to add that since his return here, he has found upon
His Table, a plain seal which it is probable was used by
accident. He apologizes for having used it. At the same time he
assures Miss J. that he could not have intended to be
disrespectful.
The Duke requests that Miss J. will be so kind as to have a
parcel made of the Letters from the Duke; that she will direct it
to Him in Piccadilly; and have it booked at Hampstead and sent by
any Coach to London.
Miss J. resolved to lose no time in returning the Duke's letters, and
went so far as to put them up in a parcel preparatory to sending them
off by coach. She thus comments:--
"In returning the parcel I send away 60 letters, received in less
than 12 months.
"_Saturday, Sept. 19, 1835._ I have been to the Post Office with my
last letter to the Duke and leave the result thereof with the Lord,
'Whose ways are in the deep waters and whose footsteps are
unknown'. I have acknowledged myself thankful for the strength
still imparted--thus fulfilling that gracious promise made to me
when on my knees before I came to this place 'I will never leave
thee nor forsake thee.' I have just risen from my knees, after
spreading the Duke's letters before the Lord, beseeching Him to do
under present circumstances whatever seemeth good in His sight for
Christ's sake. And I feel, as a prayer-hearing God He will--causing
even this unkindness to work together for good, since 'His ways are
not our ways' but as high above such as the heavens are above the
earth--That He moves in a mysterious way His wonders to perform,
who can doubt that watches His divine finger in this great work?
And since His purposes must stand, all I have to say is, Let them
be whatever they may, I desire His Holy Will alone to be done!
"My feelings will not allow me to copy this letter of the Duke's;
it is so unkind; but as those words were powerfully applied at the
commencement of my correspondence, 'The haughtiness of man shall be
brought low etc. and the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day.'"
Apparently it was not the will of "The Lord" that the letters should be
returned, for Providence interposed in the shape of Miss J.'s friend,
Mrs. L. Miss J. writes:--
"_Saturday Night._ Just as my day had been filled with all the
duties my God had graciously permitted and I was about to take a
walk, dear Mrs. L. arrived, and on my telling her all strongly
advised my _not_ returning the Duke his letters--which struck me
forcibly, as I had asked the Lord to put it into her heart to
advise me agreeably to His will.
"On my return home I found a note from the Duke addressed to me in
the third person, like the last, but thanking me for the trouble I
had taken respecting his Men's Book Bill. Thank God my feelings are
so subdued as to be resigned to His divine Will concerning seeing
or hearing from him, and I heartily pray to be directed in every
single particular, knowing if left to myself I cannot stand a
moment in safety.
"The Duke seems more indifferent respecting the return of his
letters--consequently as dearest Mrs. L. so strongly advised my
retaining them I mean to do so without noticing that formal note
received to night, leaving everything as it stands in the Lord's
Hands. Having cast my burthen upon the Lord all I now have to do is
to dedicate my time more exclusively to my usual daily duties as
before intended, endeavoring to recall perfectly to memory all my
hymns--360--and the Gospels of St. Matthew and John, with my
beautiful Psalms--which latter have been neglected more than either
of the former, although none have been allowed so much time as if I
had not been so occupied with the Duke.
"_Sept. 22nd._ My disinclination to write to the Duke continues. O
may the Lord bless him by quickening his dead soul and call him
forth to glorify Him mightily for Christ's sake!
"_Oct. 1st, 1835._ How wonderful are the dealings of God. Last
night I came home fully determined to write and send off a letter
to the Duke and this morning, although it is ready for the Post
Office, I am restrained from forwarding it. Therefore I keep it
until I see why my mind is acted upon thus, feeling 'it is the
Lord.' I knelt upon the bed in the night and implored Him to let
His honor and glory alone be considered, and before I rose this
morning, on again calling upon Him to direct me these words seemed
to follow--'Be still and know that I am God, I will be exalted in
the heavens, I will be exalted in the earth.' So, as this is the
case, it is my duty quietly and patiently to submit to the way He
may condescendingly choose for that glorious purpose. In the mean
time, in order to satisfy my feelings towards the poor dear Duke I
can indulge in writing them at all events and thereby proving it is
no want of feeling or friendship for him that keeps me silent, but
the consideration due to ONE as far above Himself not only _in
reality_ but I trust through the Grace of God in _my_ estimation
also as the heavens are above the earth. Nor would I resign one of
His gracious glorious smiles to become the Empress of a million
worlds, even were my loved precious Duke the chosen individual to
participate in such honors.
"Perhaps the Duke's conversion is at hand! Lord, if this be the
case permit me through Thy Power and Grace to become the source of
deep spiritual consolation to his precious soul, by being unto me a
mouth and wisdom which all my adversaries shall not be able to
gainsay or resist 'for without Thee I can do nothing!'"
MY LORD DUKE,--Judging from your silence to my last that all
communication between us is about to cease, having written the
accompanying Hymn for your acceptance, I take this opportunity of
bidding you Farewell! being enabled through God's Grace which is
all sufficient! to exclaim in _Scripture_ language, "THE LORD
GAVE and The Lord hath taken away _and_ BLESSED BE THE NAME OF
THE LORD!" That HE brought you to me in the _first_ place I feel
convinced and heartily hope that I have omitted no faithful
Christian duty towards you consistent with my "high calling in
Christ Jesus," _consequently_ shall not have cause to reproach
myself of neglect when _that_ AWFUL period arrives which MUST
bring us once more together, however separated on _earth_ by His
ALL WISE _decrees_, "Whose paths are in the deep waters and Whose
footsteps are not known,"--and Who knoweth FAR _better_ what is
GOOD for us than we do for _ourselves_. Consequently it is our
duty, and doubtless for our future and eventual happiness under
any and all circumstances, however trying and painful such may
be, to say THY will, O GOD, NOT MINE BE DONE! Trusting that you
will not suppose any unkind feelings are experienced towards you
by such DUE resignation to the Divine will or conclude that my
future silence renders me forgetful of you _when kneeling_ before
Him "Whose eyes are in EVERY place _beholding_ the evil and the
good," with Whom the darkness is no darkness at all but the night
is as clear as the day, I subscribe myself with much serenity as
in His sight Ever My Lord Duke.
Your faithful Christian Friend,
A. J.
The hymn enclosed is entitled--
THE SHORTNESS OF TIME AND FRAILTY OF MAN.
ALMIGHTY _Maker_ of my frame!
TEACH ME _the number of my days_!
TEACH ME _to know how_ FRAIL _I am_
AND SPEND THE REMNANT TO THY PRAISE.
My days are shorter than a span,
A little point my life appears;
How FRAIL at best is DYING MAN;
HOW VAIN are ALL _his hopes and fears_!
_VAIN his_ AMBITION, NOISE and SHOW!
VAIN are the cares Which rack his mind!
_He heaps up treasures_ MIXED WITH WOE
And dies, and leaves them all behind!
Oh be a _NOBLER portion MINE_!
_MY GOD_ I bow before Thy Throne;
Earth's _fleeting_ treasures I resign
And fix my hopes on THEE _ALONE_!
"I have underlined all just as forwarded to the Duke."
The next letter from the Duke that has been preserved is dated October
5, and contains a reference to a later note from Miss J.:--
WALMER CASTLE, October 5, 1835.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Compt^s to Miss J. He has
only this morning received her letter without date; in which Miss
J. apprizes the Duke that she is about to quit Hampstead; but she
does not state where she is about to reside.
In respect to Miss J.'s wish that the Duke should write to Her,
the Duke assures her that he will receive Her Letters with
pleasure; and that he will answer them regularly. But that he
must be permitted to do so, in a form, which shall not expose him
to the accusation of treating a Lady with disrespect.
From the perusal of Miss J.'s Letter the Duke does not exactly
understand whether Miss J. did or did not send back the Paquet
containing the Duke's Letters to her. As the Duke stated upon a
former occasion, it is a matter of Indifference whether Miss J.
has burnt the Letters; or kept them; or sent them back.
The Duke begs leave to inform her however that if she sent them
back he has not yet received them. They may however be in His
House in London as he has been absent from there since the 19th
of last Month.
In Miss J.'s next letter she inquires into the truth of a report of the
Duke's indisposition that has appeared in the papers. The reply is
decidedly testy.
WALMER CASTLE, Nov^r 3, 1835.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Compliments to Miss J.
He received only this morning Miss J.'s Letters of the 28^th and
31^st October.
The Duke returns his thanks to Miss J. for her kind Enquiries
about His Health. The Duke was unwell for one day; of which the
Newspapers obtained Intelligence; and as usual misrepresented and
exaggerated the facts.
The Duke is much concerned that Miss J. is not satisfied with the
formal style of His Notes. She was not satisfied when he wrote to
her in a form more consistent with familiarity. Such form was
considered disrespectful.
The Duke assures Miss J. that he can reply to any letter which
she may think proper to address the Duke as fully in one form as
the other.
The poor Duke's life was frequently made a burden to him by the
comments expressed by the papers upon his health and his conduct. His
letters abound in impatient references to the inaccuracies of the daily
journals in all that pertained to himself. These finally irritated him
to such an extent that, against the advice of wise friends, he sued the
"Morning Journal" for libel, and succeeded in obtaining the punishment
of the editor and printer by fines and imprisonment. His course in this
matter was deprecated by those who thought that a man of his
acknowledged character and position could afford to disregard such
attacks.
Apparently after this time matters returned to their former state, in
so far as the frequency of the letters was concerned, although the
formal mode of address was still retained, greatly to Miss J.'s
dissatisfaction. She continues in her Diary the account of the Duke's
letters:
"In the Duke's next letter of the 6th of November written in the
third person since I wrote to him concerning that plain seal he
writes; 'The considerations urged by Miss J. with her usual
facility and eloquence are for all times and seasons.'
"Thus graciously did he usually receive my letters on religious
subjects, which under circumstances of illness were doubtlessly
additionally earnest.
"In the next of November 6th His Grace writes thus; 'The Duke
assures her that he feels the deepest interest in everything that
Miss J. writes to him.' The next from the Duke is dated November
10th wherein he writes; 'The Duke will have great pleasure in
attending Miss J. when he will be in London if she will permit him
and will let him know where she resides.'
"In the Duke's next letter of Nov. 11th he writes in allusion to
me; 'She is so kind to the Duke; and she writes to him with so much
earnestness and feeling that it is impossible that he should not be
impressed with a deep sense of His obligation to her for taking so
much trouble.'
"In his next of the 12th of November he returns me many thanks for
my letters.
"By the next letter I presume some inconvenience attended my
receiving the Duke as he writes--'It appears that for some reason
with which Miss J. states it to be her intention at some future
time to acquaint the Duke--it will not be in Miss J.'s power to
receive the Duke.'
"Another letter dated the 16th of November, as was the above,
refers to my dating my letters on the outside. He writes 'Franks
are dated on the outside because the Law requires the use of that
form.'
"What I had written to call it forth I cannot remember but the Duke
in his next of the 16th of November says 'he has no pretension to
superiority,' reminding me of a circumstance which took place at
the commencement of our acquaintance when I told him that his being
the Duke of Wellington was nothing to me--leading him to reply 'I
know it, I know it and I respect you for it.'
"Judging by the Duke's next letter of the 16th (being the second of
that date) I had formed the wish to have a letter of mine
returned--which letter I found with all others had been destroyed.
The Duke encloses the succeeding one."
MY LORD DUKE,--I once more take up pen, but in all probability
for the last time, if I rightly understand you to mean you are
capable of receiving my letters in _silence_, to which I decline
subjecting myself. I consider a reply and a very different one to
those _lately_ received due to me in the sight of _That God_ Who
_created_ such an interest in your eternal happiness and I am
very much mistaken if he does not make you feel the power of this
impression by exercising His ALMIGHTY _power_ in some unforeseen
manner.
The information that you have destroyed my letters is _any
thing_ but gratifying; one and all being more or less marked
with _Divine_ Truth, calculated if properly and _seriously_
considered, to benefit your _immortal Soul_. Nor should I imagine
myself _justified_ in spending my time in _future_ by penning
such to have them committed to the flames. Therefore I shall
decline troubling you with a repetition of this kind, until you
consider them sufficiently valuable to retain instead of destroy.
In the mean time I shall occupy myself with any other work my
Heavenly Father may condescendingly point out; it being of very
little consequence to me how I am employed so that it is under
_His direction_ and in HIS _Service_....
I remain, My Lord Duke, so long as God permits.
Your faithful Christian Friend.
A. J.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. the third followed by one of
the 8th which implies I wrote to the Duke on the death of the
Countess of S., as he writes 'It is true that a near relation of
the Duke's has died a terrible death.'
"By the Duke's letter of the 11th of December I presume I continued
displeased at his having burnt my letters,--a truth elicited
through wishing one of them returned, which consequently it was not
in his power to do--considering as I told him that it was a sin in
the sight of God to destroy Epistles intended for his everlasting
good."
The Duke's reply to this is given in full:--
STRATHFIELDSAYE, Dec^r 15, 1835.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Comp^ts to Miss J. He has
only this day received her Letter commenced on Saturday and
finished on Monday. He is much concerned to learn that Miss J.
has been indisposed; and he hopes that she will have been
relieved by attending to the Advice of the Medical Gentleman for
whom she had sent.
Nothing will be more satisfactory to the Duke than to put an end
to all Dissension upon bygone subjects. He has no feeling upon
any of them excepting a desire to avoid to give occasion
unknowingly and unwillingly for irritation.
The Duke is much obliged to Miss J. for her Letter. He does not
entirely concur in all the opinions contained in that Letter. He
assures her however that he has perused it as he Does all those
received from her, with attention. He will state his objections
at some future time.
It is quite impossible for the Duke to keep Miss J.'s letters.
They are in general long; and they succeed each other rapidly. If
the Duke was to keep them, they might be seen by others. He
therefore destroys them as soon as he has read, and perfectly
understands them.
This explanation evidently soothed Miss J.'s ruffled feelings, for she
makes no further reference at this time to the "Dissension." The Diary
continues:--
"The Duke's next letter expresses concern at my illness, dated Dec.
21, 1835.
"The Duke's next letter of the 24th of Dec. implies my account of
my health was not satisfactory--which I suppose must have been
justifiable as I was then so seriously ill.
"Another letter dated the 26th of December kindly expresses anxiety
concerning my health also one of the 31st of December.
"Letters received from the Duke during the year 1835,
SEVENTY-EIGHT."
"1836.--The first letter of this year is dated Jan. 2nd wherein the
Duke writes 'The Duke is very sensible of the kindness which
induces Miss J. to write to him. He would have wished to receive
from her some account of Her Health as well as her opinion upon
other matters, however important. The Duke will certainly request
Miss J.'s permission to pay His Respects to her when he will return
to Town.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Jan. 19th, in which he writes--'On
his passage through London he has received her letter of the 11th
Inst. He sincerely rejoices at and congratulates Miss J. upon the
progress which she has made in the recovery of her health.'
"I see this is a mistake as the Duke's next letter is dated Jan.
7th in which he thanks me for my account of my health and the next
is dated Jan 13th wherein he writes thus; 'He will wait upon her
after having notified His intention and received her permission
when he will be in London. He rejoices at the improved state of
Miss J.'s health.'
"'Feb. 3rd he regrets much to learn that she has been again
indisposed.'
"In the Duke's letter of Feb. 19th he writes; 'He returns his
thanks for her note of the 17th received this morning and the
printed Enclosures.' What these printed enclosures were I do not
now remember but presume they were a tract and handbills.
"In his next dated the 25th of February he writes; 'He returns his
thanks for her letter, and he is very happy to hear that Miss J. is
sufficiently recovered to be able to quit her room and go down
stairs.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated March 9th 1836, he writes--'The
Duke has been out of Town for some time so therefore he did not
receive her first note till last night, and this day the second
which Miss J. has written to him, enclosing printed tracts; and the
latter some Manuscript Lines. The Duke begs leave to return his
thanks.'
"Again on the 12th of March the Duke writes 'He has received her
note and the Tract on one leaf; for which he returns his thanks.'
Again on the 19th of March the Duke writes--'The Duke of Wellington
presents his Compliments to Miss J. and returns his thanks for the
Tract and other papers received from her.'
"The Duke's next letter likewise acknowledges--'His thanks for her
letter of the 20th and its Enclosures.' To which he adds--'The Duke
is happy to learn that Miss J. is sufficiently recovered to be able
to walk out.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated, March 25th he writes 'The Duke of
Wellington presents his Compliments to Miss J. and returns thanks
for her Note and the Tract which she enclosed to him.'
"Again London, March the 29th, the Duke writes--He 'returns his
thanks for her letter of Sunday and the enclosures.'
"The next letter from His Grace is dated April 2nd, 1836, thanking
me for two letters, one received on Good Friday and the other
written on Good Friday,--which last, of course, treated on our
Lord's Sufferings for us sinners, as usual on such occasions.
"On the 11th of April the Duke again writes 'He has received her
Note with some Tracts.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated April 12th, 1836, in which
he returns me, as requested, a letter I had sent for his perusal
and consideration, addressed to a Minister of the Gospel by my dear
friend Mrs. L.
"The Duke's next letter is written on and dated June 18th, 1836.
'The Duke of Wellington presents his regards to Miss J. and returns
thanks for her letter and its enclosure. The Duke is happy to learn
that Miss J. is in good Health. He was apprehensive that she was
unwell, and had gone out of Town, as so much time had elapsed since
she had written to the Duke.' I need scarcely remark that this was
the day on which the Duke gave his yearly Banquet--yet The great
Lord of Lords compelled him to find time thereon to write to me,
thus verifying His own Divine declaration, 'Them that honor ME I
will honor.'"
One wonders where the busy statesman could have found time to read not
only the letters, but the hymns and tracts Miss J. constantly showered
upon him. There seems a tone of resignation, if not actual despair, in
the notes wherein he acknowledges the receipt of this flood of pious
literature.
"In the Duke's next letter of June 21st he writes--'The Duke of
Wellington presents his Compliments to Miss J. and he acknowledges
the receipt of, and thanks her for her letter of the 19th inst. and
enclosures. Miss J. does not advert to the state of her health, but
as she says that she walks in the Park, the Duke hopes that she is
entirely recovered.'
"His Grace's letter of June 23rd returns his thanks, adding: 'When
Miss J. mentions her walks in the park The Duke concludes that she
means in what is called the Regent's Park, in the neighborhood of
the Street in which she lives.' Which was the case yet of which
beautiful Park I knew nothing until dearest Mrs. L. took me into it
for the benefit of the air, after the illness herein alluded to.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated June 27th, 1836, in which
he writes--'Miss J. complains of the change of the style of the
Duke's letters; although she does not express a wish that the
former style should be renewed.'
"I certainly had a great objection to the formality attending the
Duke's letters when written in the third person, feeling restrained
in replying to such in like manner."
CHAPTER VI.
COMPARATIVE CALM.
The next letter is copied from the original:
LONDON, June 28, 1836.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Comp^s to Miss J. The Duke
has this morning received her very kind Letter of yesterday for
which he returns His thanks. The Duke begs leave again to assure
Miss J. that whatever may be the form in which he writes to her;
the motive in doing so is the same as ever; and that he is ever
sensible of and grateful for her kindness.
The Duke will with the greatest pleasure go to see her whenever
it may suit Miss J. to receive him.
The Duke did not say anything upon the Letter which Miss J. had
written to the Gentleman in question because he was unwilling to
obtrude His opinion upon a matter which Miss J. considers one of
Duty; in which the Duke is so unfortunate as to differ in opinion
with her.
Prudence and Discretion would appear to require that Miss J.
should not rebuke a Gentleman for words spoken not to Her; not
even in Her Presence; but to Her Landlady in the relation of a
Lodger in the House.
The Duke may be wrong. But he considers the exercise of Prudence
and discretion virtues; not unbecoming to any Character however
exalted.
The Diary continues:--
"Judging by the contents of the Duke's next letter dated June 29th,
1836, I presume I had felt from circumstances under the necessity
of putting aside his proposed visit adverted to in his last, as
follows 'The Duke will with the greatest pleasure go to see her
whenever it may suit Miss J. to receive him'--for in this of the
29th he writes--'I cannot but concur in your decision to postpone
to receive my visit. Nothing would distress me more than to give
you any pain. I sincerely hope that your journey to the Country
will reestablish your health and spirits.'
"I perceive by this that the Duke had again commenced addressing me
in the first person.
"It would appear by the Duke's next, dated July 1st, 1836, that I
had changed my intention concerning receiving him, as he
wrote--'Since I wrote you this morning I have had a fall by which I
have bruised my knee so that Leaches have been applied. I am not
otherwise hurt but it is quite obvious that I shall not be able to
wait upon you to-morrow. I hope to be able to do so however at the
same hour on Monday.' That such was not the will of the Lord of
lords I now perfectly recollect proving to the Duke that 'The way
of man is not in himself; it is not in man that walketh to direct
his steps,' a divine lesson which I was so anxious from time to
time, as circumstances permitted, to impress on his mind."
The Duke probably had a vivid realization of this truth just at this
juncture, although possibly not in the sense intended by Miss J. She
seems to have been devoid of any sense of humor, and saw nothing but
the spiritual application of this one of her favorite quotations.
"In the Duke's next, of the 4th of July, he writes; 'I am much
recovered from the accident under which I suffered on Friday--but I
am afraid that I shall not be allowed to quit my House this day.
Indeed I am convinced that I could not do so without increasing the
risk of being confined to my house for weeks or months. I lament
this particularly as you are going out of Town early to morrow. I
am very sensible of your Confidence in attending to my opinion in
sending your letter to Mr. B.'
"This was a letter written by me to a Minister of the Gospel whose
worldliness was justifiably condemned. It is still I believe in my
possession among my papers, the Duke having received it for perusal
and at my request returned with advice not to forward it.
"In the letter dated the 5th the Duke acknowledges a packet from me
to which he adds 'I continue to improve and hope to go out tomorrow
or next day.'
"I presume this was a very thick letter. In that of the 9th of
July, the Duke writes; 'I am better and I am in hopes that on
tomorrow I shall be able to put my foot to the ground.'
"The Duke's next letter is I see directed to me at Hastings, in
which he writes on July 11th, 1836--'I am so much better that I am
going to the House of Lords and I hope soon to be able to go about
without inconvenience' to which the Duke again refers in his next
thus; 'I continue to recover from the effects of the Accident and I
hope to be able to go out in a day or two. I am happy to find that
you are settled at Hastings to your satisfaction.'
"The next of the 13th of July refers to my letters being
overweight--apparently, but judging by the letter of the 28th I
must have been mistaken, as the Duke writes;
"'You did not send me a letter overweight. But I warned you of the
necessity of taking care not to do so because I was apprehensive
that if I should be absent my servants would decline to receive the
letter.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated July 30th wherein he
writes; 'I am much better and can walk a little. But my Knee is
bandaged up; and some time will elapse before I shall have the use
of it as heretofore.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Aug. 3rd 1836 in which he
writes 'I am much flattered by the anxiety which you express
respecting the injury which I received in my knee. I am getting the
better of it and I hope soon to be quite well.'
"Alas! it grieves me as I thus proceed, running my eye over so many
references to God's mercies to observe such were not adverted to by
the Duke--a subject I did not omit expatiating upon occasionally,
however reluctant to irritate whilst laboring under indisposition,
as my Diary will doubtlessly imply.
"On the 5th of August the Duke writes; 'I am very much obliged to
you for your letter and flattered by your desire to see me. I am so
far better as to be able to walk and I can go to see you when you
will come to Town.'
"By that of the 8th of Aug. I presume I had made enquiries
concerning his seal as the Duke writes--'I use black wax to seal my
letters as a Relation of mine died lately.'"
Immediately after the receipt of the last letter quoted, Miss J. left
Hastings for Tunbridge Wells. The Duke's letters followed her here. She
writes:--
"The Duke's next letter is directed to Tunbridge Wells, thanking me
for my letter to him dated Aug. 11th, 1836. In the Duke's next he
again adverts to his knee thus--'My knee continues to improve and I
hope to walk as well as ever in a few days.'
"In the Duke's of Aug. 16th he writes--'I entertain some doubt
whether a letter which I wrote to you yesterday was sent to the
Post. If not, I laid it by in one of my writing cases and in the
uncertainty I think it best to write again. I hope that the waters
will prove beneficial to your Health and that you will remain at
Tunbridge as long as it may be necessary that you should drink
thereof.'
"In the Duke's letter of the 20th of Aug. he writes--'I have found
in one of my writing cases the letter which I had omitted to send
on the day before yesterday. I rejoice to learn that your health
improves so much at Tunbridge Wells.'
"The Duke's next letter is directed to me at Brighton wherein he
writes 'My Knee continues to improve but it has not yet all its
strength and elasticity, but I hope that it will soon. I am much
obliged to you for enquiring about it.'
"Judging by the Duke's next letter, dated Aug. 22nd, I must have
requested him to send me the letter he had placed in one of his
writing cases, for he replies--'You will have seen that I had
destroyed the letter not sent.'
"In the Duke's next, dated Aug. 31st, the Duke writes--'I received
in due course a letter which you were so kind as to write to me on
nineteen sides of paper under three covers.'"
One ceases to wonder at the slowness of the poor man's recovery, under
such circumstances as these.
"Upon the 6th of September a letter arrived from the Duke in which
he again refers to his accident as follows--'I am getting better
every day--but slowly, as is the case with recovery from such
accidents. I hope however to recover entirely and to be quite
well.'"
Another cause of offence had been found by Miss J. The Duke's letter
explains it:--
WALMER CASTLE, Sept. 17, 1836.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I was much surprized at not hearing from you;
and I am still more surprized now that I learn the Cause of your
Silence.
Begging Your Pardon you don't repeat accurately what I wrote
respecting Your Hand writing; and you have consequently
misrepresented my Meaning; which was however not worth attending
to.
I totally forgot that your Mind is occupied with affairs of more
Importance; the Hand writing in which you convey your thoughts to
others, is a matter of but little Importance to you; and that at
all events you are seldom in a disposition to allow any body to
complain; much less to find fault with you.
Accordingly I beg your Pardon for having ventured to tell you
that I experienced great Difficulty in reading your Hand writing.
I hope that you will not give yourself the trouble of writing to
me; if it should be at all irksome or inconvenient to you.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
The unmistakable irony of the above seems to have been quite thrown
away upon Miss J., for she placidly remarks:--
"I am well aware that the poor Duke was justified in finding fault
with my writing, through finding my pen could not keep pace with my
feelings, more especially as I generally sent off whatever I wrote
just as it was _thus_ written.
"Again I see by the Duke's letter of Sept. 26th that he has
returned to the third person in addressing me, which may have been
accidental as his next dated Oct. 1st, 1836, is again in the first
and on the 11th he writes--'I have received your Note and two
Covers containing Tracts, for all of which I return my thanks.'
"In the Duke's letter of Oct. 14th he writes--'I am, I assure you,
very sensible of the kindness of your motive in writing to me.'
"The Duke's next letter is as follows 'I did not arrive in London
in time to be able to wait upon you this evening but I will wait
upon you to-morrow afternoon as soon after five as it may be in my
power.'
"On October 19^th the Duke called, after an absence of about two
years. So seldom did The Lord of Lords allow personal interviews to
take place which doubtlessly was wisely ordered for His Glory Who
knows the end from the beginning and is consequently too jealous of
His Holy Name to suffer it to be tarnished. Of this holy jealousy I
was rendered especially sensible on the visit above alluded to. I
accosted the Duke accordingly on his entering the room. He
exclaimed 'You shall do this and you shall do that!' without any
reference to God's holy Will, expatiating accordingly until dear
Mrs. L. who was only separated from us by folding doors said
afterwards she pitied the Duke and was glad when I had said
whatever I considered my duty. Nor was it until then that I even
asked him concerning his knee, although that was the first visit
since the Accident. When I did so, he appeared delighted, brushing
up his chair nearer to me, which of course met with the withdrawal
on my part _due_ to Christianity. I bless God for the grace and
strength afforded me on that occasion, causing the Duke to sink
into the utmost insignificance in comparison with His favor which
is better than life.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Nov. 3rd, 1836, wherein he
writes, 'I am much flattered by your desire to have my opinion
whether you should send the letter you had written to a gentleman,
but had refrained from putting it into the Post.'
"The Duke alludes again to this in his next letter of Nov. 10th.
The next letter from the Duke is dated Nov. 11th, 1836, entreating
me to date my letters.
"In the Duke's next letter dated Nov. 12th he writes--'It is true
that I burn every letter the preservation of which is not of
importance, but I do not forget their contents as you will have
perceived, at least, those that are material.' With this letter I
see one of mine thus written and which I presume consequently was
forwarded.--'I had imagined My Lord Duke this day would have
brought with it an acknowledgement of my two last letters whereas I
have only received a brief reply to that addressed to you on
Sunday. However as it is my duty to acknowledge the receipt of that
this day received--I do so subscribing myself
"'Your Grace's faithful Christian Friend
"'A. J.'
"The above looks very formal but I presume it was all right,
yielding up my heart to God as I did and do to govern as seemed
good in His sight.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Nov. 14th, 1836, wherein he
writes; 'I shall be in London in the end of this week, that is on
Friday, and I beg you to write to me if you should wish to see me.'
How little did the poor Duke think when he wrote thus that the
great Lord of lords had decreed he should not behold me again for
nearly eight years, namely until the summer of 1844--O how
mysterious are His unerring ways!!
"During the year 1836 I received from the Duke fifty-six Letters.
"1837.--I do not see any letter from the Duke until Feb. 26th in
this year when he writes therein as follows from Hartford Bridge;
'I am very much obliged to you for your letters, and I assure you
that I always receive with thankfulness whatever you think proper
to write to me. I do not like to trouble you when you do not write
to me lest my intrusion should be considered offensive.'
"The next letter from His Grace is dated March 2nd, wherein he
writes; 'I have now got such a cold that I cannot quit the house. I
have no fever however and I shall be quite well, I hope, in a day
or two.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated March 5th wherein he writes--'I am
much obliged to you for your enquiries. I came down to the Country
to get rid of the cold and I am much better, indeed, nearly well. I
will return the letter enclosed in yours the next time.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated March 12th 1837 in which he again
notices my letter, as follows; 'I return you the enclosed which I
ought to have sent you when I wrote last.'"
Still another dispute is now chronicled. Miss J. states that she wrote
the Duke a letter in which she referred to his "brushing up his chair
to me with so much familiarity during his last visit." The Duke's
answer shows his irritation very plainly:--
LONDON, April 18, 1837.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Compliments to Miss J. She is
quite mistaken. He has no Lock of Hair of Her's. He never had
one.
The Duke is not aware that he has been guilty of _presumption_,
of _daring presumption_.
Miss J. wrote to him a letter in which she expressed displeasure
at his having omitted to call upon Her as she expected he would.
The Duke was extremely concerned that Miss J. was displeased. But
he considered it best not to aggravate the Offence by writing
again. If he had ventured to approach Miss J., or had written to
her; he might have been accused of _daring presumption_. But he
purposely avoided both; in order not to give fresh grounds for
Irritation.
The Duke is exceedingly concerned that Miss J. should consider
that she has reason to complain of Him.
He thinks that upon reflection she will be opinion [_sic_] that
she has no reason to be offended.
Miss J. does not mention what ground she had for supposing the Duke to
be in possession of a lock of her hair. He had bestowed one of his upon
her, and it is only natural to surmise that she had given one of hers
in return. The matter was apparently smoothed over, as there is no
cessation of letters.
LONDON, April 27, 1837.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Comp^ts to Miss J. and is
very sensible of the kindness of her expressions on the loss
which a part of His family has recently sustained.
The Duke is much concerned to learn that Miss J. still thinks
that she has cause to be displeased with the Duke.
The Duke trusts that Reflection and time will convince her; that
no such cause [_sic_]. The Duke assures her, Miss J., that he is
not sensible that he has given her such cause; by anything that
he has said written done or omitted.
"In a letter dated April 29th the duke writes 'He is very
grateful for the interest which Miss J. has been pleased to
express about the health of the Duke's brother. The Newspapers
were misinformed. The Duke's brother has not been seriously
indisposed. His niece however has lost her daughter which is the
misfortune to which the Duke imagined that Miss J. had
referred.'"
LONDON, May 1, 1837.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Comp^ts to Miss J. He returns
many thanks for Her Note. The Duke will make enquiries respecting
that of the 22^nd addressed by the Duke to Miss J. which she had
not received in due course.
It is wonderful that there should be so little delay and so few
mistakes in an establishment of this Description. But the few
that do occur should render letter writers cautious not to write
in a moment of Irritation; that which would not be written if
time were taken for reflection.
Some coolness followed this letter. The Duke wrote once again saying,
"He does not know what to do to please her." Miss J. adds, "Which it
was quite impossible he could do while in and of 'the world.'"
A silence of over three months followed this latest tiff. Miss J., as
usual, re-opened the correspondence. The Duke's reply was not
cordial:--
LONDON, August 14, 1837.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Comp^ts to Miss J. He returns
His thanks for her Letter of the 13^th.
The Duke is going out of town; and he intends to go to Walmer
Castle in a few days.
The Duke assures Miss J. that he has not published an Intention
of giving what is called a grand Dinner at Walmer Castle.
In general he would recommend to Miss J. not to believe one Word
that she reads respecting the Duke of Wellington.
LONDON, August 16, 1837.
The Duke of Wellington presents his Comp^ts to Miss J. He returns
His thanks for Her letter of the 15^th.
The Duke is much concerned that Miss J. should have had the
trouble of writing a second time upon the subject of
misrepresentation in the Newspapers. They are really not
deserving of Notice.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Aug. 16th, with which I see
a copy of a letter referring to a parcel containing Tracts, etc.
for his acceptance, from which I copy as follows--'Miss J. trusts
the accompanying Tracts may not be considered an intrusion, but
received and perused with the prayerful consideration they deserve
as not from man but from That God Who has put it into her heart to
send them; relying on His own gracious Word which runs thus, "My
Word shall not return unto ME void but it shall accomplish that
which I please and shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent
it."--Miss J. begs to be excused giving her address, being desirous
to avoid all observation etc. but if on her return to Town it
should be the will of God that she should make His Grace acquainted
with her abode, wherever that may be, (respecting which there is at
present great uncertainty,) she will then give him an opportunity
of acknowledging the receipt of the parcel and its consequences,
hoping they may be of a gratifying nature; that is, beneficial to
His Great Soul which Miss J. is still desirous to behold robed in
the only Robe of righteousness that can render it safe for
Eternity.'
"The letter written on Aug. 26th is as follows 'He has received and
returns His thanks for her Note of Friday and the Tract enclosed
therewith.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated Sept. 1st he writes--'He is happy
to learn that her health is so far reestablished as that she can go
to the Country.'
"The next letter from His Grace dated Oct. 5th, 1837, acknowledges
the parcel referred to in mine as follows 'He returns thanks to
Miss J. for Her Note of the 3rd inst. received this morning, with a
Hymn for which he is very grateful. He received the Parcel
containing Tracts etc, some time ago.'
"Finding a copy of the letter which called forth the above enclosed
with it I am induced to give it a place herein, more especially as
I perceive one portion is almost defaced, regretting exceedingly
that I do not recollect the title of the Hymn alluded to and
forwarded.
"'Miss J. having promised His Grace the Duke of Wellington the
accompanying Hymn, takes the present opportunity for sending it,
however unsuited to the taste of any but the Regenerated Soul,
which _blessed_ state Miss J. has no good reason for believing His
Grace the Duke of Wellington has yet experienced. However, as there
is nothing too hard for The Lord of Lords, it is not impossible
that the period _may_ arrive when the accompanying Hymn will be
_experimentally_ understood, _consequently_ admired and valued,
being one of the most beautiful to be found.
"'Miss J. is not in the habit at present of seeing _any_ Newspaper,
and is consequently unacquainted with His Grace's present
proceedings. She concludes they are as worldly as ever, therefore
calculated to draw from her pen nothing but a _repetition_ of what
she has so frequently written, namely; "What is a man profited if
he shall gain THE WHOLE WORLD and LOSE his own SOUL? or what shall
a man give in _exchange for_ his _SOUL?_" An important enquiry sent
by her for a long time almost without interruption in every letter
to His Grace,--but Alas! with how little effect!! Rest assured, the
moment will arrive when a fervent desire will be experienced that
such advice, entreaties, observations, Scriptures, etc, etc, etc,
had been _practically_ attended to. Yes, there _is_ a period, and
an _awful_ one which must induce the _trembling soul_ that has been
swelled up by earthly splendor and earthly adulation, (BOTH
_equally empty_ and _unsatisfying_) to exclaim in the words of
Cardinal Wolsey, "Had I but served my GOD with HALF the zeal I
served my King, etc."
"'That such may not be His Grace the Duke of Wellington's fearful
state when the things of Time are giving place to those of
Eternity, Miss J. continues fervently to hope, however _groundless_
at present such hopes may appear.
"'Nor would she hesitate to address him more frequently if she had
not from long experience proved how little impression anything she
writes or says is permitted to make either in his life or
conversation, having no reason to imagine the slightest alteration
has taken place in his worldly feelings from the moment she first
beheld him to the present--on which account God seems to think
proper to restrain her pen, and address--thus preventing her from
being subject to receiving Notes as formal as they are
unsatisfactory, the loss of which she cannot,--does not regret,
being happier, infinitely happier when allowed by her gracious
Heavenly Father to indulge in, and enjoy her former as well as
present loved occupations. Yet when HE thinks proper to make her do
either, she submits, and only then--as the pleasure once enjoyed on
such occasions has long since fled, giving place to others more
satisfying.
"'Miss J. does not for a single moment by the above acknowledgments
mean to offend or displease His Grace which were she to find him
labouring under any _serious_ afflictions either of body or mind
she trusts her conduct would prove, as in the hour of necessity her
desire would be to afford him comfort and consolation: and since he
is so public a character as to insure such circumstances being
_generally_ known Miss J. trusts they will be obliged to meet her
eye or ear whenever God thinks proper to occasion the one or the
other--which HE _can_ do at any moment, and to any extent, and WILL
_if His Holy Name can be magnified thereby_.'
"I have underlined the above just as forwarded to His Grace.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Oct. 6th, in which he writes--'He
returns his thanks for her letter of Saturday just received' also
the next, dated Oct. 11th contains his thanks.
"In the Duke's next letter of the 12th of Oct. he writes--'He
returns many thanks for her letter of the 10th inst.,' and his
letter of the 14th of Oct. acknowledges another from me.
"In the Duke's letter of Nov. 1st he writes 'The Duke is unable to
give any other answer to Miss J.'s letters excepting His thanks for
taking the trouble of writing them.'
"The next is dated Nov. 7th also containing his thanks, followed by
one of the 15th, the last of that year."
CHAPTER VII.
ASPIRATIONS AND REBUFFS.
"The first letter I find for this year is dated Aug. 21st 1838
which I see contains an Enclosure of three sheets addressed to Her
Majesty Queen Adelaide, sent for the Duke's perusal, also to be
delivered by him into Her Majesty's hands, which he felt under the
necessity of declining, consequently returned it to me--having
written therein as follows.
"'It is impossible for me to be at all instrumental in transmitting
a letter to the Queen Dowager. Her Majesty has Chamberlains and
Ladies in attendance upon Her Whose duty it is to receive and lay
before H. M. the letters addressed to Her. I could not interfere in
the performance of their Duties. I could not be instrumental in
forwarding an anonymous Letter however proper, respectful and
dictated by the Highest Motives. I could not say that I did not
know that the Letter was sent; or the Writer thereof if enquiry
should be made; and I should make myself liable to the Imputation
of being instrumental in the forwarding to the Queen Dowager an
anonymous letter! I hope therefore that you will excuse me for
declining to forward this Letter and for returning it to you.
"'You are mistaken give me leave to observe in respect to the
Subject to which this Letter relates. The House in which the Queen
resides is Royal property; if not a Royal Palace! It is Her
Majesty's Jointure House. The Royal Palaces used as such are not
liable to the payment of Rates and Taxes. Her Majesty would not
have been justified in making the payment on demand without
reservation of the Right to Exemption. But she pays the money as a
Gift which was improperly and illegally demanded as a Right. You
will see it is the Parish and not the Queen which has contravened
the Lord.'
"Having thus introduced so much of the Duke's letter it will be
necessary to quote some passages from that referred to by him,
which as implied still remains in the same position and will
continue to do so among my papers for further investigation should
such be resorted to after my decease; with the six cards that
accompanied it, upon which are written in full: Matt. ii. 28, 29;
Luke xvi. 15; Romans xii. 2; Isaiah xliii. 21; Acts xiv. 22;
Hebrews xii. 6; John iii. 3; 2 Cor. v. 17; Rev. iii. 12; 1 John v.
3, 4; and James iv. 4.
"After addressing Her Majesty _at length_ on the subject alluded to
by the Duke with every desire to render 'honour to whom honour,' I
next refer to the necessity of reverencing the Sabbath, adding; 'I
recollect on one occasion seeing in a Newspaper that the Duke of
Wellington quitted Your Majesty at Hastings for Dover on The Lord's
Day and slept at the Ship Inn, on his way home.
"'Now such is the character and _loyalty_ of His Grace that had the
respected Consort of his beloved though deceased King [William IV.]
only _hinted_ a desire that he should postpone his departure until
the morrow I believe it would have been sufficient to insure his
immediate obedience. Consequently I could not help lamenting the
omission for two reasons, feeling so desirous to behold Your
Majesty a shining vessel in The Lord's Hands to show forth His
praise by honouring His Commands, also, that the Duke should be
restrained from doing that which on a dying bed would pain him to
remember. That he like too many other men of the world acts
contrary to His Maker's laws in numerous instances is, Alas! but
too evident; yet I cannot for a single moment imagine him one of
Your Majesty's Advisers with regard to resisting the Laws of His
Country, feeling assured he is too much your real friend to approve
of the same and too loyal to acquiesce in an evil the consequence
of which his penetrating eye would in an instant perceive could
only tend to your dishonor.
"'Fearing an evil may arise by my thus distinguishing or singling
out the Duke of Wellington as an adviser, duty forbids my
conclusion so immediately as intended, in order that I may beseech
your Majesty to lean to no Adviser or advice in comparison with
Christ and His Gospel, which if sedulously studied will in itself
enable you rather to instruct the Duke of Wellington than to be
instructed by him; for however great and wise he may justly be
considered in a worldly point of view, he must be brought to
acknowledge all his wisdom foolishness and all his greatness,
littleness before he can appear worthy in His sight "in Whose
presence is Life." Therefore he must be humbled before he can be
exalted far beyond all that he now is even in this world, believing
as I do, that his present greatness will bear no comparison with
that which he will experience when robed in the "Wedding garment of
Salvation" and rendered meet thereby for "an inheritance among the
saints in light," considering him in The Lord's Hands a mighty
vessel intended to show forth His praise in this present generation
as powerfully as a Daniel, David, or Paul, living more to the glory
of his Redeeming God during the few short years of his eventful
life than others who have professed themselves Christians even from
their infancy, consequently ranking among those of whom it is
written "The last shall be first." When this great glorious change
takes place in so faithful and tried a subject,--I should then
encourage your Majesty to rely on his judgment not only in one case
but all.'"
This astonishing production--whose impertinence borders upon
sublimity--being thus returned to Miss J., she proceeded to show the
Duke that she could communicate with at least one prominent personage
unaided by him. She sent him the following letter from Sir Robert Peel,
in answer to one she had written to that statesman:--
WHITE HALL, April 25th.
MADAM,--I avail myself of the earliest opportunity after my
return to London, of acknowledging the Receipt of your last
Letter and of assuring you that the former Communications with
which you favored me were received by me in the spirit in which
they were dictated.
I have the honor to be, Madam,
Your Obedient Servant,
ROBERT PEEL.
WALMER CASTLE, August 25, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I return the inclosed Letter which I received
yesterday; and at the same time the Spectacle Wipers which you
was so kind as to send me. I had already some which you had sent
me; and I am much flattered and obliged for your thinking of my
convenience.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
I had read the Work which you have sent me.[1] The same author
has recently published another which I have got; but have not yet
read.
[1] Keith on the Prophecies (A. J.).
WALMER CASTLE, August 27, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your letter of the 22^nd.
You do me Justice in believing that I could not allow any
circumstances to prevent my writing to you when I should think
that my doing so could be useful or agreeable to you.
Feeling it to be desirable that I should write to you I should
have been unpardonable if I had allowed a recollection of bygone
Dissensions to induce me to address you on topicks which might
displease, or in a form which would be disagreeable to you.
There is nothing under Heaven worth quarrelling about. Of all
disputes and quarrels those in writing are the least pardonable.
In the Heat of Conversation or of Discussion we may say that
which is not justifiable. But our communications in writing are
the Result of Reflection. That very act ought to cool us and
prevent the use of angry and irritating expressions.
You are quite right in having determined not to address the Queen
Dowager about the payment of Rates for Marlborough House. I was
certain that I should convince you upon the Subject.
It is very possibly true, that some Notice ought to be taken of
the above of the Queen upon this subject. But the expediency of
taking such Notice must not be considered as a Matter of Course;
because the answer on the part of the Queen would be triumphant.
In all these Cases particularly those in which High Personages
are concerned Prudence requires that those who advise should look
a little farther than the one Case under consideration.
Believe me, Ever Yours
Most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"By the Duke's next letter I presume I had dated one to him wrongly
as he writes: 'I have received and perused with attention your
letter dated the 29th, I conclude by mistake, for which I return my
best thanks.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Aug. 31st, below which he
again addresses me on Sept. 1st thus. 'Since writing the above my
dear Miss J., I have received your letter of the 31st of Aug. There
is no post from home today and you will not receive this
acknowledgment of its receipt and thanks for it until Monday.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Sept. 11th in which he
writes; 'I am not capable, I am sorry to acknowledge, of entering
on a discussion on the topics in your letter'--and in his next of
Sept. the 12th he writes; 'I can read your letters perfectly. I
wish that I understood the subjects to which they relate
sufficiently to be able to answer them.'"
WALMER CASTLE, Sept. 15, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have just now received two Letters from you,
both finished on the 12^th for which I return my thanks. One of
them contained the Pen wipers for which I am much obliged to you.
The Story in the Newspapers about my having been consulted by the
Queen about D^r Hook's Sermon is entirely false. There is no
foundation whatever for it.
As far as I can Judge from the accounts that I have seen the
Queen did not notice D^r Hook's Sermon in any of the Modes
supposed and stated. [Endnote 1]
I am very much obliged to you for your Enquiries about my
lameness. I thank God! I have entirely recovered from it.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"I need not say it rejoices _me_ to behold _thanks_ given to _Him_
from whom all blessings flow.
"A. J.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Sept. 16th in which he writes;
'There is no post from the country on Saturday as there is no
Delivery in London on Sunday, so you will receive both letters
therefore tomorrow, possibly at the same time.' The next from the
Duke is dated Sept. 20th in which he writes 'I hope that you will
soon recover from your indisposition,' and in that of the 23rd he
writes; 'I assure you that I was aware that you had reason to
believe that the story respecting the Queen was true.' The Duke
means 'was not true' for he had referred to this subject in some
letter just passed through my hands.
"On Sept. the 25th 1838 the Duke writes to thank me for my letters
adding 'But you do not mention your health and I hope that you have
entirely recovered from your indisposition.'
"In the Duke's next letter of Sept. 26th he writes 'I am much
obliged by your continued kindness.'
"By the Duke's next letter I see he refers to my offering him a
Bible of larger Print as follows,
WALMER CASTLE, Sept 29th.
I am much obliged to you for the offer of a Bible in large Print.
That which I now have answers perfectly, and I will not deprive
you of another.
WALMER CASTLE, October 2, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received at the Same time your Letters
of the 30^th Sept^r and 1 October.
I assure you that I am very sensible of your kindness; and of
your motives for writing to me; and that nothing could induce me
to write a Word or to commit an Act which would displease much
less excite you.
When I received the expression of your wish to have my Picture I
felt that the compliance with your wish might be inconvenient to
you. But I postponed to give you an answer Wishing to avoid to do
any thing to displease you; and thinking it possible nay probable
that your own reflections would have induced you to avoid to
renew the Subject.
As however you did mention it again I gave you the answer which
has satisfied you.
I have not mentioned the Period of my return to London; as it is
very uncertain.
Believe me My Dear Miss J.
Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Oct. 7th. 'I have four letters of
yours to acknowledge the receipt of, for which I return many
thanks. In one you mention your indisposition but as you have not
again adverted thereto I trust that you are better.'
"The 13th of Oct. the Duke writes 'I read your letters in the order
in which you wish they should be read,' before closing which letter
he acknowledges or writes another therein acknowledging mine of the
12th dating this additional letter Oct. 14th.
WALMER CASTLE, Oct. 20, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have again to acknowledge the receipt of
several Letters from you commencing on Sunday the 14^th. I have
been absent; and did not receive them till this morning. And as
the Post for London does not go out till tomorrow, I will keep
this till then in order that I may add the acknowledgment of the
receipt of any other letter that you may have written me in the
end of the Week.
In answer to the Wish that you have expressed to know when I
shall be in London I mention that I shall not be there for some
time.
You are in the Habit of writing to me freely upon all Subjects;
and you say that you derive satisfaction from so doing. I assure
you that I am sensible of the Interest which you feel for my
Welfare; and of your Motive in writing to me.
But I confess that I cannot understand as you do, the High
Authorities which you quote. I wish that I was sufficiently
informed to be capable of reasoning with you whether verbally or
in writing.
I do not pretend therefore to do more than acknowledge the
receipt of your Letters; and thank you for your kindness.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
I am delighted to find that you are so well.
_October 21._ There is no letter from you this day.
"In the Duke's next letter of Oct. 21st, 1838, he returns me many
thanks for a letter 'commenced on the 21st and ended on the 22nd.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Nov. 3rd, referring to impressions
on my mind which Time has declared to be erroneous with regard to
the end God had in view, but as His glory was then as now my chief
consideration I trust to behold this precious portion of Holy Writ
verified therein. 'As high as the heavens are above the earth so
are My Ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your
thoughts,' and that God will consequently be much more glorified
and magnified under existing circumstances than HE possibly could
under any other for His great, glorious, Holy Name Sake!
"The next letter from His Grace is dated Nov. 10th 1838 thanking
me for my last and the only remaining one of this year dated Nov.
19th wherein he returns many thanks for the letters I had sent him.
"Letters received during this year from the Duke of Wellington
TWENTY TWO."
"1839.--The first letter received during this year 1839 is I see
enclosed in a cover addressed to Her Majesty the Queen of England,
Buckingham Palace, to whom I must have written, forwarding it to
the Duke to deliver, but which as with that to Queen Adelaide was
returned to me in his dated May 14th, 1839.
"Another letter in Aug. I see in like manner contains an Enclosure
addressed to Her Majesty, but which was also returned under the
same impression that he was not entitled to deliver such. In the
Duke's next dated Nov. 17th 1839 he writes--
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I am much obliged to you for your letter of the
15th in which you have enquired about my health as you had heard
or read a report that I was indisposed. I am and have been quite
well, thank God.
Ever yours most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 14th 1839 in which he
writes--'I return a letter which I opened thinking it was addressed
to me but I now find it was intended for another, as I find the
Name in a Note to myself.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 18th in which he writes--'I
beg you not to make yourself uneasy about the missing letter.' This
was a letter which miscarried and lost.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 24th, 1839, judging by which
I presume some mistake had been made in a former epistle as he
writes therein--'I receive so many letters and have so many
directions to attend to; that you must not be surprised if I
sometimes make a mistake.'
"The Duke's next letter is directed Dec. 28th in which he
writes--'I have received your Note of the 26th. It certainly does
not appear that both Notes have been opened.'
"This arose from my enclosing the Duke some covers forwarded to me
which Mrs. L. thought had been unsealed.
"Another letter from the Duke on the same subject after making
enquiries of his servants is dated Dec. 31st 1839.
"Letters received from the Duke of Wellington during this year
EIGHT."
"1840.--The first letter from the Duke of this year is dated Jan.
the 16th, thanking me for mine of the 15th and on the 18th the Duke
again writes--'I am much obliged to you for your letter of
yesterday of which I acknowledge the receipt immediately with many
thanks.' The Duke's next letter is dated the 20th of Jan. in which
he writes--'You may rely upon it that I shall not misunderstand
your communications and I am much obliged to you for the confidence
reposed in me.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Jan. 30th, 1840, by the contents
of which I presume that I had expressed a wish concerning my
letters being confined to his perusal as he writes: 'You may rely
upon what I tell you. Nobody sees your letters. They reach me as
regularly as is possible considering the greatness of the
transactions of the Post Office.'
"Again in the Duke's next dated Jan. the 31st he writes 'You may
rely on it your letters reach me in safety.'
LONDON, February 3, 1840.
In the Morning.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I received on Saturday night the 1^st Inst.
Your Letter of the 31--Jan--; of which I acknowledge the receipt
this Morning according to your Desire.
I always write as you Desire. But you must not be surprized if a
letter sealed with a seal bearing the Impression of a Coronet;
received for you every day at the same place should occasion some
curiosity.
Nothing can be more innocent than those Letters or more
praiseworthy than those, to which they are an answer. But the
existence of such a correspondence is calculated to excite
curiosity; and Inquiry.
Believe me Ever Yours
Most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
LONDON, Feb. 5, 1840.
1/2 past eleven A.M.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I did not return from the House of Lords last
night till Midnight; and did not receive Your Letter of yesterday
till this Moment.
You are quite right not to desire to see me.
I refer you to what I wrote some time ago upon that Subject; on
which there can be no alteration.
Ever Yours Most faithfully.
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Feb. 20th 1840 wherein he
writes--'I have only this day received your letter dated Saturday
afternoon. I was indisposed last week. But thank God! I have been
quite well for some days. So many letters come here for me; that I
think it most probable that the Medical Gentlemen desired that none
should be given me.' [Endnote 2]
"The next letter from the Duke is dated March 3rd in which he
writes 'I am very much obliged to you for your letter of the 2nd
Inst. now received. I thank you for mentioning my health. I was
unwell about three weeks ago but, thank God! I have been quite well
ever since.'"
Another quarrel is now brewing, and Miss J. must, as usual, have lodged
the first complaint, since the Duke at once assumes a defensive
attitude.
LONDON, March 6, 1840. 11 A.M.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I am very much concerned that my affairs should
render it necessary for me frequently to go into the Country; and
that as you don't receive an answer to your Note you should still
think it must have been perused by my Servants or someone else.
If you cannot divest yourself of this suspicion you would act
more wisely in not writing to me again; if you should care one
Pin who sees your Letters!
I received last night on my return to London your Letter of the
4^th and I acknowledge the receipt thereof this morning.
Believe me Ever Your
Most faithful Servant,
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter dated March 9th wherein he writes: 'I am
really much concerned that you should suppose that my last note to
you was what you call Cross. But I am not so foolish as ever to be
cross much less in writing.'"
The Duke seems in his next letter, dated March 11, to return to the
third person again, wherein he writes after presenting his compliments:
"The Duke has received her letter of the 10th, Inst. which does not
appear to him to require any answer."
LONDON, March 13, 1840.
1/2 past 11 A.M.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Compliments to Miss J. Miss
J. thinks proper to write to the Duke; but complains of the
inconvenience attending the observations of the Curious among the
Publick, upon the frequency of the Correspondence.
She sometimes objects to the Substance; at others to the form of
the Duke's Letters. The Duke has endeavored invariably to render
them as respectful as possible to Miss J., in form as well as in
Substance.
The Duke is unfortunately for him not sufficiently informed to
enable Him to write upon some of the Higher and more sacred
Topicks of Miss J.'s Letters. But he considers it quite useless
to write to Miss J. at all; if he should omit to state His
opinion when he sees that she has taken an erroneous view of that
of which he has a knowledge. He submits these opinions with great
deference and Respect; and he is much concerned when any of them
give Offence.
LONDON, March 14th, 1840.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Compliments to Miss J. He has
just received Her Note of Friday evening the 13^th Ins^t.
The Duke is very sensible of Miss J.'s offer of Service in case
the Duke should be sick or afflicted. The Duke is much obliged to
Her. He is quite well. He has no reason to believe that he will
have occasion to trouble Her upon any object whatever.
Indorsed in Miss J.'s hand. "Let NOT Him that girdeth on his harness
_boast himself_ as he that putteth it off. 1 Kings XX. 11.
"Alas! I tremble for you."
"The Duke's next letter is dated March 30th expressive of his
thanks.
"The Duke's next letter is dated April 3rd in which he writes 'The
Duke assures Miss J. that neither the form, manner nor substance
nor even a Word in any letter of hers has offended him.' The Duke's
next letter is dated April 4th in which he thanks me for my letter
of that day. The Duke's next letter is dated the 4th of April in
which he writes--'The Duke is much concerned to learn that Miss J.
has been indisposed.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated April 10th in which he writes 'He
understands that Miss J. wishes him to enclose to Mrs. L. the
answers addressed to Herself although that is not stated as usual.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated April 18th in which he writes 'The
Duke has never been better than for the last month and most
particularly for the last few days. He is aware that reports are
continually circulated to the contrary but they are entirely
undeserving of credit.'"
The cause of this coolness between the Duke and Miss J. is not clear.
Her Diary throws no light upon the subject, and the only clew to the
dissension must be found in the Duke's letters. From these it would
seem that Miss J. has again criticised his manner of writing, or
resented some fancied liberty. The quarrel begun so promisingly in
March is still vigorous late in April, and the Duke is making energetic
but futile efforts to break off the correspondence.
STRATHFIELDSAYE, April 24, 1840.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Compliments to Miss J. He has
received her letter of the 21^st Ins^t for which he returns His
thanks being convinced that Her Letters to the Duke are dictated
by the best Motives.
The Duke cannot but acknowledge however that they are written to
but little purpose; and considering their Tone and Tenor, the
writing of them can be but little satisfaction to Miss J.; while
it must be troublesome; the transmission of them embarrassing; as
well as the Reception of the answers to Herself and Her friends.
Under these Circumstances the Duke would earnestly recommend to
Miss J. not to write to Him again.
LONDON, May 20, 1840.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Comp^ts to Miss J. He is
much concerned to learn that His omission to acknowledge the
receipt of Miss J. [_sic_] has occasioned any inconvenience
to her. The Duke received all her Letters in due Course.
The Duke did not acknowledge the receipt of them. He really
thought and thinks still that Miss J.'s correspondence with the
Duke is very inconvenient to Her and Her friends; that it exposes
her to the Effects of the Curiosity of the Idle; and to the
observations of the Malicious; and that however much he may be
obliged to the Kindness of Miss J. in writing to him, he ought to
endeavour to prevail upon her to refrain from doing which
[_sic_] may be inconvenient to Herself or to Her friends.
The Duke is thank God! and has been perfectly well, and he
sincerely hopes that Miss J. is so likewise.
Indorsed by Miss J. "There is _no_ wisdom nor understanding, nor
counsel against THE LORD." "MY Counsel SHALL stand, and I will perform
ALL My pleasure."
LONDON, June 30, 1840.
The Duke of Wellington presents His Comp^ts to Miss J. He has
received several Letters from Her. The last dated the 29^th
Ins^t.
He has not thought it necessary to answer these Letters. He
writes now only because Miss J. expressed an anxiety to know
before she leaves town whether Her letters had been received.
The Duke would recommend to save Herself from such anxiety in
future by omitting to write to Him.
LONDON, July 29, 1840.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your Note of the 28^th and I
thank God! that I am and have been quite well for this last week.
There was some casual Derangement of my Stomach a week ago; and
the Editors of Newspapers immediately discovered that I was in
great Danger.
They forget that their Reporters reported that I appeared in the
House of Lords quite well.
I am very much flattered by the anxiety which you express for my
recovery. I assure you that I am as well as I have been for
Years.
Believe me Ever Your most faithful Servant,
WELLINGTON.
LONDON, August 3, 1840.
The Duke of Wellington presents His compliments to Miss J., and
again returns His thanks for Her Kind Enquiries about His Health.
The Duke is quite well. He earnestly recommends to Miss J. to be
satisfied with the Accounts which she gets in the Newspapers.
It is impossible for the Duke to be certain of receiving a letter
from Miss J. to a Moment; and that he will be able to send an
answer forthwith. He has frequently stated this to Her; and in
order to avoid disappointment he now tells her that he will write
no more.
WHO is he that saith _and it cometh to pass_, when THE LORD _commandeth
it_ NOT?
Lam. iii. 37.
Indorsed by Miss J.
Miss J. writes in her Diary at this period:
"Whether the Duke would write again or not, I told him in my reply,
must depend upon God rather than himself, adding that I never
wished to hear from him till God pleased, and defied him
accordingly,--trusting in 'The Lord of Lords.'"
CHAPTER VIII.
A PEACEFUL PERIOD.
Of the long silence that followed, extending from the third of August,
1840, to the tenth of June, 1844, Miss J. thus speaks:--
"That Christ is The Lord of Lords unto Whom all power is given in
Heaven and on earth, nothing can more clearly imply than the
circumstances connected with this Portion of my Diary. The Duke's
last letter had decidedly declared he would write no more, and his
character is too well known by the World for such to conclude he
would not act up to his word and determination. But since 'IT IS
WRITTEN' 'The King's Heart is in the Hands of the Lord as the
rivers of water, He turneth it which way soever he pleaseth,' _so_
likewise ALL hearts. Consequently when _The Lord's_ time came for
proving to him the folly of forming such a rash resolution, he
writes accordingly, and that too at a moment when I least expected
it, so long a period having elapsed in silence. Nor do I, as he
therein specifies, recollect requesting him to answer that any more
than other letters from time to time forwarded as the Lord
condescendingly influenced me, however solicitous I was for their
safety. I continued to hope that their contents would eventually be
permitted to lead him to feel the emptiness and nothingness of all
earthly grandeur, in comparison with the enjoyment of a Crown of
Glory."
What induced the Duke to reopen the correspondence is hard to
determine; but the interchange of letters was soon as regular as ever.
June 10, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received all your letters, including one
written yesterday, the 9^th Ins^t; and I am very sensible of your
kindness in giving me so continually such good Counsel.
I did not write to acknowledge the receipt of your Letters;
because you did not express a wish that I should do so clearly
till you wrote this last.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
LONDON, June 14, 1844.
At night.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your letter of this day's date;
and I am very much obliged to you for your kindness in the
expression of an Interest about my Health. I am thank God! as
well as I was twenty years ago, and no longer feel any
Inconvenience from the Injury at that time done to my left Ear:
excepting that I don't hear by the use of it, as I do by that of
the other.
I hope that you are quite well.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
LONDON, June 18, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have to express to you my Gratitude for two
very kind letters since I wrote to you last; the one of the
15^th, the other of the 17^th Ins^t.
Nothing can be more satisfactory to me than to read the
statements which you write of the Interest you take in my
Welfare; and I beg you to believe me
Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"As this book only admits of my referring to the Duke's letters in
order to distinguish them and thereby secure their future safety I
only occasionally introduce one wholly; therefore state that the
next dated June 20th is an acknowledgment of others received by
him."
LONDON, June 21, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I am much obliged to you for your Letter of
yesterday evening. It is true that I made no observations upon
the Domestick Details which your former Letter contained: nor
upon your opinion on the Inmates of the Houses in which you had
been visiting.
My object in writing to you was to thank you for the kind
Interest which you had not ceased to feel for my welfare; and
which you have expressed with so much sincerity. I am very
grateful to you; and I hope that I do not fail in expressing what
I feel.
It is true! You are quite right my Time and attention are much
occupied by the Publick Duties which I have engaged to perform,
and I have very Little of the leisure to write upon subjects upon
which I can have but an imperfect knowledge.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"I presume by a portion of the Duke's next letter dated June 22nd,
1844, that I had expressed uneasiness concerning some of mine
reaching him, as he writes--'If you should have any apprehension of
your letters not reaching me, you have only not to sign them. I
know your handwriting perfectly and moreover should know from their
purport that they could come from you alone.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated June 24th, he writes; 'You are
very kind my dear Miss J. in writing to me so frequently. I have to
thank you for two letters received, the last on this morning. I
assure you that I am very sensible of the constant interest which
you feel in my welfare.'
"The portion about to be copied in the Duke's next letter dated
June 26th requires some explanation on my part previously, as it
refers to a short separation which took place between my dear
friend Mrs. L. and myself--arising from a circumstance that wounded
me concerning a letter which interfered with my gratifying a
request therein made by my dear Father before his death.
"'I am much concerned likewise to learn that you do not feel
yourself on the same satisfactory terms as usual with your old
friend Mrs. L. I regret this, because the Impression on my mind is,
that she was your friend and that you were much attached to her. I
hope therefore that before long that confidence in your mind will
revive and that you will return to your old Habits of friendly
intercourse with that lady which were heretofore so satisfactory to
you.'
"These remarks on the part of the Duke had the desired effect and
my intimacy with Mrs. L. was speedily renewed.
"In the Duke's next letter dated June 28th, 1844, he writes--'I am
happy to learn that you are likely to be reconciled to Mrs. L. It
is impossible that you should be otherwise than of a forgiving
temper and disposition, particularly as I hope in this Case no
voluntary cause for Irritation could have been given.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated July 1st he writes--'I am
delighted to hear that you have renewed your old relations with
Mrs. L. which I am convinced will prove satisfactory to you.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated July 3rd he writes--'I beg that
you will have no scruple about writing to me on any paper, or at
the moment most agreeable to you. I am aware of your occupations,
that you write as well as read a great deal, that you write your
thoughts as they occur to you, and that you do not attend to
penmanship or Hand writing which however I assure you that I peruse
with the greatest facility and always with satisfaction on account
of the great interest which you express for my welfare.'"
LONDON, July 6, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received regularly and have thanked you
I believe for all the kind Letters which you have written to me,
excepting one commenced on Wednesday night, and finished on
thursday which reached me yesterday afternoon: and another
commenced thursday afternoon which I received last night. I thank
you for them all; you are most kind in writing to me: I beg you
not to scruple about telling me what you think and feel. I can
read your hand writing with great facility; particularly by day
light, and I feel your kindness for me; and all that you express.
The Publick Duties in which I am employed occupy most of my Time:
but knowing that it is satisfactory to you to receive a Note from
me, I do not omit to write to you whenever I hear from you; as
soon as the opportunity of doing so is afforded to me.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated July 10th, 1844, wherein he
writes--'Your two letters reached me on Monday night. As I was
occupied all day yesterday by the marriage of my Son [Endnote 3] it
was not in my power to write to you and thank you for your letters,
which I do now and for your continued kindness to me.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated July 12th he writes--'It is true
that my time is much occupied by the various public duties which I
have to perform and that it frequently occurs that I am under the
necessity of postponing to thank you for your kindness and
continued interest for my welfare. But you may rely upon it that
however I may fail or rather delay to make my acknowledgments I
feel your kindness and your expressions of it.'"
LONDON, July 15, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have to thank you for a very kind Letter
commenced on friday evening and ended on Saturday; which I
received on that night. I think that I answered in a former
letter all the queries which you had stated in yours?
But if I have been mistaken and you will let me know on what
subject I will write upon it upon the first occasion.
I beg you not to attend to Interruptions at least so as to annoy
you. I should not perceive such in your letters: which are
invariably uniform in the expression of a kind Interest in my
Welfare of which as well as of your kind expressions I am very
sensible.
As I was going into Divine Service yesterday morning; a gentleman
who met me told me that it had been reported on the previous day
that I had met with a serious accident.
As this false report might reach and would annoy you; I avail
myself of the first opportunity of telling you that I thank God!
there is not the slightest foundation for it. I have met with no
accident and have not been better for twenty Years than I am at
this moment.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"In the Duke's next letter of July 19th he writes; 'I hope that you
will continue to write to me all that you feel and think. I cannot
express to you how grateful I am for your anxiety for my welfare.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated July 24th he writes--'I am very
much obliged to you for your continued anxiety for my welfare and I
read with pleasure your expressions of kind interest for me.'"
LONDON, July 27, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--Since I last wrote to you; I have received one
letter from you of the 24^th and two of the 25^th for all of
which; and your continued kindness I thank you. I am very
sensible of the freedom with which you write to me and tell me
all that occurs to your Mind.
I do not yet know at what time the parliament will be prorogued:
I should think in the end of August.
Notwithstanding the continued attendance; I continue thank God!
as well as ever.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"In the Duke's next letter dated July 31st he writes doubtlessly in
reply to some enquiry on my part--'It is impossible for me to say
at what period Parliament will be prorogued. I thank you for the
beautiful lines which you have sent me.'"
LONDON, August 10, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--Many days have elapsed since I have been able
to write you; but I have been again at Windsor Castle, upon the
occasion of the Queen's confinement; and have besides been much
occupied in Parl^t and elsewhere. I have received and thank you
for your letters, the last received having been commenced on the
4^th and ended on thursday morning the 8^th. I am very sensible
of your kindness in writing to me; notwithstanding that you had
not heard from me.
I hope you are assured that when I do not write the cause is that
I am much occupied and not that I am insensible or less sensible
of your kindness.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"In the Duke's next letter dated Aug. 12th he writes--'I have just
now received your kind letter written yesterday Morning, the 11th,
and according to your desire I do not delay to acknowledge the
receipt thereof as I understand that you are going out of Town to
morrow.'
"The next letter of the Duke's of Aug. 14th--'I am sorry to hear
that you do not feel very well but hope the Indisposition will be
but short. The weather has been and still continues very bad and is
but little inviting for a journey.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Aug. 16th 'I am very sorry indeed
to learn that any of your letters have been returned from the House
to the Post Office opened and sent back to you. I have frequently
told you to beware of the weight of your letters and to take care
that each of them had upon it the proper stamp, etc. You who do not
trouble yourself with the affairs of this world can form no idea of
the extent of the occupation of those whose duty it is to attend to
them.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated Aug. 22nd he writes 'I have been
out of Town at Portsmouth and at Oxford with the Prince of Prussia
since I wrote to you.'" [Endnote 4]
LONDON, Sept. 2, 1844.
Morning.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I write to you now as I am under the necessity
of going out of Town to Windsor Castle from whence I shall not be
permitted to return till late on Wednesday.
I found a crowd around my horses after I quitted you on Saturday
and I was followed away by the same persons who had followed me
to your part of the Town.
I enclose what I told you that I would send you; it appears to me
to be a good likeness, judging from the recollection of other
Busts.
I will write to you as soon as I am certain at what time I can
call upon you.
Ever Yours most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
Miss J. writes in her Diary for this date:
"The Duke told me that a _boy_ from his _own_ door called after
him, attracting others accordingly all the way. This annoyed him
particularly on my account, as he was aware of my objection to
notice, notwithstanding that I was at the time under Mrs. L.'s
roof, where all the visits referred to took place and under her
protection."
Of the picture to which the Duke refers, Miss J. thus writes, after his
death:--
"This was his own Picture in wax, made by himself and was an
impression conveying a striking resemblance. It is made upon one of
his own Cards, cut in _half_. On this is engraved 'Field M. The
Duke of ----.' How this valuable Article is eventually to be
disposed of, I wait upon The Lord of Lords, who permitted it to be
bestowed upon me, to point out. He must determine whether it is to
be sent to the British Museum, as a remembrance of one who in His
Hands was permitted to become the preserver of our nation, or to be
disposed of for the propagation of Christianity among the Jews in
whom I am so deeply interested. Whichever it may be I trust that
His Holy Name will be magnified, on account of its having been
bestowed on one so devoted to the poor Duke's everlasting welfare,
during the last eighteen years of his life,--his _eventful_ life!"
LONDON, Sept. 6, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I did not return from Windsor Castle till late
on Wednesday. I was in the field with the Troops yesterday
Morning; in the House of Lords from one o'clock till the
Parliament was prorogued and in the Public Offices till between
six & seven in the evening. Now I am about to return to Windsor
Castle this afternoon for the Christening of the Infant Prince
and I shall not return till night or possibly to-morrow. Here
they are crying out for me in the levee Robes. Under these
Circumstances I cannot fix a time at which I could go to pay you
a visit.
Ever Yours most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
The infant prince here referred to was Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh.
LONDON, Sept. 7, 1844.
Morning.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I write you thus early; as I see clearly that
it will not be possible for me to go to see you this day.
I did not reach Home from Windsor Castle last night; till after
half past twelve, and I am now required to go into the Cinque
Portes.
Continue to direct to My House in London. I shall be back in a
few days.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"In a letter of Sept. 9th the Duke writes from Walmer; 'My duty has
obliged me to come to this part of the Country. I will return to
London as soon as it will be in my power and with your permission
will call upon you. It is very true that I am as well known
everywhere as in my own House and that I am followed everywhere,
and all that I do observed and commented upon according to the
inclinations of those who think proper to follow and observe me. I
am therefore anxious not to expose you or your abode to such
observations.'
"The Duke's next letter is from Walmer, dated Sept. 11th, wherein
he writes, after thanking me for my letter; 'I am as usual very
much employed but I thank God, quite well.' In the Duke's next
letter, dated Sept. 12th, he writes; 'I again express my gratitude
to you for your continued kindness and good wishes. I will go to
see you as soon as I shall return to Town, of course giving you
Notice.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Sept. 21st, in which he
writes--'I am under the necessity of going out at a very early hour
in the Morning and I do not return till night. But your kindness is
always welcome to me and I wish that it was in my power at all
times immediately to acknowledge the receipt of it.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Sept. 24th, he writes--'I am very
grateful for your constant and continued kindness: you may rely
upon it that if not immediately responded to it is because my time
is so much occupied at a distance from my Residence.' In the Duke's
letter of the 27th of Sept. he thanks me for my letters of the 24th
and one concluded on Wednesday afternoon, purposing to call if in
his power.
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Sept. 30th, he writes--'I am very
happy to learn that you are not separated from Mrs. L. as soon as
you expected.'
"The commencement of Oct. brought me a letter from the Duke dated
Oct. 1st, acknowledging mine previously forwarded.
"I see there is a letter dated Oct. the 5th in which the Duke
writes; 'I write one line to apprize you that I am in Town and that
I will endeavour to go to see you at three this day.'"
WINDSOR, Saturday Evening,
Oct. 12, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have been here since the day after I left
London; having gone to and returned from Portsmouth.
I have received two letters from you the last commenced on
Wednesday evening and finished, on Friday morning or rather later
in the day on Friday after you had taken a Lodging No. 4 Fitz Roy
Street Fitz Roy Square.
There is no Post from hence to London this evening and I am going
this night to my own House in Hampshire, where I shall put this
letter in the Post tomorrow; and it will reach you on Monday. I
am going there on my way to Portsmouth for the embarkation of the
King of the French. I shall go there please God! on Monday
morning.
I cannot say when I shall be able to return to London. But I will
write to you; I am very sensible of your kindness in writing to
me although I have been so much occupied and so constantly in
movement that I have not been able to thank you.
I hope that you will find your new Lodgings quiet; and
comfortable.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
WALMER CASTLE, Oct. 17, 1844.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I arrived here yesterday evening having been in
movement since I quitted my own House in Hants on Monday morning
to go to Portsmouth to meet the King of the French. I was out
during the thunder, Lightning and Rain on that day; and travelled
afterwards: and thank God! after all this movement and exposure I
am just as well as ever. [Endnote 5]
I have to thank you for all your Letters; the last in answer to
mine written before I quitted Windsor Castle; but sent from my
House in Hampshire in which I enquired how you liked your new
Residence.
I am much obliged to you for your continued kindness. I will go
to see you as soon as I shall return to London. But I cannot yet
say at what time that will be: as I am called away so frequently
for other Affairs; and I have still much to occupy my attention
in this part of the Country.
Your last letter was commenced on Monday the 14^th and ended on
Tuesday.
I am very certain that I have received all your Letters, and I am
very sensible of your kindness in writing to me; particularly one
on five sheets of paper commenced on the 7^th of Octo^r.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Oct. 19th, in which he writes;
'This Note cannot be sent from hence this day, there being no post.
I will add a line to it when I shall have an opportunity of sending
it off, concluding at present with thanking you for your continued
kindness toward me.
"'P.S. I add a line to tell you that I have received; and am very
sensible of the kindness of your Letter of the 18th in the middle
of the day; which was brought down here this evening by a messenger
from my House in London.
"'I am happy to find that you had received my Letter; you need not
be apprehensive of my catching Cold on my Journeys. You may rely
upon my taking care of myself.
"'Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully,
"'WELLINGTON.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Oct. 24th, he writes--'I have to
acknowledge the receipt of, and to thank you for your continued
kindness in writing me two long letters.' At the end the Duke
writes; 'It is possible that I may be under the necessity of going
to London to attend to the opening of the New Royal Exchange.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Nov. 6th wherein he writes;
"'Some days have elapsed since I have heard from you and as I
cannot recollect any reason for your silence I begin to be
apprehensive that you may have been unwell and have been prevented
by indisposition from writing to me. I therefore write this line to
request you to write to me and let me know how you are.'
"On the same sheet the Duke writes Nov. 7th; 'I have this morning
received yours of the 6th and am delighted to find that you are not
indisposed. I was in Town on two different days in last week; in
one I attended the Ceremony of opening the Royal Exchange by Her
Majesty the Queen [Endnote 6]--on another to attend the marriage
and indeed to give away in marriage a young Lady and was under the
necessity of returning here as Time, Tides and Trains or Railroads
wait for no Man and I had not time even to write, much less to go
to see you.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Nov. 10th 1844 wherein he
writes--'You always express in your letters the same interest for
my welfare which has always drawn from me the expressions of my
grateful sense of your kindness.' Again in the Duke's next letter
dated Nov. the 12th he writes; 'Notwithstanding that I wrote to you
so lately I will not suffer the Post to go this day without
expressing my sense of your kindness in writing to me.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Nov. 19th, in which he writes--'I
intend to go to see you as soon as I shall have a moment's leisure.
But my time is really so much employed in the service of the Public
as to leave me none for social purposes and scarcely enough for
Repose.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Nov. 20th, wherein he writes--'I
write you one line to tell you that if it should be in my power I
will call upon you this day after three o'clock.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 3rd, wherein he writes--'I
was so much occupied with public business that I could not call
upon you again. I am quite well. Then I was at Windsor Castle in
attendance upon Her Majesty the Queen during the five last days of
last week. I have not got the Parcel to which you referred.'
"In the Duke's letter dated Dec. 11th, he writes; 'I have been very
much concerned to hear that you are unwell. You must take care of
yourself and keep yourself very warm in this bad weather.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 14th wherein he writes--'I
returned to London last night having been detained at Windsor
Castle till late in the afternoon and I went there on Thursday and
received your Note dated the 13th, for which I am much obliged.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 20th wherein he writes--'I am
very sorry, but my time is so much occupied, and while the Almighty
will deign to permit me to live will be so occupied as that I shall
not have leisure to pay visits. I have frequently expressed my
regret that it should be so and repeat them now.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Dec. 21st, he writes; 'I am very
sensible of the kindness of your letter of yesterday afternoon
which I received last night.
"'I am, thank God! in perfect good health but have had the
misfortune of losing my Sister. But I trust that by the Mercy of
God! She is Happy.' [Endnote 7]
"The Duke's next letter is dated Dec. 24th, wherein he writes--'I
have received several letters from you after my return to Town
after paying the last Respects to the Memory of my poor Sister--I
return you my thanks for them all and am very sensible of your
kindness in writing to me.'
"In a letter from the Duke dated Dec. 26th, he writes--'I am sorry
to learn that you have caught cold and are suffering from sore
throat. I hope that you will take care of yourself and avoid to
expose yourself to cold in this severe weather. I am very sensible
of your kindness in writing to me as you have; I hope that I feel
as I ought upon the occasion of the recent described affliction
which I have suffered.'
"1845.--The first letter from the Duke, of this year, is dated Jan.
3rd, wherein he writes; 'I am very much obliged to you my dear Miss
J. for several letters received from you in these last days; and
regret that I was so much occupied when I received each of them as
to be unable to acknowledge its receipt by return of Post. I am
very sensible of your kindness in writing to me.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Jan. 13th wherein he
writes--
"When I wrote to you last My dear Miss J. I omitted to thank you
for one letter which I had received from you. The one to which I
refer was dated the 23rd Inst., the day on which I attended the
funeral of my poor Sister. I was in London for three days but my
time was so much occupied that I could not even write to you, much
less fix a time at which I could be able to pay you a visit.'
"In the next letter from the Duke dated Strathfieldsaye, Jan. 17th,
he writes; 'You have been correctly informed; Her Majesty the Queen
does intend to pay me a visit here on Monday the 20th and to remain
till Thursday the 23rd.' [Endnote 8]
"In the next letter from the Duke, dated Jan. 23rd, he writes--'I
am much obliged to you my dear Miss J. for all your letters dated
the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st which I have received regularly in
due course. I wish that it were in my power to peruse them when I
receive them--still more to acknowledge the receipt of them
regularly. But that is impossible. My time is so much occupied that
I have scarcely sufficient for Rest. However my Health continues
excellent and my strength unimpaired.' The next letter from the
Duke is dated Feb. 7th 1845, wherein he writes; 'I have received
many letters from you, dated the 20th, 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 26th and
Feb. 2nd, which I have not expressed the sense of gratitude I felt
for your kindness in writing them. But in truth I have been so much
occupied, not alone by my public business but by the afflicting
sickness of one of my Family; one of whom,--My Niece, we have lost;
and another, my brother, is still very unwell that I have really
scarcely had time to turn about. However I thank God! my brother is
stronger and better and I hope that he will be able to bear the
remedies which must be administered to him.'
"In the Duke's next letter he writes, dating it Feb. 8th--'I fear
that there was one letter which I did not acknowledge in my note of
yesterday--that of the 3rd Inst. But I must say that my time and
attention are so much taken up from morning till I go to bed at
night that it is not surprising that I should pass over a letter in
acknowledging the receipt of others, however kind and interesting,
its contents. I have really more to do than I can find time for,
notwithstanding my constant attention and diligence.'
"In the poor Duke's next letter he writes--dating it Feb. 25th; 'My
omission to write to you etc--is to be attributed to my constant
occupation in the Public service and since My return to Town in
these latter days, since the Queen paid me a visit, by the
continued illness of my poor brother; and by my attendance upon
Him, his wife and afflicted family. I was very sensible of your
kind offer of Assistance--But he had everything. We lost him, Alas!
on Saturday night, I am happy to say without pain or suffering.
[Endnote 9] His last moments were those of a good Christian in
peace with all the world and I trust, in the Mercy of the Almighty,
in favor with Him! You are very kind and I am very sensible of your
kindness in offering me consolation and in urging me to call upon
you and I will do so as soon as it will be in my power and will
write to apprize you of the Time.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated March the 1st, he writes--'It is
true I have been greatly afflicted. But by the Mercy of God My poor
Brother suffered but little in his last Moments. Indeed I may
say--no pain, from the disorder by which he had been afflicted and
his mind was at ease and full of confidence in the Mercy of the
Almighty.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated March 6th he writes--'I am
concerned to learn that you are not well.'
"In the Duke's next letter he, after dating it March 15th, 1845,
reports how occupied he is, adding; 'I regret exceedingly to learn
that you are still unwell. But hope that we shall have moderate
weather usual at this season, which will soon recruit your health.'"
LONDON, April 18th, 1845.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I will give you an answer to your Note of the
17^th just now received because my attention has just now been
drawn to two paragraphs in the Morning Post, stating that I was
taken ill in the House of Lords last night. I was last night and
am at this moment thank God! as well as I ever was.
The truth is this. A Noble Lord, well known to be blind was
standing on the floor near the place where I was sitting. I
arose, gave him the assistance of my Arm and conducted him
towards the door till I met another person who took charge of
him.
That is the whole Story!
I returned to my place where I sat and took part in the
discussion going on till the House adjourned.
A man called at my door to enquire how I was at _eleven_, not at
_twelve_ o'clock. The answer was. _He is quite well_, not, _He is
convalescent_.
Ever Yours most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
"The next letter from the Duke is dated April 21st, 1845, in which
he replies to an enquiry I had made in a former Note or letter as
follows; 'You did not see me in Piccadilly on Saturday the 19th. I
was not in the Street on that day except to cross it on Horseback
from my own House to the Park.'
"The Duke's next letter is dated May 8th wherein he writes; 'I have
received and thank you for all your letters; the truth is that it
takes me a long time to peruse them and I am obliged to do so by
daylight, which I have not at command of sufficient duration to
finish the whole that I have to read at one time.'
"In the Duke's next letter dated May 28th he writes--'The truth is
that nobody can tell the amount of business which I have to
transact who should not be a witness of my constant and unremitting
exertions, and the degree in which my time is occupied. Thank God
that I have health to perform all that is required.'
"Again in the Duke's letter dated May 30th he writes--'The truth is
that my occupation in the service of the Public is incessant from
one week's end to the other
Showing first 200,000 characters. Full text: gutenberg.org/ebooks/35532